What is the best way to isolate hosts on WiFi network managed with 4400 controllers so they only see def gw but not each other, something like "switchport protected" but for WiFi ....
View 4 Repliesi've been looking for a way to isolate clients on a Cisco Aironet 1121 on a certain SSID, and i cant find anything, tried pretty much everything i coudl remember, but since im no expert on Cisco wireless.
Quote:
Cisco IOS Software, C1100 Software (C1100-K9W7-M), Version 12.3(7)JA1, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
Technical Support: [URL]
Copyright (c) 1986-2005 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
[Code].....
We have a new SSID that needs to be added to an AP through a 4400 Controller with software version
7.0.116.0
All AP's are configured as Lightweight.
I use two wlc 4400 (4.2.x version) with a mobility domain and one ssid, both wlc are connected to a cisco l2 switch infrastructure. On the wlc I use the p2p blocking action 'drop' [URL] to isolate the clients from each other. Does only unicast traffic is blocked or also multicast and broadcast traffic like arp requests?Concerning blocking p2p traffic of clients connected to the same ssid but different controllers I found the following statement in the LAP FAQs [URL]
Q. In autonomous APs, Public Secure Packet Forwarding (PSPF) is used to avoid client devices associated to this AP from inadvertently sharing files with other client devices on the wireless network. Is there any equivalent feature in Lightweight APs?
A. The feature or the mode that performs the similar function of PSPF in lightweight architecture is called peer-to-peer blocking mode. Peer-to-peer blocking mode is actually available with the controllers that manage the LAP. If this mode is disabled on the controller (which is the default setting), it allows the wireless clients to communicate with each other through the controller. If the mode is enabled, it blocks the communication between clients through the controller. It only works among the APs that have joined to the same controller. When enabled, this mode does not block wireless clients terminated on one controller from the ability to get to wireless clients terminated on a different controller, even in the same mobility group.
what's the best practise to prevent this inter wlc client traffic? I already read about using acls on the wlc dynamic interfaces, or private vlans on the l2 switch vlans where the dynamic interfaces are connected to. Is it allowed to completely isolate the wlc from each other on these dynamic interfaces with acls or private vlans or do the wlc need to see each other on this interfaces (e.g. heart beat)?
I have 2 SSIDs on WLCs.I would like to have 1 SSID point to the acs radius using LDAP store and the 2nd SSID point to the acs radius using the host identity store for mac filtering.both scenarios are working, but not together.if I adjust the rule order I can get one SSID, but then the other fails. [code] It seems to me that there should be a simple process to make this happens. I thought if the rule is not matched it would move on to the next rule etc.I might be able to live with first checking ldap and if that fails move on to the local host db, but that seems ineficient. url...
View 3 Replies View RelatedI would like to enable "client isolation" on an autonomous, standalone 1142N AP but I don't see that option anywhere in the web interface. how to keep associated clients from passing traffic to one another on this AP?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am considering upgrading our 5508 WLCs to version 7.4.1 to take advantage of the Bonjour gateway. What I want to do is allow clients on our guest wireless network to access things like the Apple TV in our conference rooms. My intention would be to have the Apple TVs on a separate vlan. Obviously, the Bonjour gateway would allow for access between these 2 networks. The question I have is this. If I have client isolation turned on my guest wireless network, is it still possible for these devices to access Apple TVs on another network?
View 2 Replies View RelatedUsing a wrt610n.I am trying to Isolate one of my wireless bands from the rest of the network. I turn on the AP Isolation and I still have access to all of my wired computers. With AP Isolation working will they be able to see the hard drive plugged into the router?I've heard that they can still see other wireless devices, is that true? And if so, can they see others wireless devices on the other wireless band?
View 18 Replies View RelatedUsing a wrt610n. I am trying to Isolate one of my wireless bands from the rest of the network. I turn on the AP Isolation and I still have access to all of my wired computers.
Questions: With AP Isolation working will they be able to see the hard drive plugged into the router? I've heard that they can still see other wireless devices, is that true? And if so, can they see others wireless devices on the other wireless band?
A Cisco RV220W router/firewall connects the local LAN to the internet. The router is connected to a new Cisco SG300-28P switch configured in Layer 2 mode. There are two new AIR-1142N wireless access points running in autonomous mode connected to 2 ports on the SG300 powered through PoE. The AIR-1142N access points are running the latest firmware version 15.2(2)JB. There are two VLANs defined: VLAN1 is the native on all devices, and VLAN2 is for wireless guest traffic to provide access to the internet only.Internal/staff traffic is on 192.168.100.x, and the wireless SSID is MYNetS.Guest traffic is on 192.168.200.x and the wireless SSID is MyNetG.IP addresses are being assigned by the RV220W.
All works well with one exception. Wireless clients on the internal SSID are able to ping/access the switch, router, and other clients on wired ports on the switch. The router, switch, and wired clients can ping wireless clients. However, wireless clients, on the same SSID and the same 1142N cannot ping/access one another. They are being isolated from each other. We absolutely need to have this capability.The SG300 does not have port security enabled on any port. none of the workstations/laptops have a firewall enabled. These laptops are all Macs btw. I have checked that neither of the 1142N access points have Public Secure Packet Forwarding enabled on either of the VLANs.I am at a loss as to why the wireless clients are being isolated.
