Cisco :: Creating Dial Peers Through Sip Trunks?
Sep 24, 2012
Had a question regarding creating dial peers through sip trunks. It will be through verizon fios so it'll be terminated through the fa0/0 port. I know to the provider i'll implement something along the lines of this:dial-peer voice 1 voipsession target ipv4:1.2.4.4sipv2port fa0/0Many of the documentation I came across really only shows pots dial-peers will a voip dial-peer work the same? Something a long of the lines of this:dial-peer voice 2 voipdesination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-]...... no digit-stripport fa0/0
View 9 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Feb 15, 2013
I need to purchase an 64K dial up modem or a 64K dial up external adapter
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2011
I have a location where I have 2 WAN links, but without a dynamic routing protocol in between. I want to implement a kind of hub to 2 spokes VPN. But the spokes will actualy be on one single ASA firewall, each spoke on a different interface. One hub-spoke will be primary, the other one the secondary. When the WAN link for the primary VPN fails the secondary should be started on the hub to the other spoke.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2012
Let's say I have a Brocade switch, and a Cisco switch, and I've formed a VLAN trunk between the two.On the Cisco switch, I configure the trunk to utilize VLAN 3 for its native VLAN.On the Brocade switch, I utilized the command 'default-vlan-id 2'. I have configured the port going to the Cisco switch in dual mode.From my understanding, when a port is placed in dual mode, it sends frames that are untagged as the default vlan. Does this cause a native VLAN mismatch?
View 19 Replies
View Related
Jul 11, 2011
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 which is setup as an EasyVPN client to e remote VPN concentrator.
The Cisco ASA has the 50 internal user license with 10 VPN peers.
We just upgraded the license from the base 10 internal user to 50 user license but it has not resolved the problem and only 10 internal users still work, the 11th fails.
Does each EasyVPN client on the inside network take up 1 of the 10 VPN peer licences?
This seems to be the issue from what I can see, just need confirmation.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 12, 2011
I am trying to get a 2811 to accept two IPSec peers however can only get one working at a time. I have setup fa0/0 and fa0/1 with their own public facing IP addresses with crypto maps associated to each interface however can only establish connectivity to one interface at any one time.
Relevent configuration below:
crypto isakmp policy 2
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
[code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2012
I need to adapt a Cisco Catalyst switch configuration into a new ASR9000 router and I do not know how to configure trunks and access ports on an ASR9K router.
This is the configuration of the catalyst switch I want to replace.
interface GigabitEthernet1/0/1
description Access-Port -> SERVER
switchport access vlan 5
spanning-tree portfast
!
[code]....
Am I right? Or do I need to use the command “rewrite ingress tag pop 1 symmetric”on any of the interfaces o subinterfaces? Do I have to configure the command “encapsulation dot1q untagged“ on the GigabitEthernet0/0/0/0.5 subinterface?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 16, 2011
I'm building this network and I stumbled upon a problem that I don't understand. Here is how my config looks:
PC -----------vlan5-------Cisco 3560----trunk3-5----Cisco AP1420
Vmware guest
Configuration of 3560:
interface Vlan3
description ID-180, wifi1
ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.224
ip access-group 115 in
[code] .......
Configuration of WIFI AP:
interface FastEthernet0
no ip address
no ip route-cache
[code]....
PC and vm ware are plugged in port 5 and 6, wifi in port 7. There if no V LAN ID set on the PC, but there is V LAN ID set on the VM ware esx interface. If I try to ping WIFI from PC or esx, ping doesn't get through. If I plug WIFI to port 5 or 6, I get access it.
View 19 Replies
View Related
May 6, 2013
I have one ASA with two tunnels. Each going to a different 3rd party Checkpoint firewall (site A, site B) Each site has two servers (A1, A2, B1, B2)I can only connect to A1 and B1. any connection to A2 and B2 fails. I have defined B2 and A2 in the crypto map to be protected.If I only have B2 or A2 in the crypto map ACL then the tunnel fails. Phase 1 does not come up. Its as if the ASA is ignoring the entries for B2 and A2.ASA running 8.4(2).I have also trashed the VPN and built via the wizard, same result.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
At our organisation our routers all have at least 3 BGP peers, each from a different connectivity provider. The different providers that we use all have different internet transit CDRs. Is there a way that I can configure a priority for the 3 BGP peers on our routers so that outbound traffic to the internet is sent to the BGP peer from the provider with the highest CDR?
Routers are C2821
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2012
What is the reason of following NTP error. I am unable to configure further ntp peers on the router. Could not able to understand the reason of 100 peers. I am adding only 2nd peer on the router but getting this error. There is no problem adding peers in other 6500s .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2011
I'm running 12.2(33)SXJ1 on a 6500 with several IPv6 BGP peers. Is there any way to monitor the BGP status of IPv6 peers? I've been through the BGP4 mib and cant seem find a way to check the status of IPv6 peers.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2012
I am imagining a smallish networking (AS1234) with say three full BGP table peers that provide transit to the network (just to keep the maths simple here); Lets say AS100 and AS200 are preferred transit providers with AS300 as a backup/least prefered (AS prepends or similar stop us from using this network by default). So in this scenario our little network gets two different paths across the Internet, as not to rely solely on one provided, with a backup provider to hand also.
