Cisco WAN :: 3750G / 2960 - LAN-to-LAN Link (Layer 2)

Apr 15, 2013

We have 2 sites that are actually connected through a 10 Mbps cooper link.
 
In site A we have a 3750G- SW
in site B we have a 2960Poe SW
This link has in each end a ISP's router (allied Tele sis)

This link is working fine. Now we contracted with the ISP a new link, 30 Mbps fiber, and we need to replace de "old" one...
in this case the IPS only gave us a transceiver so we have UTP instead fiber, no routers. the 10Mbps and 30Mbps links in were hired to be layer 2 only.
 
Is possible to create a config in site B SW to make it work? I was searching and see this IOS command: spanning-tree link-type point-to-point. could this do the rick? Or is absolutely necessary to use a router?

P.S: Actual config of the port in use is: 
Site A: 
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/5
description description NEW LINK Fiber - UPLINK TO SW4
 
Site B:
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
description NEW - Fiber - UPLINK TO SW1
[code]...

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Access Layer Mac Flapping

Mar 28, 2013

Lately I have been noticing mac flap messages on some of our access layer 3750G switches. Just a little background on how this is setup.
 
These 3750G switches are stacked and uplinked to a distribution layer 3750E stack (2 switches) via cross stacked etherchannel. (Usually 4 links) The access layer switches are stricly layer 2 where the distribution layer 3750E is routing the VLANs at the access layer to to the core 6500 switches.
 
I have just about ruled out physical loops on these stacks for the reason that the Macs are flapping. I am seeing this on two different stacks now each having 3 switches in the stack at the access layer. The cross stack etherchannel is spanned across the first two switches at the access layer and connected to both switches at the distribution layer. I have checked the etherchannel status and all ports appear to be part of the etherchannel and they appear fine.
 
The mac addressses that are flapping are just plain old desktop machines that plug directly into the access layer. I usually see this when the mac is learned on a port such as when a machine is plugged into the network or reboots.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2960 Dont Have Layer To Switch Between ASA Routers

May 23, 2011

I have 1 internet router 2960 and 2 No's ASA firewalls,The issue is Suppose if ASA-1 fails the failover will happen on ASA-2 but The issue is i dont have a layer 2 Switch in between the ASA's and Internet router, i have to manually shift the cable from ASA-1 to ASA-2,what sort of configuration i can do on 2960 router interfaces to support failover from ASA-1 to ASA-2, I have enough interface on 2960 router to occupy ASA-2. These all 3 devices should be in 1 Subnet.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Identify Layer 2 Or 3 Switch?

Feb 9, 2012

I can understand it 's one of those very basic questions , but how do I identify a Switch is Layer 2 or Layer 3 ?Looking through # show version command and checking the IOS version to be IP BASE or LAN BASE . Is it the right way ?Cisco 2960 is a Layer 2 or a Layer 3 Switch ? I noticed that access-lists could be configured which means that it 's a Layer 3 Switch , right?
 
[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Default Password For 2960-C Layer 3 Switch

Dec 23, 2012

I just received a Catalyst 2960-C (WS-C2960C-8TC-L R) switch and I am unable to sign into its web GUI in order to configure it. I've tried both the Cisco Network Assistant and Internet Explorer and I am unable to log in either way. The documentation provided by Cisco states that the default password is simply cisco and that a username is unnecessary. Needless to say, it doesn't work. I've also Googled for other default passwords (such as cisco-cisco as the username-password), none of which worked either. I've also tried resetting the switch back to its factory default a few times.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 / 2960 - How Layer 2 Switch Works Without Default Gateway

Aug 14, 2012

4500 switch is connected to 2960 switch.
 
4500  config
Vlan 10
name Data
 
It has ip helper configured that points to DHCP.From 4500  switch port  - port  x connects to 2960 port.Port x is configured as trunk between 4500 and 2960.