I have a Linksys E2000 router on my home network. The router has the newest version of firmware. Every once in a while, wireless clients on my network become "isolated". Here's an example of what happens. I set up a new wireless printer. I can print to the printer wirelessly from my phone, PC's, etc. all fine after setup. I'm thinking everything is cool!! Well after 2 weeks to 1 month this device will become "isolated" so I cannot print to it; it has an IP address, it can ping its gateway, but i cannot ping it from other devices on the same subnet. I know it's not the printer because if i unplug my E2000 and plug it back in, it works fine.
Another example. I have two windows 7 PC's that are on the same home group and i can share files between them. Sometimes it works and other times it doesnt. I can ping my gateway but they cannot ping each other. I would troubleshoot the issue like crazy from the host end, but the second i unplug my E2000 and plug it back in, BINGO they can talk. Something is wrong with how these routers function with hosts in inter-subnet communications.
I have a host that can successfully connect to a PIX 515E (7.x OS) via VPN Client; however, I have no IP routing to the LAN from the remote host.The VPN IP pool works finem,The LAN default gateway is the inside interface on the PIX; the network is flat L2 behind it.The default route on the PIX points out; no other routes are defined,The VPN remote host can be pinged from LAN hosts, but the VPN remote host cannot ping any LAN host, not even the PIX inside interface.
View 2 Replies View RelatedASA 5510
Ver 8.2(5)
I have been looking all over the place for the answer of how to allow clients on an IPSEC VPN to ping from host to host.
I'm just wondering if its possible to ping an IPv4 host using the IPv6 host assuming that the NAT64 has already been implemented?
[code]...
I own a E4200 v1 router and recently discovered that wired and wireless devices cannot talk to each other.Their IP address are acquired through DHCP and inside the same network, but cannot talk to each other by any means, such as ping or http connection.I tried switching wired device to wireless and this actually solve the problem. I've searched and seen thread talking about "AP isolation" settings in advanced wireless setting, but there's no such setting page in my router (running on v1.0.5 firmware). I've already disabled any filtering and firewall function on the router, but still no good.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to assign a single ssid to multiple interface groups by assigning the ssid to multiple AP groups?
I have buildings geographically dispersed that are configured with multiple vlans in interface groups so that I can maintain an addressing scheme of dhcp assigned addresses per building. Each building is also further grouped as AP groups. I'd like to know if by assigning the same wlan ssid to each of the AP groups, will I maintain addressing integrity for each building? I'm thinking it will work.
Do the buildings have to be outside AP range of each other to avoid problems?
5508 controller
7.2.110.0 code
6 buildings
6 interface groups
1 ssid
I found [URL] that it's possible to create IPSec between WLC and MS IAS server. Is it possible to use ACS 5.2 instead of IAS and establish IPsec between WLC and ACS?
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a Cisco 4400 series WLAN controller.When I go to the clients and view who is connected; I can also filter it. However it only lets me filter by mac address, ap, wlan profile, etc.
It does not have IP filtering. Is there a way to filter using IP? Basically I want to find a particular client with a certain IP that's connected to our WLAN.Also how do we block the client? If we deemed that person should not get access.
We have a single 4404 that was setup long before I arrived with Guest networks that timeout and other such tweaks. Is there a document somewhere that shows a way to migrate the old settings to a new 5508 that we are purchasing? By the time the 5508 arrives I will have a very small window to setup the unit before a new wing goes live. I need the new unit as we have reached our limit of licensed AP's on the old 4404. It seems like everyone keeps talking about an easy way but no one says how to do it.
I have never setup one of these units before from scratch so I don't know how long it will take.
Does WLC 4400 is supported in LMS 4.1 in CiscoView.
When I check device update in admin-system-software center. I don't see any available package for the WLC 4400.
I am configuring an old WLC4400 with V4.2.130.0. I added a new sub-interface for VLAN 50 with proper IP for the subnet and then add the Radius server(Windows server 2008 with NPS) onto WLC4400. I then created new WLAN with WPA+WPA2 Encryption and 802.1x key management and selected the Radius server under AAA for authentication.
Configured the test XP with WPA-Enterprise and PEAP as EAP method. I purposely configured computer to prompt for username and password.
When I try to connect, I did get prompt for username and password. However after that nothing happens. It seems like laptop just keep trying to authenticate.
I checked windows event log and do not see anything under NPS. I know this windows server NPS setup works as it is also the authentication server for our remotevpn.
is there any special option I need to turn on for WLC in order for Radius authentication work? Or is there any known bug with V4.2.130.
I am replacing an old 4400 series WLC running version 4.0.179.11 to a new 5508 WLC running version 7.2.110.0.
We currently have 70 x 1131 Access points on the 4400 WLC.
