Cisco WAN :: Route-Maps On L3 3750 Switches?
Dec 6, 2012
I have the following set up, at one of our sites:What I would like to do is take non 10.x.x.x web traffic, and pipe it through the ISP2 link, and keep all other 10.x.x.x traffic over the main ISP1 link. I would like to set this up on the L3 3750's that we have. Here is my configuration for the 3750's (IP's have been changed for security):
track 222 ip sla 222 reachability
track 223 ip sla 223 reachability
ip access-list extended INTERNETTRAFFIC
permit tcp 10.1.1.0 0.0.1.255 any eq www - Internet LAN subnet
permit tcp any 10.1.1.0 0.0.1.255 eq www
permit tcp any eq www 10.1.1.0 0.0.1.255
[code]....
I'm applying the policy route-map to the VLAN interface, but do not see any traffic, once I apply the interface. I'm not that experienced, with route-maps?
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 16, 2012
I have a 3750 switch and I am trying to configure PBR (route-maps) in it.But when I try to apply the policy to a vlan interface the policy does not show in the interface.So I can not use PBR to choose my default gateway!Question: Does PBR work in a 3750 switch? Can PBR be configured in a vlan interface? There is any problem with the IOS that I do not know?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 6, 2013
I have a Cisco 3750 stack with 5 members.
Switch Ports Model SW Version SW Image
------ ----- ----- ---------- ----------
1 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
2 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
* 3 24 WS-C3750G-24T 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
4 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
5 52 WS-C3750G-48TS 12.2(55)SE6 C3750-IPSERVICESK9-M
I have recently set the sdm prefer template to routing to allow route-maps and rebooted the stack:
3750GCORE#show sdm preferThe current template is "desktop routing" template.The selected template optimizes the resources inthe switch to support this level of features for8 routed interfaces and 1024 VLANs.
number of unicast mac addresses: 3K number of IPv4 IGMP groups + multicast routes: 1K number of IPv4 unicast routes: 11K number of directly-connected IPv4 hosts: 3K number of indirect IPv4 routes: 8K number of IPv4 policy based routing aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC qos aces: 0.5K number of IPv4/MAC security aces: 1K
I still cannot apply a route map to a vlan interface however:
I have preconfigured the route map as per below to take traffic from one particular client and pass it to the inside interface of our ASA firewall:(yes i know 192.9.0.0 is a public network, its an inherited problem that is in process of being remedied!)
ip access-list extended TEST
permit ip host 192.9.216.234 any
permit icmp host 192.9.216.234 any
permit tcp host 192.9.216.234 any
route-map TEST_MAP permit 9
match ip address TEST
set ip default next-hop 192.9.201.10
When i do the following I get this error from debug:
3750GCORE#config t
Enter configuration commands, one per line. End with CNTL/Z.
3750GCORE(config)#int vlan 216
3750GCORE(config-if)#ip policy route-map TEST_MAP
3750GCORE(config-if)#
007804: Feb 8 03:16:55: %PLATFORM_PBR-3-UNSUPPORTED_RMAP: Route-map TEST_MAP not supported for Policy-Based Routing
when I show the running config, the route-map is not there.3750GCORE#show running-config int vlan 216Building configuration...Current configuration : 205 bytes!interface Vlan216
no ip redirectsip directed-broadcast 101end
why TEST_MAP is not supported?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 3, 2011
I'm working on a practice lab and am having the following issue. I have a customer router connected to two different ISP routers. Each ISP router must advertise a default through BGP to the customer and one of the default routes must be preferred over the other. Given if the preferred route interface is shut down the other default route is inserted into the routing table and when the preferred default route interface it turned back on that path is used again. The catch is I cant alter the customer router only the the two ISP devices. I tried doing some route maps but I'm lost. I have deleted all my route maps and have posted the BGP portion of the ISP routers.
router bgp 300
no synchronization
bgp log-neighbor-changes
[Code]....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Aug 4, 2009
Basically I have an internet router (1841ISR) with 1 internal (LAN) connection and 2 internet connections. What I want to do is route specific traffic for 3 of my internally hosted services (smtp, https, etc) through one internet connection (fa0/0) and then route all other traffic through the unmanaged/dynamic IP ADSL connection (Dialer 0).