2960 config
vlan 10  
name data 

All user ports are configured under vlan 10 and as access ports.Port x is trunk port connected frpm 2960  to 4500 switch allowing vlan 1 and 10 only.This switch has no default gateway configured.
 
We connected user PC on 2960 switchports and they were able to get the IP from DHCP server and were able to access the network? My question is how users on 2960 switch are able to access the network without ip default-gateway configured  on 2960 switch?

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure 3750 Stack As Core / 2960 As Access Layer Switches

Sep 29, 2012

I configure 3750 stack switch as core and 2960 stack switches as access layer switches.I connected my laptop to one of my core stack in VLAN 10 and I am pinging to one of my server in VLAN 1. What will be the minimum latency at the time of inter VALN routing

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Access Layer Switching With 2960 / 3560x / 3750x And 4506

Jan 17, 2013

My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
 
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
 
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):

2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4 
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board.  For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 3750G / WS-3750G-48PS Memory

Jan 15, 2012

Has any come across show ver memory details on 3750G-48PS as below, One of our Catalyst 3750G running software 12.2(44)SE2 shows unexpected DRAM as below:

cisco WS-C3750G-48PS (PowerPC405) processor (revision F0) with 0K/12280K bytes of memory. This would equate to around 11MB memory which does not seem right... Is it a known IOS bug?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sg300 And SLM2024 VLAN As Layer 2 And Layer 3 Switches Connection

Mar 18, 2012

I want to setup VLAN with the switches SG300 and SLM2024. What is the suggestion to connect these 2 switches. We have the Juniper net screen.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Stacking Catalyst 3750 Layer 2 And Layer 3

Nov 15, 2011

I have a question if I Stack a Catalyst 3750 L3 with a Catalyst just L2, will we able to use all L3 capabilities?

Switches are  

WS-C3750G-24TS-E1U
WS-C3750V2-24PS-S

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750G Setup - Multicast Traffic Across Link

Jan 12, 2012

I am having trouble getting some multicast traffic across a link.  I have a 3750G setup, with IP routing and IP multicast routing, between two laptops.  This will eventually sit between two networks that cannot be physically connected to each other for security reasons.  I have static joins on the ports but cannot see the multicast traffic on the receiver.  I am attaching the latest config.  The sender(10.10.4.2) sits on gi1/0/24 and the receiver(10.10.3.2) sits on gi1/0/1.  I am using VLC to test this and it will connect if I point the receiver to the address of the sender, but will not receive any multicast.  The multicast traffic is not making it to the 10.10.3 side, I used wire shark to verify that it was not making it across.

View 3 Replies View Related

Changing The Link - Layer Point Of Attachment To The Internet

Sep 6, 2011

I am a newbie regarding mobile IP.the meaning of the phrase "changing the link-layer point of attachment to the Internet, yet without changing its IP address".

View 1 Replies View Related

Call A Router As Data Link Layer Device

Feb 15, 2013

What is the reason to call a router as data link layer device

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Layer 2 Link Configuration VLAN 2626

Apr 29, 2013

I've turned up a new layer 2 WAN link between two data centres and i'm having some trouble trying to logically figure out how things should be configured.As you can see from the diagram i've created, I have the link connected on port 13 on one switch and port 14 on the other. Both ports have an IP address assigned to them and they can both ping each other..
 
The problem comes when I need to add routes in order to get traffic flowing over the link.I added an IP address to switch 2 on the link interface (port 14) as: 192.168.4.10
 
I then added an IP address to switch 1 on the link interface (port 13) as:

192.168.1.10
192.168.2.10
 
When I tried to add 192.168.3.10, it said "192.168.3.0 overlaps with VLAN2626". This would be correct as Vlan 2626 has an IP address of 192.168.3.15.

However, if I remove the IP address from vlan 2626 and add 192.168.3.10 to vlan 2 (the link port VLAN), I would surely lose remote access to the switch. (I'm telnetting into the switch from a machine on vlan 2626).
 
