2901 router that I just installed. I replaced a 1760 router with a new 2901 router and all seems to be working but for some reason the txload on interface g0/0 and interface multilink1 show 255/255 even though there is no traffic going over to this router. I have dual routers at this location and at the moment I have all traffic going over to my other router a 2821.
reliability 255/255, txload 255/255, rxload 1/255
I try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks. [code]
View 7 Replies View RelatedI try to make a gre tunnel with 2 cisco routers 2901, ping responds between tunnel ip's ends, but I don't have pings from the pc's inside the networks.
[code]....
cisco 2651XM router with WIC1 adsl card and NM-16ESW switch
IOS: c2600-ipbasek9-mz.124-23.bin
I use the following config to export traffic from the adsl card to a fasterthernet port so I can look at the adsl traffic in wireshark on a pc:router(config)#ip traffic-export profile my_rite router(conf-rite)#int FastEthernet 0/0 router(conf-rite)#bidirectional router(conf-rite)#mac-address abcd.efgh.ijkl (mac address of PC) router(conf-rite)#exit router(config)#int dialer0 router(config-if)#ip traffic-export apply my_rite this config works and I can see stuff going on in wireshark but it's only one way. This config only shows traffic going out from my adsl card, but no incoming. There is defintely traffic going both ways because everything about my adsl connection is working perfectly. I've tried using a different fastethernet port, even tried exporting to a different pc but all I see is outgoing ie: source is my public ip address but never as destination . I have bidirectional in the config but it still only shows outgoing. I even tried a different IOS (c2600-adventerprisek9-mz.124-15.T8.bin) but still it doesn't show incoming traffic. Could it be my ISP in some way hiding incoming traffic from view?
I am using a Thrid party NetFlow tool, Enabled NetFlow on the Cisco 6500 as per recommendations and getting only half amout of traffic passing thorugh the interfaces. I have verified with 3 different NetFlow based tools, everything showing the same value. Is there any bug in my Cisco 6500.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 1905 series cisco router, when I run "sh int" command it gives me following details -
MTU 1500 bytes, BW 1544 Kbit/sec, DLY 20000 usec,
reliability 254/255, txload 7/255, rxload 151/255
Encapsulation PPP, LCP Open
Stopped: CDPCP
Open: IPCP, loopback not set
[code]....
let me know the significance of txload and rxload.This router is used for MPLS connectivity.Link is working OK..but I'm not able to understand exactly what is the above txload and rxload signify.There is also one peculiar phenomena occuring, when my reliability goes down then rxload also goes down or might be vise versa.
I tried to put QoS in a WS-C3560CG-8TC-S version 12.2(55)EX2.It shows 0 traffic in class-map. Here is the config My question is why I can not see the traffic via class-map?it should in the default Q if incorrect mark.I erased the config and config with the autoQoS, shows the same result.
class-map match-any VoIP description Voice IP Phone RTPmatch access-group 157
class-map match-any WEB description Internal Web, SSL Web, DNS query, Pinnaclematch access-group 153
!
policy-map QOSMARK
class VoIP set dscp ef
class WEB set dscp cs3
class class-default set dscp default
[code].....
I am monitoring my WRVS4400N with SNMP and create graphs by MRTG. Problem is that data about traffic are strange, very low. I have 50 MB line but max traffic shown on graphs is about 8000 bits per second. Also the "shape" of graph does not correspond with real traffic.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a cable modem internet connection and my cable modem is connected to an ASA 5505. The inside interface of the ASA has an IP address of 192.168.2.2 and is connected to a Linksys router's internet port which has an IP address of 192.168.2.1. The Linksys router then has a local area network of 192.168.1.0 and all my clients are on that network. Everything is working fine except in my ASA logs all the traffic shows up as the router's external address which is 192.168.2.1. I would like to see the 192.168.1.x address of the clients in the ASA firewall. I've tried making some changes to the Linksys router but that hasn't resolved it. Is there any changes I can make on the ASA to get this to work?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI Have asa 5520 with the code 8.0, the mem shows 94% and the CPU shows 85%
View 5 Replies View RelatedWhat ISO do I need to purchase to get Cisco IOS Firewall on a Cisco 2901 - is it just IP Base or do I need one of the Security IOSs?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 1-Port 3rd Gen Multiflex Trunk Voice/WAN Int. Card - T1/E1 in a 2901 that I want to configure for data only (T1 connection to the Internet)I don't see any options in the IOS for using this thing as a serial interface (data), only options for configuring PRI/ISDN.
View 5 Replies View RelatedThe license has been installed onto the router. Here is the relevant out from the show license all:
License Store: Primary License StorageStoreIndex: 0 Feature: ipbasek9 Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, In Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: MediumStoreIndex: 1 Feature: WAAS_Express Version: 1.0 License Type: Permanent License State: Active, Not in Use License Count: Non-Counted License Priority: Medium
WAAS license as it says that this is not in use, WAAS under the interface is not possible.
I am trying to come up with a config for implementing QoS over a 512 kbps WAN link that will traverse voice and data traffic for now. I am using a Cisco 2901 router with 15.1(3)T IOS on it. my config is below
class-map match-any DATA-PRIORITY match protocol citrix match protocol sshclass-map match-any VOICE-CONTROL match protocol skinny match protocol mgcp match protocol h323class-map match-any VOICE match protocol rtp audio class-map match-any ANY match any [ code]...
THE ISSUE IS : when i add in the service-policy output WAN- QOS- POLICY command , i get the error " insufficient bandwidth 256kbps for bandwidth guarantee (180)". if i take out the " bandwidth 512 " command out then i get no issues adding the above command on interface g0/1
I have a Cisco ASA and a 2901 Cisco Router connected via site-to-site VPN. The ASA can ping over the VPN to computers behind the router, but the router can not always ping to computers in the ASA network. When i ping from a computer in the IOS router's 10.100.36.0 network the requests times out most the time; although every few minutes, i will get about 10 pings back, then stops working again.
I uploaded their two configurations.
The ASAs public IP is 20.20.20.5 and local (inside) network of 10.101.36.0/24
The IOS routers public IP is 20.20.20.10
There are many internal networks, but 10.100.36.0/24 is the one with issues.
How do I disable fragmentation on a 2901 router? I want it to simply drop packets oversized packets.In my lab, I am trying to test various MTU issues. I'm trying to use a 2901 router to simulate the WAN equipment that my WAN provider would deploy in production. In production i'm expecting the WAN to only support an MTU of 1320 with no fragmentation at all.
View 2 Replies View RelatedPhysical devices are a Cisco 2901 (CISCO2901/K9) with GE0/0 configured as 192.168.1.1
Connected through a D-Link DGS-1210-24 configured as 192.168.1.202
Running on a domain with an HP domain server as 192.168.1.2
The 2901 was an EHWIC (VA-DSL-A oPoTS) on EHWIC 0/0/0
GE 0/0 on the 2901 is physically connected to the DGS-1210 which is physically connected to the server.
VDSL 0/0/0 is physically connected to the DSL jack.
So far the configuration reports all is connected, and I can ping the gateway of our ISP (using CLI or Cisco CP); however the server reports no internet connection and no workstations can access the 'net.
Once connected; I'd also like to allow ports through for use on the network (25, 80, 110, 443, 987, 1723) - but not sure on how to do that just yet!
Our IP is 202.27.19x.19x
Our Gateway is 202.27.217.5
[Code] ......
I have recently bought cisco 2901 in order to replace it with our 1811W that we have at the moment.When I try to set a failover / backup with rtr; it seems like the function is not valid.Once I select rtr and set the object #, the reachability command is not available.Does that mean this function is not a part from the license package I have?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have inherited a setup for a custom application and would like to know if this is the only way this could be set up. How would you do it?The application uses dedicated T1 links to our vendors. There is a Cisco 2901 router in the middle providing the connections. Traffic to specific vendor's IP's are routed to their prospective connections. I have attached a network diagram and a config for the 2901. The way my predecessor(s) set this up, each different vendor uses a different private IP address for the internal links. This seems odd to me. Shouldn't there be a way to have only one subnet on the inside and have the links NAT depending on which route it takes? The servers have persistent routes built in them to send vendor traffic to the associated IP on the router. E.g., traffic to Vendor 1 is routed to 192.168.50.1, the 2901's IP address for the Vendor 1 network. That traffic is then NAT'd to an IP address associated with Vendor 1's link and the 2901 then routes the traffic to the Vendor's end of the link.
I would think that I should be able to revamp this so that internally we're only using one subnet and the traffic could NAT at the link associated with the Vendor. I recently had to add the 3rd vendor connection, and wound up having to duplicate what was done for the other two in order to get it working quickly. I didn't have the time to wrap my head around the best way to revamp the whole thing.
I recently obtained a 2901 router running 15.2(2)T to replace my old 877 which was running 15.1(4)M1. The 2901 is humming along quite nicely but I have had difficulty configuring one feature which was working fine on the 877. The router needs to be a PPTP client to a hosted VPN service. On the 877, I had it configured like this: [code] I then had a dialer interface to actually set up the connection, and some PBR to control what went over the VPN. All well and good, and it worked fine. But on the 2901, when I try to configure the same thing, there is no such command as "protocol pptp" -- the only option is protocol l2tp.Was PPTP support deprecated somwhere between 15.1 and 15.2, or does the 2901 itself not support it for some reason? Obviously I understand that l2tp is superior to pptp, but at the moment this is my only option.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have one router 1841 in which i configured PBR for internet traffic from LAN. I hv two ISPs few server are configured for ISP1 and few for ISP2.I planned to shift my existing setup at 2901 G2 router. when I am configuring the same config on this router so traffic is passing through only from one ISP not from other, if I troubleshoot so I see that the interface which is connected with ISP2 is not getting any input/output packet.
