I am trying to get a 2811 to accept two IPSec peers however can only get one working at a time. I have setup fa0/0 and fa0/1 with their own public facing IP addresses with crypto maps associated to each interface however can only establish connectivity to one interface at any one time.
Relevent configuration below:
crypto isakmp policy 2
encr 3des
hash md5
authentication pre-share
group 2
lifetime 28800
[code]....
We have an ASA5520 configured with a IPSec VPN, from any ADSL home/office our VPN clients can connect without any problem, but when we use our cellular phones in tetering mode (as an accesspoint) our VPN clients are impossible to connect. Same machines,same software, same operating system, same remote IP (ASA5520 external IP) only change Wifi connection (ADSL to cellular phone). The signal of cellular phones is not the problem we was doing the tests with different phones (IPHONE & ANDROID), different locations (all in spain) and differents providers (vodafone, orange and movistar) of internet by cellular phone.We think that perhaps the problem is the licenses that our ASA5520 has..
Our ASA5520 comes with this licenses:
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Licensed features for this platform:
Maximum Physical Interfaces : Unlimited perpetual
Maximum VLANs : 150 perpetual
Inside Hosts : Unlimited perpetual
Failover : Active/Active perpetual
[code]....
i have 2811 router can, i use the below image on it , i m thinking to run bgp with ISP to accept just default route.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedWe have a remote office that needs to be connected to the central office through a site to site ipsec VPN.At the central site there is a 2811, and at the remote site there is 1841.Most of the traffic will be VoIP traffic and small amounts of data.
I need to setup some QoS that would firstly prefer the VPN traffic over internet access and then inside the VPN I need some QoS that will preffer VoIP over data.
I am having problems with CPU load on 2811 with AIM-VPN-II. There is a GRE+IPSec over E3 WAN link and the authentication is done using RSA, but even that there is around 10Mb/s of traffic I have a 70 - 85%. I also have another WAN link with router 2811 that doesn't have a AIM-VPN, and that one reach 95% CPU once the traffic goes up to 5 Mb/s.
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr aes
authentication rsa-encr
[Code]....
Are there any recommendations that RSA authentication is not supportted for hardward encryption? It worries me, becouse have more sitautions like this.
I have a 2811 that is my HQ router with a 10MB pipe. I was trying to configure a IPSEC tunnel to connect to my ASA that has access to our companies internal servers on the 10.33. and 172.16.31 network. I am having a problem getting phase 1 to even come up. I've looked over the configurations and unless i'm overlooking something I dont see what could be keeping it from at least completing phase 1
Below are the configs.
2811-CFG
crypto isakmp policy 10
encr 3des
hash md5
[Code] ....
I am trying to setup a L2L IPSec VPN between cisco VPN3020 concentrator and Cisco 2811 something is not working and I don't understand why.I describe my situation in detail my router has 2 interfaces
External interface Fa 0/1 ip 193.P.Q.R
Internal interface Fa 0/0 141.G.H.254
Lan on internal interface is 141.G.H.0/24
remote VPN concentrator has 2 interfaces
Public interface 131.A.B.C
Private interface 131.A.I.E
I have to set up L2L so that host 141.G.H.10 can talk to host 131.A.H.D whici is behind the VPN concentrator my router config:
crypto isakmp policy 3 encr 3des hash md5 authentication pre-share group 2crypto isakmp key * address 131.A.B.C!crypto ipsec transform-set presid-set esp-3des esp-md5-hmac !crypto map presid-map 5 ipsec-isakmp set peer 131.A.B.C set transform-set presid-set match address presid!interface FastEthernet0/1 ip address 193.P.Q.R 255.255.255.252 duplex full speed 100 crypto map presid-map!interface FastEthernet0/0 ip address 141.G.H.254 255.255.255.0 duplex auto speed auto!
