We have Nexus 5K switches at the aggregation layer and VPC domain has been configured on them. VPC domain includes switches at the access layer as an identity.But when primary switch reboots failover didn,t happened. We are attaching architecture diagram for the setup along with show tech for Nexus 5K both switches.
View 2 Repliesworking first time on switch 4507 , this is my 2nd week and i plug the console on this 4507 switch , the switch reboots automatically it comes to stage mention below and reboots. My question is i have not seen any error message on this switch and it reboots automatically so what is the problem.
* *
* Welcome to Rom Monitor for WS-X4013+ System. *
* Copyright (c) 1999-2003 by Cisco Systems, Inc. *
* All rights reserved. *
* *
**********************************************************
Rom Monitor Program Version 12.1(20r)EW1
Supervisor: WS-X4013+ Chassis: WS-C4507
[code]...
We are facing cold start issue on 4500 series switch. The switch is restarting automatically almost weekly twice or thrice.As per show tech. output , there is "cold start log".Please find the attached logs for your reference.After time change , auto restart happening & am not found any log for power failure also.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have four-switch Cat 3750 stack that has been working reliably for a couple years. Suddenly the other morning it reboots itself, and has been doing so every 24 hours since. take a look at the attached log? This should really be a Smartnet thing, but as it turns out the warranty we have on this is not Smartnet .
View 6 Replies View Related The Catalyst 3750 switch reboots, and the " Reloading because of stack merge or communication failure" error message appears.
I saw this issue at "Cisco wiki" but the resolution in that page is just "Open a case with TAC". Because of the reasion is H/W Problem.
Is The resolution only one ? anything else? The 3750 does not use Stack.It is just stand alone. So i think it has other resolution as "disabling Stack" or another one. How about my opinion ? Is the Resolution only "Open a Case with TAC"
I have two Cisco ASA 5510s that I would like to configure in an active passive failover setup. The ASAs are at the top of our rack and handle all our routing. We have been only using one ASA unit with one line from our ISP connected to the WAN/outside interface of the ASA. We recently had our ISP setup two lines into our rack using HSRP. I do not know what equipment they are running upstream of our ASAs but it is HSRP so it should be a set of Cisco routers/switches. Originally I thought I could just connect the 2nd new line to our 2nd ASAs WAN/outside port and setup failover using a crossover cable between the ASAs. After doing this config I had problems accessing some of our IPs in the subnet that the HSRP is part of. If I disconnected the 2nd ASAs WAN/outside line everything was fine. After talking with my ISP they explained that I need to connect both of my lines into our L2 network and then from there into the ASAs. Currently below the ASAs I have two Catalyst 3560-X switches. They are connected together with an ISL trunk and ASA-1s inside network connects to switch-1 and ASA-2 to switch-2. One idea was to connect each of the HSRP lines to each of my current switches and then from the switches to the ASA's WAN/outside interface. Finally back down from the ASA's to the switches via the inside interface that we have currently. This kind of seems messy and a poor choice. The other idea is to get two switches that would sit above the ASAs and connect the HSRP lines to them with the switches connected together. They would then connect to the ASAs. I like this idea better but I don't like having to buy two more full switches for this. These switches would only use a couple of ports and only handle just the HSRP ISP lines to the ASAs. Putting in two more 3560-Xs would be a big waste of money and space for this. So I was thinking of using two Cisco SG200-08, 8 port gigabit basic managed switches for this.
View 5 Replies View RelatedConfiguration details: I have 2 nexus 5K switches and both 5K is connected to four 2960 access switches in each floor through fiber(shown in the attached picture). I have configured each VPC for each floor and portchannel configuration on 2960s switch to communicate to 5K switches. Now I am not able to communicate PC 1 connected in 1st floor to PC2 connected in 4th Floor.
I have attached topology map of my infra and the configuration files also. 1st floor switch and 4th floor swich have same configuration except IP address and switch name.
I have a big doubt. Can I connect a LAN switch (i.e. 2960, 3560 or 3750) to a couple of Nexus 2000 FEX (i.e 2232P or 2248TP) and have a Port-Channel or vPC with STP active and several VLANs through this Port-Channel? Or Can I only connect servers to these N2K FEX?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe recently had a pair of Nexus 5k switches setup in our network. We had professional services handle the initial configuration but they weren't able to setup config sync for us. Each Fex is connected to each 5k, so we need a switch-profile to maintain a consistent setup on our interfaces. I went through the process in Configuring Switch-Profiles, but when I check the status of the peer, it says not reachable. [code]
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are getting some error logs on Nexus VDC,as follows:2012 Nov 23 08:49:11 N7K_B-Network_Center_B %$ VDC-3 %$ last message repeated 6 times 2012 Nov 23 08:50:21 N7K_B-Network_Center_B %$ VDC-3 %$ last message repeated 7 times 2012 Nov 23 08:49:11 N7K_B-Network_Center_B %$ VDC-3 %$ last message repeated 6 times2012 Nov 23 08:50:21 N7K_B-Network_Center_B %$ VDC-3 %$ last message repeated 7 times.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCurrent our environment is the following:
Core1 ---- Core2
| |
Nexus5k
| |
N2k, N2k, N2k (FEX)
||
Servers, hosts, etc..
We would like to add another Nexus5k to this topology. However, it has to be a zero downtime infrastructure add-on. When setting up the keep-alive, peer-link, vPC and vdc domain, will there be any upset in network traffic on the current N5k?Also, are the Nexus5k configurations synchronized or are they independent from one another? Before setting up the new 5k, should i configure it to teh 6509's, and vPC's to the Nexus2k's before setting up peer-link?
My network consist of that network device. cisco catalyst 3750 with stackwise, 2xnexsus 5000 series and servers.servers connected to nexsus switch. nexsus connect to 3750.
Each server have two link, one of them connect nexsus1 and other connect to nexsus2 switch.(same traffic) each nexsus have one link to 3750. At 3750 the nexsus link configurate etherchannel. but the flapping occur at 3750.
i understand that at 2 nexsus link have the same server source mac address so the flapping occur at 3750. how i solve this problem?
Trying to find some documentation as to whether there are any other steps for inserting this new module in our N7K. We have 2 blades in already and 2 Sups in 5 & 6. I'm assuming its like the 6500s, where we just slide it in and the OS configures the global parms for it and the default VLAN.
View 2 Replies View RelatedMy Name is senthil i need to configure new hp sever with Nexus 5548 how to config.. server side everything finished just i need only
Config tips for Nexus 5k for New server
i'm trying to enable command authorization for ssh as well as console access to a Nexus 7010 box (version 5.0). Following is the config:
aaa group server tacacs+ ACS5-1
server 10.12.19.11
server 10.12.19.12
source-interface loopback0
snmp-server enable traps aaa server-state-change
aaa authentication login default group ACS5-1 local
[code]....
As you can see, the default group configuration ACS5-1 for authenticatoin has applied to both defaults and console. But the command authorization does not appear to be applied to the console. As a result, when i login from the console and get authenticated, the command authorization does not trigger and i can run commands I'm not supposed to. In the configuration, I do not see "aaa authorization console" option unlike we have in IOS.
We have two catalyst 6506 switches with 10 gb u plinks and around 120 edge switches cat 3750-x switches. Still the module on the core wheere servers are connected is 1000mbps port.Now if we induct a nexus switch to the datacenter what kinds of benefits we can reap In a virtulised environment as well as real environment?following are the some of the queries.Can we reduce the number of edge switches? ( by virtual environment), Inter operabaility between cat ios and nexus ios, how this will affect the environement,What will be the over all benefits ?, What are the cons of this induction ?
View 22 Replies View RelatedWe are getting some error logs on Nexus switch 7K.
Loggs:
----------
2012 Oct 30 22:36:07 SWITCH %CMPPROXY-STANDBY-2-LOG_CMP_UP: Connectivity Management processor(on module 6) is now UP
2012 Oct 30 22:36:40 SWITCH %SYSMGR-2-GSYNC_SNAPSHOT_SRVFAILED: Service "ipqosmgr" on active supervisor failed to sto
re its snapshot (error-id 0x40480005).
2012 Oct 30 22:36:40 SWITCH %SYSMGR-2-STANDBY_BOOT_FAILED: Standby supervisor failed to boot up.
2012 Oct 30 22:36:42 SWITCH %PLATFORM-2-MOD_REMOVE: Module 6 removed (Serial number JAF1550ATBR)
2012 Oct 30 22:42:08 SWITCH %BOOTVAR-5-NEIGHBOR_UPDATE_AUTOCOPY: auto-copy supported by neighbor supervisor, starting
[code]....
we have e requirement for a Nexus 5000 switch to be accessed and managed inband, ie the Management interface can't be connected to the rest of our networks management VLAN because the switch is remote and only connected via fibre. We have enabled the interface VLAN feature and configured an interface VLAN but can't seem to PING the IP address configured on it ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to cascade a (fiber) Dell switch to Nexus5000 as shown above ?
View 4 Replies View Relatedi want to remove the sync-profile on each of two synchronized Nexus 5596UP without loosing the config stored in Switch-Profile. That means without connectivity interruption and re-configuration of interfaces in "conf t mode", for example. Since NX-OS Release 5.2(1)N1(1) there is a new command
switch(config-sync)# no switch-profile abc profile-onlyprofile-only—Deletes the switch profile without the local configuration.
[URL]
As per my understanding, Cisco Nexus 2232 can only connect to HP c7000 Chassis if we are using a Pass Through Switch in the HP c7000. Cisco Nexus 2232 can only connect to End Hosts and not to a switch. Is there a New Feature added in Nexus 2232, which enables it to connect to a Switch like HP Flex Fabric ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI try to connect a cisco blade switch 3020 to Nexus 2232 with etherchannel, but when I connect the second link a obtain flapping on vlans. [code] why the vlans are flapping ? it's something wrong on the config ? [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am trying the connection above using 10G spf connectors. Is there any special configuration in order to have a trunk (with 2 disctinct vlans) betwen NX7000 and DELL 6224 ?
