Cisco VPN :: 1811 - WebVPN Being Assigned WAN Zone
Aug 3, 2011
I have a Cisco 1811 router running the 15.1(3)T IOS. I am having some difficulty with the current zone based firewall and the SSL VPN.
When a user connects, they are put into Virtual-Template 1 which has a zone based assignment of "sslvpn". However the traffic report for the users is listed as being blocked by the zone based firewall in the outbound direction(office out to the wan zone).
We are testing a Zone Based FW config since 1month, everything run smooth but we're having problem ( big slow speed access ) when a user try to reach a website on a non-standard port ( 8080 in that case ). All the trafic stay in our LAN, using a IPSEC/EZVPN connection between the 2 sites.As soon as I have disabled the Zone Based FW, the speed was much better.
I'm sure I'm missing a parameter to fix that problem but I tried many different options and I didn't find anything yet. All the routers are Cisco 1811 running adv IP Services 15.1.2.T1 IOS.A port-map has been created to map the port 8080 to the HTTP protocol for the inspection.The PC will have an IP address in the 10.2.2.x/24 and will access a server on 10.2.3.x/24, both devices are part of the zone private in each site/LAN.All the access between sites are managed by an ASA; the IPSEC/EZVPN peer.Little summary, it's gonna be something like : SiteA with a PC on private zone then on public zone for the EZVPN to SiteB on public zone and then private zone to access the server in the LAN.
I have two 1811's connected in a lab using a ipsec vpn tunnel (using a switch to simulate an internet connection between them).I am trying to configure one of the routers as a ZBPF just to allow a remote windows login (DC on the firewalled side, workstations on the other side).I'm trying to verify that the zbpf is working, but it doesn't seem to stop anything. I had match icmp added to the class-map, but took it out to test if icmp would fail. It didn't. Basically, I don't think the firewall is working at all. Any thoughts on how I can configure this so that the policies will work between zone-pairs?
Here's an quick drawing:
Here are the configurations:
Local router: hostname sdc-1811-LocalLab ! boot-start-marker boot-end-marker ! no aaa new-model ! resource policy
I have a Cisco 2901 which terminates a Class C address pool. I have split the Class C address pool into 3 sub-nets and 2 zones and created a non-addressable pool (private pool):
dmz-zone : x.x.x.0 TO x.x.x.127 (x.x.x.0/25) in-zone: x.x.x.128 TO x.x.x.159 (x.x.x.128/27) & x.x.x.160 TO x.x.x.191 (x.x.x.160/27) private-zone: 192.168.x.0 TO 192.168.x.255 (192.168.x.0/24)
I have configured private-zone NAT to use address pool x.x.x.161 TO x.x.x.189 within the in-zone.
dmz-zone - are servers for : DNS, Syslog, SIP & HTTP/HTTPS in-zone - is a SMTP mail server which is behind VPN Gateway/NAT, TomCat (Application Server) and PostgreSQL Server private-zone - is where all standard users are operating from and they can access the SIP & HTTP/HTTPS servers within dmz-zone My problem is that I cannot seem to configure the ZBFW to allow the dmz-zone HTTP/HTTP server to redirect to in-zone TomCat server.
I do not want to make the TomCat server generally visible and am instead using the Apache proxy/ajp13 to connect from dmz-zone server to in-zone server.However I cannot seem to get anything (including icmp) to work from dmz-zone to in-zone.
I have Policy:
POLICY-DMZ-IN (dmz-zone to in-zone) which has: any any udp/tcp inspect any any icmp inspect unmatched traffic DROP/LOG
But I still cannot get anything from dmz-zone to in-zone...Could the POLICY-DMZ-IN be being overridden by other dmz-zone to out-zone policies?
NOTE: I have routing rules for each of various sub-nets and all out-zone to dmz-zone, out-zone to in-zone and private-zone to out-zone, in-zone and dmz-zone routing works ok, so it appears problem is with ZBFW not routing table.
In Cisco ASDM 7.1(1), webvpn configuration, it is possible to configure bookmarks with "vdi://" links to Citrix's or Vmware's Virtual Desktop Infrastructures, but we couldn't find any configuration resource (conf guide) on official Cisco site: if it is actually possible to integrate Vmware View Client into ASA 9.1 WebVpn solution?
We have an ASA5510 with the Anyconnect Essentials license. I'm in the process of setting up Anyconnect and immediately run into a question. We have a /29 subnet setup and AFAIK i must use the outside interface address for Anyconnect. However i already have an https service PAT forward on this address. So, can i setup Anyconnect to listen on eg. the second ip in my public subnet?
is it possible to have the ASA connected to two ISP's and use the one ISP connection for Client/S2S VPN and Internet Access and the second ISP connection just for the WebVPN Traffic? How would you manage the Routing, as the default route is pointing to the first connection or is that not an issue here?
I ve setup Anyconnect on ASA 5510 and it seems to be working fine but cant get Jabber to work on smart phones. When using the packet tracer i see my packets dropped on WEBVPN-SVC. I am not using NAT anywhere and i can normally ping the CUCM from the client , i can open the web page of cucm but jabber says connection error.
my Cisco anyconnect VPN clients are able to access all of my internal networks accept to another site which has a IPSEC VPN site-to-site. The Cisco ASA forwards the packets destined to this remote site to a Cisco router which NATS the source addresses (pool 10.17.252.0/24) to a 192.168.46.0 range. The remote network is 155.x.x.x which I have included in my internal subnets object-group and added a route on the ASA to route it inside.
I have configured NAT so that it does not NAT anything from the anyconnect client range to the internal subnets. I am using version 8.3(2) and the NAT rule is:
I've configured in an ASA5540 (8.4) access to a server in my LAN using telnet with webVPN. I've installed the ssh/telnet plug-in in the ASA and SSH access to the servers works fine but when I try telnet access I always get this error:
Could not connect to: "ip server" 23 Reason: java.io.IOException: Connection failed
It happen with any server I try. I'm not trying to access to the ASA, just servers inside my LAN that I can access with anyconnect correctly. There is a Cisco bug (CSCsq89467) saying that not configuring any Web-acl in the ASA solve the problem. Telnet always show the same error.
I've read a lot of threads on this and tried a lot of the suggested solutions... nothing has fixed my problem yet.I'm running Windows XP SP2. I've recently been installing a VPN and setting up firewall rules. I didn't have any problems (was using Comodo firewall) until I installed Sygate Firewall. I've since un-installed but still can't get Windows to connect to the internet via wired or wireless connections[CODE]
We are trying to setup a Cisco SSL VPN. When outside of the network and after logging in the web page, you have the option to Remote Control your PC at the office. When clicking that, it takes you to the login screen with MACHINEuser... Is there any way to make DOMAINuser default or even just automatically login since you've just logged in the VPN anyway?
I currently have our ASA5510 setup for AnyConnect 3.0 VPN clients and IPSec VPN clients. I'm trying to add Clientless SSL VPN functionality for employees without company laptops. Because they won't be using company PC's I want them to connect to the webvpn portal without having to install any type of client.
I have a Clientless SSL VPN connection profile setup and have it set to use Clientless SSL VPN only. However, whenever I login to the portal it automatically tries to download and install the AnyConnect client. How do I enable the VPN web portal without the AnyConnect trying to install?
I am using the port forwarding feature of the Cisco ASA5510 WebVPN to permit RDP access into the network. It seems to be working fine for one small annoynace. Whenever I click the "Start Applications" button on the web portal, I receive a small prompt to install JRE 1.4 (see attached screenshot). Obviously, this is a bit outdated and I don't want anyone to actually click on this button to perform the install. With a bit of fiddling, I can eventually bypass all of these prompts to install JRE 1.4 and it works fine anyhow (I am using JRE 1.7). Is there any way to have the system bypass this check for the JRE and just attempt to start? Or can I modify the check so that it will not prompt if newer versions of the JRE are installed? I'd rather have the onus on myself to ensure the connecting clients have the proper version of Java installed than the user potentially install an older version of the JRE.
I am facing problem while configuring SSL Web VPN on my ASA 5510 which is on version 7.2.I need to configure RDP access to the internal servers for the users using SSL Web VPN for which i dont see an option while configuring it though I have uploaded the plugin to my ASA.
I have issues connecting to the webvpn as its asking for some certificate for authentication, I am using the self generated certificate, but when I try to connect to SSL gateway via its IP address , Browser expect me to provide the certificated, I want to tell the Browser to use the self generated certificate of ASA5505, but not sure how I do it.I undestand when WEBVPN/SSL clientless VPN try to establish the VPN , ASA sends the certificate back to the browser to accept/authenticate it, but when I connect I don't get any certificate where I say YES to accept it.Can I just disable certificate with SSL and just use username/password to crater a WEBVPN ?
I'm moving from a 5505 to a 5520 and moving to a different location. I have a certificate on the 5505 that I want to export to the 5520.Can I export that key/certificate and import to the new ASA? Is there a problem since its a different location with a different IP ? (Domain name is the same, I moved the name on the DNS also)Do a have to re-do the signing process with the CA ?
I am planning to setup Clientless Web VPN on our ASA 5505 for secure access to a internal web resource from outside. When I checked the licensing details on the ASA using #sh ver I could notice thar Web VPN peers allowed is only 2 Does this mean that only two clientless simoultaneous connections are possible ?
Licensed features for this platform: Maximum Physical Interfaces : 8 VLANs : 3, DMZ Restricted
I'm new to working with the ASA 5505 ,VPN and reverse NAT.
The basic setup is as follows. I'm trying to setup a IPsec site to site tunnel with reverse nat on the remote side.
I have as the tunnel up and it passes traffic. I have setup reverse NAT for 172.x.x.1 to translated IP 216.x.2.101 my ASA also has an IP address of 216.x.2.102.
Any connection from 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.1 should appear to be comming from 216.x.2.101
When I ping or telnet from 126.96.36.199 to an open port on 216.x.2.101 I get the banner from 172.x.x.1, seems like it is working.
However in my setup I'm only given a singel IP that of the NAT address 216.x.2.101, so when I remove the IP address assigned to the inside interface 216.x.2.102. all conductivity is lost.
When I set the inside interface to 216.x.2.101 and I setup a static NAT rule for 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.101, I get a message that says all traffic will be redirected and I will be unable to connect to the ASA.
Once thats in place, and I make any connection from 216.x.2.1 to 216.x.2.101on any port I get a connection but then it's reset, I no longer get the telent banner I was expecting.
I have a Cisco ASA 5510 with a 5 block of IP addresses assigned from our ISP. I am having issues with connectivity and routing traffic from the outside interface to the outside interface. I have my outside interface set up with IP address of 24.182.x.146, it allows internet access and also hosts a web server. Any time I have a client using this device for internet access, I am unable to have traffic accepted for my web server. I.E 100.100.x.52 is using this device, it browses to https://24.182.x.146 and it gets an unable to connect. I am able to connect to the web server from any other ISP/Device. [code]
I've been using this setting for clients in small offices and what not, and since all they wanted was to give another nutch of security to their network, we've been intalling cisco routers 2600 series still outhere for their internet connections and we had no issues what so ever, not until we run into cable isp provider, and their dhcp wont be able to assign our interface a dynamic IP, this is the setting aplied to the router interface;
interface fastethernet0/0 ip address dhcp ip nat outside no ip redirects no ip unreachables no ip proxy-arp
Why it wont be seen or assigned an ip by their dhcp, I talked to their isp and they assigned a static ip (private one) and we still have the same issue, if i connect a pix 506e interface with the ip add dhcp assigned to it gets a dynamic ip right away...
I have a problem with my AIR-AP1041N-E-K9, i do not seem to get an ip-address assigned after a reset to factory defaults.I do see the AP with CDP:
Device-ID: ap Advertisement version: 2 Platform: cisco AIR-AP1041N-E-K9 Capabilities: TransBridge IGMP Interface: gi5, Port ID (outgoing port): GigabitEthernet0 Holdtime: 163 Version: Cisco IOS Software, C1040 Software (C1140-K9W7-M), Version 12.4(25d)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
I also noticed that when i connect to the AP via console-cable, i can see the AP boot up in the console session, but then i do not get a login prompt, but it seems like the AP is responding; if i shutdown the interconnecting link between the switch and the AP, i do see log messages appearing in the console-connection.I have tried to debug on the Switch, but i need a password, so i can debug, which i do not have.,
Currently my VPN settings use a shared key without certficate to access the VPN. I would like to now set up a self assigned certifcte from the ASA to get users to import the certficate in order to VPN..
I have 2 servers. 1 is a terminal server windows 2003 sb terminal server.(working fine) and the other is server 2003 small business DC configured with dhcp, dns, SQL, & wins. Last week one of the network programs that is located on the DC started refusing connections.So doing some trouble shooting I noticed that when I ping the server name I get a local address of *.*.*.42 when the address the machine is assigned is *.*.*.5. When I do an Ipconfig /all on the DC it only shows the *.*.*.5 number. I look in DHCP and *.*.*.5 is reserved for the DC Computer. And the *.*.*.42 isn't even in the address leases. I have also looked through the DNS settings and see no alias with the .42 number. And the number does not show up in the reverse lookup zone either.
I've got an issue with one of the businesses I work with. Just yesterday a PC had this problem, and this morning one more followed suit. These PC's were given a 192.168.35.x IP address when configured to take whatever the router gives them, however our Sonicwall TZ190 is configured to hand out a 192.168.20.x IP address over DHCP. There were no secondary IP configurations on the client workstation, no virii, nothing out of the ordinary. When I set a static IP on the client it works fine, but when I put it back to automatic it will once again give itself a 192.168.35.x IP (and subsequently have a gateway of .35.1, somehow). I've checked the router, there's nothing on the LAN side of the network interfaces besides 192.168.20.x.
I have set up DHCP reservations to assigned IP addresses based on MAC address. I have to block my kids access at times, and when I do this they simply change their IP address and they circumvent the blocking.Other than punishing the kids (which hasn't worked - and they need computers and Internet for homework), is there anyway to lock a computer to MAC address to IP address so if they change it they won't get network/internet access?I also tried to set up network filtering and I put in all the PCs and devices I wanted to provide access for, including the router, but when I save changes I can no longer access the internet or the router. I have to do factory reset to get back into router config.Also, I'm on 1.30WW. I know 1.34 exists, which I tried on a previous router which died and was replaced by RMA; but this didn't solve any problems.