Do not have internet connectivity, despite all the lights lit on calbe modem and the ASUS WL520GU router and only the internet and ethernet lights are lit on the Linksys 2102.Despite numerous reboots, no change and even bypassing the router and connecting directly to ATA still no conectivity.When I open a browser, it reverts to the Asus error page, "reason for failed connection: You have set the wrong dynamic or static IP address, though nothing was changed.Funny thing again, a direct internet connection to the ATA did nothing.A google search only just shows lots of unasnered posts on this issue, or only the usual 'please reboot'.
I think I'm missing a basic step here. In setting up a RV220W device behind either a cable modem or a DSL modem, the address that is being returned is not the public IP address of the modem, but rather the private IP address assigned by the modem to the RV220W. Doesn't matter for normal web access but trying to set up a VPN tunnel fails due to the inaccurate IP address.
If I do the same thing but use the dyndns.com application on a computer behind all of this (connected on the private LAN of the RV220W via cable), it reports the external IP address correctly. That works in some locations if I have an always on computer to load the application to. In some cases, however, there isn't such a computer to leave dedicated to running the separate program.
Since this works, and the RV220W doesn't, there is some difference between the Cisco implementation and the dyndns.com implementation.
So, is there a way to get the RV220W to return the true external IP address, or is it stuck returning a private address?
Okay so I currently have an ISP that offers the standard "2 Dynamic IP's" and I'm wondering how to utilize this? The tech guy said I need a HUB...but I'm not sure what kind and where to get one etc. Secondly, even if I am able to get this second IP going, will they be entirely separate IP addresses? I need the IP addresses to be completely separate and untraceable to the same source. Is this the case or can you somehow trace back the two dynamic IP's to the same source IP? Will I need two different static IP's if I want the two connections to be entirely separate, unrelated, and untraceable from each other?
I have 2 computer connected and both have dynamic IPIf I change one of my computer's IP from dynamic to static Will it be okay to another comp ? ( Can it still connected to Internet / LAN )
i need to change from dynamic IP to Static for work, Iv rang my provider talk talk and the only way i can do this is go to a buisness line and pay more a month is there anyway i can log into my router and change from dynamic to static myself? im not on about the IP thats starts 192.blah blah blah its the one where u go somewhere like whatsmyip.com mine is dynamic as it changes if router is reset, there is hiccup in internet or computer is off for the night etc...
I need assistance regarding changing of DYNAMIC WAN IP to desired WAN IP to connect my e-mail server of my office, Problem is :i have a dynamic WAN IP at my home internet router , and my e-mail server at office only allows assigned WAN ips to connect , I want to connect from my home, i know the WAN ips which are allowed to connect my e-mail server and i want to change my dynamic wan ip virutally to desired WAN ip for incoming and outgoing traffic from my wireless router, What I need to do :I need to change my dynamic WAN IP to an static desired ip at my wireless router?
I have the dir-601 as my main router. Its IP settings are dynamic, not static. My second router, the router I'd like to use as the access point is a Belkin Wireless G Mimo. My goal is to setup the Belkin as an access point downstairs away from the main router. I'd like to do this wirelessly. I'd like to phsycialy plug devices into the Belkin, while the Belkin receives access to the internet wirelessly from my main router, the dir-601.
Here's my issue. There's an easy option to use the Belkin as an access point. So I do this and set the Belkin router to an IP outside the DCHP range ( currently 192.168.0.100 - 192.168.0.199 ) to 192.168.0.250. My dir-601 will only recognize the Belkin access point while plugged in physically. I know this because when I did a ping test it only see's the Belkin when plugged into the dir-601 via ethernet cables. My ultimate goal is to simply set the dlink dir-601 to recognize the Belkin as an access point.
I am running an ASA with 8.4(3) and am trying to setup a dynamic VPN tunnel. We are having a business reason to establish a VPN tunnel to customers who do not have nailed down IP addresses. Now I found a number of documents that outline the steps involved. It seems the basic steps were to Establish a regular tunnelAdd dynamic crypto mapAssign the dynamic crypto map to the tunnel created under step 1. While this sounds pretty straight forward and simple, while prepping for doing just this I hot a road block while thinking it through. In order for my ASA to put anything into the tunnel it has to have a route to the remote network pointing at my VPN peer at the end of the tunnel. How do I do this in a dynamic tunnel? How do I add a dynamic route so the ASA knows which tunnel to stuff the traffic into? How do I stop the traffic from just being send to the Internet?
Trying to connect a 5505 with a dynamic address on 8.3(2) to a static IP'd asa (5510 on 8.2(1) with a DefaultL2LGroup and dynamic maps already created.
Inside networks: Local (5505) 192.168.100.0 /24 Remote (5510) 10.100.1.0 /24
My dynamic ASA is trying to use a Cradle point 4G connection to a head end ASA-5510. The remote end with the Cradle point 4G is not even initiating the tunnel! I need another set of eyes. it was initiating the tunnel last week but not completing the connection. Now its not doing anything. i am going backwards. Below is my remote ASA config.
ASA5510(config)# sh run : Saved ASA Version 8.2(2) host name ASA5510 enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted password 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted names [code]...
I have a laptop directly attached to the inside interface. The PC and ASA can ping each other. The test interface is the one I am trying to use. Does my default route need to point to 192.168.0.1? Or is the remote peer correct? I thought the remote peer was correct? The 4G modem is like a pass-thru device. If I connect my laptop to it I can get out to the internet.
I've deployed L2L VPN between ASA's dynamic to static in a hub and spoke format.Everything works great if you are on a spoke ASA and you need to go to the hub but you can not go from the hub to spoke.
I'm using ASA code version 8.4(1) ... Below is what I have so far...
I faced up with a strange configuration issue at my 2811 router running IOS C2800NM-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M, Version 15.1(3)T. The configured Dynamic and Static NAT do not work (users can't go out to Internet and can't reach internal services via external IPs).The configuration seems to be very simple (one internal and one external interface, one address for dynamic NAT pool, and only few static translations -- see attached file).
Recently we migrated our network to ASA 5515, since we had configured nat pool overload on our existing router the users are able to translated their ip's outside. Right now my issue was when I use the existing NAT configured to our router into firewall, it seems that the translation was not successful actually I used Dynamic NAT. When I use the Dynamic PAT(Hide) all users are able to translated to the said public IP's. I know that PAT is Port address translation but when I use static nat for specific server. The Static NAT was not able to translated. Any conflict whit PAT to Static NAT?
All outgoing connection from IP1_PRIVATE and IP2_PRIVATE should be natted to IP_PUBLIC and all incoming connection to IP_PUBLIC should be forwarded to IP1_PRIVATE: is it correct ?
I just switched from a Linksys Router to the RV215W, I was able to put custom dns servers for my wan, ie. opendns, but now in cisco, I'm missing this feature.
Does any one know how to set-up a workarround with DHCP from my ISP and access custum dns servers..
When are we gonna have this feature implemented in the WAN secction.
Is it possible to configure a Site to Site VPN from a SA520 with Dynamic IP (DSL) to a Cisco ASA5510 with static IP? I need to make sure about because i am trying to sell this solution to a customer with two branch offices with DSL connection and a Main Office with Metroethernet.
I know that using a a pre-share-key on the defaultl2lgroup of the ASA, the ASA will accept any site to site VPN. I have tried this with the ASA 5505 instead of the SA500 for the branch office, but the ASA5505 is too expensive for my customer.
we are running 8.4(2) on the asa with the below configuration we basically have a static for .7 on .25 and a nat for .7 for port direction with manual nat that takes precedense over auto nat within the object group am I correct that I dontneed the dynamic statement and that its redundant?
I have a 2003 server that is doing something wrong. When I show the mac address table I can see that the server is assigning a bad mac address to several IPS. The server assign a non-existent mac address to some IPS for this reason the server stobut I would like to solve the problem
I have a wireless printer set up with a static IP from below the DHCP restricted range but whenever the printer goes into powersave when awakening I lose connection and ping shows the static IP address being translated to one already allocated in the DHCP range. I can get around this by rebooting the router but its a pain to do this everytime we need to print.
I'm having problems configuring an IPSEC VPN between an SRP521 with a dynamic IP and a ASA5505 with a static IP. Static to Static is fine between these devices and I can configure that without problems. Dynamic to Static however.
I'm trying to combine dynamic and static NAT on a SR520. My dynamic NAT is specified with:ip nat inside source list 1 interface Dialer0 overload access-list 1 permit 192.168.0.0 0.0.7.255 In addition to this I want to perform static NAT for a couple of selected internal hosts. I can do this:ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 which works fine but means that the source address 192.168.1.5 is translated to 10.85.10.2 for all destination IPs. What I want is for the above static translation only to occur for a particular destination subnet.To accomplish this I have tried:
ip nat inside source static 192.168.1.5 10.85.10.2 route-map toOtherSite route-map toOtherSite permit 10 match ip address 150 access-list 150 permit ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.10.0 0.0.0.255
But this does not appear to work. Instead it seems to render the host 192.168.1.5 unable to progress through the NAT, whether the destination subnet is 192.168.10.0/24 or not, and I can't work out what I'm doing wrong.
I am looking for an option to do the following. [code] Cisco 6509 with SUP2 with MSFC2 full mem
I would like the cleanest most stable option to allow this to work and still be secure with authentication. I know on the home side, I can just specify the remote ip and add a password. Not sure what can be done on the DC side to allow this to work properly.
I'm having some issues configuring NAT statements on my ASA5505 which has recently been upgraded to 8.41.
I have a single dynamic IP on the outside interface of the ASA and would like all internal hosts to NAT/PAT to it. In addition, I would like to have several ports 'forwarded' to internal hosts, one of which is TCP/4343. With the current configuration all hosts are NATing to the external interface properly but the service running on TCP/4343 is not accessible from the outside. See command output below:
"sh run object" output: object network DrJones host 10.81.220.90object network LAN-10.81.220.0 subnet 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 "sh run nat" output: object network DrJones nat (inside,outside) static interface service tcp 4343 4343object network LAN-10.81.220.0 nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface "sh run access-list" output: access-list inside_access_in extended permit ip 10.81.220.0 255.255.255.0 anyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit icmp any any echo-replyaccess-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp any interface outside eq 4343
I have a ASA5510 with 2 internal interfaces (inside1 and inside2 same security level) configured with OSPF for dynamic routing with 2 routers to corporate subnets. I have a server in a private subnet that needs to be accessed from Internet. So static pat is used in ASA with the command
As OSPF is in use, the subnet 192.168.1.0/24 may be reachable from interface inside2. When I tried to configure the static command for inside2,
static (inside2, outside) tcp interface www 192.168.1.1 www netmask 255.255.255.255.the error message came out "WARNING: mapped-address conflict with existing static...". Is this just a warning, or this is not possible in ASA.
I am having trouble with getting a copier that I have networked to stay registered in the system. When connecting all the equipment back for the new year I was having trouble getting this one specific copier back online properly. I used to have it assigned with a static IP because the person that was here before me had all the computers map the printer using the IP instead of Hostname but that was causing IP conflicts so I removed it and mapped the printer through Hostname which is made "MPF-TOSHRM328"So now for the actual problem, after the copier got the new dynamic IP of 10.8.214.151 i thought it would be fine and everything would click in because it was mapped to the host name and not the IP. But when I do a tracert on the hostname it still shows up with the old IP. and now that the old ip has been reassigned it actually points to a physical machine now. Weird. All attempts to flush the DNS have not resolved the issue. I even tried going in and deleting the entries in manually. No luck. As a point of reference here is the result from the tracert.Tracing route to MFP-TOSHRM328.78B450.nycboe.org [10.8.214.126] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms SLS330W09 [10.8.214.126]Trace complete. I should also mention that this server is only here in the sense that it is the DC for the computers on this floor. There is a whole other system that assigns the IP's and handles the DNS. I do not have access to it, it is run by the main network people at the central offices.
Basically I have an internet router (1841ISR) with 1 internal (LAN) connection and 2 internet connections. What I want to do is route specific traffic for 3 of my internally hosted services (smtp, https, etc) through one internet connection (fa0/0) and then route all other traffic through the unmanaged/dynamic IP ADSL connection (Dialer 0).
I have upgraded the firmware on my Linksys BEFSR41 V4.3 router. On this router i used Statis IP (so DHCP enabled). This worked fine on my network, until this upgrade. Now when i try to ad another static IP , or when i want to change something in the Routing-tab, i get this message ' Wrong Gateway Input! It should be the same subnet with WAN IP'. Strange because i haven't changed anything in the settings.I already did a complete reset on the router, still the same problem.
i have a cisco router that has dhcp configured, the router ip address is 10.10.10.***. all computer that attached to the router are using static ip and works fine but when i am connecting my laptop using wireless in gets an 192.168.1.*** address.
I have an application for work that I need to access true vpn connection :I have Sbs server 2008 with vpn support , I can access my folders and exchange and ... , this works fine.Now I have an application that search to connect to the server via local ip at work but when I use vpn to access it then the application goes searching on my local ip adress and not on the vpn ip adress.vpn has same ip as local ip at work).Now my question is: Can I set the application to search on the range of my vpn connection instead of searching on my local ip when i am not at work but on a different site ?I tryed almost anything but the application still looks directly on my local ip instead of the ip of my vpn
