Cisco WAN :: How To Put Ip Address On 3560 Port That Is In Layer 2

Jul 6, 2011

I have the following scenario. Connected to a Cisco 3560 switch (fa0/9) is another Cisco switch (that is operating at layer 2). On the other side of that second switch is a firewall. I want to send traffic from my Cisco 3560 switch to a network behind the firewall. [code] However, when I try to add the ip address to int fa0/9, I get an error. Right now, the 3560 is operating at layer 2. I think that I need to issue the command: "ip routing" to put it in layer 3, then put the ip address on port fa0/9. However, I am concerned that I will mess up my production environment. Is there any other way of doing this? The "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0" statement sends traffic out the gateway to the Internet. I just want to send packets to 209.52.62.16/28 out int fa0/9.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - MAC Address Not Shown At LAN Switch Port

Mar 6, 2013

Problem is that at some C65K I have directly connected Unix servers and the don't show MAC address at port, and same has happened at 3560 switched where I have too Unix based equipments connected. When use show mac-address interface XXXX, nothis appears at port and tested them with other equipments that worked fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Port Security Triggers With Valid Mac Address During Power On

Feb 28, 2013

I have 2 3560 switches that are running 12.2(25)SEE2. Port security is enabled on some of the ports. Whenever there is a power failure, when power is restored, 1 port on each switch goes to err-disabled. The mac address that causes this is a valid address for that port. Below is the configuration on one of the ports.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3560 - Possible To Use Layer 3 Switch For BGP

Apr 22, 2011

can i use normal  two L3 Switch(3560) for BGP Multihoming with 2 different isp

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Layer 2 QoS

Mar 17, 2013

I found that when I enabled layer 2 auto QoS in 3560 switch, I need to wait so much time to open a file in network drive. Howerver, when I disable the Qos. It can improve a lot. I have used a sniffer to capture the packet to see. Those default packet is in DSCP 0. Therefore, I think majority packet will drop to queue 4. How can I increase the buffer and threshold in order to improve queue 4 performance.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3560 / Layer 2 Trunk Over ISP MPLS?

May 4, 2011

I recently was asked to turn a routed link between our HQ and our DR Site into a trunked link to allow us to span our main Server VLAN up to the DR Site.I was informed by the ISP that owns the 100Mb Leased Line between the sites that the link was configured to pass dot1q traffic and I should just have to configure my links at either end as trunks to get the link to come up.
 
There is a Cisco 3560 at either end with Layer 3 routing enabled (obviously as this was a routed link previously).So, I scheduled an outage and configured either end as a trunk links as follows and repointed any routes from the /30 routed addresses to the management addresses of the switches on either side:

***For info VLAN 15 is the DR Site and VLAN 11 is the Server range at our HQ and was available on the connected switch***
 
interface FastEthernet0/24
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk native vlan 15
switchport trunk allowed vlan 11,15
switchport mode trunk

[code].....

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: VLAN Routing On Layer 3 Catalyst 3560

Jan 15, 2013

My first question is I have an access layer switch which is a single VLAN and I am trunking that VLAN to a distribution layer switch, I can ping the gateway on the distribution layer switch for THAT VLAN, But cannot ping the gateway address for the second VLAN I have on the distribution layer switch. I know it is simple, But I have forgotten and just need a push
 
Also I have a third VLAN set to  route traffic not bound for those 2 VLANs out to a router is the statement "ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.252.2" good enough and do I actually need to create a VLAN for that traffic? and if so, is an access switchport the best option?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / Getting Layer 3 EtherChannel Configuration

May 23, 2012

I been practicing with the configuration of layer 3 etherchannel configuration and i am facing a problem here. I have two 3560 switches and i want a layr 3 ether channel configuration setup between the first 2 ports of bothe the switches. I assign IPs to the Port-channel 1 of both the switches "10.1.1.1 /24 and 10.1.1.2 /24" but i am unable to get a successful ping. what am i doing wrong. below are the configs for bothe of my switches.
 
