I configured dot1x port-authentication on a 3750. The switch sends out a request to the radius server. The radius server sends a answer-packet to the switch udp port 21645 but it seems the switch discards the packet or something like that. The radius server gets the answer "Destination unreachable, Port Unreachable"
View 8 RepliesI have 3750 switch (WS-C3750G-24TS-S1U) with IP Services version
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------* 1 28 WS-C3750G-24TS-1U 12.2(46)SE C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
on the switch, I have configured aaa new-modelaaa authentication dot1x default group radius dot1x system-auth-control but i am not able to implement the command under interface
Switch(config)#int gigabitEthernet 1/0/20Switch(config-if)#do?down-when-looped
dot1x commands are not available under the interface config. Is the IOS version is compatible with dot1x?
I have issue with 2950 switch dot1x config is not working , but on 2960 its working fine .Below are the configs from both switches and a debug dot1x all snap, what may be the issue with 2950 switch ...
on 2950======>
aaa new-modelaaa authentication dot1x default group radiusaaa authorization network default group radius
[Code].....
I am seeing the following behavior when computers move from one switch to another with dot1x ONLY when there is a 'stupid' switch in between.
computer -------- 'stupid' switch ------- 2960
dot1x is working fine but when the computer is disconnected, the port still shows the authentication session id so when the computer connects to another port or switch, authentication succeeds but traffic doesn't pass. While I'm almost certain that the culprit is the 'stupid' switch that doesn't clear the session id, I have already tried another one and the problem remains so I'm actually just asking for a confirmation that all these 'stupid' switches present this behavior and if there is a workaround in this case.
I want to setup the ACS 5.1 for dot1x-Port authentication. I want to make a machine authentication against an AD-Domain and I got the following error Message:24435 Machine Groups retrieval from Active Directory succeeded
View 13 Replies View RelatedWe're having an issue with the command "cts dot1x" when applied to an uplink interface.It basically kils the connection with this command is applied. Once you remove it, everything is back to normal, the platform is a cisco 3750x.
View 5 Replies View Relatedwe're having an issue with the command "cts dot1x" when applied to an uplink interface. It basically kils the connection with this command is applied. Once you remove it, everything is back to normal, the platform is a cisco 3750x.
View 0 Replies View RelatedHardware: Cisco 3750 switch and Cisco autonomous access point (AIR-AP1142N-E-K9).Requirement: A single broadcast SSID; use dot1x to assign vlan 98 to authenticated clients (computer certificate); assign vlan 3 (guest) if the authentication fails.I can achieve assigning a guest vlan on authentication failure when using a wired connection by using the following command on the interface:authentication event fail action authorize vlan 3 I'm after a way to achieve the above using the wireless access point. The main point is that internal users cannot access vlan 3 as they have a valid certificate and that guests do not have to authenticate.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco 6509 with IOS "s222-ipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-18.SXF16.bin"I need to enable dot1x on user's ports on the switch. each user is connected to the switch through the IP phone.
I just found out that I can not enabled dot1x on trunk port. I have tried to use "switchport voice vlan " but I got:
Switch(config-if)#switchport voice vlan 123
Command rejected: Gi7/20 is Dot1x enabled port.
let me know what should I do to get dot1x working?
Note: I have connected a laptop directly to the port and dot1x is working fine.
Do I need the Universal image to perform stftp on a 3750 or 3750-X?
View 8 Replies View RelatedI'm looking at adding a Cisco 3750-X switch running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1 (IP base license) into a stack of 3750-G switches running c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin Given that the version and feature sets are the same I don't forsee any compatibility issues. Would there be any reason why a universal image wouldn't stack correctly with other switches running the single .bin file?
View 9 Replies View RelatedWe have a stack of switches that is at the max number of members allowed in the stack. Problem is we are running out of port density and need to add more ports. So instead of adding a whole new stack I would rather replace 2 of the 24-port swicthes with 48-port switches.
If the two 24-port swicthes we are removing are stack members and neither of them are the stack master, I should be able to replace the 24-port switches with the 48-port switches without bringing the master offline? If the new 48-port switches are running the same IOS version as the current 24-port swicthes, they should add themselves to the stack?Would I have to tell the new 48-port swicthes what switch numbers they are replacing in order for them to be added to the stack since we are at the max number of members?Also since the 48-port swicthes are replacing 24-port switches will the master give the 48-port switches the configuration for only the 24-ports?
Trying to apply NTP authentication to 3750 switches (layer-2 WS-C3750-24P switches) but they don't wont to work. Applying the same config to any router or 4500/6500 chassis, and NTP authenticates straight away. NTP without authentication works fine on 3750s as well...
ntp authentication-key 1 md5 <key>
ntp authenticate
ntp trusted-key 1
ntp server 10.200.11.200 key 1
Is there additional config required for 3750s? This is across different IOS versions, so doesn't look like a bug..