With this upgrade, do i need to upgrade the old 4400 to version 6.0 so the AP's get an up to date IOS or can i directly migrate all AP's over to the new 5508 without any version incompatabilities on the AP's?
I am abit worried that the AP's are running a very old IOS on the 4400 v.4.0.179.11 to go straight to the new 5508 v.7.2.110.0.
l need change a wlc 4400 to 5500, but l don´t know what l need back up, and how can I do to join the H Reap APs in the new 5500 WLC because all H Reap APs that l have, are not in the same city , and I understand if l want join AP in the new WLC l need to connect in the same network segment, is it rigth ?
View 7 Replies View RelatedI have some problems integrating WLC 4400 with AD using ldap. The the WLC LDAP Server and W LAN for Web Authentication are configured according to [URL].
when I connect to SSID the laptop is given the ip address, then I can see the web-page with lo gin and password - it seems to be OK, but when I enter lo gin and pass it tells me, that it's incorrect.
The attributes of the LDAP server:
Server Address *.*.*.*
Port Number 389
User Base DN ou=ORG,dc=domain,dc=local
User Attribute userPrincipalName
User Object Type Person
the test user is located in AD folder ORG, but this folder also contains a lot of sub trees
There are some questions:
1) Is it obligatory to use value "Authenticated" in the Simple Bind option or it can be Anonymous?
2) Is the Controller capable for searching the users located in User Base DN sub trees?
Here is some debug from the controller:
667: LDAP_CLIENT: UID Search (base=.....
669: LDAP_CLIENT: ldap_search_ext_s returns 0 85
669: LDAP_CLIENT: Returned 1 msgs including 0 references
[Code]....
I current have 20 x cisco AP 1142 with WLC 4400 series, I'm looking for newer/latest Cisco AP for expansion. I was looking at Cisco 3500 series but not sure how good/flexible they are when comparing to 1142 and other AP series.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a 4400 WLC for 100APs running the 7.0.98.0software version. Now, only 48 APs are joined, and the WLC dont accept new joins. The log below are from my WLC but appear for all others APs:
%LOG-6-Q_IND: spam_lrad.c:1440 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP 00:3a:98:ae:e3:f0 supporting CAPWAP%LWAPP-6-CAPWAP_SUPP_VER: spam_lrad.c:1440 Discarding discovery request in LWAPP from AP 00:3a:98:ae:e3:f0 supporting CAPWAP%CAPWAP-3-TX_ERR: capwap_ac_sm.c:1966 Failed to transmit discovery response to AP 00:3a:98:ae:e3:f0%CAPWAP-3-ENCODE_ERR: capwap_ac_sm.c:2269 Failed to encode Discovery (code)
i have a existing wireless network setup in my office existing wlc in 4402 and LAPs are 1130 & 1242 all are working fine but we are now planning to use new 5500 series controllers for the same access points,i want to ask that how i can done this job with very minore downtime and users disconnectivity + zero error results??
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe have a WLC4400 controller with about 30 LAP. We moving to a new IP scope and was wondering what is the best way to change the IP address of the controller. We have tried doing this via GUI however we have to power cycle the controller to get it back online using the old ip address.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to upgrade all my controllers (a mix of 4400 and 5508) to 7.2.103.0 from 7.0.116.0. Can I make that jump or should I do incremental?
View 7 Replies View RelatedLike the way you do with the Cisco IOS.
ie show start | i router
Managed to guest LWA working with ISE for wireless guest portal access? I have Cisco 4400 WLCs running latest 7.0 code and ISE 1.1.2.All guest portal examples seem to be CWA which only works on 7.2 code.Am I without hope getting this working on 7.0 code?
View 3 Replies View RelatedDoes CSCua29504 affect 4400 series WLCs as well? Bug toolkit mentions just 5500, so want to get a confirmation.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have just upgraded one of our 4400 to 7.0.98.0. Most of the AP re-registered with out issues. I have two AIR-LAP1142N-E-K9 on a remote site that will not re-register.I have pointed them to another 2125 WLC (7.0.98.0) and they register fine. Point them to yet another 4400 (7.0.98.0) I get the same issue.I am getting this error when the register on the 4400s.*Jan 11 14:39:24.000: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Selected MWAR 'abzewwlc'(index 1).*Jan 11 14:39:24.000: %CAPWAP-3-ERRORLOG: Go join a capwap controller *Jan 11 07:05:55.000: %CAPWAP-5-DTLSREQSEND: DTLS connection request sent peer_ip: 144.46.211.5 peer_port: 5246*Jan 11 07:06:55.000: %DTLS-5-SEND_ALERT: Send FATAL : Close notify Alert to 144.46.211.5:5246 I suspect it may be as they both have In the client config.Then again maybe not.Configured Switch 1 Addr 158.139.177.203Configured Switch 2 Addr 144.46.214.25
Question 1 if I do a "clear config except static IP" will I still be able to telnet tp them or will they default to no telnet no ssh ?
Question 2 any idea how to get past this DTLS error ?