I have the syntax correct and thought process down right on a solution to allowing guest wireless users access to an internal webserver. (DMZ discussion aside)
We have an ASA5510 with interfaces setup as:
outside - 65.x.x.x address
inside - 172.20.1.2
guest_inet - 10.2.1.1
Internally clients resolve our website to 192.168.40.40 and that part works as it should. Clients outside of our network resolve our website to the correct external address (lets just call it 1.1.1.1). We have a NAT statement static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 and an ACL to permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq www
Clients on our guest_int use an external DNS server and hence resolve our website to 1.1.1.1. However it seems traffic goes out and back in our outside interface and this connection never occurs.
What I'm wondering is the correct NAT statement / ACL to add that would allow our internal clients on the 10.2.1.x network to access our internal website. Would that be: static (inside,guest_inet) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 ? Since there is already an ACL permitting port 80 traffic to 1.1.1.1 we should be taken care of on the ACL side of things, right?
ASA 5510I'm trying to add a static NAT for to allow access to an internal webserver on my DMZ. I've added the config, however i'm still unable to get to it from the outside. I'm able to ping and browse the server from the LAN and I'm also able to ping the external interafce from the outside, but just unable to browse.I've turned on logging and the error I'm getting is "Inbound TCP connection denied...flags SYN on interface outside"
We have a Cisco wireless infrastructure in place that includes a guest network with its own subnet that is a sub interface of the inside interface on our ASA 5520. There are no routes for it to be allowed access to the internal subnets. So it can only access the internet. This is primarily used by the public, but we have several non employee personnel that we only want to give internet access and force them to access the internal network through our clientless SSL vpn portal or through other internet facing internal resources such as webmail.I have done packet traces from within the ASA and the break appears to be there is no ACL allowing the traffic back into the network once the web resource replies to the request and the traffic is attempting to come back into the network from the web resource. Is that as clear as mud?
I know that this has to be a common problem and a way around this is to allow the guest wireless network access to the internal network but only for the select resources that they require. And that this can be done seemlessly by network specific routes and or alternate DNS entries, but I would like to keep this simple and just allow them to access the web resource, webmail and VPN, from the guest wireless using internet DNS servers without route trickery.
I have created a new sub-interface on our ASA 5520 for guest internet access.
My goal is to allow access to a few specific services hanging off some dmz interfaces on the same firewall and full unrestricted access to the internet only. Everything else should be out of bounds.
The order of the rules I plan to setup on the guest interface inbound are:
#1. <rules to allow access to specific services in the dmz>
#2. <block any ip access to the entire private network ip address space>
#3. <permit ip any any>
#1. These rules will give access to the guest user to services located in the dmz
#2. This rule will block all access to any services in the private ip address space (thus blocking access to all internal services)
#3. This rule is to allow access to any other services i.e. the internet.
Is this the best way to achieve my goal in the most secure way or is there a better way? i.e. is there a way to force the traffic by default to only go out the outside interface unless there is a specific rule allowing it go elsewhere?
(Of course Dynamic PAT will also be configured for traffic coming from the guest interface to the outside interface.)
I have one webserver which open for public via http and https. The server sit behind Cisco ASA 5510. Today our webserver have been hacked by someone. The index.html has been replaced by hacker own index.html file. Is it anyway to detect who did (by IP) this? is my Cisco ASA can give any clue about it? How to prevent from this happening in Cisco ASA? FYI, my ASA only allow HTTP and HTTPS port from outside to internal. This ASA is solely dedicated to protect the webserver.
I am having a problem getting my ASA to work properly. I attached a diagram for reference and most of the config is below. When I finally got it to route properly between 2 sub nets on the internal network, the NO NAT statement broke routing for the VPN Clients who rely on a NAT statement for the same sub net that is listed in NO NAT access list. I can get one of the 2 to work by replacing NAT statements but can't figure out a combination to allow routing for both the internal sub nets and the VPN clients to work.
It's been about 5 days of tweaking this thing just to get the internal routing to work correctly and when I finally did I broke VPN client access. To note, the VPN clients can still log in and get a session going, they just can't get anywhere once they are in. I also think there's a lot of stuff in this config that is not needed like a lot of the object groups, etc. but I am being very careful about removing anything. I took over support of this ASA after someone else put it in place and over this past weekend we moved it to a new building and new ISP and that is when I had to get it to route between sub nets. The main point of this move was to remove building 1's reliance on building 2 for Internet and outside email access in the event that building 2 is not available (it is close to water and this has happened more than once over the past year).