How do you mange issues like packet loss somewhere in AS100's or AS200's network? So lets say a host on our AS1234 network is talking to host in AS888 and the preferred route is through AS100 but somewhere deep in AS100 a link is flapping (for example) and I can't get to AS888 reliably through there anymore, but I can through to other peers of AS100 OK. We can postulate that AS100 is the best path for 50% of the Internet and AS200 for the other 50% (this is a best case fictional scenario). I can't ping 50% of the internet via AS100 and then in the event a ping fails (or some other more reliable test) tear down the BGP session to use AS100 until it's fixed again, nor vice versa with AS200.
First of all, I asume you don't know about the issue between AS100 and AS888 until someome moans about it to you? Secondly, do you then some how modify the route(s) to AS888 that come from AS100 (route map for example to change the weight or preference) so AS200 is now preferred for AS888? Do you infact shut down the AS100 peering and now use AS200 & AS300? How do you rectify these situations that are beyond you control using what is in your control?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2013
R11 is acting as host for testing purposes (pinging the DG's, and the ISP interfaces -> which are the lo0 address on the routers.I also have another question: How would I go about providing redundancy on the trunks from the Switch to the router?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I am beginning to implement OSPF into the network I work on. I have a network which consists of multiple 4500, 6500 series routers and 3560s. Each switch has its own set of VLANs. In other words VLAN X on one switch is not the same as VLAN X on another switch. I had envisioned connecting each switch via trunk links and then routing via the loopback addresses on each device. That didn't work. Then I created a VLAN 100 on each switch. Each one was configured with an IP in the same subnet range (10.3.0.1 and 10.3.0.2). I added these addresses to the OSPF process in area 0. It worked. However, this is not desired. I have not seen many examples of 4500 layer 3 switches configured with OSPF. The examples I have seen show the interfaces configured with IPs.
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2013
I've been tasked with finding all switch ports that are configured as Trunks. We plan to use LMS 4.2 to push (via Netconfig) new interface level commands to all user (non-trunked) ports. From my experience, this poses a problem because we do not know which ports are configured as trunks -vs- user ports.
Using Netconfig is not going to be easy since there is no way to script this. It would be great if I could run a show command on a switch and then have CWSI peform a change based upon the output.In other words, we need a way to run a job based upon the output of a command.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
We have an ASA5520 configured with a IPSec VPN, from any ADSL home/office our VPN clients can connect without any problem, but when we use our cellular phones in tetering mode (as an accesspoint) our VPN clients are impossible to connect. Same machines,same software, same operating system, same remote IP (ASA5520 external IP) only change Wifi connection (ADSL to cellular phone). The signal of cellular phones is not the problem we was doing the tests with different phones (IPHONE & ANDROID), different locations (all in spain) and differents providers (vodafone, orange and movistar) of internet by cellular phone.We think that perhaps the problem is the licenses that our ASA5520 has..
Our ASA5520 comes with this licenses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual
Maximum VLANs : 150 perpetual
Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual
Failover : Active/Active perpetual
[code]....
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 4, 2011
we have a cat6509 with FWSM. We pass to the FWSM several VLANs. AllL3 is assigned to the FWs.In the Cat6500 log we have received this message %SVCLC-5-FWTRUNK: Firewalled VLANs configured on trunks ,when we configure 2 vlans in a trunk to an ESX server (these 2 VLANs are alreadyassigned to the FWSM).Idea is to share an interface to a ESX server with several VLANs, some of them are assigned also to FWSM.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2009
I would like to monitor the status of ether channel and trunk configurations in 6500 Catalyst switches running both CATOS and IOS. I would like to understand the specific mibs /OIDS that should be monitored for ether channels and trunks. I am trying to get a better handle on tracking the ether channels and trunk dynamically and then understanding when the ports are having issues (up/down and errors). I need to understand how to differentiate these type of ports from regular access ports.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2013
I have 2 3750 switch stacks which I would like to have redundant trunks between them. This will provide two physical connections traveling through different geographical locations for redundancy in the event that a cable is severed. I couldn't find anything in regards to setup/config. Does it matter if I go stack1/switch1 to stack2/switch1 and stack1/switch2 to stack2/switch2 or should they cross to opposite switches like a stack cable? I don't think that should be necessary, but couldn't find any documentation. Should there be an issue with loops?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 3, 2013
A Cisco RV220W router/firewall connects the local LAN to the internet. The router is connected to a new Cisco SG300-28P switch configured in Layer 2 mode. There are two new AIR-1142N wireless access points running in autonomous mode connected to 2 ports on the SG300 powered through PoE. The AIR-1142N access points are running the latest firmware version 15.2(2)JB. There are two VLANs defined: VLAN1 is the native on all devices, and VLAN2 is for wireless guest traffic to provide access to the internet only.Internal/staff traffic is on 192.168.100.x, and the wireless SSID is MYNetS.Guest traffic is on 192.168.200.x and the wireless SSID is MyNetG.IP addresses are being assigned by the RV220W.
