I am getting following error in Cisco 6509 switch.BUt there is no impact in the switch.
: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 694 is flapping between port Te8/1 and port Te7/1
29:33.959: %MAC_MOVE-SP-4-NOTIF: Host 0000.0c07.ac01 in vlan 269 is flapping between port Te7/1 and port Te8/1
[Code].....
What is the VPC configuration template with two core 6509 switch.Pls find the attachment for Network topology.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to create a DMZ Vlan. Core switch is a 6509. FW is an ASA5520. Need to create a VLAN for DMZ purposes for outside facing servers. NAT is used on ASA.
View 7 Replies View Relatedi'm already has one internet connection is connecting directly to the Core Switch 6509,Vlan 500 (1921.168.1.0) and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
The Problem: We have a new internet connection with new Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) another ISP/ with another DSL router, so i need your kindly support and suggest how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509. is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.
is there any way like default route , route-map or any other features to :
route Vlan 500 (192.168.1.0) to exit from DSL 1 --> 10.170.10.10
route Vlan 600 (172.16.1.0) to exit from DSL 2 --> 10.80.10.10
i'm already has one internet connection is conecting directily to the Core Switch 6509, and the Switch is route any internet request with default route:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.170.10.10
10.170.10.10 is --> Next hop for the DSL router internal IP, and it's working fine.
We have a new internet connection with another ISP/ with another DSL router, how to connect both of them to exit from the Core Switch 6509.
is it ok if i make another default route to the Next hop to the new DSL router as:
SW6509-conf)# ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.80.10.10
10.80.10.10 is --> Next hop for the new DSL router internal IP.
I am planning to upgrade the current core switch(3750) to 6509 series switch. Since we have a production network running we have to plan for an online core switch upgrade.
View 7 Replies View RelatedWhat is PIM? give me an example when I will use and not use the PIM command.
View 4 Replies View RelatedHow much is the limit for the creation of PortChanel in a Core Switch 6509 and 6513?Is there a limitation byu hardware?
View 7 Replies View Relatedwe have Core-Siwtch 4503 in the main building which is connected to another Core 4503-E in another building ,, now our PCs connected to the 4503-E ,,, any XP M/C can pick an Dhcp-ip but and M/C run Win.7 Cannot !!
action taken :
1st we try to connect our win 7 pc in the node which was connected to xp M/C ,, and it didnot take ip from the DHCP . ,, 2
2nd we ensure from the core-switch configuration and its normal with no mistake
3rd trying to use tool from Microsoft Fix-it Center whih name is ( Microsoftfixit 50475 ) which is just .msi file but the problem face us is that this tool donnot accept to run on win 7 cause its made for vista .
4th after some researchs we notic that there is some modifications have to be performed on registery by disabling the dhcp broadcast flag we did it but nothing change yet
5th now we are waiting to perform another action which is Disable the IP Helper service in win 7
I do have the below setup,,
1. I have 6509 switch
2. I have 2 WLC configured in Active/Active mode connected in Trunk mode (L2 Port-Channel) connected with 6509 switch
3. On switch side i have configured the port as Trunk
4. L3 SVI for wireless users are created in 6509 switch (attached the diagram).
I would like to introduce a Cisco ASA 5520 firewall with AIp-SSM module so that all wirelees traffic can be inspected.
The issue is: Without changing any configuration in the network (switch & WLC) is it possible to introduce the firewall?
I am trying to determine a problem with flapping interface on a router not showing up in log buffer if Cisco IOS. I've included the config on the switch that pertains to the logging and can't seem to figure what is going on. The SNMP trap is being sent to our Central Management trap server and that is reporting the interface flapping but the flap doesn't show up in the log messages.
hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 up up
hstir1#sh int desc | inc 8/33
Gi8/33 down down
[code].....
We have a pair Cisco 6509 switch in which 2 * 48 Port 1G line cards and 1 * 16 Port 10G line Card, FWSM and Sup 720 are installed.We have Cisco UCS and HP Blade servers.Cisco UCS servers are connected to Cisco 6509 switch using Fabric Interconnect, and HP Servers are directly connected to core switches.Recently the team made many changes in the network. Upgraded the IOS in Cisco 6509 switch, Configured Port profiling , MAC Pinning , HBA Cards to UCS / Nexus 1000V Infrastructure. After this change they lost the connectivity to UCS and HP Serers. Every tower is checking at their end.
