Cisco Switching/Routing :: SF 100D16 - Multiple Switches
Apr 12, 2013
I have two Cisco Small Business SF 100D-16 switches, one was a spare. I have run out of ports on the first one and would like to run the other one in series to new devices across the office. I'd prefer not to buy a bigger switch at the moment, but can I run one switch into the other without any adverse effect on the network.
I'm running an optical broadband connection and so far the system is fast and stable, running 8 VOIP phones, 8 laptops and 4 printers.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 21, 2012
We have 7 3560's in 7 different locations connected to our providor for wan access. Our provider has given us a copper cable at each point and we have connected it directly to our 3560 switch at each location. Each port is configured the same way at each location. Each switch is running eigrp.All of the switch ports on each switch are configured as a trunk and vlan 299 had the ip address for the eigrp connection: [code] This setup is working as each switch see's all of the other switches as an eigrp neighbor. We have also made sure that the switch at our head office has spanning tree priority for vlan 299.
So the problem is, if there is a change in the topology at one of the locations it usually causes one or more of the other connections to go down for some reason. We just cannot pinpoint what is causing this change. There are no log's or anything other than an eigrp hold time expired message.?
View 9 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2012
For some special arrangement, I would like to connect 2 access ports from a 3550 switch to 3560 switch.1 port for vlan 200, another port for vlan 201.Will this introduce bad thing to the switches?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am aware that private-vlans are not supported on edge switches like 2960 series - so my question is would it be possibel to ceate private vlans on say just the core switch which would be a 3570 or 4506 that supports private vlans and then just trunk these to the edge like normal vlans?
what I need to achive is to have edge port not able to communicate to each other even across switches - which cannot be done using 'protected' port so need the private vlan feature
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
Could I configure and connect 3 Dell switches to an ASA-5525 Firewall which has got 8 interfaces.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2013
I have a problem with DHCP. I have two 2960 connected with a port channel on ports 47 and 48 as trunk with native vlan 10. I only have this one vlan. In port 1 of sw 1, I have a C800 as DHCP server.
I have an AP autonomous with single ssid on vlan 10. When I connect the AP to sw1, I receive dhcp with no problems.When I connect the AP to sw 2, I’m not getting IP by DHCP.I have DHCP snooping working on vlan 10 on both devices.
The ports where I connect the AP are access ports on vlan 10 config as trusted.The trunk ports are also configured as trusted.The port 1 of ws 1 that goes to the C800 is also configured as trusted.
figure out why I’m not getting IP by DHCP when I connect the AP to the SW 2.The only I notice is that when I connect the AP to sw 2, I get on SW 1 the message of packet drop by option 82, but even after configuring ip dhcp snooping information option allow-untrusted on both switches, the problem persists.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
We have a Cisco 3750G Core switch which has physical connections, each configured as trunks to two HP Access switches. The client who uses these access switches would like to put a link between the two, but this would create a loop.
------- Core Switch -------
| |
| |
[Code]....
View 12 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2010
Is it possible to have multiple dhcp pools for multiple VLANs? The switch is a 6509 and/or 4506 catalyst. I don't want to use server-based products.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2012
I have a network with a Catalyst 3750 as the main switch and then some Catalyst 2960 switches that are plugged in to that. I have a server running windows server 2008 with a couple of virtual machines running in Hyper-V. I created 4 VLANS listed below and gave the 3750 the following IP Address.I would like the 3750 to only be configurable from VLAN 40 but currently every VLAN can connect to it, I noticed in the standard web page settings there was a setting for "Management VLAN" but it was set to 1 and would not let me change it, I kinda assumed that was for the management port in the back.-Now the tricky part, I was trying to set up routing between the VLANs and so far I have only been able to get a sort of "all or nothing" routing to work. I can turn IP routing on and add two or more VLANs to the routing and it works fine. But what I was hoping to do is create a couple of "junction vlans" that would only route to one or two other vlans. For instance, I wanted to create a VLAN 100 that routed to VLAN 20 and 30 but nothing else. I also want to route VLAN 1 just to VLAN 30, and so on. I am able to do each one of the cases but only one, it seems like the switch only supports one "routing table" am I missing something or is this just a limitation of the switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 15, 2013
We have two Cisco 5505 firewalls connecting to two ISP's . The two internal LAN's on the firewalls are 192.168.184.0/24 & 192.168.186.0/24. We also have a Cisco C3560x layer3 switch with vlan interfaces 184.3 & 186.3. We have two DGS-3100 Dlink layer 2 switches connecting our users to the Layer 3. Ip routing is enabled for intervlan communication & I can reach the Switch interfaces & firewall gateways from machines on both on the vlans.We have pbr enabled on the 3560 & users only on the .186 network can get to the internet. The switch is running the ipservices license & the sdm template is "desktop routing" .
Users on the .184 cannot access the internet but we can ping the layer3 interface & the firewall gateway. [code]
View 20 Replies
View Related
Jul 17, 2012
I was looking for configuring QOS for two VLANS i have created. these will be for voice traffic vlan 22 and video traffic vlan23. i also have three other vlans for pc's, wireless devices and our cnc machines. we have 5 switches that are all SG30028P's with a single switch doing the intervlan routing (operating at layer 3). all of the switches are trunked back to the main switch and ive been through the guide written on how to do this on a single switch which i dont think is layer 3.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Aug 20, 2012
I'm going to have several SG300-28P switches to setup. I'll need to create multiple vlans for data, voice, and wireless traffic. I have the following questions in setting up this configuration:
VLAN 1 Management
VLAN 100 Data
VLAN 200 Wireless
VLAN 300 Voice
1) For managing the switches via IP, will LAN1 be the default management network? Should I create a seperate VLAN for managing the switches?
2) For uplinking the switches together, I plan to trunk a port to connect the switches together. What's the configuration on the trunk port to forward all vlans from one switch to another?
3) On some ports, I want to configure a trunk for two vlans (Data and Voice) where the phone has a pass through for PC. The phone supports tagging for the PC and the VoIP traffic. For example on port 10, would VLAN 100 and 300 be set to tagged?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2011
If I have two stackable switches one switch uplinks to one 6509 core switch and the other connection uplinks to another 6509 core switch, and also the other stackable switch does not connect to the core switches. Because I am using hsrp and also we are not using vss then one uplink to the core is not in used only ones is so then how does creating an etherchannel between does two uplinks to both core switches benefit me in anyway such as more bandwith and using both uplinks at the same time or I'm I wrong?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2011
If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 29, 2011
I want to setup an home network with a wireless router and use multiple switches for wired connections through out my home. I currently have an Airport extreme hooked up to a cable modem and a leviton gateway hooked up to the Airport. The 2 computers connected to the Leviton are on a windows 7 homegroup and share fine, but won't share or discover any wireless device connected to Airport. My main goal is to have a wireless/wired network with all computers sharing information with each other. I want 2-3 wired switches/gateways with a min of 2 devices connected to each, connected to my wireless router whiich is connected to cable modem.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 19, 2012
I'm having alot of trouble trying to connect more that one LAG between two SG300-52 switches.Basically i have configured both switches with the same vlans. For 2 of the vlans i would like to connect them together between the two switches using LAG. Switch1 has Vlan 5 (ports 1-12) & Vlan 10 (Ports 25-36) with LAG configured on ports 1-2 and ports 25-26. I have setup the second switch identical to the first. But when i connect the LAG's there is no connectivty. If i disconnect one LAG the other starts working.Can you only have i interconnect LAG between switches?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2012
My internet router acts as an IGMP Proxy for the LAN and distributes IPTV there. The router is connected to one of my three SG 300 10 Cisco switches (connected to one another via uplink port). Now I want all switches to send multicast traffic to only the recipients of such traffic (PCs with VLC and Network Media Players) connected to either one of them. How do I have to configure the switches to do so and not flood the LAN with multicast traffic, is it enough to enable IGMP Snooping on each switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2012
I recently set up a Cisco 881 to cover a small business network. The router is currently set up and working as expected. We recently decided to move to VoIP phones and here is where I'm running into some issues.
First an overview: We run a network with a cable internet WAN connection, this connection is DHCP, however we have a static IP through our ISP. We also have a block of 30 additional IP addresses for one to one mapping as we need them. The new VoIP system is being run over T1 lines throughout the township (we are a municipal organization) and the VoIP system is being run to about 5 buildings in the township.
This brings me to the topic of VLANs. As the phone engineer explained it to me, there is a network set up over the T1 that allows the VoIP equipment to talk to one another and operates all of the VoIP phones on one network. The equipment that is being installed at our building connects to the network over the T1 and "talks" to the other equipment on the network. The engineer wants to create a VLAN and run it on ports fa1 and fa2, with the fa2 port being connected to the actual "MPLS" (their term) that connects to the T1 and into the cloud, and the fa1 port connected to the internal phone switch.
TLDR; The problem is this: When we attempt to set up the VLAN on ports fa1 and fa2, we have no connectivity with the other units in the external VoIP cloud. Pinging while directly connected to the "MPLS" yields successful pings, while pinging from the router with the "MPLS" connected to fa2 yields failures. I'm going to post the running config below, I feel like what we're doing should be working. I asked around about subinterfacing, but others seemed to think this was not necessary.
ROUTER CONFIG
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 4909 bytes
!
! No configuration change since last restart
version 15.1
[Code].....
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2012
how to properly route multiple external IPs to internal ips assigned to several servers. Where I'm getting a bit lost is that I have two levels of routing - one from the outside into a comcast business class cable modem, which also creates its own internal network. Within that internal network, I have my RV180 router, which creates another separate internal network in which the servers live (don't want the servers to have access to other computers within the Comcast Modem's internal network). I want to map the external ips to servers within the RV180 second level network.
To diagram:
Comcast Cable Modem
/
RV180 Computer(s)
/
S1 S2
An internal IP is assigned to the RV180 router. Suppose it is 192.168.1.100.
The cable modem itself supports NAT as well. Do I use NAT twice (on both cable modem and RV180) to route the external IP to S1 and S2?
Or do I modify the routing table on the cable modem? Then use One to One NAT on the RV180 to map the external IPs directly to the internals?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2012
I am trying to configure a Cisco 871 router.I have 3 servers on my network that need static public IPs but also still need to communicate on the local network.
I have given my WAN interface the first IP in the block and set up PAT for the rest of the computers on the network which is working fine. Next I set up static NAT rules for the servers translating 3 of the remaining public IPs to the internal addresses of the servers.
I can access those servers internally using the public IPs but not from outside the network. A tracroute from outside the network gets dropped when it gets to my ISP.
I've never configured more than one static ip for a network before and i know i've just missed a step here. Do I also need to set up static routes? Will that update the next hop's routing table?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 17, 2012
Anyone got a single VSM (albiet in HA) managing two vDS split over two ESX clusters connected to a single instance of vCenter?
View 0 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2012
Switch: SG500 VLANS: 1 (default) xxx.xxx.0.0/24 network, 150 (device management vlan) xxx.xxx.150.0/24 network I am plugged into port 1. This is a trunk port with VLANs assigned as follows: VLAN 1 (Default) - UntaggedVLAN 150 (dev mgmt) - Tagged Device is plugged into port 2. This is an access port with the following VLAN assigned: VLAN 150 - Untagged Why is it I cannot communicate with the device on port 2?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
I have a above said switch at my remote office (600KM) which is connected with L2 Point to Point leased line. Both the ends I have Cisco 3950 catalyst switches with Vlans configured at both the ends. Now, for obvious reasons I should remove the other end 3950 switch and replace with Cisco 2950 switch. The other end 3950 is having 4 Vlans configured on 4 ports. Now my requirement is, I should configure 3 Vlans (one for P2P, one for 10 Desktops and one for to bring traffic from other network).
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2012
I have an ASA 5505 with Security Plus License ?I have 5 Static IP Addresses from my ISP?I have the following interfaces. Outside (vlan 2) / Inside (vlan 1) / Guest (vlan 3)For my Vlan3 guest network I have set it up so that DNS must be routed through opendns.org's DNS servers ( for web filtering, etc ) However, its using the static ip that I have plugged into the ASA.
What I would like to accomplish is to put my inside interface (vlan1) on another static ip for outside access if thats possible, so that I can route those clients through opendns.org however however giving them more web privlieges than what the guest network is getting.
View 14 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
I have this cisco 4507 switch that I need to configure multiple ip ranges on. The problem is that I can only configure two ip ranges on it, one ip range on the management vlan and the other ip range on vlan 2. After I have configured these 2 vlans with different ip ranges, I can route between then and get them to talk to each other, but that is all I can do. If I add another vlan with a different IP range I cannot see it from the switch or get any of the otehr ip ranges to see it.
I am doing something dumb because this is a layer 4 device so it should be able to route the ip ranges. I have tried everything just cannot get it to work. I have assigned the IP range directly to the port number and directly to the vlans. Just wont work.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
What I’m looking to do is setup a net-flow monitor for traffic going across a PIX firewall. I know unfortunately I can’t do this directly from the PIX because it does not support net-flow.
I do have a 2921 router on the same network that I have net-flow enabled to monitor traffic across the MPLS Connection.
Since the traffic for the MPLS is going out a direct interface I have applied the IP Flow egress/ingress commands to that interface to obtain the net-flow data I need. The PIX firewall however is not a direct interface so this can’t be done. I have done a little reading and believe I could use a policy map to create a “filter” so that any traffic that meets the ACL associated with the Policy-Map would get sent to net-flow monitor.
My question is how do I set that up so that so I can have the two net-flow data “streams/sources” go to separate net-flow ports so that I can monitor them independently of each other or is that not possible?
Both devices are connected to a 3750X switch; however neither is connected to a 10GB port. To my understanding that means I can’t run net-flow on the switch itself.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2012
Has come across issues with multiple GRE tunnels between two devices when using the same source and destination addresses. I've tried using tunnel keys but this makes no difference. The only way I can get this to work is between different source & destination addresses.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Mar 11, 2013
Using Cisco 2960 series switches (Have 8 . 2 stacks of 4) to replace 6 old switches. 4 old switches had IP ranges of 192.168.6.*** and all new switches have 10.1.*.* addresses. Core switch has 10.1. as well as 192.168 ip addresses but i need to configure one vlan (5?) to route to 192.168 address. PC's on 10. address taking a long time to access 192 range.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 16, 2011
Im looking for some clarification regarding running a Cisco ASA in transparent mode with multiple contexts. To give you an insight into the network design we have the following -
Collapsed Core/Aggregation Layer running Cisco 3750s. The 2 Cisco 3750s are using SVIs with HSRP for default gateways per customer with a total of 8 customers. Each customer is segregated into seperate VLANs with Cisco 2960 switches used in the Access layer. Each customer has 2 Cisco 2960 switches with redundant uplinks to the Core/Aggregation layer. Customers are spanning tree loadbalanced between core/aggregation switches.
What i need to now do is add two transparent firewalls into the mix in either an active/active or active/standby setup. I need the firewalls to support all 8 customers, therefore I am guessing they need to run in multiple context mode. Having read into this it has left me somewhat confused as to how to integrate them into the above setup as a bump in the wire so to speak.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2013
I have a Cisco 1921 Router, a Cisco Catalyst 2960 and a Cisco Catalyst 2970 and I want the router to be able to assign ip-addresses by what VLAN a device is active on.
VLAN1: 10.0.0.0/24
VLAN2: 10.0.1.0/24
The router is connected to the Catalyst 2960 and there on to the Catalyst 2970 so the VLAN1 and VLAN2 is active on the to switches and the Router.is it possible?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2012
I can not get dhcp to work.I can ping from the switch to both vlans...
here is my config for the router.....
Router is a 1760
Current configuration : 1379 bytes
!
version 12.4
service timestamps debug datetime msec
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2012
I have a a hardware server running a VM hosting virtual servers which are all on different VLANs. My challenge now is to configure the switchport that the server is connected to, to see all the VLANs needed by this VM. The VM has an IP that is used for managing the server VMs which is on a different VLAN also.
My switch is a 2960 switch and it is presently trunked from the core switch.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 13, 2011
I have a customer with three rooms where teh access layer aggregation switches are run back to.
Access Switch Stack A -> room 1 + room 2
Access Switch Stack B -> room 2 + room 3
Is it possible to have three Nexus 7000s ie one in each room (1,2 and 3) and have them setup like this:
Nexus 7000#1 vPC domain 1
Nexus 7000#2 vPC domain 1 + vPC domain 2
Nexus 7000#3 vPC domain 2
Thus gving all access switch stacks redundant links to the core withouit spanning tree.
I know its not ideal but its a campus site and thats how the existing fibre runs go.
View 5 Replies
View Related
