I have a computer connected to a domain trying to login and I got this error message "the trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed"
Then I tried to login as local Administrator and after trying a few passswords get this error. Your account has been disabled.. please see your system administrator
When attempting to log in to a computer (running Windows 7 Professional) here at the office using the network administrator account, I get the error message: "The trust relationship between this workstation and the primary domain failed." I wasn't here when this laptop was set up, and so I don't know if any local user accounts were made or what their passwords would be if they were there, so I can't think of any way to log in to the machine and disconnect/reconnect to the domain which is really my only idea on how to fix it. Finding out what would cause this to suddenly start happening would also be nice, but mostly I just need to figure out how to get reconnected so I can get this back up and running.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWhen I try to connect to our domain I get the error message:Changing the Primary Domain DNS name of this computer to "" failed. The name will remain "(name of our domain)" The specified domain either does not exist or could not be contacted.The procedure is the same I've used since Hector was a pup and never had a problem. I can't add users to the domain and can't log on directly to the domain.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI cannot ping mydomain.local from any computer on my network. In order to this, I have to set DNS 1 as my server's ip address, then I can ping it. The reason this is a problem is because in order to add a workstation to my domain, I have to manually configure DNS to my server's ip. I have two networks, all new systems and this occurs on both. So obviously it is the way im setting things up[CODE]
View 13 Replies View RelatedWork station of domain network stopped accessing the server and internet. Assigned IP address, since DHCP would not hand out automatic IP address. Was working fine before today.
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhat i am trying to accomplish is to set up a domain for my home network. the domain is going to consist of 2 server boxes both running ubuntu 12.10 server edition and a client machine running windows XPone linux box will be my DC using samba and the other will host email, and apache2 web services.i dont know if you need all of this info but in my experience its best to be thorough.I registered a domain through godaddy.com and made it point to my home IP address. now what happens because all of my machines are behind a router is when i type in my URL it brings up the login request for the cicsco webinterface. what i would like to happen is that my router points traffic to the ip address on my home net work 192.168.1.XXX that is hosting the apache2 webserver.I would also like to connect the client(XP) machine to the domain controller but i keep getting an error that says that the domain does not exist. I have been through the samba settings and they are exactly the same as when i set them up for a mock PDC using "example.com" as a domain name
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm receiving this error on a WAVE-574 appliance. The primary interface is configured and I can ping between the wave and the central manager.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an issue bringing up my RMA'd primary ASA unit.
So what happened so far:
1. primary unit failed
2. secondary took over and is now secondary - active (as per sh fail)
2. requested RMA at Cisco
3. got ASA and checked that Lic (SSL), OS (8.2.2) and ASDM are at the same level as the secondary
4. issued wr erase and reloaded
5. copied the following commands to the new (RMA) primary unit:
failover lan unit primary
failover lan interface Failover Ethernet3
failover interface ip Failover 172.x.x.9 255.255.255.248 standby 172.x.x.10
int eth3
no shut
failover
wr mem
6. installed primary unit into rack
7. plugged-in all cables (network, failover, console and power)
8. fired up the primary unit
9. expected that the unit shows:
Detected an Active mate
Beginning configuration replication from mate.
End configuration replication from mate.
10. but nothing happened on primary unit
What is a valid and viable approach in replacing a failed primary unit? Is there a missing step that hinders me to successfully replicate the secondary - active config to the primary - standby unit.
I was not able to find anything related to ASA55xx primary unit replacement with a clear guideline or step by step instructions.
I have something I assumed but I am not sure if this wrong or not. I assume that every say 1 meter, I can send say 1 bits, so if I have 10 meters of link length, I can send 10 bits of data on that link. Do you have any argument to strongly support this assumption, preferrably a reference.
View 13 Replies View Related1.Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(25)SEE2, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) This switch EIGRP coverge is slow.
2.Cisco IOS Software, C3560 Software (C3560-IPSERVICES-M), Version 12.2(35)SE5, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1) This switch EIGRP coverge is fast
The IOS have effect of the EIGRP coverge ? From which version IOS began ?
I have an old computer (Dell gx280) that has a external usb 2.0 hard drive connected to it. I was trying to copy the files over a gigabit network connection to another computer and it was only transferring at approx. 2.5 megabytes a second. This was only using a small fraction of the gigabit network card in both the source and destination computer. I saw the CPU was maxed out on the source PC b/c of an application. Once I quit that application the CPU usage went back to essentially nothing. The copy job then jumped up to 14 megabytes a second and was using 30-35% of the gigabit connection.
The NIC and the USB ports are on the motherboard. How did the CPU usage slow this whole process down and was it impacting the network card, the USB port or both?