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 17, 2011
I need to move the client machines off of the 3750 (and their DHCP dependency on it) to the SGE2010 and absolutely route their internet traffic out through the outside interface on the 5505. They must also be able to communicate back into the internal environment in order to communicate with the production servers.
The clients currently use .254 addressing through a dumb dell switch to the 3750 but I am trying to migrate them over slowly to the .253. I know that the 2010 will not do DHCP, so I am putting a DHCP server on that switch right now. The 5505 won't let me add an additional nameif statement onto one of the other eth0/x interfaces and I'm not sure if that has anything to do with it's capabilities to act as a DHCP server (it's not an option in the ASDM) or it's ability to serve as the internet gateway for the 2010 clients. (Side notes: The 5505 has a base license and is currently also connecting 1 site to site VPN. As is the 5520, so all of it's interfaces are used as well).
I statically assigned a moved client with a .253 address and plugged it into the 2010. I have tried giving the 2010 both a .4 address and a .253 address but neither will allow me to ping any of the addresses on the 5505. The 2010 shows automatic routes to the two subnets and I set it's default route to 253.1. The link between the 2010 and the 3750 works - clients receive a .254 address from the 3750 and can get out to the internet via the 5505 and reach the production servers as well.
Why won't the 2010 see the 5505 as a gateway and allow clients to get to the internet and also traverse the 3750 when they need access to the production network?
The reason why I dont' just connect the two swtiches and call it a day is because I also need the production servers to ALWAYS go out/receive web requests via the 5520 outbound/outside interface. I'm having such a hard time wrapping my head around why i can't get my clients moved over to the new switch, I haven't even grasped how I'm going to do that yet.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 1, 2011
I need to use a 3750 switch running 12.2 code to route between two networks in a test setup.Switch#sh verCisco IOS Software, C3750 Software (C3750-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(25)SEE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)Copyright (c) 1986-2006 by Cisco Systems, Inc. The idea for the test setup is 3750 emulates a client's live network which is two routers having a site-to-site tunnel connecting from their ISPs. This will allow me to test the tunnel configuration with the router configs that are in production but replacing one of the routers with an ASA.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 19, 2012
We're running a simple policy map on a 3750 stack (IOS version 12.2(53)SE2), but the route-map counters do not show any matches:
NYKIRDRCX01#sh route-map
route-map remote-route, permit, sequence 51
Match clauses:
ip address (access-lists): remoteACL
Set clauses:
ip next-hop 192.168.101.5
Policy routing matches: 0 packets, 0 bytes
However, I've confirmed via our netflow monitor that the traffic we're trying to send to the appropriate next hop is, indeed, getting there correctly.
I've seen issues in the past with a 3750 not reporting counters correctly.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2010
I try to enter the command "ip policy route-map" on 3750's interface. But the command doesn't appear. Why? Whereas I see several times that this command is possible on this switch. What I have to do to enter this command?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 19, 2012
I have a 3750 stack with several vlans and svi's. We have had no need to route between them until now. Here is what I have done...
Created the vlans.. vlan 1 and vlan 25
Given each vlan an ip address vlan 1 10.0.0.2 and vlan 25 is 192.168.5.250
no shut on everything
ip routing
sdm routing preferred
default route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 (isp)
If I'm on the switch I can ping anything on vlan 1 and anything on vlan 25 (the device I'm pinging on vlan25 is the svi and a dsl router 192.168.5.1) From a computer on vlan 1 I can ping the gateway/svi for vlan 1 and the svi for vlan 25 but no devices including the dsl router which pinged fine. If I put the computer on an access port for vlan 25 I can ping everything just fine on vlan 25 but not vlan 1 (gateway set correctly)
As a test I put in a static route ip route 195.113.20.11 255.255.255.255 192.168.5.1
I did a traceroute from the switch and it comes through great. I did a traceroute from the computer and it hits my gateway of 10.0.0.2 vlan 1 and stops.
View 13 Replies
View Related
May 2, 2012
I have Catalyst 3750. and 2 ISPs
I wanted to use, let say on port5 of Catalyst 3750 only 2nd the ISP will route to this port.
The rest is pointed to the 1st ISP.
Im thinking of using VLAN..
View 7 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2012
I have a new MPLS circuit being stood up for my site; it’s going to replace a site to site VPN connection to our "Headquarters." I want to test this without affecting my production networks. Without getting into alot of details, the admin at the remote site is not very cooperative and basically doesn't want to set this up and I don't have access to his switching/routing. He is prepared to do minimal tasks if necessary. Ultimately, I am looking to test the new Vlan, once successful, route the traffic away from the Site to Site VPN connection to the MPLS circuit. Here is what I plan on doing, I need to determine if it is going to work.
LAN in my office uses EIGRP for routing. MPLS (10.1.1.253) uses OSPF (area 0) and BGP. Currently, traffic destined to headquarters (10.10.1.1/24) uses the default route on a CAT3750 pointing to the firewall (ASA5520) (10.1.1.254).Create new VLAN/DHCP scope to use as a test Vlan to test the new MPLS circuit. 10.1.199.0/24Create static routes on 3750 destined for headquarters for L2L VPN traffic pointing to firewall so traffic to headquarters remains on the L2L connection. ip route 10.10.1.1 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.254 (once I share routes with OSPF, routes to Headquarters will be advertised over the MPLS)Create OSPF instance on the 3750 advertising only the new subnet so that the MPLS network knows to route this traffic over the MPLS for return traffic from headquarters. (this is where it is grey as I don’t know OSPF at all) The switch has a L3 interface which the MPLS router uses as its gateway, so there is direct communication.router-ospf 0 network 10.1.199.0 0.0.0.255 area 0 4. On 3750 create a PBR for the new subnet so that it is routed over the MPLS, (imagine test PC is 10.1.199.100), the remaining production subnets will use the static routes and ignore the OSPF routes because of the shorter administrative distance.Will the PBR route win over the static route for that one subnet? Is that all I need in the OSPF configuration? I see some configs that have neighbor statements with costs, authentication types etc..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2010
IP SLA configuration fails over but cannot ping the 4.2.2.2 via Site B. Here is the output on Cisco 3750...
SW2#show runBuilding configuration...
Current configuration : 2901 bytes!version 12.2no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname SW2!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!!!!no aaa
[Code].....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I have a 3750 at a branch running EIGRP connected to two routers that both have configured:
access-list 1 deny 0.0.0.0
access-list 1 permit any
access-list 2 permit 0.0.0.0
access-list 2 deny any
router eigrp 1distribute-list 1 out FastEthernet0/0distribute-list 2 in FastEthernet0/0
Due to this recently applied config the switch become unreachable from the outside and cannot ping anything. Everything connected to it works fine. I was able to remote into it from a switch behind it and noticed that the 3750 has no default route in the routing table. I do see a default route in the eigrp topology table. How to make the switch learn a default route maintaining the existing configuration on the routers.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 13, 2013
I'm attempting to redistribute a static route into EIGRP on a 3750 switch and pass it to an upstream router, sadly however this isn't working, or at least the route isn't being recieved on the upstream router. [code]
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2013
We have a 14 offfice MPLS network. All offices have Cisco 3750s running OSPF which replicate route tables via our providers BGP peers. I am introducing a new network in our SF office which is not directly connected so in SF we have a static route "ip route 172.16.20.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.1. I want our other offices to learn this route route via OSPF so that they know how to get to the new network. My problem is that of course remote sites do not see our static routes and i have tried to add this via ospf but the switch will not propagate this route because it is not directly connected to the switch in SF.
router ospf 1
log-adjacency-changes
network 10.2.0.0 0.0.0.255 area 2.2.2.2
[Code]......
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2012
Cannot set route map on interface vlan. which in non default vrf on Cisco 3750.IOS c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE.bin sdm prefer route in enable ip vrf users rd 200:0 route-target export 200:0 route-target import 200:0 interface Vlan201 description Users 1 ip vrf forwarding users ip address 10.31.76.1 255.255.252.0 ip helper-address 10.31.4.57 route-map fromuser permit 10 match ip address fromuser set ip next-hop 10.31.128.155 When I enter "ip policy route-map fromuser" to interface Vlan 201 I heve the message:
% Remove VRF configuration from interface Vlan201 first
View 5 Replies
View Related
Apr 23, 2013
I have a client with a 3750x stack. We've upgraded it to IP Services. We have a simple PBR setup. One access-list to forward traffic from a specific LAN ip to another gateway on the network.
I go to vlan1 (default vlan) to apply the PBR and the command takes with no errors, but do a "show run" and it doesn't show up under the interface.
I go to vlan1 and apply a PBR that doesn't exist and the command takes with no errors, and is listed under the interface in the config
I can apply the PBR globally and appears to work, but we can't have it there based on other issues it creates.
config: (all tracks are up)
C3750_stack#show sdm prefer
The current template is "desktop routing" template.
[Code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jun 3, 2013
Actually i have a design from my customer who have ( Cisco core switch 3750 (allports fiber ports) which is connected to L2 switches , these switches carry servers and end users .the only routing protocol on the access switches is static route ,
My question how can i route the traffic from the server to the end user , as the the server is not direct connect to the core switch.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 1, 2012
I am trying to configure policy based routing however when i try to apply to an interface vlan. The configuration does not show in the interface.
route-map OTHER_ROUTE permit 10
match ip address OTHER_ROUTE
set ip next-hop x.x.x.x
[Code]....
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2012
i wonder if i can make a backup static route for an existing link over wan using the below diagram
the Core Switch type is 3750 in both sides i`m using only static routing for all destination like
Core1:
ip route 192.168.8.0 255.255.255.0 172.10.10.30
Core2:
ip route 172.17.200.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.105
requirements is to track the reachibility for the core ip address from both sides & change the routing automatically to the backup tunnel line
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 18, 2011
If I have two stackable switches one switch uplinks to one 6509 core switch and the other connection uplinks to another 6509 core switch, and also the other stackable switch does not connect to the core switches. Because I am using hsrp and also we are not using vss then one uplink to the core is not in used only ones is so then how does creating an etherchannel between does two uplinks to both core switches benefit me in anyway such as more bandwith and using both uplinks at the same time or I'm I wrong?
View 7 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2011
If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 22, 2012
Here is my configuration below , i have upgraded my C-3750 switch IOS from IPbase to IPservices , after upgrading i have tried to apply PBR on my Vlan 4 and failed , when i am tying to apply route-map to Vlan4 the command was taking but i am unable to see the route-map when sh run , i am giving the command as "ip policy route-map TTSL" in my Vlan4 , below is the configuration.
In Vlan2 i have connected one ISP and Vlan4 I have connected one ISP , my local subnets are 192.168.1.x and 192.168.2.x , now i want to route the 192.168.1.x traffic from Vlan2 and 192.168.2.x Traffic from Vlan4 .
sh boot
coreswitch#sh boot
BOOT path-list : flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-35.SE5.bin
[Code].....
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2013
We have a cisco 3750-48 port switch.We have a few SVI's configured and some static routes configured.I had created a new interface vlan and gave it an IP. I can ping the gateway.
Now I want to add a static route to go out that interface.when I add: ip route 10.x.x.x 255.255.255.0 10.52.10.1
it eccepts it (no errors) But, it does not show in the routing table nor in the config? How to add the static route to go out that vlan interface.