So that is why I can't go with the smartest option of just keeping the routes on the router in the other building. I also know the 1600s are ancient but they're all we have for now. I can provide those router configs also but they are VERY basic, all static routing. The IP for the Cisco router on the same sub net as the ASA is 192.168.42.254.
This is the statement that allows the routing to work between the 2 internal sub nets but breaks VPN clients: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list NO NAT
This is the statement that allows the VPN clients to work but breaks the internal routing: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list INSIDE_nat0_outbound
The rest of the config is below the diagram. ASA Version 8.2(2) host name Cisco asa domain-name default.domain.invalid enable password - encrypted password - encrypted names dns-guard [code]...
I have a subnet for guest network access, both wired and wireless. We have a Netgear ProSafe that is trunked to a Cisco 2901 performing 'Router-on-a-Stick'. For most internal traffic, it all stays behind the ASA. But for guest traffic, I have a route-map that sets the next-hop address as the outside interface of the ASA. The question is, how can I still permit those users to access our internal DNS servers? Do I need any particular NAT translations, exemptions, DNS doctoring, hairpinning, etc.? I have an ACL on the inside interface that permits traffic from the guest networks to our internal DNS servers, and then the next ACL line denies any other traffic from the guest networks to any of our internal networks.
Is it possible to perform static Nat's through an internal network?I have a ASA 5510 with a public outside interface (let’s call it 68.68.68.1), and I have an inside private IP address (192.168.1.2/24). The inside IP address leads to a 4900m with that interface being configured with a 192.168.1.1 (no switching). On the 4900 M I have several VLANs one of them is an internal DMZ of sorts. (192.168.2.0/24). Within this DMZ network are several Web servers which need to be associated a public IP address (68.68.68.x).
Every time I configure a static Nat to associating a public IP address with an internal IP address within the DMZ, packet Tracer on the ASA informs me that the packet gets dropped at the static Nat and I cannot figure out why this is so.Safe it to say my question still stands is it possible to Nat (68.68.68.222 to and 92.168.2.60) given the configuration above, and how would I go about configuring in such the manner above so that I acn apply static nat through the 192.168.1.0 network to reach the 192.168.2.0 network.
I have an ASA 5510 configured 3 interface Internet_AAPT, Internal_Network and Server_Network. The server network works fine as is able to connect to the internet and services like port 80 work from the internet in. But from the Internal_Network can only get to the server network but not internet (6May 13 201214:17:4030201310.153.111.21253663199.47.216.14880Built outbound TCP connection 42508 for Internet_AAPT:199.47.216.148/80 (199.47.216.148/80) to Server_Network:10.153.111.212/53663 (10.153.111.212/53663). The weird thing in logs i see a connection being made but for some reason its referring to the Server_Network interface? below is my current config...
ASA Version 8.2(5) ! hostname ASA01 domain-name names name 10.153.11.184 QNAP name 10.153.11.192 exc2010 name 10.153.11.133 zeacom
I have a situation with a customer who has an ASA 5510. They have a fairly standard config with an Internal, DMZ and Outside interface, with rules on the Internal and Outside interfaces primarily. What they want to do is set up a guest wireless network.What I want to do is split the Internal interface into 2 sub interfaces - one with the same settings as the current Internal interface and the other in a second VLAN for the guest wireless traffic. In order to do this though I have to remove the current config from the internal interface. The big question mark for me is what happens to all the firewall rules for the current Internal interface when I remove it? Do they all get deleted? do they revert to Global rules?, do they remain unchanged ready to be applied to whatever interface is named as Internal in the future? (That's what I'm hoping for)
One other thing, if I put the second sub interface for the wireless guest trafffic into VLAN 2 that is effectively enabling 802.1q right? Frames tagged for VLAN 2 will go to the second sub interface and native VLAN 1 will go to the Internal sub interface right?
I have been tasked with setting up a guest wireless network for a remote office. They would prefer that the guest network be on a different VLAN than the trusted network, and they want to use a different outside IP address for the guest network.
I am trying to figure out how to configure the ASA so that it supports two different LANS, each with it's own outside IP address. Is this possible?
We have a guest wireless network using 1130AG Access Points. Is it possible to allow devices on this network access to an Internal IP? I know that kind of defeats the purpose on the guest network, but we'd like to give access to internal email to these devices. Currently this does not work because you cannot loop back into the network to gain access (out the firewall and right back in the same port).