View 14 Replies View RelatedI've Nexus 7010 switch installed in my DC. I've conncected Cisco router to one of the Ports. On the same port I'm getting following error message and hence, unable to form EIGRP neighborship.
DR-CORE-SW-S01-NEXUS7K %MODULE-2-MOD_SOMEPORTS_FAILED:
Module 1 (serial: JAF*******NGK) reported failure on ports 1/2-1/2 (Ethernet) due
to R2D2 : Speed patch failed - no frames transmitted in device 143 (error 0xc8f0
1273)
Basically I am trying to use Wireshark to do a packet capture on a Nexus 5010. I want to do a monitor session on on the switch so I can capture from a source port to a destination port on the same switch. I can configure the source port but when I go to configure the destination port I get "ERROR: Eth102/1/4: Configuration not allowed on fex interface". I have tried to reconfigure this port as a switchport but "switchport mode access" command does not take. I don't want to make any changes to any other ports but this one.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCan i configure access ports into port channel on Nexus 7K switch.If possible then provide the complete configuration.....
View 2 Replies View RelatedDoes the LACP will be supported on Nexus 2000 host interfaces when parent switch is Nexus 7000?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI attempted to enable jumbo frames on a Nexus 5010 (NX-OS version 4.2(1)N1(1)). I created the policy map below and lost access to the switch.
policy-map type network-qos jumbo
class type network-qos class-default
mtu 9216
After recovery I see from the logs that all vlans and interface were suspended. I've attempted to look for reasons for a compatibility issue but I am unable to find what is checked and what could have been incompatible. The other troubling thing is the adjacent switch suspended its interfaces too but no change was done there. What I need to look out for so that this does not happen again?
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 1,10,601 on Interface port-channel1 are being suspen
ded. (Reason: QoSMgr Network QoS configuration incompatible)
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-5-IF_TRUNK_DOWN: Interface port-channel1, vlan 1,10,601 down
2011 Nov 22 23:43:09 phx-ipcg1dwfcma %ETHPORT-3-IF_ERROR_VLANS_SUSPENDED: VLANs 10 on Interface port-channel508 are being suspended.
[code]....
I have an outside 7206 router that is configured with BGP. Behind that I have an ASA 5520 with a failover. Everytime my primary ISP goes down I have to failover the ASA to restablish a connection to the secondary ISP. When the primary comes back on line I have to fail it over again. I have had Cisco TAC look at the ASA and they didn't see anything misconfigured on the ASA. Doesn't seem to be any problems with the router config either.
View 11 Replies View RelatedIs there any challenge to upgrade core switch 6500 series from Nexus 7009 which runs NxOS, because i have 3750X series switches connected at distribution and access layer in my network topology??
Is there any challenge if we place NxOS in core and IOS in distribution and Access layer??? how we are able to match sh run config in existing 6500 switch to Nexus 7009 NXOS?
I have a remote site with 2 WAN links.Link 1 MPLS with telecom provider managing the PE and advertising EIGRP routes to my switch(3750-E stack).Link 2 Directly connected to core site switch (4506) and advertising EIGRP routes.
It looks like this:
-------- Provider MPLS Cloud ------- GI2/0/1Remote Site (3750-E Stack)
Core Site Switch(4506)----
gi4/2------------------------------------------------ GI1/0/1Remote Site (3750-E Stack)
When both links are up MPLS is disrupted from other sites (that have MPLS only) to the core site. I was unable to get a route list to see what exactly was going on before shutting the directly connected link down.What i'd like to have is:Use MPLS as my primary link as it is fully meshed with all my remote sites (and not just the core) and have the directly connected link as my failover in case of issues with the primary. I assumed putting a delay 1000 on the directly connected link at the remote site would have been enough but it looks like both were active and leaking routes all over the place Is there a way to set this up that the MPLS link is favoured and if it loses routes to that specific remote site it would failover to the directly connected link?
Here is my current configuration for EIGRP on the remote and Core sites:
Remote 3750-E
router eigrp 100
redistribute connected
redistribute static
passive-interface default
no passive-interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
[code]....
I had a working active/passive pair of ASA5510's, and then I had to do a rush firmware upgrade, but didn't have time to do it on the secondary at the same time. Now I have made config changes and upgraded the secondary firmware to be the same, and wish to know if I plug it back in if it will think the secondary has the "correct" config or if it will know that the primary is newer. I disconnected the failover cable because it was complaining about version mismatches constantly.
Is it safe to add the secondary back in or is it possible it will be declared newer and overwrite the config?
Almost every sunday L3 switch reboot and give following error message.
View 2 Replies View Related