I configurated ipsec remote vpn at catalyst 6500.
192.168.14.0/24-- my servers are assigned this subnet
vpn user:10.10.10.0/24
192.168.10.229 ---- webserver ip address
[code]...
I am running a webserver locally and I am unable to resolve it by domain name (e.g. mydomain.com) when I am inside my network. However, I am able to hit it internally (e.g. 192.168.0.10) just fine. When I try to access mydomain.com from inside my network it comes up with my Actiontec router's admin page on 192.168.1.1.Here is my configuration:Actiontec FIOS router 192.168.1.1 (connected to internet)DHCP disabled Netgear Router 192.168.1.2 is in the DMZHas cable running from Actiontec's LAN port to Netgear's WAN port[CODE]
View 7 Replies View RelatedBased on my diagram, my computer A (192.168.100.11) can ping and access my computer B (192.168.10.14). But, when i'm home and i use remote access vpn (192.168.200.x) in cisco asa 5520 to connect to my computer A is okay. But, when i try to ping my computer B is not okay. I already do the exemption for 192.168.100.x and 192.168.10.x in nat rules for inside interface (192.168.100.2) ...
Should i put routing from outside 1.1.1.2 to 192.168.10.x by using 192.168.100.1 as a gateway?
I need a way to block MAC OS X users connecting remotely to our coporate users over VPN. I know there is an option to block connections based on VPN client Version, but cant find a way to block users based on operating system.
We use Cisco ASA 5510 firewals one with v8.2(1) and other with v7.2(3). I need to do on both firewalls. They are both at diffrent sites.
We have a high availability pair of ASA 5510's in Data Centre where we have configured remote access to allow users log in via SSL VPN, now we want to add further security to our environment we are adding endpoint assessment licenses...the question I have would I need two sets of the license ASA-ADV-END-SEC ?
I learned the hardway before with ASA SSL VPN licenses breaking other failover pair as it needed identical licenses on both units! Will I need 2 separate license sets to keep my firewalls in a HA pair?
I was trying to access some computers in network via remote desktop. All those computers had been used by other staffs.What I noticed that, for some computers I can access via remote desktop by forcing them to log off (people who were using the computers)But for some computers, I got the message similar to "user is currently logged onto the computer, you are not allowed to connect"I want to force them too and access these computers. How I can do it?
View 6 Replies View RelatedHow to designate access-list for the remote access vpn users in order to let them access specific subnet or host,asa 5510 and acs is in the picture
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have five (5) sites all connected via static VPN tunnels. They are all using Cisco ASA 5510s running 8.4(4)1. Any internal IP on each site can ping any IP on a remote site, because of the static VPN tunnels. I have the external IP (routeable) addresses connecting to each other.
Site A: 10.1.0.0 /24
Site B: 10.2.0.0 /24
Site C: 10.3.0.0 /24
Site D: 10.5.0.0 /24
Site E: 10.10.0.0 /20
I have remote users who connect using Cisco AnyConnect 3.1 to Site E. They get a static IP within the 10.10.100.0 /24 subnet (vpnpool00) and can access anything in the 10.10.0.0 /20 subnet. So far, so good.No management wants users to access devices within the other sites, specifically Site A using teh same AnyConnect connection. In other words, they get an Ip address of say, 10.10.100.5 and now need to access a server on Site A's subnet or 10.1.0.5.I have checked my NAT statements and they appear to allow this, but so far when I do a ping I get the following: Routing failed to locate next hop for ICMP from outside: 10.10.100.5/1 to inside: 10.1.0.5/0 What am I missing? Is there a NAT statement that is wrong, or an access-list statement or possibly a static route?
I have a weird problem which I have already submitted a TAC ticket about. When users authenticate through AnyConnect into our HQ ASA 5510 they grab an address from 172.16.254.x. What we have been noticing intermittently is that when logged into our network through the client they are unable to access their resources at one of our remote offices which is connected over l2l to the HQ ASA. This problem just started randomly a week ago and we have been working with Cisco trying to create a solution.
My quick fix is logging into a device at the remote office which is trying to be accessed and pinging the gateway of the virtual subnet for AnyConnect users. When I ping 172.16.254.1 it goes through after a few dropped icmp packets and then the issue is resolved for about 8 hours or so.
My company is using an RV016 router as a gateway to our internal network. My end goal is to allow remote users to access network shares via Samba.I've been trying to create a VPN using the router with absolutely no luck. I've tried QuickVPN. I've tried creating a client-to-site group vpn. I've tried creating a client-to-site tunnel vpn. I've tried pptp. Nothing will allow me to establish a VPN connection. Sometimes there is information logged in the router but most of the time there is not.