I have been trying to create a Guest WLan on my 4402 WLC system and have found several confilcting documents explaining the procedure. During this process I have notices that although the current corp wireless works, there was never a virtual interface created for it. Instead it uses the same Wlan/Vlan as the ap manager and managemnt interfaces. Could this by why I cant seem to get the Guest access working? or is this not a problem after all since the wireless does work.
i have two WAP4410N wireless router. with software version (2.0.1.0) , here i have a problem on SSID broadcast and access.i have created Two ssid's WC72 and SREE with same security configuration WPA2-personalmixed . i cant see the broadcasted SSID of name SREE where i only view WC72 and get connected to it..
where i initially want is separate SSID and internal network access for internal employees and Guests (shouldn't connect to internal network).
After connecting via anyconnect client 2.5, I cannot access my internal network or internet. My Host is getting ip address of 10.2.2.1/24 & gw:10.2.2.2
Following is the config
ASA Version 8.2(5) ! names name 172.16.1.200 EOCVLAN198 description EOC VLAN 198 dns-guard ! interface Ethernet0/0 description to EOCATT7200-G0/2 switchport access vlan 2
I am using ASA 5520 with 8.2.4 IOS. I'm new to ASA/Firewall. I need to do access webserver from outside network.From Laptop (192.168.2.51), If I connect to url... it should open page from 10.10.10.50.I also need to ssh to webserver from laptop. If I ssh to 192.168.2.50 from laptop, it should connect to 10. 10. 10.50. [code]I can't get to webserver from outside network, so now, I connected laptop to directly ASA 5520 outside port with crossover cable.ASA Inside port connects to L3 switch. Webserver also connects to L3 switch. But still doesn't work.
I have a 5505 between a vendor router & my company network, vendor is not able to access devices on internal network. I am also not able to access the firewall via asdm
We just changed ISPs and now have a /29 routed subnet to be used on our ASA 5510 (8.4) instead of the one public ip we had before.There are a couple of PAT translations that were previously setup on the "interface" address which i now want to assign to a different ip address further in my subnet.
So i just changed this:
object network BMMM nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp to: object network BMMM nat (inside,outside) static other.external.ip.in.subnet service tcp smtp smtp
And assumed that this would work,y it does not, and this leaves me unable to contact that machine from the outside.And shoud i also change my access-list?The relevant access-list rule is:access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any object BMMM eq smtp
we have a ASA 5510 firewall and i have created remote vpn user who connects the internal network via vpn any connect after connecting i want him to only access his internal PC via rdp and not access other internal website or shared folders without connecting to the RDP however now he can access the internal website wihtout connecting to RDP?
I've been following most of the comments in regarding how to allow communication between two internal networks on a ASA5510 8.2.5 But I am still a little confused about to how to set my firewall. I made chages to it and still do not have the desired results.
I need to allow comunication between Interface 0/1 and Interface 0/2. See configuration file with fake or dummy ip address below.
ASA Version 8.2(5) ! hostname ciscoasa domain-name lxx.com
What should I do to get the SIP and 8080 port working on my Public IP, likewise just as access from my browse the http://189.xxx.xxx.129:8080 and get through directly to my internal server 10.xx.xx.61 ?
Having trouble with a couple items. First of all, should I be able to ping the inside interface of the ASA from all internal subnets assuming all of these subnets/vlans are directly connected to the same L3 switch? I can ping the ASA inside interface from our L3 switch, but I cannot ping the inside interface from a host on a different internal subnet. I have setup static routing on the ASA [
route inside 10.10.96.0 255.255.248.0 10.30.1.1 1]and verified that I can ping the host [10.10.96.212] from the ASA inside interface [10.30.1.5]. The inside interface is on the 10.30.1.x/24 subnet. My host is on the 10.10.96.x/21 subnet. From the ASA I can ping 10.10.96.212, but I cannot ping 10.30.1.5 from 10.10.96.212. I can however ping 10.30.1.1 from 10.10.96.212.
This leads to my next issue, which is trying to setup the ASA to work concurrently with our current firewall. I'm doing this in order to transition to the ASA. I'd much prefer to cutover inbound NAT a little at a time vs. doing it all at once. Our current firewall is setup at 10.30.1.2 and this is the default route on our L3 switch (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.30.1.2). So my question is, if I setup an inbound NAT to one of our web servers on the 10.10.96.x subnet, will I be able to get it to route back to the ASA as opposed to ending up in asymmetric routing **** since the default route points back to our other firewall?
I have inherited an asa 5510 whit 4GE SSM module installed. The asa runs fine, but i can not use the 4GE SSM ports. Using ASDM or console i can get and configure the gigabitethernet1/x ports but i can not get traffic on it. The ping from the console to the ip address of the Gigabitethernet1/0 is successful. On switches or hubs connected to those ports i can not see the port's mac address. The two Internal-data0/0 and Internal-data1/0 are down and i can get they up. How to configure 4GE SSM or ASA internal-data ports.
I am tasked with transferring all clients from one subnet to the other. I figure the nicest way to do this is to temporarily have the subnets talk to each other in an endeavour to avoid as much downtime as possible. The two internal subnets are:
192.168.0.0/24 192.168.43.0/24 (the intended migration network)
I am beating my head against the desk here as I dont seem to be getting anywhere after the changes I have made. The current configuration is as such:
I was just wondering if it's possible with an ASA 5510 to connect to the external IP address of an internal server from inside the network. I have already set up dns doctoring for dns lookups, and everything is working fine there. We have an application inside the network that tries to connect straight to the external Ip of another internal server. where to look in the ASDM 6.4?
We have a site with two inbound circuits, one for internet and one for our MPLS. Each circuit is being terminated by a 2921 Router and matching ASA 5510 Firewall. For the internal network, the Internet ASA's inside interface (172.16.0.1) is the default gateway for all hosts. OSPF is the routing protocol between all the routers and ASA's and routing is working. In fact, ICMP is working as well. From an inside host (172.16.0.81), we can ping anything on the MPLS network. But when I try to use telnet (for example), the connection fails. If I add a route to 10.10.10.0 to the host, or re-configure the host to point to the MPLS ASA (172.16.0.254) as it's default gateway, connections will establish.
Both ASAs are running 8.4(3), and have the following commands:
I am implementing a guest wireless network to work alongside my internal network. The guest network will use the existing switching network and will be separated by VLANs. I have the ASA set so that traffic can get to it and out to the Internet. I can set up a workstation on the same VLAN as my guest network and can route inside my network (strictly doing this for testing purposes). Where I am having problems is with the Catalyst 4506 switches and the ip routing. I had two separate "ip route" statements defined on my switches.
ip route 10.200.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.2.254 ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.100.100.254
I have discovered that the traffic is always following the default route despite the fact that my IP address on my test workstation falls in the 10.200.2.x network. I was looking at documentation and found that it is possible to set up policy-based routing on the core switches. Can you have two "ip route" statements defined like this to segreate traffic or do I have to use PBR for routing (or a combination) in this case? If I define PBR then how does that impact my existing routing? I need to make sure that I can still route the existing traffic while I'm configuring this change.
Is it possible to configure remote access (IPSEC client) to force all traffic through the tunnel (no split tunnel) yet still limit the internal hosts that can be accessed?
I have been asked to provide remote access (via ASA5510) with the following requirements:
- the client should have unrestricted internet access via the ASA (the source address will appear to be the outside interface of the ASA)
- the client should have access to only two internal hosts (192.168.10.10 and 192.168.44.10)
Is there a way to limit access to those two internal hosts, while still providing secured internet access? The only way I can see is to use an access list on another device (for example our core switch).
I am working on replacing our Checkpoint Firewalls with ASA's, and am running into the following NAT problem. On some of our Checkpoints, there are external NAT's that are mapped to multiple internal hosts based on ports.Is there any way to translate that to the ASA? I'm not sure the ASA will let you have multiple internal hosts mapped to one external IP using static NATs. The main issue, is these are alarm panels that receive data from external hosts (the traffic is initiated externally on the Internet) so I can't use dynamic PAT with this.
Since the power failure two days ago, my -ASA stops forwarding traffic to internal servers, for no apparent reason. Packet trace shows all OK, packet capture buffer stays empty when I try to http into the mail server. The only way to get it working is to change the Outside Ip to the one used for mail, then to change it back. It will work OK for a few hours, then stop, with nothing obvious in the logs.
I am using two firewalls to connect two different offices. Firewall 5510 is running ASDM 6.3 and 5505 is running ASDM 6.2, Problem is that even after connecting two sites, i am unable to ping remote network from either side. I am mentioned static route as tunneled.