How long it will be until we see OSPFv3 authentication in NX-OS? We now have it in both IOS and IOS XR, but the latest releases of NX-OS still do not support it.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI am trying to use a Tekradius Windows2008 server to aaa authenticate switch admin logins. The Radius server and 6509 loop0 are in a management VRF "netman". I can happily ping to and from the Server and loopback0 interface without issue. I have also tested the radius server account using RadiusNT on a workstation. I get an accept reply with the following variables..
shell:priv-lvl=15
NAS-Prompt
Here are the relevant parts of my config as far as I can see..
aaa new-model
aaa group server radius SRADIUS
server-private 192.168.1.101 auth-port 1812 acct-port 1813 key cisco
ip vrf forwarding netman
ip radius source-interface Loopback0
!
aaa authentication login default group SRADIUS local
[code]...
Im having a strange problem on a 6509 switch. I am trying to use a Tekradius Windows2008 server to aaa authenticate switch admin logins. The Radius server and 6509 loop0 are in a management VRF "netman". I can happily ping to and from the Server and loopback0 interface without issue. I have also tested the radius server account using RadiusNT on a workstation. [code]
View 8 Replies View RelatedI am configuring NTP on a new Cisco Nexus 7000 running version 6.1(2). NTP is working properly between the access switches and Nexus, however when configuring Authentication, NTP is not working anymore.
confguration:
Nexus 7K server
=============
ntp server x.x.x.x
ntp peer q.q.q.q
ntp server e.e.e.e
ntp server r.r.r.r
ntp source-interface Vlanx
[code]...
why NTP authentication is not working !!!!! on Nexus 7000
All ip's and any identifying numbers have been change to protect.
I have a 6500 series switch that for some reason will not authenticate to the tacacs server. When you try, you get a password authentication failure. However, it will let you use the configured username and secret to log in thru ssh. And the enable secret to get into privileged mode. Tacacs key is correct, btw.we will call the server vlan 300 and the admin vlan 400.the tacacs source interface is in vlan 400 and the tacacs server is in vlan 300.
I can ping the tacacs server via the switch, but when i use the source cmd with the ip address of the admin interface vlan, ping will not work. I changed the tactics source interface to vlan 300 (the server vlan) and authentication with the tacacs server works fine. ip routing is turned on. There are entries for both the server vlan subnet and the ad-min vlan subnet in the routing table. There are only standard access-lists, and none of them are blocking packets from getting to the tacacs server via the admin vlan.
I could just leave the source interface on the int vlan for the servers, but I would like to find out why this isn't working. I have 1 other 6500 switch on a different network that is configured exactly the same (except for ip's, keys, and vlans) and am not having any issues with that LAN. I also have 6 other 3700 switches on the network that Im having an issue with, and none of them are having issues with authentication.
some of our switches have the switchport mode trunk command configured between the 3750 switches but other 3750 switches connected to our 6509 core switch do not have the switchport mode trunk command to permit Vlans from going across the swtiches instead it has an ip address and says no switchport what is the difference between does two. Is trunking used only for Layer 2 and L3 is used to route interface vlans?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a network with a Catalyst 3750 as the main switch and then some Catalyst 2960 switches that are plugged in to that. I have a server running windows server 2008 with a couple of virtual machines running in Hyper-V. I created 4 VLANS listed below and gave the 3750 the following IP Address.I would like the 3750 to only be configurable from VLAN 40 but currently every VLAN can connect to it, I noticed in the standard web page settings there was a setting for "Management VLAN" but it was set to 1 and would not let me change it, I kinda assumed that was for the management port in the back.-Now the tricky part, I was trying to set up routing between the VLANs and so far I have only been able to get a sort of "all or nothing" routing to work. I can turn IP routing on and add two or more VLANs to the routing and it works fine. But what I was hoping to do is create a couple of "junction vlans" that would only route to one or two other vlans. For instance, I wanted to create a VLAN 100 that routed to VLAN 20 and 30 but nothing else. I also want to route VLAN 1 just to VLAN 30, and so on. I am able to do each one of the cases but only one, it seems like the switch only supports one "routing table" am I missing something or is this just a limitation of the switch?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs a 3750 sw capable of handling full routing tables and what can you recommend in a small mutihomed BGP router or switch capable of handling full routing tables?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a network with several catalyst 2960 switches and one catalyst 3750. I have created two VLAN and set up the proper routing and everything is working fine there. I have a client/server application that used multicast in the initial start up for the client to determine available servers, the issue is one of my clients is on a different VLAN then the server. I am able to route the multicast using MVR as long as both the server and the client are plugged into the 3750 by creating a static route, making the server a source port and the client a receive port. Unfortunately I need the client and the server plugged in to different 2960s. My question is how do I establish multicast routing between the two and perferably do it dynamically (always route multicast traffic from one VLAN to another).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have been looking into this for a while and I can't seem to figure out why my 2nd vlan is not able to connect properly to the net.
My switch has 12 ports where my devices connects directly, they are all on Vlan 1 and they all work perfectly. on Port 12 I have a dlink router that is connected to a cable modem. the dlink router has an Ip address of 192.168.0.20
I created a second vlan (vlan2) and enabled dhcp relay on it. then I assigned port 9 on the switch to (vlan2)my laptop which is connected to port 9 seems to get an ip address fine and able to ping only some devices on my network (vlan1) and is not able to go out to the internet. I think it has to do with the routes. [code]
I have the task of replicating the router config on a 3825 router on a 3750 switch. Reason is we are taking out the router and replacing it with the switch to make use of the router for other functions.
Below is main part of the router config:
!
ip source-route
ip cef
!
!
multilink bundle-name authenticated
!
license udi pid CISCO3825 sn FCZxxxxxxx
!
vlan internal allocation policy ascending
[code].....
The 3750 switch I have runs C3750E-UNIVERSALK9-M, Version 12.2(55)SE3 on a LAN BASE license.
The first thing I have done is to order for a license upgrade to IP BASE which would give the support for OSPF routing.I do not see much of an issue with the Interface configs, however, I am not too sure about replicating the routing config on the switch.
My question is can I run the commands as shown for the OSPF routing on the switch? If not, can I get suggestions on how best to set this up on the switch?
In 3750 switch,I have configured intervlan routing.I have three vlans Vlan 10,vlan 20,Vlan 30 and I have assigned IP address for that Vlan.In vlan 10,I have connected one systen gigabitethernet 0/1 interface.From my system I am able to ping vlan 10 ip address but I can't able to ping other vlan ip address (vlan 20,vlan 30).Is it possible to up the protocol for all that time.
View 2 Replies View RelatedFor intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?and on 3750 switches, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am using a 3750 as a default gateway for multiple Vlans on a few 2960 switches. The trunk lines are configured and working and I have assigned ip addresses to each of the Vlan interfaces on the 3750. My issue is that I can only ping the ip address on the Vlan interface of the 3750 if I have a working computer plugged directly into the Vlan on the 3750. I only have 3 vlans on the 3750 that have hosts directly connected (vlans 2, 10 and 40) the other vlans ( 20 and 70) don't have any clients plugged into them on the 3750 but the hosts reside on 2 different 2960s that connect via trunk ports. How do I keep the vlan interface on the 3750 switch pingable when I don't have hosts directly connected in that vlan on the 3750? (yes, I have enabled ip routing on the 3750)
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a simple design with 3750. I configured a route-map which define a next hop. I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR? I think of CEF .
View 5 Replies View RelatedIn our datacenter we have a 3750 stack with IP base image. I have enabled PBR and reloaded the switch. Show sdm prefer says i am using default template. The reason i want to use PBR is that we have 2 firewalls on the same work and want to be able to have granular control over which gateway out of the network they use but still be able to access all internal resouces accross wan and locally.
Created access list to identify traffic:
access-list 10 permit 10.2.3.59 (test workstation on vlan 3)
Created policy:
route-map TestASA permit 10
match ip address 10
set ip next-hop 10.2.0.3
Assigned policy to the user vlan3:
ip policy route-map TestASA
Results:It changed the default gateway to the above gateway but i could not access any resources on any other vlan, could not access resouces accross wan.
I have been looking into this for a while and I can't seem to figure out why my 2nd vlan is not able to connect properly to the net. My switch has 12 ports where my devices connects directly, they are all on Vlan 1 and they all work perfectly. on Port 12 I have a dlink router that is connected to a cable modem. the dlink router has an Ip address of 192.168.0.20,I created a second vlan (vlan2) and enabled dhcp relay on it. then I assigned port 9 on the switch to (vlan2),my laptop which is connected to port 9 seems to get an ip address fine and able to ping only some devices on my network (vlan1) and is not able to,go out to the internet.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a simple design with 3750.I configured a route-map which define a next hop.I defined this route-map on a policy on a vlan interface.When I test some ping and a debug ip policy and it seems that my policy never match.Is there any mechanism that prevent the switch from using PBR?
View 10 Replies View RelatedI'm running into what seems a basic ip routing config problem with a Catalyst 3750 (IP Base) switch. I have several VLANS configured on the switch with IP routing enabled, and the switch is connected to the inside interace of a new ASA 5520 as follows:
ASA5520 IP (Default gateway): 192.168.1.1Switchport Gi1/0/1 is configured as a routed port, IP address 192.168.1.3 255.255.255.0Example VLAN is VLAN 100, IP address 192.168.100.1 255.255.252.0 From the switch CLI, I can ping all VLAN addresses, as well as the ASA5520, and the client laptop I'm testing with from VLAN 100.
From the client laptop on VLAN 100, I can ping all switch interface and VLAN addresses (inter-VLAN routing is working), including 192.168.1.3, but I CANNOT ping the default gateway at 192.168.1.1.
Here is the relevant configuration information on the 3750:
!
no aaa new-model
switch 1 provision ws-c3750x-24
system mtu routing 1500
[Code]....
I have a Cisco 3750 with private VLANS configured.. VLAN 2 is the "primary", VLAN 3 is "isolated" and VLAN 4 is "community". This is all working correctly, however I now have the need to another VLAN called "production". I need the production VLAN to be able to reach all the private VLAN hosts (community and Isolated), and vice versa
View 2 Replies View Related