ip access-list extended presid permit ip host 141.G.H.10 host 131.A.H.D
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 193.P.Q.S
Then I configured VPN3020 accordingly creating a lan to lan profile with the proper IKE proposals ecc ecc when interesting traffic is matched by VPN acl (presid) I see this messages in the VPN concentrator logs:
57101 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 IKE/119 RPT=4033 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]PHASE 1 COMPLETED 57102 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 AUTH/22 RPT=3935 193.P.Q.R User [193.P.Q.R] Group [193.P.Q.R] connected, Session Type: IPSec/LAN-to-LAN 57104 02/23/2011 15:49:05.310 SEV=4 AUTH/84 RPT=11 LAN-to-LAN tunnel to headend device 193.P.Q.R connected 57110 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 IKE/123 RPT=1093 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]IKE lost contact with remote peer, deleting connection (keepalive type: DPD) 57112 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=5 IKE/194 RPT=3778 193.P.Q.R Group [193.P.Q.R]Sending IKE Delete With Reason message: Connectivity to Client Lost. 57114 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 AUTH/23 RPT=14 193.P.Q.R User [193.P.Q.R] Group [193.P.Q.R] disconnected: duration: 0:00:49 57115 02/23/2011 15:49:54.820 SEV=4 AUTH/85 RPT=11 LAN-to-LAN tunnel to headend device 193.P.Q.R disconnected: duration: 0:00:49
and from router side I See this with show crypto isakmp sa
131.A.B.C 193.P.Q.R CONF_XAUTH 5 0 ACTIVE
but the status got stuck in CONF_XAUTH state and then disconnects?
I'm now trying to implement a IPsec VPN network over transport mode in my simple network environment.I got two Cisco 2811 routers connected each other and each router hosts a client PC running Windows7.
I have finished the configuration on both routers and make them running over transport mode.However, as what it should be, transport mode indicates the communication between two end stations (two PCs) the client PC (install or configure something) to make the network fully works?
My router is Cisco 2811 with IOS version 12.4(22)T1. It had established IPSec with another peer (203.*.*.250 shown below) for long until recently we make it re-establish IPSec VPN with another peer (203.*.*.30 shown below). It showed that the new sa is active but the result still showed there were 4 deleted SAs. The 4 obsolete sa entries won't vanish no matter what I do i.e. reset the interface, re-create crypto map, clear all sa and etc.
From numerous testings we knew that the VPN doesn't work even the desired sa is there remaining active. I reckon it has something to do with those deleted sas ( i mean it is supposed to show only the last one if it is working fine ). I don't know how it would be come like this as we did pretty much the samething on other VPN routers with no problems.
setting up IPsec for a DMVPN between a 2811 and 2951s in a test lab. I have enabled IPsec on the hub (2811) but I am unable to do so on either of the 2951s. After researching, it seems that I may have the incorrect IOS for this, but I am at a loss which IOS I should be using. Currently the 2951s are on "c2951-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-2.T2.bin" and the only crypto options are(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
key Long term key operations
pki Public Key components
while on the 2811 I get:
WIN-T(config)#crypto ?
ca Certification authority
call Configure Crypto Call Admission Control
ctcp Configure cTCP encapsulation
dynamic-map Specify a dynamic crypto map template
engine Enter a crypto engine configurable menu
gdoi Configure GDOI policy
[code]...
These are all hand me downs?
I have a asa and Cisco 2811, needs to build a site-to-site ip sec tunnel between them. Due to a requirement need to encrypt inside traffic, i need to apply on the inside interfaces on both devices to build the tunnel.
I don't see a problem but just want to check if it would work on terminating on Inside interfaces on both ip sec peers.
I have a location where I have 2 WAN links, but without a dynamic routing protocol in between. I want to implement a kind of hub to 2 spokes VPN. But the spokes will actualy be on one single ASA firewall, each spoke on a different interface. One hub-spoke will be primary, the other one the secondary. When the WAN link for the primary VPN fails the secondary should be started on the hub to the other spoke.
View 1 Replies View RelatedHad a question regarding creating dial peers through sip trunks. It will be through verizon fios so it'll be terminated through the fa0/0 port. I know to the provider i'll implement something along the lines of this:dial-peer voice 1 voipsession target ipv4:1.2.4.4sipv2port fa0/0Many of the documentation I came across really only shows pots dial-peers will a voip dial-peer work the same? Something a long of the lines of this:dial-peer voice 2 voipdesination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-]...... no digit-stripport fa0/0
View 9 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco ASA 5505 which is setup as an EasyVPN client to e remote VPN concentrator.
The Cisco ASA has the 50 internal user license with 10 VPN peers.
We just upgraded the license from the base 10 internal user to 50 user license but it has not resolved the problem and only 10 internal users still work, the 11th fails.