View 1 Replies View RelatedASA 5510I'm trying to add a static NAT for to allow access to an internal webserver on my DMZ. I've added the config, however i'm still unable to get to it from the outside. I'm able to ping and browse the server from the LAN and I'm also able to ping the external interafce from the outside, but just unable to browse.I've turned on logging and the error I'm getting is "Inbound TCP connection denied...flags SYN on interface outside"
View 0 Replies View Relatedwe have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
I have the syntax correct and thought process down right on a solution to allowing guest wireless users access to an internal webserver. (DMZ discussion aside)
We have an ASA5510 with interfaces setup as:
outside - 65.x.x.x address
inside - 172.20.1.2
guest_inet - 10.2.1.1
Internally clients resolve our website to 192.168.40.40 and that part works as it should. Clients outside of our network resolve our website to the correct external address (lets just call it 1.1.1.1). We have a NAT statement static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 and an ACL to permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq www
Clients on our guest_int use an external DNS server and hence resolve our website to 1.1.1.1. However it seems traffic goes out and back in our outside interface and this connection never occurs.
What I'm wondering is the correct NAT statement / ACL to add that would allow our internal clients on the 10.2.1.x network to access our internal website. Would that be: static (inside,guest_inet) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 ? Since there is already an ACL permitting port 80 traffic to 1.1.1.1 we should be taken care of on the ACL side of things, right?
during the first set up I have set a password as it was requested during the installation routine. After the installation, I added the camera's IP to my browser (tried IE9 and FF). In both cases I was asked to enter the user name and the PW, but I can't access the 930. I'm using the very same PW as I had set up during the routine, but none of the browsers accepts the PW.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have home network with my Linksys E-4200.
My HP Microserver (Ubuntu +Samba+Apache) is connected via LAN. I have notebook (Windows 7). To my server (FILE+WEB) I have access only when I connected via LAN cable. In windows 7 i see my server and have access to the files. Webserver works also properly: access with the name of the server in web browser.
But by WiFI connection, there is no access ! The server has the reserved local IP-address, like 192.168.1.200.
What should I do to solve it? By typing "192.168.1.200" i see the localhost page, but nothing more!
I just purchased the EA4500 router and went through the setup with no issues. The only problem is I cannot access the router either locally or through the Smart Wifi dashboard. Everytime I go to the page with "Access Router", enter the password and clikc the "Submit" button it does nothing...no incorrect password prompt or idle prompt...almost like the page is broken somehow. I've done all of the usual, restart router, restart PC, restart cable modem, etc. and always having the same result.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have set this up on pre 8.3 code and 8.3 code as well. I have the following configured on the ASA, but it is not working and I am not seeing the ASA trying to NAT the VPN pool IP address that the client gets assigned.
object network VPNPool
subnet 192.168.70.0 255.255.255.0
nat (outside,outside) dynamic interface
same-security-traffic permit intra-interface
I have roughly 50 users that are remote, and use VPN to access the resources in my network such as file servers, application servers etc. We currently use Microsoft VPN to authenticate those users. It works, but I am not a fan on Microsoft VPN.
I have purchased an ASA5520 to replace my crappy layer 3 HP core backbone switch, and plan on replacing my Microsoft VPN with Cisco VPN. I want to configure my ASA so my remote users can continue to VPN into my network securely?Is this possible?
One of our accounting administrators will be working in our server this weekend from his home remotely. He wanted to know if there was a way I could temporarily lock users from remoting in a few days to prevent them from messing up his work.The only way I could think of was disabling the accounts in Active Directory and then re-enabling them once he was done. Server is running Windows Server 2003 with the users remoting in via RDP. They all have accounts in Active Directory.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have setup an SA520W and configured SSL-VPN for our small business. Everything seemed to go smoothly and I tested SSL VPN by logging in and playing around a bit which seemed to be fine. However, shortly after deployment I started getting complaints about it being much slower than our old VPN through the consumer grade router I just replaced. I investigated and tested with IE8 and Chrome on Windows XP 32-bit with several different machines, and in all instances it did seem very slow indeed. While looking around I noticed that the Task Manager under the Networking tab shows the SSL VPN connection as VirutalPassage at 64 Kbps. Going into Network Connections shows VirtualPassage under the Dial-up heading with device name Virtual Passage SSLDrv Adapter. Additional properties describe it as an ISDN channel. I have attached an image of the Task Manager pane.The router is running the latest firmware of 2.1.51. It is connected via a static IP that does not require a login, to our dedicated 5 Mbit / 5 Mbit ethernet over copper link to our ISP. We get great speeds and low latency through everything but SSL VPN connections. I haven't done anything fancy so the router certificate is the factory default. Currently we are using the existing 2 SSL VPN licenses that come with the router until we need more access, at which point I want to upgrade to the 25 user bundle. However, I don't feel comfortable upgrading until I get this resolved, because 64kbps simply cannot work for us for a VPN solution.how to configure the SSL VPN to not limit at 64kbps? My engineers are making fun of me for bringing us back to dialup, and I have to agree with them!
View 1 Replies View Relatedcan i have 2 pools each with diifferent subnet [code] i wanna put restricution on remote vpn users having address from pool-2,and just give them access to 172.16.10.0/24,is it possible on the asa 5510?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have a problem on a Cisco ASA5520 version 8.2(5). A customer has set up a syslog to keep tracks of tcp sessions made by vpn users. On the syslog we filter %ASA-6-302013 and %ASA-6-302014 log messages, respectively: Built inbound TCP connection and Teardown TCP connection. When the connection is made by a vpn user, at the end of the log line you see the vpn username which should be the same in both the messages for the same connection. I have verified that when a user, let's say UserA, disconnects from the vpn, their tcp sessions are not properly closed; if another user, let's say UserB, establish a VPN immeditaely after and gets the same IP address previously assigned to UserA, the log sessions are recored with UserA in the %ASA-6-302013 message and UserB in the %ASA-6-302014 message. I presume this is due to the fact the tcp sessions are not tore down when the first user disconnects and it looks like a bug to me but I didn't find it referenced anywhere. Is there a way to have all tcp session tore down when a user disconnects the VPN connection?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am using my ASA 5505 to remote VPN. I use both windows and Macs. I use the Cisco VPN client software on the windows machine, on the Mac I have used both the Cisco VPN software and the built in OS X VPN client.
I am able to VPN with all machines, but randomly the VPN will disconnect all users. I know there is a setting that may fix this which I think I tested in the past and it did not work, but I have now forgotten it.
how to disable XAuth for Remote VPN users on the ASA 5510 running 7.2(1)?
HPMFIRE(config)# tunnel-group vpn3000 general-attributes
HPMFIRE(config-tunnel-general)# authen
HPMFIRE(config-tunnel-general)# authentication-server-group none
ERROR: The authentication-server-group none command has been deprecated.
The isakmp command in the ipsec-attributes should be used instead.
--[code]....
I couldn't find anything under isakmp to disable it.
Currently we have a CISCO 3020 VPN Concentrator to terminate Lan-to-Lan tunnels and have our mobile workers connect via CISCO VPN client (300 users-employees and contractors-). Since this device is coming to an EOL this year we purchased a CISCO 5520 (below are the current licenses on it)
The licensing seems rather complicated, therefore this is my question:
- What VPN solution do you recommend for our users and contractors? it is my understanding the CISCO VPN client does not work with ASA 5500 series devices
- Is there a license needed to deploy VPN solutions for our remote users(employees/contractors)?
We have a need to access an VLAN at the main office( ie Core Switch 6500,switch 3750) from a remote site(Cisco3845 router, Switch3750) connecting by a SP through fibre link.
what is the easiest and quick way to do it and the user from the remote site just want to have access to that VLAN for a couple of days only.
We have a Cisco secure VPN site to site tunnel between the 2 locations.Which ports are need to open on tunnel so that users can successfully use OCS over the site to site VPN tunnel.All the users are havning the main brach AD account.Using Wireshark captured the packets, found only port TCP 5060, after allowing this port over tunnel I can see the authentication window.The user authentication fails. Already port 3389, 80, 443 are allowed.The main requirement is to only have the Chat, Group Chat and file transfer. Not require AV traffic.OCS is using TCP. no TLS is configured.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to assign IP addresses to remote site WIFI users from local DHCP server and forward all other traffic to 2504 WLC?
[WIFI Users] >--------<AP (DHCP server) >------ VPN ---------< WLC
configuring an ACL for a 857 Cisco router for web-server traffic. I've configured a NAT for the inside network and added ACL entries for port 80 access but dont seem to have any luck accessing the website remotely. I suspect there's an ACL rule blocking access.
Setup Internet === Router === Webserver
Router address: 10.0.10.1 Web-server address: 10.0.10.77IP from ISP address: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX
(masked for security)
The remote office is connected to hq via site to site vpn. I have 1 static IP (on the remote site)that I use for the site to site. I need to publish a web server at the remote site. My question is can I use the same IP for VPN and web server publishing, I am having trouble getting the web server to publish
View 2 Replies View RelatedRemote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
We have a site-site and remote vpn configured in same interface in ASA 5520 ( software version 8.3 ). When Remote vpn users try to connect to computers located on the distant end of site-site VPN, their request failed. I tried No-Nat between remote vpn private IP to the remote site private IP, also stated the same in Split tunneling. I cant find even the tracert, ping also timed out.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI need to be VPN'd in to work all day but during the day I need to print to my home network printer. The work around has always been to press print then disconnect from VPN, wait for the document to finish then reconnect VPN. This is starting to get on my nerves and I was hoping that there was a way to be on VPN through my physical LAN and maybe print over my wireless network. Is there a way to separate traffic in Windows 7?
View 2 Replies View Related