I started to tinker with this by manually adding a route to a server in each location and seeing if I could get traffic to flow:

On server 1: route add 192.168.4.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.10 METRIC 1
On server 2: route add 192.168.1.0 MASK 255.255.255.0 192.168.4.10 METRIC 1

If I try to tracert 192.168.1.20 from server 2, the first hop is the default gateway instead of 192.168.4.10.
 
The ultimate goal is to add the static routes to the Layer 3 router/firewall, but before I do that, I need to be sure of what to add to that router (It's a manged firewall from the data centre, so I don't have access to it and I need to raise firewall change requests to get the work done, so want to ensure it's right first time.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 / Layer 3 Port-channel Up But Can't Ping Across Link

May 17, 2012

I configured the interfaces individually at L3 and could ping across each link Example:

4500 Switch 2:            6500 Switch 1
int t5/1                    -      int g3/17                    1 Gig fiber link
tore down config
tried second set of interface
int t6/1                    -      int g8/17                    1 Gig fiber link
 Ping successful

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching / Routing :: 3560 - Accessing Management Interface Using Layer 3 Link

Apr 9, 2012

I am setting up a link between buildings that uses wireless links. I'm using Layer 3 routed ports on 2 3560 switches to handle the routing between sites. Normally I would just put these in a /30 and then the switches handle the rest. However, the wireless access points have a web interface for managing them that I want to be able to access, but it's only available on the single NIC that also carries traffic. What would be the best way of making this work? Should I make the link a /29 and give the access points an IP in the same range? If this is the case what do I use for the default gateway for the access points?
 
I have included a diagram to try to explain the issue clearer. The IP addresses in black are what I would do if this were a standard cable (and indeed this will work, but I wont be able to access the admin interface of the wireless AP) and the red ip addresses are the alternative if I use a /29 (but as I said, I'm not sure what to use for the default gateways).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Application Layer Service The Same As Application Layer Software?

Apr 3, 2012

I am taking an introduction class to CCNA and we are focusing on the Application Layer,and I'm having some difficulty in understanding what is an Application Layer Service. Is the Application Layer Service the same as Application Layer Software?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Link Aggregation With Different Technologies?

Jan 8, 2012

I have two 2960 switches connected with two links. One of them is transparent modem connection with 2Mbps limit, and the other is optical link with media convertos on both sides. Is there a way to set up etherchannel, LACP or any other kind of link transparent to switches or I have to use some sort of STP?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 2960 Logical Link Control

Feb 16, 2013

I have 2 devices which need to communicate through Logical Link Control.  Each device functions like this: they have a built in network switch that allows their internal components to communicate with TCP/IP which is then encapsulated inside LLC frames and sent out a special port.  The LLC frames from each device all come from a single source MAC address and are broadcast out the network.  The receiving deivce receives the LLC frames, unencapsulates the data and uses it directly.
 
Using it this way through a single 2960 (such that device 1 is connected to fa0/2 and device 2 is connected to fa0/23) with its own dedicated VLAN and no other traffic on the switch (all other ports shutdown), the two devices are unable to "connect".  Using a SPAN session, I can clearly see them exchanging LLC frames, but if I connect my computer to the internal device switch and try to ping the other device through the LLC encapsulated link, I get anywhere from a 25% to 100% loss with response times between 2ms and 15ms.
 
When I connect the special ports of each device together directly with a straight through cat-5e cable, they can connect and I can successfully ping through the link with sub-millisecond response times.  The same goes if I connect them through an old unmanaged Linksys switch.  I have toggled everything on the 2960 I can think of, including STP, CDP, LLDP, storm control, keepalives, IGMP snooping, management interface VLAN1, and QoS.  In general, the more of those that I turned off, the faster the ping responses became, but nothing seems to stop the data loss.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 - Using PAGP As Backup For Wireless Link With Another One

Jul 7, 2012

use PAGP as backup for wireless link with another wireless link.
 