Does each EasyVPN client on the inside network take up 1 of the 10 VPN peer licences?
This seems to be the issue from what I can see, just need confirmation.
I have one ASA with two tunnels. Each going to a different 3rd party Checkpoint firewall (site A, site B) Each site has two servers (A1, A2, B1, B2)I can only connect to A1 and B1. any connection to A2 and B2 fails. I have defined B2 and A2 in the crypto map to be protected.If I only have B2 or A2 in the crypto map ACL then the tunnel fails. Phase 1 does not come up. Its as if the ASA is ignoring the entries for B2 and A2.ASA running 8.4(2).I have also trashed the VPN and built via the wizard, same result.
View 12 Replies View RelatedAt our organisation our routers all have at least 3 BGP peers, each from a different connectivity provider. The different providers that we use all have different internet transit CDRs. Is there a way that I can configure a priority for the 3 BGP peers on our routers so that outbound traffic to the internet is sent to the BGP peer from the provider with the highest CDR?
Routers are C2821
What is the reason of following NTP error. I am unable to configure further ntp peers on the router. Could not able to understand the reason of 100 peers. I am adding only 2nd peer on the router but getting this error. There is no problem adding peers in other 6500s .
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'm running 12.2(33)SXJ1 on a 6500 with several IPv6 BGP peers. Is there any way to monitor the BGP status of IPv6 peers? I've been through the BGP4 mib and cant seem find a way to check the status of IPv6 peers.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI am imagining a smallish networking (AS1234) with say three full BGP table peers that provide transit to the network (just to keep the maths simple here); Lets say AS100 and AS200 are preferred transit providers with AS300 as a backup/least prefered (AS prepends or similar stop us from using this network by default). So in this scenario our little network gets two different paths across the Internet, as not to rely solely on one provided, with a backup provider to hand also.
How do you mange issues like packet loss somewhere in AS100's or AS200's network? So lets say a host on our AS1234 network is talking to host in AS888 and the preferred route is through AS100 but somewhere deep in AS100 a link is flapping (for example) and I can't get to AS888 reliably through there anymore, but I can through to other peers of AS100 OK. We can postulate that AS100 is the best path for 50% of the Internet and AS200 for the other 50% (this is a best case fictional scenario). I can't ping 50% of the internet via AS100 and then in the event a ping fails (or some other more reliable test) tear down the BGP session to use AS100 until it's fixed again, nor vice versa with AS200.
First of all, I asume you don't know about the issue between AS100 and AS888 until someome moans about it to you? Secondly, do you then some how modify the route(s) to AS888 that come from AS100 (route map for example to change the weight or preference) so AS200 is now preferred for AS888? Do you infact shut down the AS100 peering and now use AS200 & AS300? How do you rectify these situations that are beyond you control using what is in your control?
A Cisco RV220W router/firewall connects the local LAN to the internet. The router is connected to a new Cisco SG300-28P switch configured in Layer 2 mode. There are two new AIR-1142N wireless access points running in autonomous mode connected to 2 ports on the SG300 powered through PoE. The AIR-1142N access points are running the latest firmware version 15.2(2)JB. There are two VLANs defined: VLAN1 is the native on all devices, and VLAN2 is for wireless guest traffic to provide access to the internet only.Internal/staff traffic is on 192.168.100.x, and the wireless SSID is MYNetS.Guest traffic is on 192.168.200.x and the wireless SSID is MyNetG.IP addresses are being assigned by the RV220W.
All works well with one exception. Wireless clients on the internal SSID are able to ping/access the switch, router, and other clients on wired ports on the switch. The router, switch, and wired clients can ping wireless clients. However, wireless clients, on the same SSID and the same 1142N cannot ping/access one another. They are being isolated from each other. We absolutely need to have this capability.The SG300 does not have port security enabled on any port. none of the workstations/laptops have a firewall enabled. These laptops are all Macs btw. I have checked that neither of the 1142N access points have Public Secure Packet Forwarding enabled on either of the VLANs.I am at a loss as to why the wireless clients are being isolated.
I keep seeing these messages in my logs very frequently on a Nexus 5548UP.
%LLDP-3-DETECT_MULTIPLE_PEERS: Multiple peers detected on mgmt0
what might be causing these? Google has shown less than desirable amounts of information on this message.
i have the topology below :
internet
|
|
Gateway2
|
|
|
RX========== <sw 2960g>==========(Gi0/1)(Gi0/2)Gateway 1 ============>internet
|
|
|
Cache server
Now from RX the traffic is out , it may go to Gateway1 router or Gateway2 router
Note that router Gateway 1 has its traffic cached by Cache server. But the Gateway 2 router has not configured to cache its traffic , note that Gateway 1 router has two interfaces connected with sw but Gateway 2 only 1 interface connected to sw .
In the end , if I want Router Gateway 2 to hve its traffic to be cached by cahce server , can I do as the same config which is currently exist in Gateway 1 , or there is different behaviuor ???? Is there new modification on cahce server ?? im using suid cahe based linux .
I will include a brief info about only cache config in gateway1 router
======================================
ip access-list extended CACHE5
deny tcp any host x..x.x.x eq www
deny tcp any host x.x.x.x
permit tcp x.x.x.x x.x.x.x any eq www
==================================
[Code] ........
Can I do the same config on router gateway 2 ?
I tried any type of combination and just couldn't make it works. Only PPTP works well. Whether Apple iOS IPSec VPN is supported or not?
View 11 Replies View Relatedmy computer is XP SP3 and i have a realtek installer with it's usb but when i installed it the xp says cannot install hardware because the wizard cannot find the nessesary software but when i see the install from a specific location i see that it have the files ther i tried it on another pc but it worked what am i going to do?
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe just purchased a company with multiple sites using Sonicwall's and Dynamic assigned external IP's. I am running a ASA 5510 with a outside Static.
I have done lots of S2S with both ends static but never a Dynamic to static.
what the commands are to set the ASA to accept dynamic VPN tunnels.
Since Monday, when I have tried to access my emails in Outlook, a box pops up saying Enter Network Password The box is already prepopulated, with Server: pop3.live.com User name: my email address and a password that shows up as a bunch of stars.
Clicking on "ok" or "cancel" just causes the box to pop up again. (I can still access my emails on Hotmail, BTW, and all internet is working fine). I access the web through Qwest/Century link and MSN.
I am hesitant to delete the password 'cause who knows what it is?? It is NOT my Windows Live/Live Mesh password, as it has one too many stars. But the box came up prepopulated so I assume at some point this was the correct password.
In the past when this happened, you could call Qwest/Century Link and they would walk me through (as best as I remember) redoing all the pop 3 settings. Now, they say they "don't support" MSN.
I am trying to configure QoS on my Cisco 851w router using the class-map command.However it won't accept the class-map command.The router is running cisco IOS version 12.4(15)T10 "C850-advsecurityk9-mz.124-15.T10.bin".
View 3 Replies View RelatedI need to put a FWSM and a line card WS-X6148A-GE-TX to a router 7606. The FWSM version is 3.2(13). The router is running IOS 12.1(18)SXD3. The Cisco document here says the required IOS for router 7606 is 12.2(18)SXF or higher. I have downloaded the IOS 12.2(33)SRD4 and loaded it to the flash card. When I turn the router on, it doesn't load the new IOS and goes to rommon. Which IOS I should use to make the router 7606 work and accept the FWSM.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 3750 stack with 4 switches.I am trying to make change some port to new VLAN, but switch 2 & 3 new change never works, the ports stick with old VLAN. Other two switches works as I expected on new changed VLAN.Tried to reboot, no progress.
#Show VLAN command confirmed the VLAN changes are made.
#show switch detail
Current
Switch# Role Mac Address Priority State
--------------------------------------------------------
1 Member 0019.e752.xxxx 1 Ready
2 Member 0015.f9bf.xxxx 1 Ready
[code]......
its a dell xps 420.
View 1 Replies View Relatedrouter will not accept kodak printer
View 1 Replies View RelatedBoth the integrated wireless adapter in my PC and a USB adapter work fine and conect automatically to my D-Link DIR-615 router. I have the integrated adapter disabled in the control panel. Just bought a D-Link DWA-140 Rangebooster N wireless adapter. This finds all the networks my older USN adapter finds but at greater strength. When I click on connect to my own network I get the enter network key box. I enter the correct key, but get an error message telling it's incorrect. I revert to the older adapter or enable the integrated adapter and I get connected automatically.
View 5 Replies View Related
