Cisco :: 3750 Via Vlan250 From Core 6509 - Getting Connection Refused?

Apr 11, 2013

We just replaced our ancient 6509 dedicated SAN switch with a Nexus 5548UP (with 4 2248 FEXs).Our old SAN 6509 was completely separated from the Core 6509, and that Core 6509 doubled as a Datacenter switch. We've now segmented the "Datacenter" and "Core." The SAN and servers are connected to the Nexus gear rather than the Core. The old SAN had only 3 vlans. One for SAN data (Vlan16), one for management interfaces (Vlan250), and one for switch management (Vlan15).

As part of my cleanup, I want to get rid of that Vlan15 and use vlan250 for switch management. In another building, we have a 3750 that provides SAN (Vlan16) and management (Vlan250) connectivity to a single Equallogic box and a Dell PowerVault tape drive for backup purpose. That 3750 is the only device that still has an address on Vlan15 (other than the core). Refer to the drawing below.

The Core 6509 is the gateway for Vlan250 and Vlan15. I have created an interface for Vlan250 on the 3750. ACLs exist on vty connections of each switch allowing telnet access ONLY from the Mgmt 2960. There are no ACLs on the Vlans themselves.From the Mgmt 2960, I can telnet to the 3750 using either its Vlan250 IP address or its Vlan15 IP address. However, if I shut down Interface Vlan15 on the Core 6509, I can no longer telnet to the 3750, not even using its Vlan250 IP address.

The connection times out. If I attempt to telnet to the 3750 via Vlan250 from the Core 6509, I get connection refused (which I should get due to the ACL on the vty connections). I can still telnet to other devices on Vlan250 (such as the management interfaces on the Nexus 5Ks). Why am I able to telnet to the 3750's Vlan250 Interface only when the Core's Vlan15 Interface is Up?

View 5 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 6509 - Upgrade Core Switch Without Disrupting Network?

Feb 2, 2013

I am planning to upgrade the current core switch(3750) to 6509 series switch. Since we have a production network running we have to plan for an online core switch upgrade.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches

Nov 14, 2011

If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2 Internet Connection Connected To Same Core Switch 6509

Jan 25, 2012

i'm already has one internet connection is conecting directily to the Core Switch 6509, and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
 
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
 
We have a new internet connection with another ISP/ with another DSL router, how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509.
 
is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
 
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco :: LMS 3.2 Syslog Connection Refused

Mar 26, 2012

I get the following error:
 
SyslogCollector - [Thread: SyslogObjectForwarder] ERROR, 27 Mar 2012 09:02:12,254, Could not send syslogs, removing the subscriber...Connection refused: connect
SyslogCollector - [Thread: SyslogObjectForwarder] ERROR, 27 Mar 2012 09:03:15,223, Could not send syslogs, removing the subscriber...Connection refused: connect
 
Syslog subscription seems ok but syslog messages are dropped and not forwarded:
  
I attached SyslogCollector.log, SyslogAnalyzer.log, AnalyzerDebug.log

View 4 Replies View Related

Cnet Cwr-854 192.168.1.254 Connection Refused?

Sep 1, 2012

I can ping 192.168.1.254 gateway for about 5 seconds and lose the Ethernet connection.On IE nothing happens.Is there any tool I can use to find the router address or update firmware or restore factory default settings.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Connection Refused By Remote Host?

Oct 26, 2011

i have to get a 2811 acting as a terminal server?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Using 6509 As Core Router?

May 6, 2011

One of the pur client want to use Cisco 6509 as core Router. STM Module they want to install in it and used as Core Routing through it. Is it ok with core network ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042G Connection Refused / Policy Violation LAN To WAN

Jul 23, 2012

my firewall log is full of entries listing policy violations rejections.  These look like traffic from LAN to WAN that is being rejected, right? [code]Noted that most of the rejections are in the 40,000-60,000 port range.
 
-new RV042G
-WAN 1 set to 10.x
-LAN 192.168.1.1
 
Action Interface SourceInterface Source Destination Time
 
1. Allow All Traffic [1] LAN Any Any Always
2. Deny All Traffic [1] WAN1 Any Any Always
3. Deny All Traffic [1]  WAN2 Any Any Always
 
 Have tried re-flashing firmware to current version (was already on it), disabled SPI, disabling Denial of Service, all no change.Also noted another issue with logging; bug?   When the router was brand new out of box and again after firmware flash:

* the "All" drop down of System Log was BLANK, not logging any entries although other drop downs such as "System Log and Firewall Log were
* email alerts were not being triggered for log entries
* clear log button appears to resolve the issue after which the ALL shows all entries now

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Connection Refused By Remote Host

Apr 26, 2011

I am trying to telnet to my asa 5510 from the core swith,however i received the below msg,how enable it?
 
 172.30.1.100 is the inside interface of the asa
 CITYCORE#telnet 172.30.1.100Trying 172.30.1.100 ... % Connection refused by remote host
CITYCORE#

View 8 Replies View Related

Servers :: Firefox Proxy Server Refused HTTPS Connection?

Oct 25, 2011

When i access a url with http, it works fine. But with https it dosen't work, and get the message on the firefox as "The proxy server is refusing connections Firefox is configured to use a proxy server that is refusing connections. Check the proxy settings to make sure that they are correct. Contact your network administrator to make sure the proxy server is working.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 - MAC Address Flapping In Core Switch

Dec 28, 2010

I am getting following error in Cisco 6509 switch.BUt there is no impact in the switch.
 
: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 694 is flapping between port Te8/1 and port Te7/1
29:33.959: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 269 is flapping between port Te7/1 and port Te8/1

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: VPC Configuration Template With Two Core 6509 Switch

Jan 3, 2013

What is the VPC configuration template with two core 6509 switch.Pls find the attachment for Network topology.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - High Utilization On Core

May 22, 2012

We have a 6509 core with the below modules running for a long time and the utilization used to be always 10 to 13 percent checking with the supplier it was told to us that due to the firewall modue we have and its normal Now 2 days back i noticed the utilzation had jumped to 90 % and now it happened again
 
I see that on runnung proc cpu
 
16407    56.1%   56.5%    55.9% ios-base
 
16430    35.3%   35.2%    33.9% iprouting.iosproc  
 
the modules present
 
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------  1    6  Firewall Module                        WS-SVC-FWM-1       SAD140901XA  3   16  16 port 1000mb GBIC ethernet      

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Using 6509 Series As Core Switches

Jun 2, 2012

we are using cisco 6509 series switches as core switches. and Cisco 4510,4507 series switches as edge switches. all the vlans are created at core switches and propogating to edge switches through VTP. we are using OSPF as routing protocol at core switch for internal routing. till now we are using 4510,4507 switches as layer 2 switches. Since, 4510 & 4507 switches are hign end swithces i want use them as layer 3 switches instead of layer 2.if i change these switches from layer 2 to layer 3 does it make any impact on our network or better to keep them as layer 2 switches.if i change these switches to layer 3 is there any advantage i will have.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 Core Switch - How To Create DMZ Vlan

Oct 31, 2012

I need to create a DMZ Vlan.  Core switch is a 6509.  FW is an ASA5520.  Need to create a VLAN for DMZ purposes for outside facing servers.  NAT is used on ASA.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3845 - SSH Connection Fails - Server Refused Authentication Protocol

Nov 16, 2011

I have a 3845 router.  Setup SSH Version 2generated rsa keys (1024)set login localtransport input ssh and telnet is enabled since I can't get ssh connection working When I connect using SSH, I get the following error. server refused authentication protocol.

View 21 Replies View Related

TP-Link ADSL2+ Wireless :: TD-W8968 - Port Forwarding Setup / Connection Refused?

Jan 23, 2013

Region : Australia
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 0.6.0 1.1 v0005.0
Build 120926 Rel.27100n
ISP : Bigpond

I am trying to setup port-forwarding (6360 for IP 192.168.1.111 & 6361 for IP 192.168.1.112) on this TD-W8968 modem. But when I test it on [URL]. I get a message "connection refused".

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Implementation As A Service Module Core

Jun 8, 2011

I m planning to implement VSS in core but want some inputs on IOS as i have FWSM as a service module Core :- Ii am running 12.2(33)SXH2a on my Core 6509  and i checkd cisco sites and Fwsm release notes but it states only  I-Train of IOS while mine is H-Train so can I directly upgrade to  I-Train or I was thinking of SXH8b IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding UCS 6248UP To 6509 Core Switches?

Apr 21, 2013

In the next couple weekends I'm planning to add 2 CISCO UCS 6248UP Interconnects to 6509 Core Switches via 10G links.
 
Is there any impact anticipated?  It's a production environment and no loss of up-time is acceptable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Core Switch 6509 - Route Each Vlan To Exit From Spacific DSL

Jan 26, 2012

i'm already has one internet connection is connecting directly to the Core Switch 6509,Vlan 500 (1921.168.1.0) and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
 
The Problem: We have a new internet connection with new Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) another ISP/ with another DSL router, so i need your kindly support and suggest how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509. is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.
 
is there any way like default route , route-map or any other features to :

route Vlan 500 (192.168.1.0) to exit from DSL 1 --> 10.170.10.10
route Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) to exit from DSL 2 --> 10.80.10.10

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: FSWM Active / Standby Installed In 6509-E Core Switches

May 9, 2011

I have FSWM active/standby installed in 6509-E core switches running following FWSM Firewall Version 3.1(3) Device Manager Version 5.0(2)F..I want to upgrade to latest FWSM version as well as ASDM, I downloaded asdm-622f.bin and c6svc-fwm-k9.4-1-5.bin from cisco portal. When i checked the show version of FWSM, it says..The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default settings: Running Activation Key: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
 
I have gone through threads on CSC about how to upgrade FWSM in failover mode, now my concern is, Do i have to take care about activation key or keep as it is ? I have maintenance contract with cisco for all devices.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 5548 Pair To 2 6509 Core Switches / No Vss

Jun 8, 2012

connecting a 5548 pair to our core 6509s.  Just want to be sure we don't introduce any issues into the network.The 6509's are connected and perform all the routing.  Essentially, we're moving away from a 3750 stack in the data center and the 5548s are the replacement.  We'd want to limit the vlans to the specific server network vlans. Our current setup is a port channel between the 3750 and each of the 2 6509s for redundancy. I'd like to use the same functionality when we connect the 5548's but I'm looking for what the config should look like to ensure no spanning tree loops are introduced and that it is configured optimally.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: View Capacity Throughput (backplane) Of Core Switches (6509)?

May 30, 2012

How i can view the capacity throughput (backplane) of core switches (6509)? How i know much is in use?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Core Switch Command / IP PIM Sparse-dense-mode

Oct 23, 2011

What is PIM? give me an example when I will use and not use the PIM command.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Limit For Creation Of Port Chanel In Core Switch 6509 And 6513

Feb 20, 2012

How much is the limit for the creation of PortChanel in a Core Switch 6509 and 6513?Is there a limitation byu hardware?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: 3750 Core Crashes During Nessus Scan

May 24, 2011

I'm currently investigating an issue for one of our customers where one of their 3750 Core Switch Stacks crash / becomes unresponsive during a NESSUS Scan.
 
They've diabled DoS testing and have ensured that safe scanning is enabled.  For the test they are port scanning all of their VLANs (around 600 internal addresses).
 
The network consists of 2x 3750 Switch Stacks connected via fiber, edge switches connect into these cores.  Both cores are running HSRP, for VLAN gateway redundancy.
 
Issue Being faced is as follows:
 
During the scan, Core 1 becomes unreachable from Core 2.  We can telnet to Core 2 and administer as necessary.  However we cannot telnet to Core1, a console connection also fails - the switch stack is unresponsive, but  does respond to pings.
 
On Core 2 I've performed a show proc cpu sorted and can see the IP Input process is running at around 60% and the CPU is highly utilised.
 
Once Core 1 becomes unreachable the network gradually grinds to a halt, almost mimicking some sort of broadcast storm or Spanning Tree loop.
 
Interestingly Core 1 HSRP is still active, so the hello packets are still being sent.
  
The only resolution to the issue is to perform a hard reset of the Core to restore service.
 
Logs from core 1 show the CPU becomes fully utilised.  There is also an error logged indiciating:
 
%FIB-2-FIBDOWN: CEF has been disabled due to a low memory condition. It can be re-enabled by configuring "ip cef [distributed]"
  
Both cores are running IOS 12.2.(52) SE IPBASE.  I've attempted to reproduce the issue in the office here and although a NESSUS scan does increase switch CPU utilisation I couldn't reproduce the failure scenario.
  
What may be causing the 1st core to become unresponsive?  I've found some articles with regard to a 6500 switch rebooting during a NESSUS scan, and also some HP switches exhibiting similar behaviour but nothing that matches the exact scenario I'm investigating.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: LMS 4.0 Manually Added Core 3750 Switch Into System

Jun 25, 2011

I am doing an evaluation of LMS 4.0.  I have loaded the system on Windows and manually added my core 3750 switch into the system.  Device availability is showing the device as available.  However, the other pollers like link utilization, error count, etc. all show that there is no data.  When I go into the poller config, the pollers for link utilization and errors show 0 devices associated and a status of "instance not found".  The CPU and availability pollers show active with my one device added.  I have verified the credentials and if I go into Inventory -> Port and module and select my 3750 I do get a list of all the interfaces and the descriptions so LMS is connecting to the switch and pulling data. 
 
So how do I get the pollers for link utilization and errors to start populating data?
 
Second question, during install I did configure the software update section and it said there was an LMS 4.0.1 available which I told it to download.  Now I have a psu_download directory and some more directories like cm, cmf, etc. but I don't see any file on what to do with them.  What do I need to do to install the new package files that were downlaoded to psu_download?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Infrastructure :: 3750 - Routing At Core Versus Edge?

Mar 29, 2011

I have a very basic networking question If I have, say, 3750's (or any L3 switch, capable of routing) at the edge and a 4500 at the core, where should I route? At the edge? At the Core? Both?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Migrating Core Switch From 3750 To 6500?

Jun 5, 2013

I am planning to migrate the core switch from cisco 3750 to Cisco catalysts 6513 switch. What could be the best approach to minimize the downtime or avoid disrupting the production. I have couple of thoughts, one method is to build the core and then replace the existing core, another option is to build the new switch as the second VTP server and once it recieves all the VTP information then disconnect the old server.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade IOS For Production Core 3750 Switch

May 7, 2013

I want to upgrade IOS for my production core 3750 switch. Below is Show version/fash output. I have IOS image "c3750-ipservicesk9-mz.122-55.SE7", need to confirm below concerns:-
 
1-As this is stackable switch do i need to upgrade on all Switch..i can see there are 3 flash while doing show flash?
2-Is above IOS image support with  my switch? do i able to enable ssh?
3-is flash memory is enough to succefully upgrade IOS?
4-Any other point which i should keep in mind before upgrading..any special feature which this IOS wont support.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 EtherChannel / Stacking In Core Layer

Nov 23, 2011

As we know there are three layer in cisco Network Model:
 
-Core
-Distribution
-Access
 
So my question is  in Core / Distribution layer should i use Etherchannel between switches or use Stacking if switches are stackble.For ex: suppose I have two cisco 3750 switches . so should i use etherchannel between them or use stacking in core layer?What are the advantages and disadv of both.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G / 4948 / 3750 / 3600 - DC Core Design

Jun 19, 2012

I'm working designing a switch system for our core/data center.
 
We have 5 esx hosts, 2 sans with 3 nodes each.  We have voice servers, a couple of routers and a few odds and ends.  There are 7 other locations aggregating into this data center via 1-2gbps fiber connections.  The bandwidth usage on these links is minimal, but there is a total of about 3000 devices aggregating into the system. My main concern right now is the 3560G's are seeing many output drops, due to the small buffer size on those switches.  I have been looking at couple of options to resolve this issue, including the 4948E, 4507E, and 3750X switches.
 
Budget being the biggest factor, I am finding that the 4507 might be out of the price range.  So I was leaning towards the 4948E switches for connecting the servers and iscsi san's as the 3750X is not recommended for iscsi.  Redundancy is important so I would like to have two. The second concern is that I need to aggregate the fiber connections and for that I was looking at the ME-3600X or possibly the WS-C3750X-12S-E.  I'm running eigrp, so this switch would need to have full routing, as it would also serve as the core switch for the 4948E's.
 
So in the end I was thinking that two 4948E switches up linked to the ME-3600X which would do full routing for the fiber aggregation and any routing needed for the servers and sans.
 
Servers and Sans_________4948E________ME-3600X_________7 fiber connections
                    |____________4948E_____________|
 
I would look at a second ME-3600X in the future for redundancy.  This is the lowest cost biggest buffer solution that I could find.

View 2 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved