We have a router that was installed a few months ago which has the following version: 15.1(3)T
I am unable to reverse telnet to a new ASA firewall, however when I move the console to a second older router with an older version of code I am able to reverse telnet
Are there any known bugs, issues with version 15.1. I use the following command as normal: telnet x.x.x.x 2001
I have a new 877 that I am using for internet traffic for 3-4 internet only devices.I also have a clean network that i want to insure no cross contamination. However I plan on rolling this out to many sites, but for management I was hoping to set up a reverse telnet to the console port from our one of my clean switches. which should allow me to keep the units seperated and allow me to manage changes etc remotely. Unfortunatly there is no Aux port on the clean switch (3560). Is there still a way to acheive this? can i configure one of the ethernet ports to connect to the console of the 877?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am facing an issue with a cisco 877 router. I am not able to telnet to this router from outside using the public IP. I have also notices this works when the Nat is removed.
View 7 Replies View RelatedI am unable to Telnet/SSH/RDP from my inside network to my DMZ. I am not sure where the problem lies, I am able to use VNC from the inside to the DMZ (ports 5800, 5900), and also establish connection on Ports (26700-26899). I have a computer connected directly to the DMZ and those services work to all networks on the DMZ.I have attached Logs of successful VNC connections, unsuccessful RDP and Telnet sessions, and the running config.
View 23 Replies View Related5508 controller is at the headquarters which can be normally pinged, telnetted, http'd and tftp'ed....at the remote site, controller can be pinged and http'ed but cannot be telnetted and tftp'ed.there is a complete tracert from the remote site pc all the way to the controller.from a switch at a remote site, the controller can be telnetted. but from a pc on the remote site (which belongs to a remote site vlan), it is unable to telnet and tftp the controller.all active components can be telnetted from the remote site, such as the core switches and routers at the headquearters, except the controller.upgraded the controller code to 7.2.xxx in headquarters but still unable to telnet and tftp the controller from remote site.is there any more settings on the controller for telnet and tftp?what could be the problem why the controller is not available for telnet and tftp from the remote site?
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm having some difficulties configuring my Cisco WLC (5508) - ver 7.0.230.0 .I'm have multiple client device residing on same vlan associated to the WLC but unable to telnet over port 8090. However, when inter-vlan, client device able to telnet over port 8090.Say Machine A as application hosted machine and Machine B as client machine; [code] i should be looking on the WLC to allow telnet port 8090 over from Machine A to B within the vlan .
View 2 Replies View RelatedThe network is set up like this.
Host -----> 3750 (classic) running IPSERVICES stack ----> 3550 router -----> VPN 3005 Concentrator.
IP routing is disabled on the 3750 (it's acting solely as a switch) IP routing is enabled with an EIGRP process running on the 3550 router that has the network for the 3005 broadcasting.
I can ping the vpn 3005 concentrator from a telnet session in the 3550 but not from the 3750.I can ping between the 3750 and the 3550 vlan management interfaces. Visually speaking it's like this
3750 ------> 3550 [Success!!!!]
3550 ------> VPN 3005 Concentrator [Success!!!!]
3750 ------> 3550 --xxxx--> VPN 3005 Concentrator [Timeout....]
I know this because I tracerout to the 3005 from the 3750 and it resolved the default gateway configured for the 3550 properly but then started timing out.
The 3750 is trunked to the 3550.
3750 is vtp client mode
3550 is vtp server mode
I'm wondering if there's a layer 2 issue involved here as it is a VTP domain and maybe it's not returning properly.
I have just bought a Lenovo Z570 laptop. I have a desktop and wireless internet with Talktalk. I have no idea what my original security code was - how do I find it?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to order SMB switch SG300-10 for india but unable to identify the exact part code. Is it SRW2008-K9-NA or SRW2008-K9-AU?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm having this problem at work where im trying to map my folders within our server, i used to be able to do so but as if out of nowhere i couldn't do so anymore, our network support said everything is fine with our server and the problem is probably something with my laptop.
Im using a laptop with windows 7 Home Premium 64bits
My network adapters are:
Intel Centrino Ultimate - N6300 AGN
Intel 82577LC Gigabit Network Connection
Im able to ping my server just fine, left only one of these microsoft 6to4 adapters, tried turning off my AVG and Firewall, sharing devices and printers is enabled, Netbios is enabled.
Oh, and my antivirus is AVG free.
ipconfig /all :
Microsoft Windows [Version 6.1.7600]
Copyright (c) 2009 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved.
[Code].....
Any work around to enable reverse NAT or similar functionality on the EA6500? I recently upgraded from a Dlink that did support reverse NAT to my internal devices through a dynamic dns service. Now I have to know the IP address for all the devices.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have been searching through the cisco docs for a while and i just cant seem to find this info. Can I run aironet 1600's with my wism running 7.0.116? Also, could I run my 1130 series ap's with a wism2? Basically, what is the minimum code level for a lightweight 1600, and what is the maximum code level for a lightweight 1130?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI'm having difficulty logging onto my 1801 router over the internet I can ping the device and tracert to it but I can't telnet or SSH ,Here is the config - Can you see whay this would happen. Its on ADSL link.
View 7 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to enable the snmp in a router via telnet with the wan address(I have the routers' passwords) ? If yes, how
Router 1 : Cisco 871 w
Router 2 : Sagem – F@st 3304 v2
I have 2 data centers conencted via WAN and each has their own Internet conenction. One of the site's Internet is close to maximum bandwidth and we want to use the second site's Internet for future connections. The problem is the core switches in each site has a default rout to their local firewalls, so even if I can NAT on the firewall, the return traffic goes out whichever firewall is local and will fail.
So, my plan is to change the source IP address of the packets to be an address on the inside interface's LAN subnet. That way it is routed back to the proper firewall. I am able to do this with the following code, but this code only works with a static one to one NAT. I am limited in public IP addresses, so I want to NAT on a per port basis. Each time I try to change the any any to a specific port, it fails.
object network host-inside-int
host 10.1.52.172
object network host-outside-nat1
[Code].....
I am currently trying to apply a reverse NAT on asa 8.2 and not sure how to do this. I have done this on asdm 6.2 for asa 8.3 but the options are not simiar on 8.2. Is there a CLI equivelant?
I am trying to Achieve the object below for any traffic coming from outside interface to the inside interface with any source address to destination 10.X.X.58 then translate it so that it become 192.X.X.X to address 192.X.X.58. This is so that communications can traverse internal network as the server is not ona DMZ.
I have done this on 8.3 (shown below) but do not know if it is possible for 8.2, I have tried replicating the same command on 8.2 but commands are not recognised.
nat (outside,any) source static any 192.X.X.X destination static 10.X.X.X 192.X.X.58
Should I just upgrade to 8.3? never done it before so not sure of the consequences.
After upgrade to 9.0.1 from 8.4 I have problems with reverse dns resolving, like this:
named[2679]: DNS format error from 193.0.9.1#53 resolving 82.64/27.195.26.72.in-addr.arpa/PTR for client 127.0.0.1#37124: question section mismatch: got 90.64.195.26.in-addr.arpa/IN/PTR
Only solution I found is to disable inspect dns, which is not very good.
i am on pc i want same outlook on mac no delete on main xp pro home office pc. would like to received and send email from new mac book pro: fully synced between both?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to know the return path between my IP and a server. I know that trace route gets some information about the hops from my IP to a server (for example www.google.com) but this info is about the forward path. But I want to know what is the path from the server to my PC, what is the reverse path (return path)? What are the middle hops? In other word, I want to know where is the forward and reverse path when I ping a server? I can find the forward path using trace route, but what about the return path?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI recently acquired a Cisco VPN 3000 Concentrator Series (fairly old hardware) without a manual, and I'm trying to figure out how to 'telnet' or browser into the router to access the IOS. The device has been reset and I am plugged into the console. I'm running Windows 7 and enabled the Win7 Telnet Client in the OS. Can any tell me how to do this or at least point me in the right direction to obtain the user manual for basic instructions?
Model number: CVPN3005-E/FE
I found the manual for it after going through some hyperlinks. But when you access the console in the Windows OS, is your network connection supposed to show disconnected, or connected but no internet access?
i have 68 sites with Routers. On each site I have one equipment DIRECTLY connected to the Router that needs to be accessed by telnet port 23.
I have 15 off this sites that the access via telnet to the equipment’s connected after the routers are not working. These sites are using Router Cisco 3925. The other sites that are working are using Routers Cisco MWR 2921.
Both router models are running the same configuration with no filter on it.
The equipment’s after the routers are all accessed directly via telnet without the router. If the router is directly plugged to the equipment the 15 sites with Router Cisco 3925 are not accessed via telnet.
There is any bug related with the IOS version that Router Cisco 3925 is using?:
Cisco IOS Software, C3900 Software (C3900-UNIVERSALK9-M), Version 15.1(2)T2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).ROM: System Bootstrap, Version 15.0(1r)M8, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1).System image file is "flash0:c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T2.bin"
I'm new to working with the ASA 5505 ,VPN and reverse NAT.
The basic setup is as follows. I'm trying to setup a IPsec site to site tunnel with reverse nat on the remote side.
I have as the tunnel up and it passes traffic. I have setup reverse NAT for 172.x.x.1 to translated IP 216.x.2.101 my ASA also has an IP address of 216.x.2.102.
Any connection from 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.1 should appear to be comming from 216.x.2.101
When I ping or telnet from 216.116.86.1 to an open port on 216.x.2.101 I get the banner from 172.x.x.1, seems like it is working.
However in my setup I'm only given a singel IP that of the NAT address 216.x.2.101, so when I remove the IP address assigned to the inside interface 216.x.2.102. all conductivity is lost.
When I set the inside interface to 216.x.2.101 and I setup a static NAT rule for 172.x.x.1 to 216.x.2.101, I get a message that says all traffic will be redirected and I will be unable to connect to the ASA.
Once thats in place, and I make any connection from 216.x.2.1 to 216.x.2.101on any port I get a connection but then it's reset, I no longer get the telent banner I was expecting.
My running config is,
ASA Version 8.2(1)
!
hostname ciscoasa
[Code].....
My network consists of a router and a ASA5505. The router has a serial connection back ot HQ. The ASA has a VPN connection back to HQ. I want the network traffic destined for HQ to travel over the VPN connection until that connection is no longer valid (down). I've been told that RRI is the way to go but cannot get it to work. I get one of my routes to show up in the router but that's it (and not as a static route). Also I don't want the routes to be injected if the VPN connection is down. But I do want the VPN connection to be the preferred connection.
View 2 Replies View RelatedASA running 8.2(5).When I enable ip spoofing on my network interfaces I see this getting logged:
Deny UDP reverse path check from 10.100.100.102 to 10.100.100.255 on interface SPECTRA-LAN
This is because interface SPECTRA-LAN (VLAN50) is the interface connected to the network with ip 10.100.100.0/24 but the interface do not have a ip address so it does not exist in the routing table I believe?However interface INTERN do also belong to network 10.100.100.0/24 which also is the management interface and the default route for hosts in network 10.100.100.0/24, but has no vlan.
1. move the management0/0 to SPECTRA-LAN and give SPECTRA-LAN ip 10.100.100.1?
2. give SPECTRA-LAN a ip address in the 10.100.100.0 range?
My routing table and interface list is:
Current available interface(s):
DATA-BACKUP Name of interface Redundant1.10
DMZ Name of interface Redundant1.900
GUEST Name of interface Redundant1.990
HOSTING Name of interface Redundant1.100
Infrastruktur Name of interface Redundant1.20
[code]....
I've got a 5520 running 8.4(1).I've setup a simple NAT: [code] Running wireshark on the outside of the ASA, I can see the packets going out fine (the source address has been translated). I can see the replies coming in from the 'net. But the replies don't get through the ASA to the internal host.What do I need to do to allow the reverse packets to get through the ASA back to the host ?
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy Setup / I've been lurking on here a while, working hard to understand the basic networking concepts and eventually pursue the CISCO certs. I bought a lab and have since managed to setup a four router config (2610XM-DTE, 2621-DTE, 2501-DCE, and a linksys E1000 with routing, DHCP, and NAT turned off to make it a wirelss access point) with three switches (2@2950 and a 2924XL).
So far, I have managed to bring in my public IP using DHCP, and setup PAT. The network is fully functional, I can ping every interface, and reach the web on host PCs from any switchport. I am also able to telnet into the FastEthernet interface IPd with my public address.
My Issue : My concern right now is in feature support. I recently read on here that CISCO does not support UPnP, and due to my limited resources, I am using the only public IP I have to allow remote testing/learning on my lab. The issue is that I also have a PS3 and XBox 360 on this network that is requiring UPnP for certain online games and features.
The only solution I can see to this problem is to return my public IP back to the E1000 router, which is running RIP Version 2 (white papers said version 1, but a debup ip rip showed that updates were being ignored due to illegal version), and then poing my other three routers to it for outside access.
The questions I have in this scenario:
1. Will NAT still function if I use the E1000 and set the interfaces connecting to it as ip nat inside? I'm assuming that PAT is already hardcoded onto the router to allow for multiple connections to public IP space.
2. If my IP is 68.X.X.X, I set the E1000 to an IP of 192.168.1.1 and the FastEthernet it connects to is on my 2621 with an IP of 192.168.1.2, would it be possible to telnet into 192.168.1.2? If I were to forward port 23 out of the E1000 to the 192.168.1.2 address. Will my login and password for line vty 0 4 understand the request if the original telnet was to my public IP?
3. If all of that is just non-sense, is there another work-around that allows me to acheive UPnP through my E1000, while retaining telnet ability to my lab so I can try things in different scenarios or while I'm away from home?
We have a singe IP Address in the Internet and want to forward SMTP traffic that hits our ASA Outside Interace to the internal Mailserver.And we like to forward Http Traffic to our Webserver.
Example.
212.23.23.23 Port 25 -> 192.168.1.100 Port 25
212.23.23.23 Port 80 -> 192 168.1.200 Port 80
How do i acomplish that. Which NAT rules do in need?
I have the need to do an outbound NAT redirection. So what I mean is this. I have a custom program that uses SSH to port 22 from a server inside the ASA firewall. This goes out to a server on the Internet over port 22. The ISP of the SSH server told me that they changed their SSH port from 22 to 2102. So instead of changing the custom code on the developed application on the server... I thought it would be easier to do a OUTBOUND NAT redirection for the ASA to see port 22 from the server and redirect it OUTBOUND to port 2102.
so for example:
The server is at 192.168.0.2 and it uses a program to initiate SSH traffic to 205.246.1.1. The server sends to port 22 but I need it automatically changed on the firewall to port 2201 at 205.246.1.1.
It is a Cisco ASA 5510. The server at 192.168.0.2 does have a fixed IP address on the outside with INBOUND NAT for things like port 25 (mail) traffic etc. Lets pretend that was at 64.18.23.60.
I have some legacy (read: old) audio equipment that used leased lines to run, no way to convert them to IP internally. They have x.21 and v.35 interfaces on them.
Is there a way i could use something like an old 2600 series router and run it in reverse, like just using them as a media converter to shove the v.35 over into IP land?
I'm not interested in buying newest latest greatest (these audio codecs are upwards of $5k a pop to replace, x2 for a complete link), i'm just curious if i can turn a WIC-1T into the interface for these boxes and do a direct route to another 2600 on the other end with the same configuration.
This would essentially turn the WIC portion into the local side and the ethernet into the WAN side.
I have Cisco VPN 3000 in main office which provides VPN tunnel to the remote site (PIX 506). In main office we have Domain Controller as well as DNS/DHCP servers.I ran into the issue where DNS reverse lookups are not working from main office to the remote computers:
ping remotecomputer.mydomain.org - works fine from main office and resolves to appropriate IP address ping -a IP address - from main office returns nothing.attdns.com
From the remote computers, both forward and reverse lookups are working fine.
Is it possible to connect WRT54GC with telnet?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have 2 questions regarding wrt160nl.
1.Is it possible to have ssh or telnet access on the router, with the default firmware?
2.Is it possible to disable one of the antennas on the router, while has installed the default firmware?
i got my samsung galaxy s duos...i wanna connect my mobile to laptop for internet using wi fi and also i have mts data card so how to connect frm lap to my mobile for internet using mts data card.??
View 1 Replies View Related