                             __WiFi________
PC-------Switch 1                              Switch2---------- PC
                            __WiFi________
 
We are using 2960 series and from this reason we cant use L3 PAGP I dont know how is PAGP working. If it is checkung port status (UP/Down) or there are some specific L2 packet between etherchannel ports in group?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: Single Mode Fiber Link Between SGE2000P And Catalyst 2960?

Jun 4, 2013

I'm working with a customer who has an SGE2000P and a Catalyst 2960 to setup and configure a single mode fiber link.  The SGE2000P has an MFELX1 fiber GBIC and the 2960 has a GLC-LH-SMD GBIC.  When I have the customer plug in his fiber, there is a power light that comes on on the MFELX1 GBIC. Neither GBICs/switches show that a link or activity is occurring, but the presence of that light makes me think that they are connecting somehow. Are these two switches/GBICs compatible?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add Another Fiber Redundant Link Between 6509 And 2960 Stack?

Jan 6, 2012

below is the current config of link that is already up. I need to add another fiber redundant link between 6509 and 2960 stack. How to work on config Spanning side by not taking 6509 down after the change. 6509 is in distribution.
 
---------------X-ALPHA-IDF-1FORMS-2960S-0# (SIDE)
!interface GigabitEthernet1/0/52description X-ALPHA-F-6509-0 uplinkswitchport trunk native vlan 18switchport mode trunksrr-queue bandwidth share 1 50 30 19priority-queue out mls qos trust dscpmacro description cisco-routerauto qos trust spanning-tree portfast disablespanning-tree guard loopip dhcp snooping trust!
 
-----------------X-ALPHA-F-6509-0# (SIDE)
!interface GigabitEthernet3/10description 1st floor POC2 Forms IDFswitchportswitchport trunk encapsulation dot1qswitchport trunk native vlan 18switchport mode trunkno ip addressmls qos trust dscpspanning-tree guard loop!

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Add 2960 To Stack Of 4 X 2960 Switches

Feb 7, 2012

I have an existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches connected by stack cables.I would like to add another 2960-S switch to the stack but am unable to as the 2960-S will only allow 4 x 2960-S switches per stack.how I would add the 5th 2960-S switch to the existing stack of 4 x 2960-S switches.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960-S To 2960-LST Configuration Over Fiber?

Feb 11, 2013

I have a 24 port 2960-S that is not communicating with a 2960-LST that it is directly connected to over fiber.  The link is up on the LST but will not come up on the -S.  What command should I use to bring up this link?  I have tried no shut from the (Config-if)# prompt.         

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3750G LC To SC Conversion

Nov 1, 2011

I have a core switch Cisco3750G with 4 SFP slot populated with GLC-SX-MM module.Now in these 4 fiber GLC-SX-MM modules 3 are connected to 3 floor switches which are having the same GLC-SX-MM.Each link is configured as a TRUNK and allowed only that floor VLAN and working fine.Now the 4th GLC-SX-MM module has to be connected to a single desk top PC using a FIBER to UTP convereter,which is SC to UTP .Now patch pannel is LC ,I used a LC to SC fiber patch cord,but link is not coming up,in this situation if I used both side SC convereter then link is up.
 
All 4th GLC-SX-MM modules are checked and it is working fine.Only the forth floor link is not coming up,if I use the UTP to Fiber SC type connector in the CORE switch for teh 4th Floor then it is working.How to resolve this issue,Whether I need to use the UTP to Fiber LC type convereter in the fourth floor instead of SC type converter,logically when I use the LC-SC type patch cord and connecting to SC type converter it should work.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3750G Routing Between 2 Vlans

Nov 7, 2012

Our network system has 125 different Vlans (Cisco) and I would like to be able to route between only 2 particular Vlans, I know with the command “ip route “ in our layer 3 switches (ws-c3750G -12S) I would be able to route among all Vlans but I need to be able to route between 2 Vlans to be able to access the PCs in vlan 1 from vlan 2 and wise versa

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Configuring BGP On WS-3750G-12S-E?