Config is here:
==========
interface FastEthernet0/0
description ****** ISP2 ******
ip address 203.xx.xx.110 255.255.255.248
[Code].......
Why I cant correctly use ip sla command. I only have on my 2901 such commands: ip sla ?
key-chain Use MD5 Authentication for IP SLAs Control Messages
responder Enable IP SLAs Responder
server IPPM server configuration
There is my "sh ver"
ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M15, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
And...What should i do. if i want to create a failover with to WANs
Where's the ideal place to put the KS? My current setup is 1 KS, 19 GM. The KS sits BEHIND a GM, so all other GMs have to come through one GM to get to KS.Now, I have purchased two dedicated KS routers. I configured one today, and placed it right on my WAN. My WAN is a L2 Ethernet domain, so i just provisioned a switch port in the WAN vlan, and away we go. I copied RSA keys over from the current KS, configured redundancy and the two hooked up, saw each other and it seems to be good to go. For the ACL, I put in an exclustion for my two KS to talk to each other:
deny ip host 192.168.250.40 host 192.168.250.41 (Old IP, New IP)
deny ip host 192.168.250.41 host 192.168.250.40.
I used a test router and pointed it to the new KS, it registered without a hitch... HOWEVER about two hours later (my 7200 second timeout) I lost ALL my branches. My 18 other GM were still pointed to the OLD IP only, they didnt have the second IP configured yet. In a hurry, I quickly disabled the redundancy configuration on the old KS and had to go to each GM and do a 'clear crypto gdoi' on each one to get them to re-register. There were no log messages about not being able to rekey, no log messages about dropped peerings, nothing. Once I did that, everything returned to normal.
The Question I have...
Would having configured the redundant KS caused this problem? Would having one KS behind a GM and the other Coop KS in the WAN make a difference?
Relevant config from existing KS, 2801:
crypto gdoi group GETVPN_GROUP
identity number 1234
server local
rekey retransmit 60 number 2
rekey authentication mypubkey rsa GETVPN_KEYS
[Code]...
I have a 2901 ISR G2 router, with IOS 15.0.1M3 , this router is not working with static NATing, I have tried to configure this router with one internet link and make few static translations with it. But this configuration is perfectly working with 1841 ISR router.
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe've have a client who had a ordered 2 units of 2901 router to have site to site connectivity. User has bought a leased line of 256kbps from service provider in between two sites, but the issue is the service provider has layed a rj11 cable and there is no rj11 interface on 2901 router it only has two rj45.
View 5 Replies View RelatedNeed to know if I have 2 type of license on my 2901 router: ipbase and uc, will the 2 type of fuctions of this license work at the same time. Another words will i have route and nat functions work with voip having to type of license on my 2901?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI been working with PPTP server on cisco IOS since a log time ago. Up to release 15.0 seems is just stopped working. I mean external users can log in the pptp but after logged in there no traffic flow. A simple downgrade to 12.4 solves the problem.
But now i have all my infrastructure with ISR2 2901 and all IOS are 15.
I'm trying to run the ISM-VPN-29 in a 2901 router. Cisco says that the SECK9 and HSECK9 licenses are needed to operate this ISM. However, they also say that the HSECK9 license is not available on the 2901. I'm running the SECK9 license but it's still not working.
This link, table 5 states that the HSECK9 feature license is for 2921 and 2951 only:[URL]This link states that it is a requirement to run the card, and also that the card works on the 2901:[URL]
I am running 15.3(1)T IOS.
how to install VIC3-2E/M in cisco router 2901 & what precaution should have to be taken.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI wonder if I can build a NTP Stratum 0 device using a GPS and a Cisco router.Preferred would be a CISCO819 as it has a build in GPS, alternative a CISCO2901 + EHWIC-3G-HSPA+7.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have purchased a 2901 router with permenant licenses for ipbase, security and uc. The router came shipped with c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M3.bin but there are newer releases available. I understand that our licenses will cover us to upgrade to the latest version, c2900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M.bin, but when I attempt to download I am denied.
How do I go about downloading and upgrading?
I have a 2901 router and I would like to enable the following feature router mobile. [code] I used c2800nm-advipservicesk9-mz.151-3.T1.bin on a 2811 and this worked without any problem.Is there a possibility that there is some kind of license associated with this feature on a 2901?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm sure this is simple to resolve. I just bought a new Cisco 2901 ISR Router. How do I configure the Cisco 2901 ISR Router for Zone Firewall? The "zone" command is not recognized and does not show up in the "?" list in config or user modes -
View 4 Replies View Related