Cisco WAN :: Using 6509 As Core Router?

May 6, 2011

One of the pur client want to use Cisco 6509 as core Router. STM Module they want to install in it and used as Core Routing through it. Is it ok with core network ?

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco WAN :: 6509 - MAC Address Flapping In Core Switch

Dec 28, 2010

I am getting following error in Cisco 6509 switch.BUt there is no impact in the switch.
 
: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 694 is flapping between port Te8/1 and port Te7/1
29:33.959: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 269 is flapping between port Te7/1 and port Te8/1

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: VPC Configuration Template With Two Core 6509 Switch

Jan 3, 2013

What is the VPC configuration template with two core 6509 switch.Pls find the attachment for Network topology.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 - High Utilization On Core

May 22, 2012

We have a 6509 core with the below modules running for a long time and the utilization used to be always 10 to 13 percent checking with the supplier it was told to us that due to the firewall modue we have and its normal Now 2 days back i noticed the utilzation had jumped to 90 % and now it happened again
 
I see that on runnung proc cpu
 
16407    56.1%   56.5%    55.9% ios-base
 
16430    35.3%   35.2%    33.9% iprouting.iosproc  
 
the modules present
 
Mod Ports Card Type                              Model              Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ -----------  1    6  Firewall Module                        WS-SVC-FWM-1       SAD140901XA  3   16  16 port 1000mb GBIC ethernet      

[Code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 3750 Via Vlan250 From Core 6509 - Getting Connection Refused?

Apr 11, 2013

We just replaced our ancient 6509 dedicated SAN switch with a Nexus 5548UP (with 4 2248 FEXs).Our old SAN 6509 was completely separated from the Core 6509, and that Core 6509 doubled as a Datacenter switch. We've now segmented the "Datacenter" and "Core." The SAN and servers are connected to the Nexus gear rather than the Core. The old SAN had only 3 vlans. One for SAN data (Vlan16), one for management interfaces (Vlan250), and one for switch management (Vlan15).

As part of my cleanup, I want to get rid of that Vlan15 and use vlan250 for switch management. In another building, we have a 3750 that provides SAN (Vlan16) and management (Vlan250) connectivity to a single Equallogic box and a Dell PowerVault tape drive for backup purpose. That 3750 is the only device that still has an address on Vlan15 (other than the core). Refer to the drawing below.

The Core 6509 is the gateway for Vlan250 and Vlan15. I have created an interface for Vlan250 on the 3750. ACLs exist on vty connections of each switch allowing telnet access ONLY from the Mgmt 2960. There are no ACLs on the Vlans themselves.From the Mgmt 2960, I can telnet to the 3750 using either its Vlan250 IP address or its Vlan15 IP address. However, if I shut down Interface Vlan15 on the Core 6509, I can no longer telnet to the 3750, not even using its Vlan250 IP address.

The connection times out. If I attempt to telnet to the 3750 via Vlan250 from the Core 6509, I get connection refused (which I should get due to the ACL on the vty connections). I can still telnet to other devices on Vlan250 (such as the management interfaces on the Nexus 5Ks). Why am I able to telnet to the 3750's Vlan250 Interface only when the Core's Vlan15 Interface is Up?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Using 6509 Series As Core Switches

Jun 2, 2012

we are using cisco 6509 series switches as core switches. and Cisco 4510,4507 series switches as edge switches. all the vlans are created at core switches and propogating to edge switches through VTP. we are using OSPF as routing protocol at core switch for internal routing. till now we are using 4510,4507 switches as layer 2 switches. Since, 4510 & 4507 switches are hign end swithces i want use them as layer 3 switches instead of layer 2.if i change these switches from layer 2 to layer 3 does it make any impact on our network or better to keep them as layer 2 switches.if i change these switches to layer 3 is there any advantage i will have.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 6509 Core Switch - How To Create DMZ Vlan

Oct 31, 2012

I need to create a DMZ Vlan.  Core switch is a 6509.  FW is an ASA5520.  Need to create a VLAN for DMZ purposes for outside facing servers.  NAT is used on ASA.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 VSS Implementation As A Service Module Core

Jun 8, 2011

I m planning to implement VSS in core but want some inputs on IOS as i have FWSM as a service module Core :- Ii am running 12.2(33)SXH2a on my Core 6509  and i checkd cisco sites and Fwsm release notes but it states only  I-Train of IOS while mine is H-Train so can I directly upgrade to  I-Train or I was thinking of SXH8b IOS.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Adding UCS 6248UP To 6509 Core Switches?

