Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cat4500-IPBASEK9-M / Catalyst 4503-E Linecard Support?
Mar 22, 2012
I have a 4503-e with WS-X4013+TS supervisor and WS-X4548-GB-RJ45 card. I purchased a WS-X4648-RJ45-E card and installed but IOS says its unsupported. Supervisor is running 12.2(46)SG software and 12.2(31r)SGA firmware. Obviously I'm hoping this cars can be supported somehow. Do I need to upgrade software or firmware, or return the linecard and get equivalent supported card? Oh, system is running Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software. (cat4500-IPBASEK9-M)
View 6 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 26, 2012
OK so I am following the steps that i got from off the CISCO site on upgrading the IOS, when i get the the part where if says to:
redundancy reload peer
so after i do that i go to the standby supervisor and i see that it is in a continuous reboot loop. I stop the loop and i reload the sup to the original IOS cat4000-i9s.........
SO i look at the logs and this is what i see:
Aug 12 22:21:01.251: %C4K_REDUNDANCY-6-INIT: STANDBY:Initializing as STANDBY Supervisor
*Aug 12 22:21:03.259: %CHKPT-3-IPCSESSION: STANDBY:Unable to open an IPC
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
I am sure that F1 linecards on Nexus weren’t able to support L3 functionality, so my query is does the F2 linecard (N7k-F248XP-25) on Nexus 7010 support Layer 3?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2012
i'm performing configuration PBR on catalyst 4503, but it doesn't work. [code]
View 21 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2012
Currently we have cisco 4503 switch in one of our location without redundancy which servers below,
300 user (desktop & ip phones)
5 vlans
15 access switches are connected
one L3 connectivity.
Actually i want to understand is it really necessary to have 4503 or we can go for 4900 series as we are planning to have redundancy in distribution segment.
Which is the best L3 switch in the above scenario and how to measure the overall performance of the current 4503 switch...
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2013
After deleting configuration with „write erase“ and reloading, our Cisco Catalyst 4503 with version cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.02.00.XO.150-2.XO.bin, and licence ipbase, doesn't recognize any command regarding SSH. We tried configuring SSH key with „crypto key generate“, but that command is not recognized either.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 7, 2012
Does the Catalyst 3560 support GRE ?
I know that Catalyst 3750X support GRE ,but Catalyst 3750X cannot work in hardware it.
Does the Catalyst 3560 cannot work in hardware too?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2007
Does Catalyst 3550 switch support inter vlan routing ?
View 12 Replies
View Related
Dec 28, 2011
how is port-ASIC mapping in linecard WS-X6148-GE-TX?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
I've installed second WS-X6748-SFP linecard on my catalyst 6509 with sup720-3b and after that NAM-2 and IDSM-2 module become inaccessible from management network. I can only login with session slot N proc 1.When I execute #hw-module module 4 reset, modules become accessible.
#sh module from cat6509
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.
--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------
2 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL114670XW
3 48 48-port 100FX SFP Ethernet Module WS-X6148-FE-SFP SAL1201BZKF
4 48 CEF720 48 port 1000mb SFP WS-X6748-SFP SAL1625ETFJ
5 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Active) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FNGQ
6 2 Supervisor Engine 720 (Hot) WS-SUP720-3B SAL1206FVFB
8 8 Intrusion Detection System WS-SVC-IDSM-2 SAD120502LR
9 8 Network Analysis Module WS-SVC-NAM-2 SAD120206LB
Mod MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status
--- ---------------------------------- ------ ------------ ------------ -------
2 001e.4a3e.3b30 to 001e.4a3e.3b5f 1.10 12.2(14r)S5 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
3 001e.4aea.e7b0 to 001e.4aea.e7df 3.3 8.4(1) 8.5(0.46)RFW Ok
4 5057.a895.bb84 to 5057.a895.bbb3 2.4 12.2(18r)S1 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
5 001c.58d0.6dc4 to 001c.58d0.6dc7 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
6 0016.c848.3698 to 0016.c848.369b 5.6 8.5(2) 12.2(18)SXF1 Ok
8 001e.f7a1.54b0 to 001e.f7a1.54b7 6.3 7.2(1) 7.0(8)E4 Ok
9 001e.f72a.ba62 to 001e.f72a.ba69 4.3 7.2(1) 5.1(2) Ok
Mod Sub-Module Model Serial Hw Status
---- --------------------------- ------------------ ----------- ------- -------
2 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL114881B6 4.0 Ok
4 Centralized Forwarding Card WS-F6700-CFC SAL1624EGQS 4.1 Ok
5 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FNZY 2.3 Ok
5 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FSFH 3.1 Ok
6 Policy Feature Card 3 WS-F6K-PFC3B SAL1206FP27 2.3 Ok
6 MSFC3 Daughterboard WS-SUP720 SAL1206FN26 3.1 Ok
8 IDS 2 accelerator board WS-SVC-IDSUPG ADBG7270048 2.5 Ok
cat6500 running 12.2(18)SXF12a ios...
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 25, 2011
I need to know if Cisco Switch 2960 support Netflow. If it doesn't, how do I configure the switch to enable Netflow?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2012
I have CISCO RPS 600 (PWR-AC-RPS) is it support Catalyst 2960 and 3560 ? and which type of cable require since i have cable 22-18 pin and on my switch require 22-14 pin.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 14, 2012
I have a customer with Cisco 7940 and 7960 IP phones that they do not plan to replace. They do want a new LAN and are looking at the Catalyst WS-C2960S-48FPD-L and WS-C2960S-24PD-L as access layer devices.
these switches support the Cisco pre-standard PoE required by the 7940 and 7960 IP phones.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2011
I'm trying to work out if I need to order the "IP services" image for a couple of C3750-X. I need to run OSPF on these switches, but find the IOS image requirements on Cisco contradict.
At the top of the data sheet it says: • Open Shortest Path First (OSPF) in IP Base image
On the product info page it says: IP Base: Enterprise Access Layer 3 Switching, including OSPF (Open Shortest Path First) for routed access
But in lots of other places it says you need 'IP services' for OSPF.
As the IP services IOS is quite a bit more expensive I would like to avoid buying it. What image do I need to run OSPF?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2012
Need to clarify if ip sla icmp echo operation is supported in catalyst 3kx switches (ip services)? on the configuration guide, commands are available, but on the feature navigator, i can't find the feature, only ip sla video operation. i don't have a device to test on here.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
Q. Does the Supervisor 720 support all existing Cisco Catalyst 6500 series interface and services module, protecting customer investments?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
Any one know when object-group ACLs will be supported in cat4500 IOS-XE ?? Doesnt seem to be supported now.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 22, 2013
We have 3 Cat 4500 switches on three floors teh 3rd floor switch connects to the 2nd and 4th floor switches ,but we are receiving an alert from monitoring tool that " Interface(314) Backup-1Gb-Ring is Down at least 2 min on Switch: SOM500-4510-3FL the following output from "sh int status module 1 " shows the int 1/3 and 1/4 are 'inactive'local IT guy said If the status is inactive,the ports cannot be used and might lost the capability when he added 48-port blade into the 10th slot.
2nd Floor
Port Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed TypeTe1/1 SOM500-Core1 connected trunk full 10G 10GBase-LRMTe1/2 SOM500-Core1 connected trunk full 10G 10GBase-LRMGi1/3 Backup-1Gb-Ring notconnect 1 full 1000 1000BaseSXGi1/4 Backup-1Gb-Ring connected trunk full 1000 1000BaseSX
3rd FloorPort Name Status Vlan Duplex Speed TypeTe1/1 SOM500-Core1 connected trunk full 10G 10GBase-LRMTe1/2 SOM500-Core1 connected trunk full 10G 10GBase-LRMGi1/3 Backup-1Gb-Ring inactive 1 full 1000 1000BaseSXGi1/4 Backup-1Gb-Ring inactive 1 full 1000
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2012
I came across this Multichassis EtherChannel Features when read about information from Cisco Smart Business Architecture.After checking further, knowing that Cataly stwitch 6500 supports this feature.provide information that beside Catalyst 6500, is there any other model of Catalyst switch can support this feature?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
In testlab we use pim-sm with bootstrap router on sup7 with IOS-XE 03.04.00.SG. Any possibility to prevent non authorized rp from connecting to the candidate bootstrap routers? We found several security recommendations concerning limiting registering of sources at the rp, rate-limits etc, but no possibility to control rp connecting to the bsr.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 16, 2011
just got a new supervisor 4 engine for this catalyst 4503 switch that has ios 12.2 (53) SG installed on it. That's quite a bit above the 7.6 i was working with. I'm having a couple issues now. first, I read that it is supposed to be sending out broadcasts automatically to get it's IP address but it doesn't seem to be. the module i'm plugging into there is ws-x4448-gb-rj45, a 48 port 10/100/1000 module in case it matters. it works other than that. I can plug two computers in and see them and i can plug the network in and they'll both get addresses and internet, but i need an IP on the switch. is there a way to send a manual request for broadcast out or somehow set the IP manually? (I know I can do it in the rommon, but that doesn't seem to do anything)
also, the last module in the switch is a 24 port poe ws-x4224-rj45v. the module is recognized, the status light green, the "show interface status" lists it, but it doesn't recognize anything plugged into it. the supervisor is not configured at all yet, so maybe that has something to do with it, but the other module, like i said, works.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 18, 2012
There is some way to increase the speed of changing the interface state from DOWN to UP when the cable is connected. I need to configure a port of Cisco 4503 in a way that when a cable is connected the port goes immediatly UP.
A solution can be to keep Cisco interface always UP and I remember that with "no keepalive" command to the interface configuration it was possible. But I tried and nothing happens.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Sep 16, 2012
I need to implement over an ethernet link L2 tunnel because I want to isolate another VLANs domain.On the first side I can use the command : sw mo dot1q-tunnel on a new C4503 on the other side I cannot configure the command : sw mo dot1q-tunnel.
the other side is an old C4503 we upgrade the flash with a compact flash to upgrade to a new IOS v15 but the command doesn't exist also.I red the cisco feature navigator feature and I am sure the dot1Q-tunnel is available on my image : cat4500-ipbasek9-mz.150-2.SG.binso I don't know why I can use it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2013
We have microsoft servers and other application servers (around 12 in nos) which should have gig connections to the access switch. In turn this access switch will be connected to our distribution switch 4503. Which model of access switch best fits from the below 3 models. It should be cost effective as well.
WS-C2960 S-24PS-L
WS-C2960-24TS-L
WS-C3560G-24TS-S
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I am installing a connection between Brocade MLX and Cisco 4503 using SE and SVI's. Below is the config for each. Am I missing anything like MTU Ignore or something along that nature?
*** Cisco 4503 (v15.01) Config ***
VLAN 35
name EOC_Gi1/2
[Code].....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 2, 2012
I am trying to connect a 6509 switch to a 4503-E switch using single mode dark fiber over a distance of less than half a mile. Although a routine task, it does not work..We have a care 6509 switch where we concentrate all of our dark fiber connections for our remote sites. The 6509 switch already has 30 remote sites, most of them with 4503-E switches, connected in this way therefore it is a tested scenario. For the connections we use the GLC-LH-SM SFPs on both switches. Out of these 30 sites we had a similar problem with two of them, which we solved with the use of CWDM SFPs. With the CWDMs the fiber came up right away. However, I cannot keep using this solution because it is way too expensive! I had the losses of the fiber measured end-to-end and they are negligible (>0.5 dB).
In this latest case, like I said, we could not bring the connection up between the core 6509 switch and the 4503-E switch using the GLC-LH-SM SFPs. I then replaced the 4503-E switch with a 3560 and the link came up! Then I tried using a CWDM-SFP in the 4503-E, while keeping the GLC-LH-SM SFP in the 6509 and the link came alive again! Of course we already tried replacing the fiber patch cords with no luck. [code] I find it very weird for the link to work with the 3560 or with a CWDM in the 4503 but NOT with the SFP in the 4503!
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
I have a 4503 switch (in L2 mode) running 12.1 hooked into a C2950 running 12.1, using regular 4 pair Cat5e cables to connect between them. The 4503 has Gigabit port 2/1 trunking to the 2950's Fa port 0/13.
When I set the duplex mode to DUPLEX FULL and SPEED to SPEED 100 on both switches (for their trunk ports) the link fails, and my 4503 loses connectivity (since it gets it from the 2950).
Here is my config from the switches (per description):
The 4503:
interface GigabitEthernet2/1
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1,2,100-140
[Code].....
Note, this is the only mode that works (which seems to work fine, but I get TERRIBLE throughput for anything that goes over the 2950.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Sep 13, 2011
We have Cisco 4503-E switch and software version is cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.01.01.SG.150-1.xo1.bin. Now i have uploaded cat4500e-universal.SPA.03.02.01.SG.150-2.SG1.bin IOS-XE software in the switch and want to boot the switch from this image.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Nov 30, 2011
I need a 10G support on 4503 chassi with SUP II plus TS.Is any of the 10G line cards i.e. 4712 or 4606 supported on SUP II plus TS on 4503?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2012
We had a core switch(30 vlans) in our environment and it's noticed that CPU utilization of the core switch is showing high during recent days. I have checked logs and processes, but couldn't find the root cause. The issue found only in the office hourly only(after that the cpu utilization is idle and normal). I have already referred the following link to troubleshoot the issue " [URL]
see the following outputs from the core switch
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/0%; one minute: 99%; five minutes: 99%
PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process
30 6687557041432420936 466 47.52% 47.10% 45.98% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri
55 30667074884269560256 0 45.36% 45.50% 45.85% 0 IP Input
29 28552856922870089254 0 3.59% 3.50% 3.57% 0 Cat4k Mgmt HiPri
[code]....
Note: Each Invalid source mac entry in each day from same port (above is the output after clearing logs before 3 days)
My queries regarding the issues are following
1) How can we find root cause regarding the high cpu utilization?
2) Is a single invalid mac address makes the cpu highly utilized for suppressing it?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Dec 17, 2011
I am working with a Catalyst 4503-E with a Sup7-E. I'm trying to enable Netflow, and I have read the following guides: Catalyst 4500 Series Switch SW Configuration Guide, Release IOS ...
I have also enabled Netflow in IOS 12.1/12.2 and figured the process was similar (It seems to be). CEF is enabled, and I have all the pre-reqs according to the document above, however, the flow commands don't exist, they simply say "command unrecognized". I have included my sh version below.
sh version (edited):
Cisco IOS Software, IOS-XE Software, Catalyst 4500 L3 Switch Software (cat4500e-UNIVERSAL-M), Version 03.01.01.SG RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2012
We have two core switches in our network (Cisco WS-4503). HSRP is working as Active-Standby mode. Recently it has been found that core 1 (which is in active mode) shown high CPU load (60% - 100%). Also found that the below mentioned process takes more CPU. Our network consist of around 30 Vlans. We have already checked for the solution in Cisco website [URL] but couldn't find exact reason. see the below outputs for core 1 switch.
Core1# sh processes cpu sorted
CPU utilization for five seconds: 55%/3%; one minute: 65%; five minutes: 71%PID Runtime(ms) Invoked uSecs 5Sec 1Min 5Min TTY Process 30 1606933521086983644 147 24.79% 29.93% 35.85% 0 Cat4k Mgmt LoPri 29
[Code]....
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
We have a gateway on a 4503, say on port 2/1, and we only want the other devices that are plugged into the 4503 to be able to talk to the gateway and thats it. The other devices are Motorola TUT DSL devices and they plug into the 4503 directly.
Normally "switchport protected" would make this very easy to keep stuff on one port from talking to other ports but with 4500's you are not able to do that command. So we implemented a MAC Access-List Extended ACL. Here is what we did
mac access-list extended BLAH
permit #host 0000.XXXX.YYYY any
interface range fa 2/5 - 20
mac access-group BLAH out
The MAC address 0000.XXXX.YYYY is the MAC address of the gateway that is plugged into Fa2/1 and the DSL TUT devices are plugged into ports Fa2/5-20. We would think that this config would only allow devices on the TUT DSL to talk only to the Gateway but we don't really think this is happening. The TUT devices are learning about MAC addresses that are on other TUT devices.
View 1 Replies
View Related