Mar 24, 2013

I have WS-3750G-12S-E with me and would like to configure BGP on the same. whether it is advisable to configure BGP on 3750G or not.

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: EIGRP On L3 3750G Is Not Working

Feb 23, 2011

We have 2x 3750G L3 switches and I am trying to set them up to use  EIGRP but for some reason it’s not working, I created 2 routed ports on each switch and I want to route vlan10 traffic to vlan20 to S2. I also enable EIGRP as the routing protocol but I still cannot ping between VLAN 10 and VLAN20 ,  here are the configs for both switches. What am I doing wrong?
 
Current configuration : 1943 bytes
 
!
version 12.2
no service pad
service timestamps debug uptime
service timestamps log uptime
no service password-encryption
!
[Code]...

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3750G-12S Not Able To SSH To Another Switch When VRF Configured

Jan 26, 2011

I'm having issues with SSH on my 3750G-12S.  I'm not able to SSH to another switch when VRFs are configured.I've tried ip ssh source-interface, ssh -vrf doesn't exsist and I've upgraded the IOS to the latest version.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switches :: VLAN Tagging ESW-540 And 3750g

Aug 19, 2011

I am currently tasked with setting up a network, pretty much from scratch, that requires some fairly hefty VLAN deployment. My hardware on hand (already existed so can't can't change anything easily) 5x ESW-540-48 Switches, 1x3750g switch, 1x2811 router.  I don't believe the router should be required as the 3750 is capable of intervlan routing. [code]
 
Now at one point I actually had the VLAN's *working* in that I could specify an IP address and could ping to and from it!  However DHCP wasn't passing despite numerous attempts with DHCP relay and IP-Helper configurations.Also I was having issues with VLAN 1 as the native VLAN, the ESW switches don't allow you to do much with them, as they 'weren't created by the user'.  So tried switching that out to VLAN11 also but with very little success there (I had to change the native vlan on all trunks to VLAN 11)All the 10.x.x.x addresses need to be able to communicate with each other.All the ESW switches need to be able to handle their respective VLAN's as well as VLAN 1 (for Printers and wireless access points distributed around the building).

View 16 Replies View Related

Cisco LAN :: 3750G - DHCP Blocked By VLAN

Jan 22, 2012

We have a server that we remove from the rack. The only role it has is to give out DHCP on the wireless network. I tried enabling  the built in DHCP server on  the Airespace 4112, though a Catalyst 3750G, but I dont get an address when I'm connected to the wireless network even though the range is enabled. If I set an static IP on my wireless card I can access the network. I also tried enabling DHCP on a Sonicwall that is connected to the Catalyst 3750G.
 
 Do I need to link the DHCP scope to the wireless network? Is there anything on the switch that would be blocking DCHP since it on a VLAN? I have the last four ports in a VLAN for the AP's and the internet connection to the Sonciwall.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3750G / How To Identify Source Of Runts

Aug 27, 2012

I am getting input errors/runts on 2 of my gigabit interfaces that connect to our WAN service provider's network. In relation to total packets, its not a large number, so its probably not a big deal, but I'd just like to find the source so I stop seeing the errors in Solarwinds. Our service provider says that they don't see any errors on their side, but the errors are incoming to us.
 
I've tried to capture the traffic with Wireshark, but discovered that often these packets are either discarded or padded by NICs so Wireshark will not see them, or at least will not see them as undersized.
 
Is there any other way I can capture these packets so I can find the source and figure out how to stop them? Our equipment is 3750G running 12.2(55)SE. Its not a trunk port. I know there was a bug in prior IOS that would cause some frames to be marked as runts even though they were forwarded successfully.

View 3 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved