I need to split a network: 10.0.4.0/24 into 3 subnets with the following hosts per subnet:
Subnet 1: 80 hosts
Subnet 2: 10 hosts
Subnet 3: 120 hosts
split into 3 subnets?
Im thinking something like this:
Subnet 1
Network 10.0.4.0
Subnet Mask 255.255.255.128
[Code].....
We have ASA 5520 acting as the VPN Server and Cisco 1941 router as EZVPN client. Since last few days client is not able to establish vpn connection. 1941 router is continuously generating the below log messages
001569: Jul 22 12:19:05.883 ABC: %CRYPTO-4-EZVPN_SA_LIMIT: EZVPN(VPNGROUP) Split tunnel attributes(51) greater than max allowed split attributes(50)
001574: Jul 22 12:19:07.835 ABC: %CRYPTO-6-EZVPN_CONNECTION_DOWN: (Client) User=vpn_user Group=VPNGROUP Client_public_addr=<client public ip> Server_public_addr=<server public ip>
004943: Jul 22 11:32:42.247 ABC: %IP_VFR-4-FRAG_TABLE_OVERFLOW: Dialer1: the fragment table has reached its maximum threshold 16
I need to split a client's current LAN into 2 LANs so that the staff's office computers and devices are not accessible to the residents/guests. They currently have a modem+router device that gets it's public IP via DHCP, a couple of switches and a wireless access point that both staff and residents connect to (same SSID). The catch is they don't have static public IPs and the modem+router device MUST keep the current LAN IP network schema (10.1.10.0/24) or the ISP won't provide technical support.
View 6 Replies View RelatedMy question is can I split my cable to create my own network? For example my direct cable wire into the home then split it to tv then router to my laptop...
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a network that I want to split into 3 VLANs, One for the main traffic, another one for the kids so I can control the sites they visit via opendns and the 3rd for the playstation and the Wii. The catch is that I only want the kids network to access the printer and the NAS on the main network, and then the 3rd network not to be able to access the other 2 vlans. I am trying to perform this via a Cisco 871 router
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhat is the best way to install a split tunneling on a network, I got Cisco ASA 5510 with Cisco vpn clients.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have several branch offices that only have a Cisco ASA 5505 connecting clients to the Internet, our main office and other networks. Some of the branch offices uses Site-to-Site VPN to connect to our main Office, other uses a VPN-service delivered by our ISP.
The networking is working fine, but we are having problems with figuring out how to handle dns lookups. I see that the ASA DNS Client can use conditional DNS forwarding, but it cannot act as a DNS server for our clients on the inside network.
We want to do the following:
- Default dns quires should use the DNS servers for the site's local ISP (some sites also uses dual ISP, so we are using DNS1 and DNS2)
- The domain name: company.local should use our main office DNS server (acces by Site-to-Site VPN or our ISP's VPN)
- The domain name: sitea.company.local should use our SiteA DNS server (acces by Site-to-Site VPN or our ISP's VPN)
etc...
We have solved the issue by using Windows DNS server's conditional forwarding for the branch offices that has a local Windows 2008 domain controller.
our branch office's that only have a Cisco ASA 5505 Security Applience?
I need to NAT some subnets to one IP and other subnets to another IP. The range command want work because some of the subnets are out of order.For example subnets 192.168.1.0 - 192.168.7.0 and 192.168.25.0, 192.168.28.0 nat'd to 1.1.1.1. subnet 192.168.26.0-192.168.27.0 nat'd to 1.1.1.2
View 2 Replies View RelatedI recently added a post lately referring to drawing a topology of a large network with a high number of hosts. Now with project itself, I'm designing a network for a large organisation with a different number of hosts at each location.These are, 500,18,52,236 and 12. The location with 500 hosts is the head office, to which every other branch has a wide area network connection through a serial link.How many subnets would I require? I wrote down subnet details, but only for 5 subnets, a subnet for each location. Is that all I need? Or do the WAN connections count as subnets
View 9 Replies View RelatedI've done a very crude drawing of the network setup I'm working on. I just need to run an idea past some network guru's to see if I'm right about my idea.
The existing network consists of
Internet
Proxy Server
Several switches scattered around school
PC's
What the school wants to do is setup a side-along wireless network that uses the same physical switches but on a different subnet. The current subnet is 10.172.1.x .
To facilitate this I'm running a 2008r2 running RIP V2 to route internet traffic to 192.168.1.x subnet. I've had the wireless units use a static address and their own dhcp servers on the 192.168.1.x subnet. Wireless devices found their way to the internet fine. But I'd like to control the addresses from a single point of contact, hence the 2nd domain server running 2008r2. There are reasons for using a 2nd server, I've covered this in previous topics. If it's important, lets call it an intellectual exercise and leave it at that.
The question(s) : If I run a DHCP server on the 2nd server serving 192.168.1.x addresses, then any device on the physical network will obtain either an 192. or a 10. address correct ? The wireless devices will only take a 192. address because the wan address is statically assigned to a 192. address ?
The 2nd question : By setting a static routes out of the 2nd nic on the 2nd server, I can control the dhcp server so it will ONLY route dhcp requests to the statically assigned wireless devices ?
I have a home network. There are a total of 3 PCs. Each runs Server 2008 32 bit. One PC - Lets say Server A has 2 NICs with Ip addresses, 10.0.0.10/30, 10.0.0.2/30.Other two computers Server B and Server C have single NIC with addresses 10.0.0.1/30 and 10.0.0.9/30 resp. So as you can see that there are two subnets 10.0.0.2 - 1 and 10.0.0.9 - 10. I can ping B and C from A. I want that B and C can also ping each other and if I run tracert on B or C, it should give me the route to the destination via A. All this without any other hardware. Like using route add... etc eg. if I write tracert 10.0.0.9 on B, it should return a route like 10.0.0.1-----10.0.0.10------10.0.0.9. Refer to the image that I have Attached
View 7 Replies View RelatedHow many bits must be reallocated from host ID to network ID to create 16 subnets?( i did read the discussion on another page and still no clue). For the Class C network address 192.168.10.0 , which of the following subnet masks provides 32 subnets? How many host bits are necessary to assign addresses to 62 hosts ??
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have a Time Warner Cable business class service with no static IP, with a wireless modem which is plugged to a CAT5 distribution panel. On the jacks (2 other rooms on the house) I have a Linksys E3000 and a Linksys Valet router for signal boost and gadgets usage (TV, cameras, etc).The main router (TWC) has it's own external IP which TWC assigns to me and internally distributes via DHCP the range 192.168.0.x. With that said:
- The E3000 has a 192.168.0.6 IP -- this is fixed setup on the TWC router (ubee brand) by MAC address
- The Valet has a 192.168.0.7 IP -- this is fixed setup on the TWC router (ubee brand) by MAC address
- The main router has the 192.168.0.1 as the gateway and web-interface
Whenever I connect something to the E3000, it is distributing the 192.168.1.x range and the valet 192.168.2.x range.That works perfectly for my home based business until I decided to use more stuff on the network such as a IP printer, IP cameras, etc.
- The IP cameras are connected to the E3000 due to signal strength and I have manually assigned them the 192.168.1.15 and 192.168.1.16 IPs and ports 9001 and 9002.
- The printer is connected to the E3000 and I have manually assigned the IP 192.168.1.30.
Issue 1: Port forwarding On the main router (TWC - UBEE) I have tried to setup a port forwarding by informing the Local IP as 192.168.0.6 (E3000 IP), Internal Port 0, Public Interface IP (0.0.0.0), Ext Start Port 9001, Ext End Port 9001, Protocol - Both, Enabled Yes. On the E3000 I did the same config (screen shot attached e3000.png).This is not working properly. I can't get into the camera.
Issue 2: Printer/ The printer is only accessible if I connect to the E3000 (because it is on the 192.168.1.x network)
Issue 3: How to configure all the devices on the same subnet? If I want everyone to be on the 192.168.0.x network, how to configure properly the E3000 and the Valet? I have tried to force them into the same network but it would not work properly. It would not get an IP from the UBEE router (main).
We have a Cisco wireless infrastructure in place that includes a guest network with its own subnet that is a sub interface of the inside interface on our ASA 5520. There are no routes for it to be allowed access to the internal subnets. So it can only access the internet. This is primarily used by the public, but we have several non employee personnel that we only want to give internet access and force them to access the internal network through our clientless SSL vpn portal or through other internet facing internal resources such as webmail.I have done packet traces from within the ASA and the break appears to be there is no ACL allowing the traffic back into the network once the web resource replies to the request and the traffic is attempting to come back into the network from the web resource. Is that as clear as mud?
I know that this has to be a common problem and a way around this is to allow the guest wireless network access to the internal network but only for the select resources that they require. And that this can be done seemlessly by network specific routes and or alternate DNS entries, but I would like to keep this simple and just allow them to access the web resource, webmail and VPN, from the guest wireless using internet DNS servers without route trickery.
I need to split a connection so I can get internet to two computers.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI got cable modem broadband and need to share that Internet amongst my home, my home office and the apartment I rent out to a tenant on the second floor. I also need them to be on separate networks/LANs/zones so they can't see each other (but still sharing the same Internet connection). How do I do this?
View 3 Replies View RelatedIm about to move into a sleepout which is about 20 metres away from the router. I was thinking of laying a network cable out to my room which would connect to a switch then use network cables to connect up my PS3, TV and Computer. Is this all going to work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe inherited a soundbooth configuration Current Configuration:
1. Networked Projector interfaces directly with a PC through a second NIC
2. We can then control the projector through a web interface via the PC and the IP of the projector.
Desired New Configuration:
1. Maintain current configuration - but ADD a second computer (an iMac)
2. I want to split the connection coming from the projector to the 2 computers so that we can interface with the projector from both computers.
I was thinking I would need a switch but didn't know if there is any configuring I would need to do to get it to work.
I just moved our vpn over to using LDAP/DAP instead of the previous RADIUS we were using before. First of all, the group policy split tunnel is setup for Tunnel Network list Below Network list has a group of networks named "split-tunnel" setup with all of our internal subnets in it. Which seems to be working fine, users are hitting internal networks no problem.Where the issue lies is surfing the web while they are connected to the VPN.I think I know what one of the the issues are, I'm just not sure how to get around it. I have a proxy server setup that all domain traffic goes through say 10.20.30.40. That is obviously on our internal subnet. Our remote users has a policy on their laptops set to where if they can see/get to the proxy server then it pushes all traffic through there, however if they can not, it goes straight to the internet. That way they can still surf the web when they aren't connected to the domain network.
With the new DAP vpn policies, it seems as though they are trying to go through the proxy but failing so all http traffic is getting blocked on their computer as I can still ping say google.com...just can't open the web page.In my SALES-VPN access lists there isn't any acl that allows any traffic to 10.20.30.40(proxy server) so there isn't any reason their laptop would think it could get to it correct?I can't put an access-list SALES-VPN extended deny ip any any log critical at the end of the acl list because then it doesn't show up as an option to apply to the DAP since the acls have to be either permit or deny, not a mix.Also, if I just create an ACL access-list DENY-VPN extended deny ip any any log critical and apply it to the DAP *after* the SALES-VPN ACLs thinking all traffic would flow down as in go through all the permit acls first, and then hit the deny acl after, it just blocks all traffic.It almost seems that some traffic that isn't specifically being permitted by the permit acls is still getting through which is obviously not wanted. However, if I try to rdp into a server that isn't specifically permitted in the SALES-VPN acls it doesn't work so I'm kind of at a loss..
I'm pretty new to this, and I've been trying to read up on what I should do. Here's my situation: we have a new 15mps internet connection coming into our building. We also have a new 891 router. We would like to devote 1.5mbs at the highest priority to one LAN which is just used for VOIP phones. We would like to allow one of the other tenants to use up (but no more than) to 5mps for their LAN, and we'd like to be able to use up to 13.5mps for ourselves if it's available, or at least 8.5mps (15-1.5-5=8.5).
From searching in here and reading the various articles on policing and shaping, I'm thinking that we'd want to set up Class-based weighted fair queuing on a per-interface basis, and have one interface connected to our VOIP switch, one connected to the other tenants switch, and one connected to our firewall. Does this sound like the right way to go? And would anyone have an example of a configuration which achieves this?
I have several PIX 501's and one of them is extremely slow accessing network resources and does not have Internet access. I would like to use split tunnel and have them access the Internet throught their DSL connection and any traffic for network resources sent over the VPN. How can I improve the speed and set up split tunnel via the command line? I dont have the PDM software so I guess I will need to do all the configuration via the command line. Below is the configuration:
PIX Version 6.3(1)interface ethernet0 autointerface ethernet1 100fullnameif ethernet0 outside security0nameif ethernet1 inside security100enable password k4HlcGX2lC1ypFOm encryptedpasswd y5Nu/Nt1/5dK8Iuf encryptedhostname
[Code].....
I have a Cisco 2911 Router and I need to split the traffic from my Lan (Gi0 / 0) by ISP1 (fa0 / 0) and that of my servers (Gi/0/0) by ISP2 (fa0 / 1). [code]My problem comes when wanting to communicate with my remote networks that reach the int Gi 0/1, because when my network to match the policy- route internet sends me all the way.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5505 configured using easy VPN connecting to our corporate ASA. The ASA5505 is configured for network extension mode with a routable subnet. The clients that hang off the ASA 5505 are DHCP and get their IP address and DNS settings from the ASA 5505. I have a split tunnel setup, so only certain networks go over the tunnel back to corporate. Local Internet browsing goes out the ASA 5505 to the ISP.
My questions is how to setup split-dns. i would like to have my clients query the ISP's DNS servers for Internet based websites and when they need to access the exchange server the query goes to our corporate DNS servers. I see a setting for DNS names under the group policy on the corporate ASA, but how does the client know which DNS server to use?
The clients receive a primary DNS server (ISP) and a secondary (Corporate DNS) from the ASA5505.
I'm using an ASA5510 for remote access IP Sec VPN clients and it is configured for split-tunneling. The client computers are running Cisco VPN client software. All of the client computers running Win 7 work perfect, but the client computers running Win XP Pro cannot browse the internet, they only connect to the inside network.
1) Does XP Pro support split tunneling when using the Cisco VPN client software?
2) Does the ASA require a special config to support split tunneling with Win XP clients?
I'm having with my VPN Server on my Cisco 2621xm.
I started by creating a VPN - everything worked great. I assigned the DNS Servers, Domain name, WINS Server so when I connect I'm able to resolve local hostnames on the network with no problem, however I couldn't connect to the internet. I then set up a split tunnel access list. Since I've set that up, I'm now able to ping internet based addresses (www.google.ca), but no longer able to resolve internal host names. I can ping the ip addresses, just name resolution no longer works.
I have one running UTP cable of around 50m, terminated at a point. Is it possible to split my cable so that i can terminate two points - so that i can connect my 2 Pc without a switch in.
View 1 Replies View RelatedBecause of limited budget and a paranoid boss, the MS Access database at work is running through a simple Linksys wireless E2000 N router rather than a more dedicated server setup.A desktop server PC is storing the Access database and 3-4 laptops are connecting to the split database linked tables via laptop wireless N adapters only.Upon having several people accessing and updating records we've noticed a huge amount of instability frequent network interruptions.I have several theories/observations:
1) While not an ideal location (one end of the building), signal strength is consistently shown as 4/5 bars to 5/5 bars, even through several walls
2) Interference: Several other routers, all on 2.4Ghz could be creating too much interference. (none of the laptops support 5Ghz)
3) Number of individuals accessing the database at one time. This is where I'm unclear. Could having 3-4 people working on the database at once pose any potential problems? I'd ordinarily think not but I am coming up short with explanations.
Last week two of us were working with the database, updating records and such, from probably 100 ft or more away with no issues. Then the last few days just to stay connected requires being within 5-10 feet of the router AT MOST. No settings have been changed and network disconnects/interruptions in Access are happening every few minutes.
I am currently trying to configure an Easy VPN connection from an ASA 5505 to and ASA 5520. I have enabled split tunnelling and in the group policy defined the network to be tunneled but when I activate the VPN it tunnels everything from the host computer connected to the ASA 5505. I get no internet access. Have been trying to troubleshoot this for days.Hee are soe specifics, running version 8.2(5) on the 5505 and the 5520 and below is the local config on the 5505 for the Easy VPN:
vpnclient server **.***.***.**
vpnclient mode network-extension-mode
vpnclient nem-st-autoconnect
vpnclient vpngroup dbernstein-5505 password *****
vpnclient username dbernstein password *****
vpnclient ipsec-over-tcp port 10000
vpnclient enable
and the downloaded dynamic policy:
Current Server : 12.***.163.**
Primary DNS : ***.160.***.39
Default Domain : cisco.com
PFS Enabled : No
Secure Unit Authentication Enabled : No
User Authentication Enabled : No
Split Tunnel Networks : ***.160.***.0/255.255.255.0
Backup Servers : None
Is it possible to split data flows on a single T1. Say 1 Flow on time-slots 5-6 and another data flow on time-slots 10-14. If one was data and the other voice would this work?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI'm configurig a VPN profile with NO split tunneling. The tunnel is working to the inside, but I'm not able to get internet access. Below are the NAT statements that I created.
nat (outside) 2 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
global (outside) 2 (ip address)
I'm familiar with 8.6 nat statements, but with 8.2 it's not letting me put in the same commands.
my company has used Split Tunneling for all of our VPN uses, however we recently purchased 2 ASA5505s for use at various jobsites, and have been running into problems with Local Network Administrators blocking certain traffic that we need to operate. They allow full VPN connectivity to traverse their networks, so we are able to use our LAN Resources over the split tunnel no problem.
We have it set up as a Dynamic L2L Connection, and this ASA is operating flawlessly minus the traffic being blocked upstream by the network admin. Our VPN topolgy is Hub & Spoke. Below is excerpts from our config on how the VPN is set up: [code]
What we'd like to achieve is being able to pass ALL traffic (LAN & Internet) through the VPN tunnel, then be processed by the Hub ASA (192.168.9.1) on the other end. I am guessing crypto map + routing would have to be changed?
access-list to_hq extended permit ip 192.168.101.0 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0route inside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.9.1Disable NAT on Spoke. Is this how I would go about doing this??? We need ip address dhcp setroute so our ASA can find the other end and form the VPN tunnel, and I am not sure how this would affect things. [code]
I've created an IPSEC VPN site-to-site from a SR520 (remote office) to a Nortel Contivity(home office)...all works really well on the VPN front as I can communicate effectively over the tunnel. However, this setup will be deployed at a few smaller sites and I'd like to setup a split tunnel so that Internet bound traffic goes straight to the Internet while traffic bound for our home office goes over the IPSEC Tunnel.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have some troubles configuring split-tunneling on ASA 5520.Number of remote users establish ipsec connection with ASA 5520 (in central office) using ubuntu vpnc-client.Split-tunneling is in use, to allow remote users to surf Internet using their ISP.The goal is to remove the possibility to ssh/telnet servers inside corporate LAN for remote users. [code]
There is nat enabled on interface, but there is special statement in nat0 ACL for 192.168.100.0 subnetwork access-list INSIDE_LAN_nat0_outbound extended permit ip 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0.The problem is that remote users can easely ssh and telnet servers in INSIDE_LAN network. Whatever i put in INSIDE_LAN_in ACL, remote users still have full access to this network. Restrictions in REMOTE_split ACL don't work either.