Apr 21, 2013

In the next couple weekends I'm planning to add 2 CISCO UCS 6248UP Interconnects to 6509 Core Switches via 10G links.
 
Is there any impact anticipated?  It's a production environment and no loss of up-time is acceptable.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Core Switch 6509 - Route Each Vlan To Exit From Spacific DSL

Jan 26, 2012

i'm already has one internet connection is connecting directly to the Core Switch 6509,Vlan 500 (1921.168.1.0) and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
 
The Problem: We have a new internet connection with new Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) another ISP/ with another DSL router, so i need your kindly support and suggest how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509. is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.
 
is there any way like default route , route-map or any other features to :

route Vlan 500 (192.168.1.0) to exit from DSL 1 --> 10.170.10.10
route Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) to exit from DSL 2 --> 10.80.10.10

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: FSWM Active / Standby Installed In 6509-E Core Switches

May 9, 2011

I have FSWM active/standby installed in 6509-E core switches running following FWSM Firewall Version 3.1(3) Device Manager Version 5.0(2)F..I want to upgrade to latest FWSM version as well as ASDM, I downloaded asdm-622f.bin and c6svc-fwm-k9.4-1-5.bin from cisco portal. When i checked the show version of FWSM, it says..The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default settings: Running Activation Key: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
 
I have gone through threads on CSC about how to upgrade FWSM in failover mode, now my concern is, Do i have to take care about activation key or keep as it is ? I have maintenance contract with cisco for all devices.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2 Internet Connection Connected To Same Core Switch 6509

Jan 25, 2012

i'm already has one internet connection is conecting directily to the Core Switch 6509, and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
 
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
 
We have a new internet connection with another ISP/ with another DSL router, how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509.
 
is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
 
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
 
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Connecting 5548 Pair To 2 6509 Core Switches / No Vss

Jun 8, 2012

connecting a 5548 pair to our core 6509s.  Just want to be sure we don't introduce any issues into the network.The 6509's are connected and perform all the routing.  Essentially, we're moving away from a 3750 stack in the data center and the 5548s are the replacement.  We'd want to limit the vlans to the specific server network vlans. Our current setup is a port channel between the 3750 and each of the 2 6509s for redundancy. I'd like to use the same functionality when we connect the 5548's but I'm looking for what the config should look like to ensure no spanning tree loops are introduced and that it is configured optimally.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: View Capacity Throughput (backplane) Of Core Switches (6509)?

May 30, 2012

How i can view the capacity throughput (backplane) of core switches (6509)? How i know much is in use?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / 6509 - Upgrade Core Switch Without Disrupting Network?

Feb 2, 2013

I am planning to upgrade the current core switch(3750) to 6509 series switch. Since we have a production network running we have to plan for an online core switch upgrade.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Core Switch Command / IP PIM Sparse-dense-mode

Oct 23, 2011

What is PIM? give me an example when I will use and not use the PIM command.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Limit For Creation Of Port Chanel In Core Switch 6509 And 6513

Feb 20, 2012

How much is the limit for the creation of PortChanel in a Core Switch 6509 and 6513?Is there a limitation byu hardware?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA Firewall Positioning In Transparent Mode Between 6509 Core Switch And WLC

Apr 26, 2011

I do have the below setup,,
 
1. I have 6509 switch
 
2. I have 2 WLC configured in Active/Active mode connected in Trunk mode (L2 Port-Channel) connected with 6509 switch
 
3. On switch side i have configured the port as Trunk
 
4. L3 SVI for wireless users are created in 6509 switch (attached the diagram).
 
I would like to introduce a Cisco ASA 5520 firewall with AIp-SSM module so that all wirelees traffic can be inspected.
 
The issue is: Without changing any configuration in the network (switch & WLC) is it possible to introduce the firewall?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Stackable Switches And 6509 Core Switches

Nov 14, 2011

If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1921 - How To Chose Core Router

Jan 26, 2012

How do I chose a router? Network has about 100+ devices across a campus with remote sites connected thru metro-e.Thinking of a 1921 to use as core router.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 To 6509-E Chassis Upgrade?

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

     x3     48 ports
     x1     NAM
     x2     Sup720
     Running 12.2(18)SXF3
 
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade Of 6509 To 6509-E Chassis

Nov 21, 2011

I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:

x3     48 ports
x1     NAM
x2     Sup720

Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Using 6509 As Router?

Jul 23, 2011

I have an old 6509. I have being using it as a switch. It is running CATOS.
 
Its configuration is :
 
WS-C6509 Software, Version NmpSW: 8.5(2)
Copyright (c) 1995-2005 by Cisco Systems
NMP S/W compiled on Dec  6 2005, 20:22:19

[Code]....

Any IOS version (bgp bundle) wich could be used to have 6509 as a router?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 / Flapping Interface On A Router?

Nov 20, 2012

I am trying to determine a problem with flapping interface on a router  not showing up in log buffer if Cisco IOS. I've included the config on  the switch that pertains to the logging and can't seem to figure what is  going on. The SNMP trap is being sent to our Central Management trap  server and that is reporting the interface flapping but the flap doesn't  show up in the log messages.

hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 up up
hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 down down

[code].....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Duplicate Router ID?

Mar 19, 2012

I have a duplicate router ID problem that is confusing to me.  A 6509 and 4510 swich both show the same router ID, but only the 6500 has the router ID IP address configured in it. We are running EIGPR.  The 6509 has L0 as 164.72.239.1 configured, which is it's router ID. The 4510 doesn't have 164.72.239.1 configured on it, yet that's what it's router ID is.  Below are a few show commands displaying this - and as you can see from the 'show run | include 239' from the 4510 there is no 164.72.239.1 configured on it:
 
6509 chassis
 
interface Loopback0ip address 164.72.239.1 255.255.255.255end
RS6509-Core-A#sh ip eigrp topIP-EIGRP Topology Table for AS(1)/ID(164.72.239.1)
Codes: P - Passive, A - Active, U - Update, Q - Query, R - Reply,       r - reply Status, s -

[Code].....

why the 4510 has that router ID?
 
I know I can configure a different router ID on the 4510, but I'm curious as to why it is the way it is.

View 3 Replies View Related

Core Switch Getting Hanged?

Jun 6, 2011

In my Company there is a core Switch 4500 series , to which in the 1st module servers are connected and in the second module 2960 , 3750 series Switches are connected, problem is that the Utilization of Core switch is very high and the core gets hanged. the configuration of the senerio is VTP domain i.e core is Server and the rest are Clients....

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Connecting Servers To Core Switch?

Jul 19, 2011

there are more than 15 servers which include xen,esx,vmware,also san etc..which are connected to L3 core switch directly. And vlans are created for each.....xen,iscsi,vmware,xen,server. wanted to know is there any other technology other than directly connecting servers to core switch and assigning vlans that can be used in place?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: L3 Core Switch VLAN Monitoring With IPS?

Jun 10, 2012

We have a L3 core switch with multiple VLANs setup. Is there a way to place an IPS so as to monitor the traffic passing between, lets say, VLANS 1-3 and VLANs 4-10?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco :: LMS 4.0 - Core Switch Is Showing In RED Color

Aug 31, 2012

I am facing issue with LMS 4.0. The Core Switch is showing in RED color,and device type as UNKNOWN. It was working fine but some how it is showing this problem.

View 14 Replies View Related

Juniper Core With Baystack Switches?

May 21, 2011

Is there any problems expected in working with core switch of Juniper EX8208 with access switches of Nortel Baystack5520 / 380 / 425 and 325? Whether the VLAN, Multicasting, streaming, STP, SNMP, etc will work without any issues?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Auto Failover Of Core Switch With Other Route

Apr 18, 2013

I want my core switch auto failover to other route if the primary route is link down it will go to the secondary route

example
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 100

if my core switch detect next-hop 1.1.1.1 it will re-route and go to the 2.2.2.2 for the next-hop my core switch using static route and cant support ip sla

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Any Traffic Interruption Turning On TE In MPLS Core

Jul 4, 2012

Is there any traffic interruption if turning on TE in a working MPLS core?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: L2 Vs L3 Between 1002 And 3750X Core?

Feb 4, 2013

we are replacing network equipment at one of our sites. The network will have 12, 3750X switches(6 stacks) - one stack will be the core. A 1002 will be the WAN router to the Main campus. The 1002 will connect to the core via 2 ethernet cables. I'm debating whether to use L3 or L2 between the router and Core. I've heard that routing is more efficient if L3 is used and also I will be able to create an L3 etherchannel  between the 1002 and Core switch. See the attached doc.

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved