The access swtich is a Cisco 3750 and the Core switch is a Nexus 5000 series. I am configuring the switchport were the AP (3502) and WLC (5508) is connected below:
For AP: interface GigabitEthernetX/XX
switchport access vlan 244
switchport mode access
[Code]....
The WLC is connected to the Nexus switch and it is not accepting the 'mls qos trust cos' command.
I am writting in response to MAB issue which I noticed a few days ago and I am still not able to undestand what exactly happend. First of all I would like to say that I configured MAB authentication and according to the MAC the ISE configure a VLAN. All worked well: the test computer can change VLAN based on its MAC. The problem appear when I cut the connection to ISE server. Accourding to configuration the switch authorize the new device to VLAN 11 (critical VLAN) That is fine ! When the ISE server is up again I had a configuration which should reauthorize all ports assign in critical VLAN. But why that is not happend ??? It looks as the switch didn't notice that the RADIUS (ISE) was up and working again. [code]
View 1 Replies View Relatedim trying to move the config from an 3750 to 3750 PoE but without using the PoE options.I have allready download the config with tftp and upload it to the 3750 PoE. Now the new config is stored on the PoE switch but some of the old setting are still there. Not sure why, i think the config only overwrite the settings which are in the conf file and the setting which are not in the conf file but enabled on it will stay on the switch.After the upload of the config file I deleted all the config I do not need by hand.They are some settings i can't delete and I don't know why, this are the sittings:
1. each fastethernet port has this option: "no cdp enabled" this entry was no availble on the old switch, is the any possiblity to remove this entry?
2. the same for "no mls qos rewrite ip dscp"
3 and for this one "vlan internal allocation policy ascending"
We are using 3750 switches as WAN router facing the WAN cloud. To configure QoS for its WAN port, should I use 'auto qos voip trust" or treat it like a router port and configure class-maps, policy-maps, and attact service-policy input or output?
Because switches have different queuing and dropping methods than routers, auto qos can generate QoS configs that are considered most appropriate for 3750 switches. However the switch functions as WAN router. Maybe it should be configured using router type of QoS with policy-maps and service-policy?
I have a 3750 stack of 4 switches that was installed about 2 years ago. Recently I was doing some work on the switch and realized that I am unable to save the config. I amobviously concerned that if the power fails or the switch reboots I will be reconfiguring it and that is not something I am interested in doing!
Here is the error that I am receiving:
switch#copy run startup-config
Destination filename [startup-config]?
Building configuration.
I am trying to configure a trunk between the above two devices. I like to have vlan11 on ASA. Then I like to connect a host to my switch, and have it communicate with other devices in VLAN 11 or other vlans that reside on the ASA. Below is the config that I currently have.
ASA:
ciscoasa# show run interface Ethernet0/1
!
interface Ethernet0/1
[Code].....
I am uploading new configurations to my Cisco 3750 stacked switch and noticed that after the load I cannot log back into the switch because my password somehow was changed. After performing password recovery and getting back into the swtch, I noticed the configuration register was 0xF. I have never seen this before. The config-register command does not seem to be supported to change it back to factory default. The switch is on a ship which has several power hits when they switch power from shore to ship power.Can this cause the configuration register to change? What is the best way to change the configuration register?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have stack of 2 switches 3750?I config etherchannel between them.
here is result
2 Po2(SD) LACP Fa1/0/15(I) Fa2/0/15(I)
Both ports are up up but standalone Int port channel 2 is down down.Need to know if this is default behaviour when we config etherchannel between stack switches?
I have a 2911 router connected to a 3750 switch. I have configured vlan interfaces on the 2911 router:I am using the vlan 89 (89.2) as the management ip address for me to remotely get to the switch. Is this a proper configuration or could this cause issues in the future.
View 4 Replies View Relatedboot system switch all flash:c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE1/c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin;flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-25.SEE2/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin We have two stack of 3750 switches. When I enter above command getting below mentioned error, two images are showing switch 1, but one image only showing in switch 2, i.e 1st image in show boot command.
%Command to set boot system switch all flash:c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE1/c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin;flash:c3750-ipservices-mz.122-25.SEE2/c3750-ipservices-mz.122-25.SEE2.bin on switch=2 failed
Since Avaya phones do not run CDP, how does the phone know which DHCP pool to pull from to get its IP address if the PC is connected to the phone.
Let's say I have a interface config like this
interface gigabitethernet1/0/1
cisco3750(config-if)#switchport mode trunk
cisco3750(config-if)#switchport access vlan 126
[code]....
And two DHCP scopes configured on the switch. What keeps the phone from pulling from the wrong scope?
i have an issue to connect a trunk between cisco switch and extreme switch i have many vlans that i want to cross via a link between cisco 3750 switch and a Extreme Alpine 3800 switch
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have two 3750-X configured to be a stack and I am planning to re-rack these somewhere else. What I would like to know is what are the effects of having the master switch itself lose power? Does it immediately just make the member take over master (there should be no election since there are only 2 switches??) and there would be no loss of connectivity?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI connected my 2504 wlc with my 3750-x switch using port-channel. Later i came to know that LAG mode is not supported in 2500 series , so i removed port-channel from my core switch and connected all the 4 port in WLC to core without any port-channel. Is that recommended?
one more thing is , from WLC i can ping tha management interface on my core. but i cannot ping the default-gateway of my dynamically created interface on my WLC to core(core is the defauly gateway for all).
I have a 1250 AP connected to an Switch Cisco 3750. We have a SSID(v lan 1 - native) which get an IP Address from our DHCP Server(located in a Windows 2003 server). I added a new SSID in VLAN 2 and I would like no to use the DHCP Server but to make the AP get an IP Address from the pool I created in the own AP (ip dhcp pool Guest) but every time I try to connect the new v lan, it doesn't get an ip address.
Follow the settings of the AP.
version 12.4
no service pad
service timestamps debug datetime msec
service timestamps log datetime msec
no service password-encryption
[Code]...
I have a Catalyst 4006 switch in production and a spare switch of same model. I have to quickly copy the configuration from production switch to spare switch (both L2 and L3 configurations) How do I do that?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have found some samples on the FlexConnect setup for the controller side. However none of the documents mentioned how the switch port should be configured that goes to the controller and AP.
At this moment I have a Cisco 5508 configured in CAPWAP mode with 20 APs. I would like to use same controller for connecting one of the remote sites with 2 APs in FlexConnect mode. Current the 5508 to switch port is configured as 802.1Q port. All CAPWAP AP ports are configured as "switchport access vlan X" where X=capwap VLAN. Need to know how the switch port should be set for the remote site where flexconnect APs connect.
We have PC's that connect through the Siemens IP phones and back to the cisco 3750 which is connected to our core 6500 via L3. The phones use a voice VLAN and the PC's use another VLAN. The whole setup seems to work ok but I was just wondering if the QOS was configured correctly. Our current config on our 3750 switches are mls qos trust dscp on the port that connects to the phone and PC and mls qos trust dscp on the L3 links. The phones are configured for "QOS L2/L3"From the reading I've done so far it seems that any ports connected to a L2 device should be set to cos and not dscp?
View 16 Replies View RelatedI could do configuration of a VPLS in 3750, I have doubt about whether the configuration is similar to that of 7600, but is so I could recommend some document to observe the configuration.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with connecting my OPTEMAN 100mb handoff to the 3750 ME ES ports. Because the ES ports will only accept gig connections, I am unable to use the ES ports.
Is there a work-around? It's too costly to have the OPTEMAN changed over to a GIG hand off and I really don't want to put in another piece of equipment to use the ES ports.
Is there a way to have the traffic flow into a 100mb port ont the 3750 and then over to the ES port?
i have linksys modem which already running for differents vlans i cerated another different vlans 10 amd 20 for 10 and 20 i need internet how should i configure internet on another core switch3750
View 0 Replies View RelatedI have a WCS that I use to manage 8 controllers (2 WiSM's totaling 4 controllers, and 4 more controllers at remote locations). All controllers connect to 3750 switches. The layer three interfaces for all V LAN's that are related to the wireless network are created on these switches. Each layer three interface has a helper address that points the devices in the sub net to the correct DHCP server.
When a wireless device requests a DHCP request I believe it gets to that server based on the relay from the layer three interface on the 3750. However, I know that the virtual interface on the controller is also requesting an address because my firewall is flooded with deny statements. The virtual interface is configured for 1.1.1.1 and so it gets blocked. I am starting to question the use of this interface considering the fact that it is getting blocked and the clients are still getting address.
Are both interfaces trying to act as DHCP relays? Could I setup the controllers to be the only relay (without using the virtual interface)?
I've inherited a server running Ciscoworks LMS 4.0 to manage our plethora of switches. Running 'Configuration > Configuration Archive > Synchronization' against a Catalyst 3750 switch called switch1 successfully retrieved the Running, Startup, and VLAN configs.Running the same command the following day on switch1 failed and returned this in the job execution result:Unable to get results of job execution for device. Retry the job after increasing the job result wait time using the option:Admin > Collection Settings > Config > Config Job Timeout Settings I modified the job result wait time setting to be 600 seconds, tried again and received the same timeout failure. I have also seen this same Failed message on other devices, but have never actually received the configs for them, so I feel switch1 is a better place to start.What are the first things I should check in CiscoWorks for a problem like this? Is there a particular software revision I should be on with LMS 4.0? What timeout value should be used for Archive Synchronization?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a few stacked 3750 switches with vtp transparent configured...some plugged in a fiber from another network into our stacked switches...that network/switch has vtp server configured...once that switch connected to our stack of switches, it turned that stack switch into vtp server...causing the previous vlans configured to erase thus causing management issues with the stacked switches..
View 4 Replies View Relatedseeking for configuration assitance on etherchannel between catalyst 3750 and 6506
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have CISCO catalyst with VLANs (VLAN ID 33, 36, 40-53) configured. I need to configure port mirroring in Switch 3750 for NAC (Network Access Control). I need to Monitor all the VLANs. Here is the SPAN configuration of switch: [code] Monitor session 1 source vlan 33 , 36 , 40 – 53.Monitor Session 1 destination interface fa 1/0/8 (here I am not able to set encapsulation dot1q ) because the error occurred saying %one or more dest port do not support the encapsulation%.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.
Network Diagram:
switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1
[Code]....
Our servers are hosted at the Main site, site office A access to the Main site for Internet and servers. We are thinking NextG to take over when the link between sites goes down.
To start with, what is the configuration for 3750 at Site A and the Main site:
1) Trunking for both switches
2) Routing
3) the automatic failover configuration for the switch at Site A.
I'm fairly new at trying to create isolated network segments on Cisco switches. What I'm trying to do is have multiple isolated paths that originate from my v Sphere infrastructure travel through a layer 2 link, v LAN, up to a MLS, and ultimately out to to the internet through a firewall. Each sub net might ultimately have a number of hosts on it, but I don't think the make up of those hosts will matter here.
My initial thought was creating v LAN tagged port groups on v Switches on my v Sphere infrastructure. Physical connections will go from my ESXi hosts to the 2900 series Cisco switch connected to trunk ports. Both v LANs would be configured on the switch but not assigned to physical ports. The physical connection to the 3750 would also be a trunk port connection from the 2960. The 3750 would have SVI's created that are attached to VRFs that would control route traffic. This might be totally wrong but from what i've read it seems to be going down the correct path I think.
Two part question, is this the best way to go about designing this network? If so I seem to be really struggling with the SVI/VRF part. Every time I create an SVI all of my hosts on the 10.10.10.x network can ping them, regardless of which v LAN they're on.
I just cannot seem to isolate the 172 network.
I'm trying to configure a mirror port on a 3750. This configuration needs to replicate data from local ports, but I need that also act as a regular access port.
With the initial configuration, SPAN port, there is no problem, all the data of the configurated ports is replicating in the configurated port. On the port configurated as mirror there is a PC connected for audio recording. When the port is not operating as SPAN there is communications without problem over the LAN. But when I configure the port as SPAN, communication is interrupted.
Here is the actual configuration:
SWITCH1-PISO7#sh monitor session 1
Session 1
---------
Type : Local Session
[Code]......
I have a 3750 switch.The status of the switch is rommon," switch : ".there is not an IOS in the switch....Are there ways to install an IOS excepted xmodem
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am building a new network and intended on using the min-link feature on my port-channels between a 3750-X series switch and Nexus 4k.
However reading further into this it seems this feature is only supported on higher end models. I cannot find any reference to the min-links feature in the 3750-X configuration guide. Is this an available feature?
The 3750-X model is WS-C3750X-24T-L running IOS 12.2(55)SE3 IP Services
My thoughts is that the is only an LACP supported feature so I may not see the command until I have entered an LACP specific command on the port-channel but unfortunately I do not have a 3750X to verify this on at present.
I have one server which run some application for wireless user. this server forward multicast packet to wireless user. server and wlc physically connect to cisco 3750 switch.i want the server forward the multicast packet to wireless users.server access vlan 4.wlc controller have 2 vlan: 90 and 110.and wireless user some of vlan 90 and some of vlan 110.i enable igmp snooping on wireless controller. and enable globally command but it is not working.which additional configuration i need on cisco switch.
Switch(config)# ip igmp snooping