The Network Team has reverted back the core switch with old IOS , but still the problem persisit.I could only see the following error log in the core switch. There are two port-channels one between core 1 and core 2. The other is between core switch and FWSM module. [code]
One of the pur client want to use Cisco 6509 as core Router. STM Module they want to install in it and used as Core Routing through it. Is it ok with core network ?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a 6509 core with the below modules running for a long time and the utilization used to be always 10 to 13 percent checking with the supplier it was told to us that due to the firewall modue we have and its normal Now 2 days back i noticed the utilzation had jumped to 90 % and now it happened again
I see that on runnung proc cpu
16407 56.1% 56.5% 55.9% ios-base
16430 35.3% 35.2% 33.9% iprouting.iosproc
the modules present
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.--- ----- -------------------------------------- ------------------ ----------- 1 6 Firewall Module WS-SVC-FWM-1 SAD140901XA 3 16 16 port 1000mb GBIC ethernet
[Code].....
We just replaced our ancient 6509 dedicated SAN switch with a Nexus 5548UP (with 4 2248 FEXs).Our old SAN 6509 was completely separated from the Core 6509, and that Core 6509 doubled as a Datacenter switch. We've now segmented the "Datacenter" and "Core." The SAN and servers are connected to the Nexus gear rather than the Core. The old SAN had only 3 vlans. One for SAN data (Vlan16), one for management interfaces (Vlan250), and one for switch management (Vlan15).
As part of my cleanup, I want to get rid of that Vlan15 and use vlan250 for switch management. In another building, we have a 3750 that provides SAN (Vlan16) and management (Vlan250) connectivity to a single Equallogic box and a Dell PowerVault tape drive for backup purpose. That 3750 is the only device that still has an address on Vlan15 (other than the core). Refer to the drawing below.
The Core 6509 is the gateway for Vlan250 and Vlan15. I have created an interface for Vlan250 on the 3750. ACLs exist on vty connections of each switch allowing telnet access ONLY from the Mgmt 2960. There are no ACLs on the Vlans themselves.From the Mgmt 2960, I can telnet to the 3750 using either its Vlan250 IP address or its Vlan15 IP address. However, if I shut down Interface Vlan15 on the Core 6509, I can no longer telnet to the 3750, not even using its Vlan250 IP address.
The connection times out. If I attempt to telnet to the 3750 via Vlan250 from the Core 6509, I get connection refused (which I should get due to the ACL on the vty connections). I can still telnet to other devices on Vlan250 (such as the management interfaces on the Nexus 5Ks). Why am I able to telnet to the 3750's Vlan250 Interface only when the Core's Vlan15 Interface is Up?
we are using cisco 6509 series switches as core switches. and Cisco 4510,4507 series switches as edge switches. all the vlans are created at core switches and propogating to edge switches through VTP. we are using OSPF as routing protocol at core switch for internal routing. till now we are using 4510,4507 switches as layer 2 switches. Since, 4510 & 4507 switches are hign end swithces i want use them as layer 3 switches instead of layer 2.if i change these switches from layer 2 to layer 3 does it make any impact on our network or better to keep them as layer 2 switches.if i change these switches to layer 3 is there any advantage i will have.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwe have coonection between c3750 and wlc 5508 and it shows that mac address flaps between two interfaces of c3750. [code] two ports are trunking and one port is for management purposes and the other port is for the all other vlans. But it shows that it flaps always. And i think WLC uses one mac address for all device and not for port specific and that causes problem.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI m planning to implement VSS in core but want some inputs on IOS as i have FWSM as a service module Core :- Ii am running 12.2(33)SXH2a on my Core 6509 and i checkd cisco sites and Fwsm release notes but it states only I-Train of IOS while mine is H-Train so can I directly upgrade to I-Train or I was thinking of SXH8b IOS.
View 2 Replies View RelatedIn the next couple weekends I'm planning to add 2 CISCO UCS 6248UP Interconnects to 6509 Core Switches via 10G links.
Is there any impact anticipated? It's a production environment and no loss of up-time is acceptable.
I have FSWM active/standby installed in 6509-E core switches running following FWSM Firewall Version 3.1(3) Device Manager Version 5.0(2)F..I want to upgrade to latest FWSM version as well as ASDM, I downloaded asdm-622f.bin and c6svc-fwm-k9.4-1-5.bin from cisco portal. When i checked the show version of FWSM, it says..The Running Activation Key is not valid, using default settings: Running Activation Key: 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000 0x00000000
I have gone through threads on CSC about how to upgrade FWSM in failover mode, now my concern is, Do i have to take care about activation key or keep as it is ? I have maintenance contract with cisco for all devices.
connecting a 5548 pair to our core 6509s. Just want to be sure we don't introduce any issues into the network.The 6509's are connected and perform all the routing. Essentially, we're moving away from a 3750 stack in the data center and the 5548s are the replacement. We'd want to limit the vlans to the specific server network vlans. Our current setup is a port channel between the 3750 and each of the 2 6509s for redundancy. I'd like to use the same functionality when we connect the 5548's but I'm looking for what the config should look like to ensure no spanning tree loops are introduced and that it is configured optimally.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow i can view the capacity throughput (backplane) of core switches (6509)? How i know much is in use?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 2960 switch and every then and now the ports are flapping, while i was on console i saw ports going down and coming up...when the ping to machine ip addresses timed out the port status on switch was still up...no errors collisions seen on sw port. Below is sh int when the port was flapping
[code]...
we have cisco 2960 switch which is connected to a cisco 2811 router. flapping issue between these two devices??
The following actions i have taken, but no result.. I have changed cables. have set speed to 100 and duplex full on both the interfaces but the interfaces are showing up up still not getting connectivity. same i have to auto on both sides still no result what configurations should i set to resolve this issue...?
show logging
May 1 16:00:30: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to down
May 1 16:00:39: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to up
May 1 16:17:28: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to down
May 1 16:17:36: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/12, changed state to up
May 1 16:25:28: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to down
May 1 16:25:37: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to up
May 1 17:19:25: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/11, changed state to down
Configuration as below:
macro name vmware
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport mode trunk
no switchport access vlan
[code].....
Note:Both active blade switch and standby one are connecting to same aggregate switch 3750. Yet the active one, with same config as standby one, has not occurred this issue.
If I have two stackable switches were only one stackable switch has two uplinks one uplink goes to one core 6509 switch and the other uplink goes to the other 6509 core switch can a Layer 3 etherchannel be used if each uplink go to a different core switch, by the way hsrp is running between both switches and also can you give an example how data will be routed from the stackable switch through the ethernetchannel to one of the core switch accross the WAN to another core switch?
View 1 Replies View RelatedIn my Company there is a core Switch 4500 series , to which in the 1st module servers are connected and in the second module 2960 , 3750 series Switches are connected, problem is that the Utilization of Core switch is very high and the core gets hanged. the configuration of the senerio is VTP domain i.e core is Server and the rest are Clients....
View 12 Replies View RelatedI have an Issue.In my networks, 1 single user is facing Network Slowness issue. i needs to check to which port user is coneected in switch to CHeck whether that port has any errors.But problem is, i am providing support from remote location.And my concern LAN segment is Very big,I have only user Ip address details,when i ping the Ip address from Core switch it is pinging. but when i give show ip arp & give Ip address then its not learning and listing out the Mac address to trace down to the specific port.
View 3 Replies View Relatedthere are more than 15 servers which include xen,esx,vmware,also san etc..which are connected to L3 core switch directly. And vlans are created for each.....xen,iscsi,vmware,xen,server. wanted to know is there any other technology other than directly connecting servers to core switch and assigning vlans that can be used in place?
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe have a L3 core switch with multiple VLANs setup. Is there a way to place an IPS so as to monitor the traffic passing between, lets say, VLANS 1-3 and VLANs 4-10?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI am facing issue with LMS 4.0. The Core Switch is showing in RED color,and device type as UNKNOWN. It was working fine but some how it is showing this problem.
View 14 Replies View RelatedI want my core switch auto failover to other route if the primary route is link down it will go to the secondary route
example
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 1.1.1.1
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 2.2.2.2 100
if my core switch detect next-hop 1.1.1.1 it will re-route and go to the 2.2.2.2 for the next-hop my core switch using static route and cant support ip sla
I tried to implement WLC5508 in my network but when I came to connect it to the switch core which is a Catalyst 4000 the link didn't get up. This switch module is a fastethernet, I wonder if that might be the problem since I also tried connecting my laptop to the WLC and the link got up.
If that might be the cause, is it possible to get WLC to 100 Mbps?