I updated the configuration per your response below... It still doesn't work. See my new config files below.
make follow changes on host: officeasa
remove this line below highlighted.
crypto dynamic-map L2LMap 1 match address Crypto_L2L
It is only because group1 is weak, so please change it to group2
crypto dynamic-map L2LMap 1 set pfs group1
route outside 10.10.6.0 255.255.255.0 96.xxx.xxx.117
[code].....
I need to create a vpn tunnel between my Cisco 837 having a dynamic IP and my Firewall (Static IP).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm having some trouble configuring 2 cisco routers (877) with ipsec vpn tunnel.The 2 of them are linked to the internet with dynamic adsl's - their ip-addresses changes all the time.when the configuration is based on ip addresses it's working ok, but when I'm trying to use host name with the DDNS feature, it's not coming up, I get a lot of errors...
I've searched google and various posts regarding that issue.It's seems like it's possible to do a dynamic-ip to dynamic-ip ipsec tunnel, but I found zero manuals and configuration.I've added the template that I'm using to configure the tunnel with ip addresses.
I am looking for an option to do the following. [code] Cisco 6509 with SUP2 with MSFC2 full mem
I would like the cleanest most stable option to allow this to work and still be secure with authentication. I know on the home side, I can just specify the remote ip and add a password. Not sure what can be done on the DC side to allow this to work properly.
I need to create a VPN tunnel between two offices of the same company. I bought two Zyxel P-661HW-D to create the secure VPN tunnel but the problem is that the two offices has a ADSL connection with dynamic IP. Is possible, with this router, to use a DDNS service to create the VPN tunnel or it' s required to have static IP ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedMy SIP trunk provider uses a SonicWall Pro 3060, I need to initiate a IPSec VPN tunnel from an ASA 5505 (ASA1) for SIP traffic to a PBX connected on ASA1's inside.ASA1 should also connect a VPN to ASA2, ASA2 has a fixed IP I have not been able to figure out how to initiate the tunnel from the ASA1 to the Sonicwall due to the dynamic IP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedTrying to connect a 5505 with a dynamic address on 8.3(2) to a static IP'd asa (5510 on 8.2(1) with a DefaultL2LGroup and dynamic maps already created.
Inside networks:
Local (5505) 192.168.100.0 /24
Remote (5510) 10.100.1.0 /24
Configuration on 5505
isakmp policy 20 authentication pre-share isakmp policy 20 encryption 3des isakmp policy 20 hash md5 isakmp policy 20 group 2 isakmp policy 20 lifetime 3600 isakmp enable outside access-list 100 extended permit ip 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 10.100.1.0 255.255.255.0nat (inside,any) 0 access-list 100tunnel-group DefaultL2LGroup ipsec-attributes pre-shared-key *****crypto ipsec transform-set myset esp-3des esp-md5-hmac crypto dynamic-map cisco 1 set transform-set myset crypto map dyn-map 20 ipsec-isakmp dynamic cisco crypto map dyn-map interface outside
I'd like to connect through a VPN the HQ office to a Branch using two ASAs.I have a 5520 in the HQ and 5505 in the Branch Office.My problem is in the Branch office where I have a dynamic IP (ADSL).
I couldn't find a example this kind of configuration.
There are three different sites, two are composed of Multilayer switches cisco 3560 and 3570 as core switches (a 3560 in one site and a 3570 in another site), the last site doesn't have any routers just a 2950 switch. Each site has two asa 5505 as firewalls. Two Internet connexions are connected to every site, one on every firewall. One Internet line is used to connect the different sites together using VPN crypted with IPsec and the other line is just for Internet access. The line that is used to interconnect sites contains voice and data traffic.At the moment all the routes are static routes, the network isn't too big for now and counts not more than 20 subnets.But it is evolving, and I want to use dynamic routing, EIGRP to be more accurate. I've looked into it and I'm not sure how to make it work. The VPNs active on the ASAs don't support dynamic routing, so I thought about GRE tunnels but the ASAs don't seem to allow it either.
View 11 Replies View RelatedHow to get DynDNS or some other public dynamic DNS services on the Internet working on ASA 5505?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm having some issues configuring NAT statements on my ASA5505 which has recently been upgraded to 8.41.
I have a single dynamic IP on the outside interface of the ASA and would like all internal hosts to NAT/PAT to it. In addition, I would like to have several ports 'forwarded' to internal hosts, one of which is TCP/4343. With the current configuration all hosts are NATing to the external interface properly but the service running on TCP/4343 is not accessible from the outside. See command output below:
"sh run object" output:
object network DrJones host 10.81.220.90object network LAN-10.81.220.0 subnet 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0
"sh run nat" output:
object network DrJones nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 4343 4343object network LAN-10.81.220.0 nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
"sh run access-list" output:
access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 anyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-replyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 4343
I wanted to move to the cisco arena, and having a bugger of a time figuring out simple nat/pat rules combined with access lists. I've been reading Richard Deal's Cisco ASA configuration book, googling the heck out of this simple problem and can't see what I'm missing.
I have an ASA 5505 unlimited security plus license running 8.2(3) and a simple network, 192.168.0.x internal, 192.168.3.x dmz (not even touching that yet!) and outside I have a /29 subnet of addresses, 25 is the gateway, and 26-30 are my addresses.
I have simple dynamic nat set up on the .26 address to nat to 192.168.0.x. All I'm trying to do is port forward a simple tcp port I set for my linux server (192.168.0.2) on the inside, for arguement's sake, it's 2222 (it's not really). My outside vlan 50 is X.X.X.226 255.255.255.248 , can I make a static nat (inside,outside) x.x.x.226 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 ?
I tried using (inside,outside) x.x.x.230 192.168.0.2 netmask 255.255.255.255 and that didn't work either. Is it not possible to use two external addresses to hit the entire /24 range AND a single server?
My access rule for this nat is permit tcp any 192.168.0.2 eq 2222 (where I'm using 2222 for my ssh port). then I apply that access list to the access group interface "outside".
I thought the outside interface would do a proxy arp (since I do not have the sysopt noproxyarp command) for my 227,228,229, and 230 addresses where .226 is my internal nat for all my internal machines i.e. 192.168.0.1 -> x.x.x.226 . I had this working like a charm before with my fortinet, so I know I have systems listening.
I'm working on setting up a template configuration for the Cisco ASA 5505 device that we'll use to configure more routers for various client needs. One of the requirements requested of me is the following: Internal hosts assigned a DHCP address are blocked from the internet Internal hosts with a static IP are permitted access to internet All internal hosts can communicate regardless of state
Now, I'm fairly new to this and I'm certain my terminology isn't correct so googling the problem has been fruitless. I have followed basic configuration guides and have configured the device to hand out DHCP addresses to hosts plugged in ports 1-7. If I'm plugged in and specify my address manually in the OS I am blocked from any access so I can only assume there is an access policy or some rule preventing me from authenticating against the router despite having set up VLAN1 to be the entire class C subnet. What sort of steps would I need to do to configure this? New access lists. For the record, the dhcp addresses are in the range of 10.100.31.64-10.100.31.95. VPN users are assigned an address from 10.100.31.220-10.100.31.240 and there seems to be no issues with that configuraiton. I don't wish to constrain what addresses a user can use should they specify a static IP (10.100.31.5 should be just as valid as 10.100.31.100).
i got a person who connect with vpn on a adsl connection to the corporate network.this person is using cisco ip phone on his remote location and i did configure the ASA 5505 to priorize voice over data.i still get voice skips when the remote pc is uploading data to the corporate network...what i've done is :
1.with asdm i did create 2 priority queues one for inside (queue limit 2048 trans ring limit 512) and outside (queue limit 2048 trans limit 256)
2. with the service policy wizard i did create a global service policy (all interface) and a traffic class for dscp 46 ef and on qos tab i did check the "enable priority for this flow"...
3. When using the phone, i clearly see that packets are growing on the LLQ queue (show priority-queue statistics)
4. i still get voice skips when uploading data to the corporate network... upload bandwidth is about 800k for upload the pc and the phone is on the same subnet
I finally got the VPN tunnel between 2 asa 5505's up and running, but I have some error codes on the initiator side that I can not figure out. [code]I have looked at the Crypto transforms on both sides, and they match just fine as far has the DH ID code, Group Number and the encryption. The remote side however, does not have any of there errors.
Is this something that I have skipped over, or missed that I should be looking for? The IP address that is listed above is not in my static addresses, not sure where theose are coming from. I believe that they are outside public IP's.
We're setting up a site to site VPN with a customer. Our side is a Cisco sa520 and there side is a Checkpoint. The tunnel is up, we've verified phase 1 and 2 are good. The issue is passing traffic across the tunnel, our LAN ip address are private addresses 10.10.1.0/24 but the customer states that we need to have a public IP address for our LAN in order to access there server on there LAN. So looking through all the forums, I see that you can NAT before crossing the VPN tunnel, but our issue is that our site only has 6 IP addresses assigned to it and those are the Comcast router, the WAN side of the SA520 firewall.
So we were wondering was there a way that we can either use the WAN interface on the SA520 or use another available of the 6 that were assigned to NAT and pass traffic across the tunnel. Sounds confusing? sorry but it is, rarely do I have a customer say I have to have a public IP for my side of the LAN. Now I also say this is a SA520 firewall, but if it's not possible to do with that is there a way were could with an ASA5505?
I have an interesting SVPN challenge that I'm asking the subject experts here to assist me in solving.A customer in Domain A wants to transmit data to Domain B. The customers have agreed to establishing a secure vpn connection from Domain A to Domain B to transmit real time data. The challenge comes from sending unencrypted data from nodeA to nodeB & nodeC withing an encrypted VPN tunned to node d.The challenge is sending non-encrypted data from NodeA to NodeB where an encrypted VPN session is active. Every time I attempt to configure the interface (AppC) the VPN session is terminated, and the interface can no longer "see" nodeD via IP mapping. An engineer recommended adding a second NIC card to NodeB thereby permitting control of the AppC even when the VPN is up and running.Can I send live non-encrypted data to NodeB data buffer, while AppC sends data to NodeD in a VPN tunnel ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedHaving a strange issue with RDP to a XP machine through a L2L tunnel.Tunnel is between an ASA5505 and ASA5510. Site A 5510, Site B 5505 I have a handful of Win7 and XP Dev machines running on ESXi 4.1 within Site A.Site B to Site A I can RDP to all Server 2008 and W7 machines(physical and virtual).I can also RDP to a physical XP machine.I can ping the XP VMs by name and IP successfully.I cannot RDP to the 5 XP VMs running on the ESXi 4.1 host Site A to Site B I can RDP from the XP VMs on the ESXi 4.1 host to any machine within Site B.Within Site A I can RDP to these XP VMs AnyConnect I can AnyConnect into Site A and RDP to the XP VMs I have tried to Telnet on 3389 to the XP VMs with no success.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have set up two ASA 5505's (lets call them ASA1 and ASA2) with site to site VPN configuration and i've encountered two problems with my setup.ASA1 has IP 192.168.1.254 on the inside interface and is connects ASA2. It's also an Easy VPN Server for external users to connect through Easy VPN Client.ASA2 has IP 192.168.11.1 on the inside interface and connects to ASA1 Problem #1 None of the ASA's can ping eachothers inside LAN IP address. Computers behind the ASA's are unable to ping the remote ASA's inside IP address. My guess is that this has to do with either NAT or built in security.Problem #2. The Easy VPN clients which connects to ASA1 are unable to access the LAN behind ASA2.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI´m getting a dynamic public IP from my provider and what I´m trying to do is to establish a remote vpn tunnnel using IPSec which I achieve but every time the sessions resets or the ASA 5505 resets I get a new public IP and I need to put the new IP on the remote client so I can establish the vpn... How can I establish an ipsec vpn using DNS? For this scenario the remote vpn client is a vpn phone but it could be for any vpn client.
Private IP Public IP Private IP
PBX ---- (LAN) ---- ASA 5505 ---( Internet ) --- Remote Site ( Router ) --- (LAN) -- VPN Phone
I have a site to site IPSec tunnel setup and operational but periodically the remote site goes down, because of a somewhat reliable internet connection. The only way to get the tunnel to re-establish is to go to the remote site and simply issue a ping from a workstation on the remote network. We were having this same issue with a Cisco PIX 506E but decided to upgrade the hardware and see if that resolve the issue. It ran for well over a year and our assumtions was that the issue was resolved. I was looking in the direction of the security-association lifetime but if we power cycle the unit, I would expect that it would kill the SA but even after power cycling, the VPN does not come up automatically.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've a asa 5510 on the main site and different ASA 5505 on secundary sites for VPN tunneling between the sites. The problem is that the tunnels are acomplished but no traffic is going over them. What am i doing wrong? For the moment there is a ASA 5505 on the main site managing the tunnels but I want the 5510 to take over the job.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI configured an IPSec VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505 firewalls. I would like to make sure that the IPSec tunnel (hence the security association) is permanent and do not drop due to idle condition.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a ASA 5505 VPN Concentrator using ADSM 5.2 connecting to a BEFSX41 router. Its a pretty simple set up that has been working for years. However, over the past several weeks the VPN tunnel is consistently dropping every day or two, however both side are able to ping the internet at all times. My current work around is to manually log into the BEFSX41 router and re-connect the VPN tunnel, which simply connects immediately. The tunnel will stay up for about a day or two until it reliably drops the tunnel connection. Every time the tunnel drops I get an alert with an error message: [code] After doing searches about what this error means, all I can find is that its supposed to mean there is a problem with the encryption keys. I have checked the keys many times over and everything is the same. I find it odd that nothing has changed in almost 2 years.
I have 10 other VPN connections that are always up at never have any problems. I have the same make/model router connected to other offices with no problems. I have swapped the router twice, and each time I get the same symptoms.
Two 5505 ASA's for a customer main site and a local office. I have the tunnel up. But I'm unable to pass traffic across it.
Main Site:
ASA Version 7.2(4)
!
hostname Town
enable password iNbSyJZ1ffmb9kn1 encrypted
passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted
names
[code]....
I have two cisco ASA 5505 devices and two cisco switches plugged to ASAs in each office. I need to create a VPN tunnel between two offices.
-Network behind the ASA1 in office1 is 192.168.1.0/24 with DHCP server – 192.168.1.10
-Networks behind the ASA2 in office2 are 192.168.5.0/25; 192.168.5.128/26 and 192.168.5.192/26
All computers in office2 need to get IPs from DHCP server 192.168.1.10. I have switch in office2 with 3 VLANS and I can assign computers from different subnets to different VLANs.How can I archive this goal? Should I assign 3 IPs for ASA2 inside interface (192.168.5.1, ...5.129, ...5.193) as a default gateways for each subnet? Should I put dhcp helper address 192.168.1.10 on the switch for each VLAN?
I have a Site to Site IPSEC VPN Tunnel created with ASDM wizard.
Cisco ASA-5505
Peer A: x.x.x.x
Lan A: 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0
Fortinet FortiGate-50b
Peer B: y.y.y.y
Lan B: 192.168.23.0 255.255.255.0
I start traffic from LAN B with a ping (or telnet it doesn't matter) that receive no reply but tunnel goes up fine.
"show isakmp sa" seems ok (says "State : MM_ACTIVE")
"show ipsec sa" seems ok but all #pkts are zero
try ftp, telnet from LAN B to LAN A systems but no one work. "show ipsec sa" all #pkts are zero As soon as I generate traffic from LAN A to LAN B these works (with tunnel already up) also traffic from LAN B to LAN A works.Obviously if I end VPN and start tunnel making traffic from LAN A all work fine bidirectionally, LAN A reach LAN B and LAN B reach LAN A.No msg logged in either two appliance.
Seems a very strange problem because seems not related to Phase1 or Phase2 already established.Traffic (routing ?) start works only after at least one packet goes from LAN A to LAN B.No msg logged in either two appliance.Problems begun in ASA version 8.0(4) ASDM version 6.1(3) and remain/continue after upgrade to ASA Version 8.4(1) ASDM version 6.4(1).
I upgraded an ASA 5505 from 8.3(2) to 8.4(4) this evening. The 5505 is a backup and used to perform testing prior to production changes. After the upgrade was complete, a VPN tunnel began to fail. I did a limited search online to see if this was a known issue or something new. I also reviewed the release notes but did not see anything that matched the issue I received.
My concern is that this tunnel configuration is scheduled to be deployed to the production firewalls next week after their upgrade. But if it failed on the upgraded test unit, it may fail on the production units.
I downgraded the backup unit to 8.3(1) and verified that the tunnel indeed worked at that level.
Having a problem getting an ipsec tunnel to work between 2 asa 5505. This in one of the two configs.
Result of the command: "show run"
: Saved:ASA Version 8.3(2) !hostname 20Pullmandomain-name skeincenable password IKxxneNMTRgDw/Xd encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 172.16.1.70 255.255.255.0 !interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip [Code]...
I have an ASA5505 running which is on a static IP. I have just got an SRP527W for a remote worker and want to create a site-to-site VPN into the ASA. I have a number of other router of non-cisco brand which just all dial-in and connect no problem.
On other routers I have been abloe to specify the DDNS hostname in the VPN setup so that the ASA can identify it. I'm not sure how I setup the SRP527 to connect to the ASA.
I have 2 ipsec tunnel active on ASA5505 (secplus license).I would like to activate sslvpn also. Is it possible or there are issues in keeping active both services?
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe have a VPN setup and here's the configuration on the Cisco ASA 5505: [code] The problem is that i'm able to ping the otherside of the tunnel i.e. 192.168.23.14 from the dmz IP 172.16.1.2 but i'm unable to ping from the hosts behind the ASA.Also the other side is able to ping 172.16.1.2 IP but no IP's behind the ASA.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am trying to monitor my ASA 5505. This asa is connect via a ip-sec tunnel to our network. I have no problems with snmp monitoring devices behind the ASA, but when trying to monitor the asa itself I do not get a SNMP response.
View 2 Replies View Related