All works well with one exception. Wireless clients on the internal SSID are able to ping/access the switch, router, and other clients on wired ports on the switch. The router, switch, and wired clients can ping wireless clients. However, wireless clients, on the same SSID and the same 1142N cannot ping/access one another. They are being isolated from each other. We absolutely need to have this capability.The SG300 does not have port security enabled on any port. none of the workstations/laptops have a firewall enabled. These laptops are all Macs btw. I have checked that neither of the 1142N access points have Public Secure Packet Forwarding enabled on either of the VLANs.I am at a loss as to why the wireless clients are being isolated.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
I keep seeing these messages in my logs very frequently on a Nexus 5548UP.
%LLDP-3-DETECT_MULTIPLE_PEERS: Multiple peers detected on mgmt0
what might be causing these? Google has shown less than desirable amounts of information on this message.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I'm configuring two etherchannel groups (2 ports in each) on a 3560 switch. I need to trunk multiple vlans over each channel group.
I created the vlan trunks and allowed vlans on each physical interface. I notice that I can also configure the vlan trunks on the port-channel interfaces that were created. Should I configure them under those interfaces, or leave them on the physical interfaces? Relevant config is below:
interface Port-channel1
!
interface Port-channel2
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 28, 2012
how to configure QoS on my SGE2010 to support my Toshiba CIX PBX VoIP trunks. The infrastructure is straight forward: PBX(1)<==>SGE2010(1)<==>SGE2010(2)<==>SGE2010(3)<==>PBX(2) where PBX(1) and PBX(2) are connected through three SGE2010's that are trunked via fiber between buildings. I don't have VoIP handsets and the PBX's are on their own VLAN. Everything else has been a breeze in these switches but I have no experience with QoS
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jul 21, 2012
We are upgrading out internal office network. I have setup 4 switches and 1 router using the following config.
-2 SGE2010p's are stacked together forming vlan 30 (to be used for phones)
-2 SGE2010's stacked for workstation's under vlan 20
Both switches are apart of vlan 1 (the default)Ports 1 on each stack are connected to a Cisco 890 (port fe2 and fe3) in trunk mode. Ports 2 and 3 are in an LAG group and connected to the neighboring stack (I have attached a diagram), and are also in trunk mode).At this point one port (port 1 on either stack) goes into blocking mode, and I get why ,it's a physical loop.I need more than a 100mb link between switches (which is what pulling the LAG between switches gets me), but I don't want to route phone traffic through my workstation switches to get out of the LAN.Is it possible using these switches and router to have a LAG between stacks and a link to the router for traffic to 0.0.0.0 ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I have defined a trunk between a nexus 5k and cat 3750 as a pvlan trunk - now I would like to add redundance and performance and tried to establish a vpc between my par of nexus's and the 3750 stack - but the nexus tell me that the port-channel doesn't support pvlan's - and then - ehh - do I get any benefits of running the trunk as a pvlan trunk at all?
interface Ethernet1/4
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
switchport private-vlan trunk allowed vlan 550-552
switchport private-vlan mapping trunk 550 551-552
[code]...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
We have a Cisco 3750G Core switch which has physical connections, each configured as trunks to two HP Access switches. The client who uses these access switches would like to put a link between the two, but this would create a loop.
------- Core Switch -------
| |
| |
[Code]....
View 12 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2012
i have the topology below :
internet
|
|
Gateway2
|
|
|
RX========== <sw 2960g>==========(Gi0/1)(Gi0/2)Gateway 1 ============>internet
|
|
|
Cache server
Now from RX the traffic is out , it may go to Gateway1 router or Gateway2 router
Note that router Gateway 1 has its traffic cached by Cache server. But the Gateway 2 router has not configured to cache its traffic , note that Gateway 1 router has two interfaces connected with sw but Gateway 2 only 1 interface connected to sw .
In the end , if I want Router Gateway 2 to hve its traffic to be cached by cahce server , can I do as the same config which is currently exist in Gateway 1 , or there is different behaviuor ???? Is there new modification on cahce server ?? im using suid cahe based linux .
I will include a brief info about only cache config in gateway1 router
======================================
ip access-list extended CACHE5
deny tcp any host x..x.x.x eq www
deny tcp any host x.x.x.x
permit tcp x.x.x.x x.x.x.x any eq www
==================================
[Code] ........
Can I do the same config on router gateway 2 ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 31, 2011
what or where is the ethernet port
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 6, 2012
The servers are calibrated to allow this, however I'm not sure how to connect from my end. I have an assignment where I have to dial into both a Windows server and an Ubuntu server to conduct some tasks (the actual process of dialing into the servers is not part of the assignment). I've been given the username, password, IP address, and protocol for each server. However, I cannot figure out how to use these to "dial into" them.I am running Windows 7 on a wireless connection
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jun 28, 2011
My wifes Wifi is down. Need to connect to AOL via dial up.How can I get to internet to do so.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 25, 2012
can i use a AT&T Router for dial up
View 1 Replies
View Related
