I have cisco 3845 on my network now its working fine.Now one of my client is asking to they want to connect their network through my router ethernet interface.
now my doubt is 3845 router will support two different gateways.
how can i route their network they have bring new router.
we are using single cisco 3845 gateway as Ingress as well as vxml gateway . Can you provide any documentation regarding the call volume capacity this gateway can handle. We have deployed this gateway in a UCCE parent- child model.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs there any physical or technical diferrences between PWR-3845 AC/2 and PWR-3845 AC? We are trying to order replacement parts and wondering if PWR-3845 AC is for one power supply and AC/2 means you get two with one order?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs there any physical or technical diferrences between PWR-3845 AC/2 and PWR-3845 AC? We are trying to order replacement parts and if PWR-3845 AC is for one power supply and AC/2 means you get two with one order.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've got two RV082's connected. Each has a dynamic IP (changes typically every few weeks). I've configured the tunnels on both ends with a local and remote "Remote/Local Security Gateway Type" of "Dynamic IP + Domain Name(FQDN) Authentication".If I look at the VPN Summary tunnel status, it shows an IP address of "mydomain.dyndns.org 0.0.0.0" under the "Remote Gateway" column heading. The Tunnel Test "Connect" button is N/A.I can resolve both of the mydomain.dyndns.org entries on both sides of each VPN using the Diagnostic DNS lookup tool within each router. If I hardwire a fixed IP address for the Local and Remote Gateway everything works just fine. VPN is good.
I just can't seem to get the "mydomain.dyndns.org" function to work. It appears the router can't resolve the dynamic IP from the domain names on each of the routers.
I replace our aging rv082 routers with wireless rv220w routers. The gateway to gateway vpn works great, however I am no longer able to manage our print servers port 80 management page. I can ping any host with success, and I can manage hosts that have a port 10000 or 8000 web interface - but no port 80 ones... I had no issues when using the old rv082 routers...
View 0 Replies View RelatedI picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly. What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there. For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site. Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up. Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected. But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me. I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs
[URL]
config setup
protostack=netkey
klipsdebug=none
[Code]....
Can I have use a Gateway-to-Gateway IPSec tunnel whereby a user can surf the Internet using his local Internet connection and at the same time connect through the IPSec tunnel to a remote subnet using RVS4000 routers?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two Cisco RV042 Routers, they are being used to connect two offices, i have created a standard gateway to gateway connection, fixed public ip addresses on both sides and everything works fine, except when the tunnel gets disconnected, it does not connect back automatically, i have to log into either router console and click the connect button to get the tunnel working again, this is really annoying since it happens once or twice a day at least.
View 2 Replies View RelatedNew hardware here, requesting a bit of your knowledge, We are tryingin to setup a simple gateway to gateway VPN
HomeA Has an RV016 with a public static IP
Local Group Security Gateway type is IP Only with the IP
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.0.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: Dynamic + Email
Email address some@emailaddress.com
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.1.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
HomeB has an RV082 with a dynamic ADSL link
Local Group Security Gateway type is DynamicIP +Email
Email address some@emailaddress.com
Local Security Group Type is Subnet, with the local IP class 192.160.1.0
Remote Security Gateway Type: IP Only
Remote Security Group Type: Subnet
IP Address 192.168.0.0
IPSec Setup as default with nice password.
The idea is for HomeB which has a dynamic IP, to reach HomeA, which has a static IP and connect. But they just wont. I have not clue what's wrong, I followed the instructions, maybe i miss interpreted something. I could share the VPN logs for both., Im getting a lot of errors there.
I have a pair of RV082 routers and I'd like to configure gateway to gateway VPN tunnel as described in a cookbook, "How to configure a VPN tunnel that routes all traffic to the Remote Gateway," (file name Small_business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc). I followed this cookbook and found that my while the Main office has internet connectivity, the branch subnet doesn't have internet connectivity.
Routing does behave as advertised, where all traffic does go to the main office. However, the 192.168.1.0 subnet in the branch office does not get internet connectivity. I've read in other posts that the Main office router will only provide NAT for the local subnet, not the branch office subnet. Is there a way to configure the RV082 router to provide NAT for all subnets?
If not, which Cisco product will provide the VPN Tunnel connectivity as well as the NAT for all subnets? Can the RV082 be used as part of the final solution or are my RV082s a wasted expenditure?
Following is the configuration that I'd implemented, (real IP and IKE keys are bogus).
Gateway To Gateway
Remote Main Office
Add a New Tunnel
Tunnel No. 1 2
Tunnel Name : n1-2122012_n2-1282012 n1-2122012_n2-1282012
Interface : WAN1 WAN1
[code].....
I have two Cisco RV8082 Routers which I would like to setup a VPN Tunnel with Gateway to Gateway. One location is a static IP Address. The other location is a dynamic IP address.
View 2 Replies View RelatedJust bought 3 WRVS4400N, I wanted to setup gateway to gateway VPN. I followed the instructions on the WRVS4400N admin guide and VPN does not connect. I also downloaded the VPN setup wizard and that also did get the gateway connected. Everything seems to be correct. Do I have to enable anything else? Firewall setting?
Below is my config.
IPSec VPN Tunnel: Enabled
Tunnel Name: TUN01
Local Security gateway: IP only
WAN1 IP: 192.168.100.1
SUBNET: 255.255.255.0
Local Security type: subnet
LOCAL IP: 10.10.10.1
SUBNET: 255.255.255.0
[code]....
I am trying to set up a gateway to gateway VPN connection between a RV042G (central site) and a RV110W (newest firmware) which is used for presentation purposes on various customer's sites. The RV042G has a static IP. The RV110W has different IPs, depending on where it is used.
Basic VPN settings are clear to me (we have another VPN between two RV042G with static IPs). I set up the VPN connection on the RV042G wth the following settings for "Remote Group Setup":
Remote Security Gateway Type : IP + Domain Name (FQDN) Authentication IP by DNS resolved: mydomain.no-ip.org Domain Name: router12345
The value "router12345" is what I have configured in the RV110W as "Host name" in the network settings.
This configuration does not work so I am obviously doing something wrong. Do I have to use "router12345.mydomain.local" instead if I configured "mydomain.local" as the domain name in the RV110Ws network settings? For my tests the RV110W has a WAN-IP of 192.168.178.100 because it is located behind a DSL-Router. The external IP of this DSL-router is 178.0.x.x. The resolved IP from mydomain.no-ip-org is 192.168.178.100 but when I look in the RV042G log I see the requests coming withg the external IP (178.0.x.x). Is this the problem? The last message I see in the log is "no connection has been authorized with policy=PSK".
Or can I use "IP + Email Address (USER FQDN) Authentication" instead (where can I enter this email address in the RV110W?). Or do I have to use "Dynamic IP"?
I recently swapped out an RV082 with a newer model (still RV082 but black and a different interface). I configured the Gateway to Gateway VPN exactly as it was before but none of the three other RV082's will connect. I have tried deleting the connections several times to no avail. I have aggressive mode disabled and have tried with the firewall on and off. Below are the settings (IP's have been X'd out) and the log.
Settings:
IP OnlyIP Address : X0X.X0X.20.31Local Security Group Type : IPSubnetIP RangeIP Address : Subnet Mask : Remote Group Setup
Remote Security Gateway Type : IP OnlyIP AddressIP by DNS Resolved : Remote Security Group Type : IPSubnetIP RangeIP Address : Subnet Mask : AES-192AES-256AES-128 AES-192AES-256 AES-128 IPSec Setup3DES Keying Mode : ManualIKE with Preshared keyPhase 1 DH Group : Group 1 - 768 bitGroup 2 - 1024 bitGroup 5 - 1536 bitPhase 1 Encryption : DES Phase 1 Authentication : MD5SHA1Phase 1 SA Life Time : secondsPerfect Forward Secrecy : Phase 2 DH Group : Group 1 - 768 bitGroup 2 - 1024 bitGroup 5 - 1536 bitPhase 2 Encryption : NULLDES3DES Phase 2 Authentication : NULLMD5SHA1Phase 2 SA Life Time : secondsPreshared Key : Minimum Preshared Key Complexity : EnableLOG:
[code].....
My two RV042 , one at home and the other one at my working site, constantly lost VPN connection after successfully connected.Both Firmware are identical. [code]
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe do have 2 Rv042, one in my office and one in my house.. in the office we do have static ip and at home none.. question is can i connect the two RV042?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some problems in my network with Gateway to Gateway Vpn Connection using two Rv042 routers.
I cannot ping the computers with static ip configuration.
In local an remote computers who have DHCP ip configuration i can ping each other .
We have a VPN setup between two Cisco RV082 routers, the VPN status shows as connected however I can't ping the other network. I am unable to ping between routers, let alone ping computers behind those routers.
We have 2 branches, branch 1 is on a static IP and branch 2 is Dynamic. I am able to connect via QuickVPN from Branch 2 to Branch 1 and remote desktop to computers, however have yet to VPN/remote desktop in the opposite direction.
To me it seems like a firewall issue at branch 2, but what's causing this. Also they are currently running 2 differnet firmware version not sure if this would cause a problem.
i am trying to setup a vpn Gateway To Gateway when i setup the vpn i can ping the 2 rv042 i cant see any computer in the network places when there comect we need to see the computer in the network places so are pos will run?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an RV082 and a RV042. I have been able to successfully establish a gateway to gateway vpn connection between them both, and I can remotely administer each router through the VPN connection, but I am unable to ping computers from one side of the connection to the other. For example, a computer in the 10.10.1.0 subnet can't see / ping / communicate with a computer in the 192.168.1.0 subnet.
Below are the configurations for each. Aside from the static IP configurations and the VPN configurations, no other changes were made to the routers. RV082 DHCP Enabled Tunnel Status: Connected Local Group Setup
IP Only: X.X.X.66Local Security Group Type: SubnetIP Address: 10.10.1.0Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0Remote Group Setup
Can a router using OSPF propagate that he is a router with default-information originate... at the same time when he got an own gateway of last resort to an IP-adress? If so, how? I can't get it to work.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI try to install a Gateway to Gateway VPN between a RV042G router (LAN1) and a 1721 router (LAN2). The VPN is connected. I can ping the devices from a LAN to the other in the two way.
But otherwise I can't access to the devices of LAN2 from LAN1 like with telnet, HTTP, mstsc, ....
And it is OK to access to the devices of LAN1 from LAN2....
Normally I access to all the resources of LAN2 with the Cisco VPN Client but i try to change it with this router. The firewalls are off on all the computers I look.
I exchanged a RV042 v1.2 (Firmware 1.3.13.02) by a new RV042G v3. (Firmware 4.2.1.02).
My problem is now the following: The old RV042 established the Gateway to gateway VPN connection as soon as an IP- address of the remote location was requested. The new RV042G stays on „Waiting for connection“ all the time and does nothing at all. The connection works by clicking „CONNECT“ or by ticking Keep-Alive in the advanced tunnel settings but NOT automatically as before. Is this a firmware issue or have I to configure something additional?
Issue with my Gateway to Gateway VPN connection. I have outlined the settings for both sites and I feel I should mention that this was an established connection that was working until I came in this morning. Nothing has changed (as far as I know) but for some reason I am not able to reconnect. Can you see any reason why this would be? Of course I've changed the WAN IPs and Shared Key for security purposes.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 x Cisco 3845 each one with a DS3 circuit, both running c3845-spservicesk9-mz.124-15.T3. In each of them I have one pvc provided by my carrier and I received the following info to configure:
vc-class atm ATM
vbr-nrt 44096 44096 1
oam-pvc manage
oam retry 3 10 1
encapsulation aal5mux ip
That worked fine for the first one with the NM-ATM-DS3, however, using NM-1A-T3/E3, it seems that I'm restricted up to 40700 kbps PCR/SCR:
router(config-vc-class)#vbr-nrt ?
I tried to look for some reference but couldn't find... Is there a way I can have a full DS3 with this card?
We have 3845 Router which is using for only Internet connectivity with one ISP(X) Customer has only one Vlan, Public AS number, and Public IP pool.Scenario:User--> L2Access-SW--> L3 (6500) SW--> Firewall (5520) --> IPS--> 3845Router.Now we have another ASR Router, which also has Internet connectivity from another ISP(Y).Now the issue is we would like to use both ISP in active/active scenario.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have two routers 3845 and HSRP is configured properly. Currently we are using default route to ISP and right now I want to use BGP as I have 3 Public pools and that's why I want to advertise in the public network. How I can configure that in my Router.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am replacing our core router, which is a very old 7204VXR, with a T3 card in it. We are using it to terminate about 10 point to point T1's. It is also the central gateway for our entire network.
I am planning on replacing it with a 3845, and an NM-1T3/E3 card for my DS3. I think I've got that part worked out.
My real question is concerning future upgrades. We are trying to convert many of these point to point connections to Metro Ethernet, and get rid of the huge DS3 cost. When that happens, I'll probably have a handful of point to point T1's left over (maybe 2-6 of them). So, what I need is a good solution to terminate those 2-6 PTP T1's in my 3845. In the past I have just been using the old WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 cards to terminate my T1's. I am looking for a solution that won't break the bank. I looked at both the HWIC-4T1/E1 and the NM-8CE1T1-PRI cards (which terminate 4 and 8 T1's), but they are like $4,500 and $8,500 respectively. That's way beyond my budget for these. I definitley don't need a card that will do PRI's (DSP's etc.). I just need it to terminate plain old point to point T1's.
So it may be that I'm just looking at the wrong cards. Or maybe the make cards that will go in the back of the 3845 that will house 2, 4 or more WIC slots, and I could just use WIC-1DSU-T1-V2 cards?
I am upgrading from an old 7204VXR to a 3845. I am running a DS3 in the 7200, channelized into 28 point to point T1's. I need to break them all out into individual Serial interfaces on the new 3845, like I have on the 7200, but I don't know the correct commands.
[code]...
I am installing Cisco blank CF upgrades (double the capacity of the CF that came with the router) in Cisco 3845 routers and I cannot get the IOS to load.
Network security requires tftp be disabled, so I am limited to xmodem. Slow, but it works. I know the IOS download is good, because I can load it on the CF that came with the router.
I can install, format and read the new flash. But the download locks up and bombs about 1/3 of the way through.
Note: CF that came with the router was "C" so I used the format flash: command. The new flash reads the same as the old, except that there is no file IOS loaded.
I've never had an issue upgrading an IOS, but this is my first shot at installing on a new CF.
1841 & 3845 router. We send 30 GB data on 100 Mbps link. First time we use 3845 router for sending the data and 47 Min are required to complete the data, during this link utilization was 100%. After that we send same data through 1841 router & 46 Min are required for the same. Only difference in data transfer is CPU Utilization of 1841 router goes 30% & 5 % of 3845 router Can we use 1841 router instead of 3845 router ? .
View 2 Replies View Related