3560_1
Building configuration...
 Current configuration : 1274 bytes
!
version 12.2
no service timestamps log datetime msec
no service timestamps debug datetime msec

[code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 DHCP In Layer 3 Switch

May 25, 2012

I have made a topology by using one 3560 switch and 2 2950 switches. I have also made 2 vlans name Clients and other Servers and vlan 1 is for anagement purposes. The left 2950 switch is for clients and the right is for servers. Clients is vlan 2 and servers is vlan3 . Now what i want is that my dhcp is should assign ips to clients in vlans 2 provided that servers are in vlan 3. I am also using a border router and i have introduced a default route on the 3560 to the border router.
 
Now when i assign static ips to my clients pc and server dhcp then i can ping between vlans but when i try to assign ip through dhcp then it wont work. Also the default route on the switch to the border router doesnt seem to work. I can ping only the border router when i put a default route on the border router instead of the 3560 switch.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / Connectivity From Layer 3 Switch To Firewall?

Nov 29, 2012

RACK 1 is the old rack and NEW RACK is the rack which is going to be procurred for some new Servers. All the Servers in the RACK 1 has a default gateway as PIX Inside IP. As of now the 3560 Switches acts as Layer 2 and does not have L3 IP routing enabled. How can I enable conenctivity between 192.168.36.0 range and 192.168.57.0 range wihtout making any change to current PIX inside IP address 192.168.57.1?Is it possible that I can enable IP routing on the 3560 Switches , create interface VLAN 36 and since already Switch 2 has it 's default gateway as 192.168.57.1 , Would the traffic from 192.168.36.0 be routed to 192.168.57.1 ? Or do I need to create static route for that ?Since L3 Routing is not enabled and since the 3560 Switches are just acting as L2 , the  VLAN 2 - 192.168.57.0 range does not have any interface VLAN configured. When it is changed I would need to create interface VLAN 2 on 3560 Switches?

View 18 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching / Routing :: 3560 - Accessing Management Interface Using Layer 3 Link

Apr 9, 2012

I am setting up a link between buildings that uses wireless links. I'm using Layer 3 routed ports on 2 3560 switches to handle the routing between sites. Normally I would just put these in a /30 and then the switches handle the rest. However, the wireless access points have a web interface for managing them that I want to be able to access, but it's only available on the single NIC that also carries traffic. What would be the best way of making this work? Should I make the link a /29 and give the access points an IP in the same range? If this is the case what do I use for the default gateway for the access points?
 
I have included a diagram to try to explain the issue clearer. The IP addresses in black are what I would do if this were a standard cable (and indeed this will work, but I wont be able to access the admin interface of the wireless AP) and the red ip addresses are the alternative if I use a /29 (but as I said, I'm not sure what to use for the default gateways).

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Bring Up A Tunnel Up-and-up Without Any Layer 3 Address?

Apr 24, 2012

I know I can bring up a tunnel up-and-up without any layer 3 address, without any ipv4 or ipv6 address (apart from tunnel source/destination of course). And I don't have to use "ip unnumbered <interface>" either. But what good is a tunnel interface with no address? Can you bridge them or something?

View 5 Replies View Related

Why Layer 2 Switches Need Mac Address Even It Does Not Have Any Interface

Dec 27, 2011

Why layer 2 switches need its mac address, even it does not have any interface ? (does not have stp and etc)

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching / Routing :: 3560 - Management Port Used As Regular Port?

Jan 30, 2012

I have an all gigE  3560.  I don't use the management FE0 port on the back.  I was thinking to use that for a 100Mbps WAN connection. 

Seems to work just fine when I plugged in an test.  But I am not routing across that link yet as I still need to setup the far end.

Is there any reason this would not work?  I would like to not burn a gig port if the max throughput of the circuit is 100Mbps.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Assign Ip Address To Layer 2 Interface In 878

Apr 19, 2012

I have a cisco 878 router and I can’t assign ip address to it’s fast Ethernet interface. When I assign ip address give me this message: “you can not assign ip address to layer 2 interface”.
 