How to trust the transit CoS value on ASR1013?
Tried so:
Router# configure terminal
Router(config)# interface gigabitethernet 0/0/0.1
Router(config-subif)# encapsulation dot1Q 1 native
Router(config-subif)# plim qos input map cos enable
But not worked.
Traffic path without ASR:
Server --> DLink 3526_1 --> Cisco 3750 --> Cisco 7606 vrf VoIP --> DLnk 3526_2 --> Client
DLink 3526_1 sets the CoS = 5
Client receives CoS = 5
If we add ASR1013:
Server --> DLink 3526_1 --> Cisco 3750 --> Cisco 7606 vrf VoIP --> Cisco ASR1013 --> Cisco 7600 global --> DLink 3526_2 - Client
DLink 3526_1 sets the CoS = 5
Client receives CoS = 0
We are trying to set up ACS 5.2 in our multi-forest AD environment. As part of our evaluation we set up an Active Directory External Identity Store to a domain (a.b.edu). It connects properly and I can see the directory groups in the that tab when we Select. This domain (a.b.edu) has a two way trust with another domain in another forest (x.y.b.edu). However, I do not see the groups in that domain and I cannot seem to manually add those groups using the Add on the free text Group Name.
The documentation is not clear on this point: Page 8-41 and 8-42 of the "User Guide for the Cisco Secure Access Control System 5.2) says: "The External User Groups dialog box appears displaying a list of AD groups in the domain, as well as other trusted domains in the same forest." This implies to me that it cannot cross forests even though a trust is set up. This seems to be what is happening.
I have a question which i am unsure of, on the 6500 i know i can set mls qos trust to cos or dscp since I don't have any trunks configured on that switch that i want to trust cos most of my ports trust dscp instead. The question is will packets coming in or going out at L3 with the TOS bits set get placed in the correct in/out queue. For example if a packet comes in on a port with a mls qos trust dscp and has the TOS set to XX will this XX get mapped to the correct COS value based on the default dscp to cos map and end up going out the correct queue which handles that specific COS number?
I mainly asked this because i saw the following on the cisco site and again i am suing dscp trust and not cos.
Weighted Round Robin (WRR), Deficit Weighted Round Robin (DWRR) and Shaped Round Robin (SRR). WRED and all the Round Robin scheduling options use the priority tag (CoS) inside an Ethernet frame to provide enhanced buffer management and outbound scheduling.
I applied command "auto qos voip trust" to the uplink interface. But I found that the interface shown command "auto qos trust" was applied when i show running-config. Could the command "auto qos voip trust" show in the configuration after i applied? If not, how can i check the interface that applied "auto qos voip trust"?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a problem with the command mls qos trust dscp, I used the ios c2800nm-ipvoice_ivs-mz.124-25f.bin but i can not enable dont show me the complete command in the interface Ethernet o Giga. I want to configuring mls qos trust dscp.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI want to know what the default behavior about the command 'mls qos trust dscp' under router platform interface. the router is ASR1000 series.we don't need to put above command line to trust dscp in case of router? otherwise, we have to add it as welll as like switch platform.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am reading through a QOS Document and they want me to trust the DSCP value from an IP phone (Siemens) but UN trust the PC DSCP value. How can I trust one thing but not the other? I am using a 2960 Cisco switch with IP base IOS.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have Catalyst2950SI with iOS12.1, connect a wifi-access-point to f1/1(dot1q trunk port),and connect another L2SW to f1/2(dot1q trunk port),and IP phone, MobileCamera connects to wifi-access-point,IP phone has dscp=40 value on its own packet,but MobileCamera doesn't have any dscp value or cos.now, i wanna do QoS by that dscp, So i type as below,
interface 1/1
switchport mode trunk
mls qos trust dscp
interface 1/2
switchport mode trunk
mls qos trust cos
We have QoS configured throughout the company, but the standard config we have applied across the 3750 switches only includes the below: We have IP phones (not cisco) attached that are marking with EF, and the PC is an untrusted end device (so needs to be by default marked as zero).Is the above enough to trust VOIP DSCP EF without resetting it to DSCP 0, or do I also need to add a trust line (i.e.: mls qos trust dscp)?
View 2 Replies View RelatedAre there any differences between the autoqos commands on a WS-C2960S switches (or in any other series)? Follow the commands:
- auto qos trust
- auto qos voip trust
I was checking the documentation on this link:
URL
And couldn't find any great difference between the two commands, as far as I could see they'll set the Ingress and Egress queues the same way.
Are there any differences between those two commands (auto qos trust and auto qos voip trust)? If so, when should I use one and the other?
i would like to know the possibility to use mls qos trust dscp with service-policy in the IOS ver.12.2(25)SEE2.The specific version is not possible to configure like below.
Cat3750(config-if)#do sh run int f1/0/1
Building configuration...
[code]....
Can I use one 1 PC (Powerful PC) as a work station and can I use for to create different nodes.(Clients) Ex. By adding 5 Monitors to that PC, can it be treated as server/workstation ?So each monitor will be treated as single PC ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am having Cisco 3845 series router with c3900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M2.bin IOS . I want to install new Licence on it for DATA. When i am trying to install licence on it i am facing the error "% Error: License installation failed with error: XML parsing failed".
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have some 2960 switches with Lan Lite ios in my infrastructure.And I try to configure them to support "trust device cisco-phone" and "switchport priority extend cos 0" on ports with cisco phones.But LAN Lite image does not support "mls qos trust device cisco-phone".can I use any workaround to trust cos of cisco phone and to remark PC traffic with cos 0?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am wondering if having a Nexus 7K is mandatory to implement SGACLs within a TrustSec Infrastructure deployment or having a Nexus 5500 could be enough?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI've just been testing QOS on 3560 with version 15.0(1) and it seems the the default qos trust behavior on access ports has changed. By default the trust state of a port is not to trust anything, however rather than rewriting the DSCP value of the incoming packets and settign it to 0 the switch now seems to leave the DSCP value unchanged.
SW04-C3560(config)# do sh mls qos int g0/2
GigabitEthernet0/2
trust state: not trusted
trust mode: not trusted
trust enabled flag: ena
[Code]......
Ok so I am working on this networking project for cleaning up our Internal DNS. So we are running untangle that uses DHCP. I am currently going though and 'Reserving' the IP addresses for each work station. This way we can connect to workstations and install software remotely. Problem is our Host (A) records are so messed up and PTR records point to multiple users/pcs. I am aware of scavenging, but we have that set to 14 days per our network admin, but during this time the DNS gets messed up because we have 30 people in our office running MAC's with VM bootcamp and they also use VPN connections. So for instance I use Mac with parallels 7. I used both wired and wireless connections to the internet. This creates 2 IP addresses that needs to be reserved and 1 bridged connection for my VM. So Technically I would have 3 host A records and 3 PTR records? But what about the VPN connection? Sometimes when other ping my work station (ex. ping link2057macbook) it returns an IP address that I used for my VPN and not the correct IP.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwhat is terminal and workstation in networking? I assume they mean client computers.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am setting up the network for the computer institue I work for. We are discarding the old network and are going for a new network. There will be 2 Computer Labs with 60 computers in each Lab. The staffroom will have 20 computers. The Accounts department will have 5 computers. All the departments are in the same building with just 2 floors. It will be a wired network. All computers should have access to the Internet. There will be a printer each in the 2 Labs, staffroom & accounts department which has to be shared with their respective network. The Lab computers will run MS Office, Adobe software etc. Likewise the the staffroom and accounts department computers will also have to run MS Office and probably Adobe software as well. We will be using Windows Server 2003 and are inclined to use IBM servers due to a partnership. Cost isn't a major issue and the management is willing to spend to set this up rightly in the first place.My main question is whether we should go for a thin client network with everything running in the main servers. In that case how many servers should we have and what would be the ideal config of those servers.If we go for workstation PCs for each user if cost isn't an issue then what are the benefits over thin client computersDo we have to have a separate server for data?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI keep getting a 50% loss on one workstation. I tried switching out the network card and that seems to have resolved the issue... Do network cards exhibit strange behavior when they fail or am I overlooking a deeper issue?
View 1 Replies View Relateda workstation on our domain running windows 7 64 bit downloaded updates from microsoft. There was about a hundred of them. Since they installed the machine won't connect to the network shares. It can access the internet easily enough. The Workstation Service won't start. It comes up with an error 1068: The dependancy service or group failed to start. I used System restore to go back before the updates and everything worked again. Installed the updates and the problem re-appears. I have 2 wireless network adaptors so I disabled one.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a hardwired network with 10 workstations plugged into switch. Printer plugged into switch. Server plugged into switch.Switch plugged into router.Router DHCPs except printer is static IP. All have access to internet through server then out through router.Have added another workstation that is not allowed access to the network (on purpose) but needs to be able to use the printer. The workstation is not under our security for virus control, etc so I don't want it in the server. But it needs access to internet and access to printer. Should I create a separate subnet from the router and keep the workstation separate there? If so, then how can I keep the printer accessible to both subnets?
View 1 Replies View Related
