I want to upgrade LMS 3.2 to 4.1. But when I look to "Special Notes and Exceptions for Devices Supported" document ,It seems that 2811 have 2 SysID.
Why there are two IDs for the same hardware and under which ID will my 2811 routers be classified into inventory database. This information is important since customer want to have support of 2811 in CiscoView of LMS 4.1 (around 200 devices).
I am looking to upgrade a 2811 router to 15.1.2T and see in the release notes that this image is only compatible with the "C Series" older ISR routers? What is a "C Series" ISR and how do I know if I have one?
I recently upgraded my 2811 router with an AC- IP power supply, and installed a HWIC-4ESW-POE, with an Inline Power Daughter Card (ILPM-4) installed on the HWIC.
The second I turned the router's power on, there was a spark and a burning smell. Everything still works, except POE. Examining the card, I see it caused a circuit on the ILPM-4 motherboard to blow, and there is black residue everywhere. This is a Genuine Cisco power supply, but why it's done this.
Furthermore, when the power supply was first installed, it had so much electricity (and I know this is why the card got toasted) that touching the end of the console cable or an Ethernet cable connected to the router, or even the router chassis, would cause you to get a small electric shock, like touching a mild electric fence. Clearly, the power supply I installed is "too-powerful", but it is a 2811-AC-IP and nothing should have caused this.
I upgraded a 2811 router to the latest version and apparently everything went smooth. I reloaded and did a sh ver the IOS show the correct version, but the boot strap shows the old IOS. How can I change the boot strap to show the new IOS.
I have two Windows 7 computers and neither one will successfully upgrade a 1242 AP to LWAP. However, I go to a coworker's XP machine and run the tool without issues. On Windows 7 I keep receiving the error message of ACL or Firewall is blocking. I have added rules and then even tried disabling the firewalls completely on both computers and still no success.
Is it possible to upgrade the CSACS-1121-UP-K9 to be a non upgrade part? We were going to upgrade from a Windows 4.x to the above Appliance (version 5.x) but there is now a reason to keep the old Windows version running therefore we cannot give the new Appliance the old ACS's licenses?!So we should have (with hindsight) bought a fresh version of the ACS 5.x rather than an upgrade.
My setup is ISP-2811-PIX 515E-LAN. Right now, I am doing a PAT for IPSEC tunnels to terminate on the PIX. Do you recommend I use the 2811 instead of PIX for VPN or keep things the way it is? Trying to determine the best box to use.
i have a branch router that connects to mpls WAN. Also has a second interface that is used for dmvpn failover in case WAN goes down.We want to use this second interface also as the primary internet circuit for the branch. I changed the default route to the next hop address on the other side of the second interface and expected this to work.But i was told i need to set up NAT for this to work, and set up an ACL for NAT to use. how to set up NAT?
I have a particular site that is causing me trouble, this site is connected in a back to back configuration using 2811 at CO and 2621XM at CPE. The CO end is also the CO for 3 other sites so has a total of 4 wics installed (WIC-1SHDSL-v2), these other sites also have 2621XMs for the CPE.
The problem i am getting is when one site in particular transfers large files to/from client machines, the CPU on the 2811 jumps to 99%:
CPU utilization for five seconds: 99%/98%; one minute: 26%;
I have a Cisco 2811 with an additional HWIC-4ESW card. [code] I need to NAT anything heading out of the WAN port. [code] I can ping anything connected to my other private networks from my 10.0.24.0 network but nothing on the Internet. [code]
I just bought an additional router for my network and I'm in the process of setting it up.I have however hit a snag with enabling ssh on the device. It is a cisco router 2811 running IOS 15.0 (refer below to my attempts)
I have a 2811 ISR configured to provide the following services to my network: Internet access to LAN usersCisco Call Manager ExpressSite-to-stie VPN to 3rd party networksVPN server to provide VPN access to remote usersSecurity Zone configurationsStatic NAT configurations.Now I recently just got the ASA5510 device and I am not sure how to go about with the setup, whether to put the ASA in between the internet and the ISR (Internet - ASA - ISR - LAN), or put the ISR in between the internet and the ASA (Internet - ISR - ASA - LAN)? While i know I can move most of the config unto the ASA, i know that the CME cannot be moved, hence I would like to do the setup such that users on the network still have access to CME.
I've setup a NTP service by using Cisco 2811 routers. This works fine at the moment, but in the end there are some questions left.
1. I'm using two 2811 Routers, one for primary, which is resceiving the time from PUBLIC NTP 1, and one for backup, which is resceiving the time from PUBLIC NTP 2. Is it possible to compare these to times an check if the match? And if not, generate an alarm via e.g. SNMP
2. Is it possible to check via SNMP, if the routers are reaching PUBLIC NTP 1 and PUBLIC NTP 2 for sync?
I have a site that is connected to the internet via T1 into 2811 runing C2800NM-ADVENTERPRISEK9-M), Version 12.4(11)X. I have noticed that when i do a port scan on the outside nat pool i see well know ports in the closed state .ie...7,21,22,23,25,99,100,80,443. These pools for end users to access internet. Does this pose a security risk? What can i change to provide end user access to web but not let these well know ports open?
I have a Cisco 2811 router with two HWIC-ADSL cards configured for dsl connection. I have two lines from the same ISP and i am load balancing between them. I have created a couple of SLA's to check the state of the connections and add to the routing table the two default routes if both are up or any one of them is up.My problem is that when i try to download big files (especially antivirus updates) the download at some point stops (especially the antivirus exits with an error of unreachability). If i shut down one line everything works fine.Could i use something (configuration-wise) to prevent this problem from happening?????Is there any way i can combine the two lines? They are simple ADSL connctions with static ip's.
I want to create a VPN between two PC's, (the server "Data" and "Remote Desktop" check the topology below), the Router Clabeck (cisco 2811 ) is connected to the internet through int f0/0 using a PPPoE connection and connects all the LAN PC's by PAT to the internet (you can see all the configurations in the Show Run below), the "Remote Desktop" is any PC with internet connection.
F0/1 F0/0 DATA--------------------SW-------------------ROUTER(Cisco 2811)---------------------INTERNET---------------REMOTE DESKTOP 192.168.1.51 192.168.1.254 220.127.116.11 192.168.1.1 Current configuration : 2116 bytes ! version 12.4 service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec
I am currently configuring a number of cisco 2811 routers that require the BGP exterior routing protocol, however the IOS version (12.4) currently installed does not support the bgp protocol.After entering the commands into the cisco CLI 'protocol not in this image' is returned.
how many extra interface port can be plugged in to the 2811 router ,there are 2 fixed FE port on this router and i have 3 connection i.e one mpls link , one internet link and one sip trunk .. some body confirm me that i can insert module in 2811 ?
I have a 2811 that is really hitting the CPU hard. Nothing shows on CPU processes. It has an IPsec VPN tunnel back to HQ which also has a 2811 that terminates the VPN. The HQ has 2-3 IPsec tunnels to other remote sites. The CPU at the HQ avg 50% utilization during business hrs, peaks at about 80%. The remote one is very high 95% peaks, avg 80%-95% during business hours with bandwidth utilization of only 10-20Mbps. I read somewhere that its possible that fragmentation could be causing this. My question is, if I set the MTU to 1450 on the remote, I am guessing I will need to do all the other routers as well, the HQ and other remote sites? Siince they use the same outside interface to my HQ, is that correct?