But I can not understand why give me this alert when I use a layer3 device?!

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 3550 Port Forward Down Through Layer 3 Switch

Aug 18, 2011

I'm looking at implementing a cisco 3550 Layer 3 switch and would like to know if i can forward ports down to all of my different Subnet Servers/Pc's.
 
For example. See attached image.10.0.3.5 is a mail server. 4.2.2.2 is our public IP.
 
I would like to forward TCP port 25 down to our Mail servers IP. Any reason this will not work by using the cisco 3550? Currently we have a flat network (1 subnet) and port forwarding works fine.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Does Ip Helper Address Work On A Layer 2 Switch 2950

Jan 9, 2012

I would like to know if ip helper-address feature is working on a layer 2 switch (2950,2960) or you should use a Layer 3 switch to do that?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Can Layer 2 2950 Switch Be Used As DHCP Server With Its Own Address Pool

Mar 18, 2009

Can a layer 2 cisco 2950 switch be used as a dhcp server with it's own address pool.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Possible To Configure QoS On 4500 Sup7 On Layer 3 Routed Port

Apr 26, 2013

I want to know if is it possible to configure QoS on a 4500 Sup7 on a Layer 3 routed port like the following example (Similar to CBWFQ on IOS Router)?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4500 / Layer 3 Port-channel Up But Can't Ping Across Link

May 17, 2012

I configured the interfaces individually at L3 and could ping across each link Example:

4500 Switch 2:            6500 Switch 1
int t5/1                    -      int g3/17                    1 Gig fiber link
tore down config
tried second set of interface
int t6/1                    -      int g8/17                    1 Gig fiber link
 Ping successful

[code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E Switches Interconnected On Layer 3 Port Channel

Oct 3, 2012

We are currently designing  Layer 3 to the edge EIGRP solution  for our customers. The network is a hybrid of collapsed  core (Core to access) as well as a three layer design (Core/Distro/Access) for connectivity to the Data Centre, Internet, Wireless Blocks etc.The  core of the network contains two 6509-E switches interconnected on a  Layer 3 Port channel (no VSS). Access Layer switches (3750-X series running Stackwiseplus protocol)  connect to the core switches over p2p routed links and Distribution layer switches (3750X stackwiseplus) provide connectivity to the  Data centre, Internet, wireless blocks etc.
 
The access and distribution switch stacks(Cisco 3750-X) are set up with two or three member switches with uplinks multihomed to the primary and secondary core switch with each uplink included in EIGRP. In each of the stacks, one of the switches controls the operation of the stack, which will be  the stack master.As the Cisco Stackwise architecture is not SSO-capable but NSF aware, all Layer 3 fuctions must be re-established during a master switch outage. To minimize control plane impact and improve Layer3 convergence, uplinks should be diverse and originate from the member switches instead of the Master switches in the respective stack. This is as per Cisco recommended design solution.The above solution can be setup if there are more than two switches in the stack. i.e. uplinks are configured on the backup member switch modules.
 
1.But what about stack with two switches..Which switch should be set up as the Master for a two member stack with uplinks to the core primary and secondary from each switch(Master and Backup)
 
2. For Layer 3 routing, does the routing takes precedene over switch failures? Say for eg. In a two member stack, the master switch with uplink to primary fails, does EIGRP provide a fast convergence to route traffic via backup secondary and does not wait for the control plane on the switch stack to converge? All the access to core links will be set up for ECMP.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Layer 3 Port Channel From 6500 VSS Switch To Two Standalone

Jul 30, 2012

Configured Layer 3 portchannel from 6500VSS enabled switch to two different 6500 standalone switch. Configured first ip on VSS switch, second ip on standalone switch1 and third IP on standalone switch2. My question is
 
1. Will the portchannel be up?
2. If port channel is up, will I able to ping the connected IP's.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sg300 And SLM2024 VLAN As Layer 2 And Layer 3 Switches Connection