View 15 Replies
View Related
Oct 13, 2011
We recently purchased a SF 300-48P to replace a Layer 3 3Com switch that died. I've sucessfully put the switch into Layer 3 mode and assigned ip addresses to each of the VLANs but I cannot figure out how to implement routes for those. Here's some info on our network and what the previous switch had. [code]
Not sure if this can be translated into the Cisco or not.. If i try to create an IP route like these i get errors that the Gateway can be a route.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jul 19, 2012
We are planning 3 Internet Connections into our building. 1 will be for actual Internet traffic, 2nd for Voip phone system, and 3rd for internal network for Active Directory...etc. Oh the AD servers are controlled by another business so technically this line is still considered and outside line and is a T1. What I need to know is how best to make this all work so that our internet phones use the VOIP system, computers can log into the domain and access that network but use the Internet network for actual internet traffic? We were considering a series of managed switches and creating 3 VLAN's but I'm thinking we instead need a new router that all 3 networks connect to and dishes out DHCP to computers and phonesn example network is below.192.168.1.x ----> Internet (all computers use for internet traffic)72.10.10.x ----> VOIP (All physical and software phones use this network)10.10.10.x -----> Connection to external company that controls our network and has domain controllers, mainframe...etc.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 27, 2011
We have recently purchased a Cisco SG300 and have been configuring it. [code] The VLANs have ACLs set up to prevent any communication between the Holly and Tempo VLANs (and their associated WAN VLANs).Each VLAN has a WAN available for it's use, which connects to external networks (including the Internet).In order to facilitate this, we have set up all the necessary ACLs and routes and confirmed that this all works.However, the problem comes when we assign the static routes that specify the default gateways.We add the two static routes below:
-0.0.0.0 next hop 10.10.200.254 metric 1
-0.0.0.0 next hop 192.168.200.254 metric 1
In this case, only one of the VLANs has WAN access. It is either Holly or Tempo (it can be either if the order the static route is added is changed).What we need is to force Holly to use Holly WAN and Tempo to use Tempo WAN, but we cannot see a way of doing this.Effectively, we want the following static routes: [code]
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
This is to see if I am the only one disappointed with the Mapping portion of Cisco Prime Infrastructure: my disappointments are as follows: The Map can only be zoomed up to a certain size, under WCS and NCS we could almost zoom indefinitely into the map.2. The edit map sizing tool bit and its working has changed and quite difficult to use, the tool tip has changed into a small square, and uses double click which are not as intuitive as before, why change a working thing?3. Printing the Map is almost like priting the screen, when you say print you are telling it to print the map and not how it appears on your screen, for there are other tools like snagit or greenshot.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2011
I have a network architecture like the one HERE but with alot more spokes (32). Would my cisco 3925 be able to support so many crypto maps?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 21, 2005
I have users that are unable to save their changes to topology maps - when devices are moved in a map and the map is exited, the next time the user goes into the map it is back at the default layout. The unusual part is that this does not affect all users - I have two users with the same CiscoWorks rights, but only one can save map changes. The admin user is one that can't save map changes. I'm running LMS 2.2 on Solaris 2.8. The problem existed before and after I upgraded to Campus Manager IDU 11, and stopping and starting services hasn't worked.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Aug 21, 2012
I'm currently looking at doing some re-design work for a platform we manage on the ACE.I want to be able to run a single VIP and only do a sticky session based around specific URL's not all. I've got the following configuration to apply a sticky session to a URL. [code]Notice, under the Policy-map type loadbalance http first-match WEB-POLICY-L7 i have two class statements, one that matches the URL L7 policy and applies a sticky farm and the second class falls into the default.Am i right in saying with this configuration, any http traffic hitting the VIP 192.168.1.1 that does NOT match /urltobedefined.co.uk/test sticky sessions are NOT applied. But traffic hitting 192.168.1.1 that does match /urltobedefined.co.uk/test will apply the sticky policy?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 21, 2013
I have to build a MESH topology with 1 Root Access Point and 4 Mesh Access Points which are 1552E.I have a wireless controller which is a WiSM 2 card into a 6500 chassis.I want to know if there is a pre-configuration to do on the AP before installing it, or if they are automaticaly discovered by controller (even for MESH AP which are NOT wired to LAN) ?
View 15 Replies
View Related
