we have a ASA 5510 firewall and i have created remote vpn user who connects the internal network via vpn any connect after connecting i want him to only access his internal PC via rdp and not access other internal website or shared folders without connecting to the RDP however now he can access the internal website wihtout connecting to RDP?
View 3 RepliesI have a base config of AnyConnect VPN below, however the ASA 8.3.1 code has deprecated some commands and the VPN/NAT/FW rule syntax is quite different. Can som point out what's missing from the pertinent config below that prevents the VPN Pool from accessing the internal LAN?
The Core LAN router is 1.2.3.1.
!
ASA Version 8.3(1)
!
interface Ethernet0/0
nameif inside
security-level 100
ip address 1.2.3.2 255.255.255.0
How does one configure the router so that Internet users can access internal company websites? The only thing that appears is the Cisco router login. Also I need to configure Terminal Services and its not on the list under Service.
View 2 Replies View RelatedClient has a Cisco ASA 5510 with 4 L2L VPN's all using 5505's
The L2L connect to the "outside" interface as do the VPN Users (I'm leary of this
The VPN Users need access to the "inside" networks and all L2L subnets.
The VPN User has its own subnet (192.168.168.0/24( seperate from the Local LANs (172.16.0.0/16)
When the Users VPN in they can get to all the subnets connected to the inside interface but none of the L2L subnets
I have verified that the UserVPN Subnet is in the crypto acls and in the route statements of all L2L 5505s
ASA 5510I'm trying to add a static NAT for to allow access to an internal webserver on my DMZ. I've added the config, however i'm still unable to get to it from the outside. I'm able to ping and browse the server from the LAN and I'm also able to ping the external interafce from the outside, but just unable to browse.I've turned on logging and the error I'm getting is "Inbound TCP connection denied...flags SYN on interface outside"
View 0 Replies View RelatedI need a way to block MAC OS X users connecting remotely to our coporate users over VPN. I know there is an option to block connections based on VPN client Version, but cant find a way to block users based on operating system.
We use Cisco ASA 5510 firewals one with v8.2(1) and other with v7.2(3). I need to do on both firewalls. They are both at diffrent sites.
I configured one ASA 5510 firewall with CSC-SSM-10 in one of my customer location.
Here i want configure my firewall to send email alerts to particular mail ID, if anybody any access my network from outside( Like VPN users).
How to designate access-list for the remote access vpn users in order to let them access specific subnet or host,asa 5510 and acs is in the picture
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have the syntax correct and thought process down right on a solution to allowing guest wireless users access to an internal webserver. (DMZ discussion aside)
We have an ASA5510 with interfaces setup as:
outside - 65.x.x.x address
inside - 172.20.1.2
guest_inet - 10.2.1.1
Internally clients resolve our website to 192.168.40.40 and that part works as it should. Clients outside of our network resolve our website to the correct external address (lets just call it 1.1.1.1). We have a NAT statement static (inside, outside) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 and an ACL to permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq www
Clients on our guest_int use an external DNS server and hence resolve our website to 1.1.1.1. However it seems traffic goes out and back in our outside interface and this connection never occurs.
What I'm wondering is the correct NAT statement / ACL to add that would allow our internal clients on the 10.2.1.x network to access our internal website. Would that be: static (inside,guest_inet) 1.1.1.1 192.168.40.40 netmask 255.255.255.255 ? Since there is already an ACL permitting port 80 traffic to 1.1.1.1 we should be taken care of on the ACL side of things, right?
Is it possible to provide communication between two different interfaces which had configured as different security level in ASA 5510?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a weird problem which I have already submitted a TAC ticket about. When users authenticate through AnyConnect into our HQ ASA 5510 they grab an address from 172.16.254.x. What we have been noticing intermittently is that when logged into our network through the client they are unable to access their resources at one of our remote offices which is connected over l2l to the HQ ASA. This problem just started randomly a week ago and we have been working with Cisco trying to create a solution.
My quick fix is logging into a device at the remote office which is trying to be accessed and pinging the gateway of the virtual subnet for AnyConnect users. When I ping 172.16.254.1 it goes through after a few dropped icmp packets and then the issue is resolved for about 8 hours or so.
Is it possible to configure remote access (IPSEC client) to force all traffic through the tunnel (no split tunnel) yet still limit the internal hosts that can be accessed?
I have been asked to provide remote access (via ASA5510) with the following requirements:
- the client should have unrestricted internet access via the ASA (the source address will appear to be the outside interface of the ASA)
- the client should have access to only two internal hosts (192.168.10.10 and 192.168.44.10)
Is there a way to limit access to those two internal hosts, while still providing secured internet access? The only way I can see is to use an access list on another device (for example our core switch).
we have two ASA 5510s one in 8.4(4) and one in 8.2(5) in a site-to-site VPN setup. All internal traffic is working smoothly.Site/Subnet A: 192.160.0.0 - local (8.4(4)) Site/Subnet B: 192.260.0.0 - remote (8.2(5)) VPN Users: 192.160.40.0 - assigned by ASA When you VPN into the network, all traffic hits Site A, and everything on subnet A is accessible.
Site B however, is completely inaccessible for VPN users. All machines on subnet B, the firewall itself, etc... is not reachable by ping or otherwise.There are also some weird NAT rules that I am not happy with that were created after I upgraded Site A ASA to 8.4
Site A internal: 192.160.x.x External: 55.55.555.201(main)/202(mail)
Site B (over site-to-site) is 192.260.x.x External: 66.66.666.54(all)
I pretty much just have the basic NAT rules for VPN, Email, Internet and the site-to-site.What do I need to add for the VPN to be able to access the site-to-site network?
Here is my NAT config:
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static VPN_Network VPN_Network no-proxy-arp route-lookup
nat (inside,Outside) source static DOMAIN_LOCAL DOMAIN_LOCAL destination static DOMAIN_REMOTE DOMAIN_REMOTE no-proxy-arp route-lookup
!
object network DMZ_Network
nat (DMZ,Outside) dynamic interface
object network DOMAIN_LOCAL
[code]....
I have some problem with the ASA 5510 ver 7.0(6). My manager wants to keep this as backup. tried lots of things but still users not able to access internet nor can i ping anywhere.For example when i ping 4.2.2.2 i dont get any reply.The runing config is below for ur ref :
HQ-ASA-01# show running-config
: Saved
:
[Code]......
I have two ASA 5515 configured in failover (active / standby).I used the ASDM wizard to create connections through ipsec cisco client.Currently users are able to connect but can not do a ping to anywhere inside the network.
The ping request is received from the internal client but the internal client can not communicate with the remote user.The ping fail also directly from the ASA.
When the remote client is connected an entry is added to the routing table:
S 192.168.10.130 255 255 255 255 [1/0] via <ip of the ISP>, "WAN"
as if that IP was reachable directly from the Internet.I tried changing the settings of the NAT but in no way I can make them communicate.The ultimate goal would be to create different users with different access permissions to the LAN and the other subnets in the company.
Have a WLC 5508 running 6.x code with LAP's providing wireless for our internal laptops (WPA2 and EAP-TLS). I want to provide guest wireless which goes out a different port on the WLC to a guest firewall/cable modem. However, we want to prevent our internal laptops from being able to use the guest wireless. I have RADIUS (IAS) and LDAP for my AD available. We would prefer not to have use Lobby Ambassador and just have the guests use a simple password or web passthru. Guests may be laptops or smartphones. What options are available? I have tried a test setup using dynamic vlan assignments from RADIUS using the IETF flags, but can't seem to get it to work. Is there a way to identify the SSID is being used at the RADIUS server?
View 13 Replies View Relatedwe recently upgraded from an RVS4000 router which didn't have this issue.
the problem; Internal users from Site A cannot access the external owa address.From Site A i can successfully ping both the external/internal IP addresses/names and they resolve correctly, including pinging the address ('mail.company.com") resolves correctly to the external ip address.
[code]...
I have a ace board(Acsm) in my switch 6509.I need provide access for clients over https, my scenario looks like this post [URL] .But, i have only one interface, and need to configure nat for inbound clients, to access the server with ip address of the interface vlan of my ace(if i set ace gateway in a rserver, the ssl termination works). The Topology is: Client(https) -> Ace(Https) -> Ace(http) -> rserver (http). Need to configuring this nat? I need that external clients arrive at the server with the ip of the same network as him, he did not right back the packet to the default gateway, but the origin of the same network as him, so that the communication function successfully, end order.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe are having a SRP526W here which replaced a cheap, simple router. Now we would like to set up the VPN-access for outside clients again. So far this was done by forwarding PPTP (TCP 1723 and GRE) to the Windows 2000 Routing and RAS-server inside the network.According to this post the SRP521W, and therefore I suppose as well the SRP526W, are not able to forward GRE: [URL]
Is there a way to provide VPN access for outside clients with this router? Maybe with L2TP (but then we would need to forward ESP) or IPSec (ESP and AH as far as I know)?
If there is no solution we would need to replace this device again with a cheap, simple router which is able to forward GRE - as you can imagine, we would like to save Cisco from this shame.
I've got an ASA 5505 running 6.3 I've connected the management interface to our management vlan (which contains switch IPs, ilo's etc)Is there a way to allow access to this vlan from another?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to configure a network in 1 small office space that segregates 2 company domains but allows them to share an Internet connection, a WAP, a couple of printers, and a non-Cisco VoIP phone system. And, it needs to provide guest access to the internet and printers via wireless. I have a SG300-28P, an SA520W, and a WAP2000 to make it all happen. [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedI set up my internet access by adsl modem as gateway, then RV042 as load balancer and dhcp server, security by MAC address restriction and static IP assignment. WAP 610N used as access point.works great for first few weeks, then somehow I can't access the network.I've been using linksys on my SOHO network, no problem before (RV042+WAP54g)
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've been trying to set up my new Cisco 1921 Router to provide internet access to my local network but with no success. I've been reading guides and looking at videos and I have to be missing something becaouse I can't access internet (ping/tracert) from my local network.
The DHCP server works fine and the clients on my local network gets ip-adresses from the router but can't ping or tracert outside the local network.
[code]....
We just changed ISPs and now have a /29 routed subnet to be used on our ASA 5510 (8.4) instead of the one public ip we had before.There are a couple of PAT translations that were previously setup on the "interface" address which i now want to assign to a different ip address further in my subnet.
So i just changed this:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp smtp smtp
to:
object network BMMM
nat (inside,outside) static other.external.ip.in.subnet service tcp smtp smtp
And assumed that this would work,y it does not, and this leaves me unable to contact that machine from the outside.And shoud i also change my access-list?The relevant access-list rule is:access-list outside_in extended permit tcp any object BMMM eq smtp
I've been following most of the comments in regarding how to allow communication between two internal networks on a ASA5510 8.2.5 But I am still a little confused about to how to set my firewall. I made chages to it and still do not have the desired results.
I need to allow comunication between Interface 0/1 and Interface 0/2. See configuration file with fake or dummy ip address below.
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name lxx.com
[Code].....
I am trying to setup a VPN tunnel between a Cisco ASA 5510 (Version 8.2(2)) and Sonicwall TZ200. I got tunnel up and going and I am able to ping the Cisco ASA internal IP from the Sonicwall LAN but nothing else works.
When I try to ping a host behind the Cisco ASA from the Sonicwall LAN I get the following message "Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows;
[code]...
I have a doubt on how do nat 2 internal ip addresses to 1 public ip for FTP uses.
As I know Cisco ASA cannot use to nat 2 internal ips to 1 public ip as the ASA cannot read the host header. It there anyway to control it by using acl or network object group?
My current configuration for nat 1 internal ip to 1 public ip:
static (firewall-dmz,firewall-outside) tcp 210.19.xx.xx 21 172.16.101.11 21 netmask 255.255.255.255 dns
I've tried a bunch things but it didn't work, I'm about to gave up! :-/
I have the following scenario:
ASA5510 - v8.3(2)
Interfaces
ETH0/0 = outside = 189.xxx.xxx.129
ETH0/1 = inside = 10.xx.1.15
[Code]....
What should I do to get the SIP and 8080 port working on my Public IP, likewise just as access from my browse the http://189.xxx.xxx.129:8080 and get through directly to my internal server 10.xx.xx.61 ?
Having trouble with a couple items. First of all, should I be able to ping the inside interface of the ASA from all internal subnets assuming all of these subnets/vlans are directly connected to the same L3 switch? I can ping the ASA inside interface from our L3 switch, but I cannot ping the inside interface from a host on a different internal subnet. I have setup static routing on the ASA [
route inside 10.10.96.0 255.255.248.0 10.30.1.1 1]and verified that I can ping the host [10.10.96.212] from the ASA inside interface [10.30.1.5]. The inside interface is on the 10.30.1.x/24 subnet. My host is on the 10.10.96.x/21 subnet. From the ASA I can ping 10.10.96.212, but I cannot ping 10.30.1.5 from 10.10.96.212. I can however ping 10.30.1.1 from 10.10.96.212.
This leads to my next issue, which is trying to setup the ASA to work concurrently with our current firewall. I'm doing this in order to transition to the ASA. I'd much prefer to cutover inbound NAT a little at a time vs. doing it all at once. Our current firewall is setup at 10.30.1.2 and this is the default route on our L3 switch (0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.30.1.2). So my question is, if I setup an inbound NAT to one of our web servers on the 10.10.96.x subnet, will I be able to get it to route back to the ASA as opposed to ending up in asymmetric routing **** since the default route points back to our other firewall?
I am having a problem getting my ASA to work properly. I attached a diagram for reference and most of the config is below. When I finally got it to route properly between 2 sub nets on the internal network, the NO NAT statement broke routing for the VPN Clients who rely on a NAT statement for the same sub net that is listed in NO NAT access list. I can get one of the 2 to work by replacing NAT statements but can't figure out a combination to allow routing for both the internal sub nets and the VPN clients to work.
It's been about 5 days of tweaking this thing just to get the internal routing to work correctly and when I finally did I broke VPN client access. To note, the VPN clients can still log in and get a session going, they just can't get anywhere once they are in. I also think there's a lot of stuff in this config that is not needed like a lot of the object groups, etc. but I am being very careful about removing anything. I took over support of this ASA after someone else put it in place and over this past weekend we moved it to a new building and new ISP and that is when I had to get it to route between sub nets. The main point of this move was to remove building 1's reliance on building 2 for Internet and outside email access in the event that building 2 is not available (it is close to water and this has happened more than once over the past year).
So that is why I can't go with the smartest option of just keeping the routes on the router in the other building. I also know the 1600s are ancient but they're all we have for now. I can provide those router configs also but they are VERY basic, all static routing. The IP for the Cisco router on the same sub net as the ASA is 192.168.42.254.
This is the statement that allows the routing to work between the 2 internal sub nets but breaks VPN clients: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list NO NAT
This is the statement that allows the VPN clients to work but breaks the internal routing: nat (INSIDE) 0 access-list INSIDE_nat0_outbound
The rest of the config is below the diagram.
ASA Version 8.2(2)
host name Cisco asa
domain-name default.domain.invalid
enable password - encrypted
password - encrypted
names
dns-guard
[code]...
I Have an asa 5510 running code 7.2 configured with ssl vpn,ssl vpn users able to connect to to portal which i have configured with the required resources,but the thing is that these ssl users unable to upload files to cifs shared directory , although they have full access to the shared folder
View 0 Replies View Relatedcan i have 2 pools each with diifferent subnet [code] i wanna put restricution on remote vpn users having address from pool-2,and just give them access to 172.16.10.0/24,is it possible on the asa 5510?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have inherited an asa 5510 whit 4GE SSM module installed. The asa runs fine, but i can not use the 4GE SSM ports. Using ASDM or console i can get and configure the gigabitethernet1/x ports but i can not get traffic on it. The ping from the console to the ip address of the Gigabitethernet1/0 is successful. On switches or hubs connected to those ports i can not see the port's mac address. The two Internal-data0/0 and Internal-data1/0 are down and i can get they up. How to configure 4GE SSM or ASA internal-data ports.
View 8 Replies View Related