Mar 18, 2012

I want to setup VLAN with the switches SG300 and SLM2024. What is the suggestion to connect these 2 switches. We have the Juniper net screen.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Configure Switch Layer 3 Port Connected To Firewall

Feb 26, 2012

I have a switch layer 6500  series connected to a firewall, the port configuration between them is  layer 2, in another words I do not configure an IP address in the Cisco  switch port to conected it in the firewall, but when a apply a policy on  firewall it lose communication with others vlans, just the vlan that is  connected between the switch and firewall works, attachment the design.  I think that is necessary to configure the connection between the  firewall and switch as layer 3 ( a port with IP address in the switch),  but I would like to know why? The switch is configured with about 10  vlan and it is a inter vlan routing, a default route is configured in  the switch where the gateway is the firewall.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: Stacking Catalyst 3750 Layer 2 And Layer 3

Nov 15, 2011

I have a question if I Stack a Catalyst 3750 L3 with a Catalyst just L2, will we able to use all L3 capabilities?

Switches are  

WS-C3750G-24TS-E1U
WS-C3750V2-24PS-S

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Layer 3 Port Channel Between Sites Connected Over Dark Fiber?

May 21, 2013

Has anyone configured Layer 3 port channel on Cisco 6509 switches which are connected over dark fiber between two buildings?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco LAN :: 3560 To Use IP Address Helper Feature

Mar 5, 2012

I would like to use the ip address-helper feature of my 3560 switch to point 10.1.0.0/24 to my Windows DHCP Server on 10.0.0.0/24 and I am unsure how to go about doing this.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 Windows Deployment Services / IP Address

Nov 7, 2011

i'm using some catalysts 3560 with 10 VLANs and inter vlan routing. we use a windows deployment services server to install our workstations. the pxe boot works fine. the image is loading, and when the windows 7 PE is booting, the dhcp request failes. when i use a small not manageable switch between the computers and the catalysts, it works fine.all other things work fine.

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Servers Updated When Gateway MAC Address Changes?

Feb 7, 2012

We have a server connected to a 3560 switch which in turn connects to 6500s. The gateway interface is on the 6500. We will be changing the 6500s so the mac address for the gateway will change, however the IP address will remain the same. As we change out the 6500s the uplink connections to the 3560 will go down. This will flush the old mac address from the 3560.When the 3560 removes a MAC address does it update servers so they have to relearn the correct MAC address?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - System Returned To ROM By Address Error At PC 0x0

Jun 7, 2012

We have observed that one of the 3560 switch was rebooted with "System returned to ROM by address error at PC 0x0, address 0x0"

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - Dhcp - Excluded Address Range

Apr 29, 2012

we have a 3560 switch configured with EIGRP with dhcp.  We have a user that we cannot ping, however the interface show up / up and no errors on interface. the ip address is 10.2.0.199 - however we have dhcp configured to exclude the range from dhcp ip dhcp excluded-address 10.22.0.1 10.22.0.200 how can this work station get a dhcp address if we have that ip range excluded from the dhcp pool?
 
The user is off a different switch that is a uplink to this distribution switch. Traceroutes shows that the problem is with the distribution switch.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 - MAC ACL / Address Will Change When Packet Routed

Nov 8, 2012

I have Cisco 3560x layer 3, but there is one problem with MAC ACL. Here is sample scenario:

I have two V LANS 2 & 3. There is one device (D1) on V LAN 2 and three (D2,D3,D4) devices on V LAN 3. D1 can talk only to D2 and D3. D4 can talk only to D2 and D3. D1 and D4 cannot talk at all. I got the IP access list all set, but I was asked to get the MAC ACL on it. The problem is that as soon as packet is routed, its MAC addresses will change, correct? Is there way of preventing device with same IP but different MAC from talking to device it should not to, keeping in mind that the packet will be routed?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560 / Apply Acl Restrictions To The Vlan Interface Ip Address Itself

Nov 1, 2011

I've set up my 3560 to do routing.  Now, I'm looking for a way to apply acl restrictions to the vlan interface ip address itself. 

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved