i have a question about tunneling a software EasyVPN client to a client ASA Network. It looks like this:
EasyVPN Server 192.168.202.0/24 Network extension mode to Client EasyVPN ASA 192.168.1.0/24 This works fine in both directions. But now i want to connect the client ASA network via EasyVPN software client from outside. The user are already able to connect to the ASA Server on its static outside IP obtaining an IP from a 192.168.21.0/24 pool. This works fine. But how am i able to connect to the 192.168.1.0/24 network from this client?
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 which is setup as an EasyVPN client to e remote VPN concentrator.The Cisco ASA has the 50 internal user license with 10 VPN peers.We just upgraded the license from the base 10 internal user to 50 user license but it has not resolved the problem and only 10 internal users still work, the 11th fails. Does each EasyVPN client on the inside network take up 1 of the 10 VPN peer licences? This seems to be the issue from what I can see, just need confirmation.
So I have three ASA 5505 firewall. my firewalls we are in the test environment. I read on the net that when you have a situation like in my company where are headquarter and two offices, i should put in each branch office and headquarter one asa firewall and a firewalls should be configured as easyvpn.
VPN server is in headquarter and easyvpn's are in branch offices. i tried everything, but we could not configure them. maybe it's not a problem that in my test environment at my the external interfaces which have static addresses on these three firewalls, respectively serever 192.168.2.1, 192.168.2.2 and 192.168.2.3 client client. I seted firewalls by following the instructions, but does not work
I solved the problem with the server as a remote access VPN. client workstations that are on the 192.168.2.0/24 network can access a local LAN via VPN. But when you put the ASA 5505 firewall. clients on the LAN side of the firewall can not access the VPN. I use software products Cisco VPN Client 5.0.06, but when I create a connection and try to connect to get an error secure vpn connection terminated locally by the client. reason 412: the remote peer is no longer responding.
A Cisco RV220W router/firewall connects the local LAN to the internet. The router is connected to a new Cisco SG300-28P switch configured in Layer 2 mode. There are two new AIR-1142N wireless access points running in autonomous mode connected to 2 ports on the SG300 powered through PoE. The AIR-1142N access points are running the latest firmware version 15.2(2)JB. There are two VLANs defined: VLAN1 is the native on all devices, and VLAN2 is for wireless guest traffic to provide access to the internet only.Internal/staff traffic is on 192.168.100.x, and the wireless SSID is MYNetS.Guest traffic is on 192.168.200.x and the wireless SSID is MyNetG.IP addresses are being assigned by the RV220W.
All works well with one exception. Wireless clients on the internal SSID are able to ping/access the switch, router, and other clients on wired ports on the switch. The router, switch, and wired clients can ping wireless clients. However, wireless clients, on the same SSID and the same 1142N cannot ping/access one another. They are being isolated from each other. We absolutely need to have this capability.The SG300 does not have port security enabled on any port. none of the workstations/laptops have a firewall enabled. These laptops are all Macs btw. I have checked that neither of the 1142N access points have Public Secure Packet Forwarding enabled on either of the VLANs.I am at a loss as to why the wireless clients are being isolated.
(Router is ISR 1921)This is doing my head in. I am not using NAT, there are no ACLs, there is no split horizon.Here is what I have. It is practically generated by CCP. When connected I cannot ping the loopback interface or the gig0/0 interface, (not to mention anything else).
version 15.0 service config service timestamps debug datetime msec service timestamps log datetime msec no service password-encryption ! hostname dcsgw1
I am using Cisco configuration professional to set up one easy vpn server on 887-K9,vpn client can dial up the server successfully but can only ping router but on other lan. Looks like there is a nat issues between lan and vpn client?
I need to configure our ASA5505 firewall for remote access to our network using EasyVPN software installed on a laptop. That laptop will be connected in the different places, using DSL or 3G toggle or Public Wi-Fi. For some people it's very easy, but I don't have any experience with firewalls.
I have couple of issues with my EasyVPN server and Cisco VPN Client on Win7.
1: VPN Client establishes the connection, traffic flow, destination network can be pinged. After a few minutes traffic stops passing the VPN. No ping to IP or DNS names can be made. In order to resole it. Users have to re-establish the VPN again. Occastioanl it stays and continue to work.
2: VPN Clients don't pick the same IP address from local address pool even though I specified "RECYLE" option in the IP local pool command.
############################################################################## TQI-WN-RT2911#sh run Building configuration... Current configuration : 7420 bytes ! ! Last configuration change at 14:49:13 UTC Fri Oct 12 2012 by admin ! NVRAM config last updated at 14:49:14 UTC Fri Oct 12 2012 by admin
We have many new and very small remote sites that will be connecting via an ASA5505 using easy VPN. Works without an issue and we've got the configuration and process nailed down.
The challenge I was presented with today involve non-standard remote sites where I need to configure a third interface on an ASA 5505 and allow it to pass directly to the Internet and not go through the VPN. Configuration of the third interface, assignment and configuration of the ACLs / NAT(PAT) are straight forward.
The challenge I face and haven't been able to find a direct answer to is if it's possible to have the traffic bypass the easy vpn network extension process. At this time the traffic is going down the tunnel which isn't what I want.
I fear I'll have to build classic site-to-site VPN configurations which isn't a huge issue though it breaks all maintenance/operations methods, processes and I'll have to spend time training the support team how to detect the differences.
I've two sites, the branch with an ASA 5505 and on the corporate office i've an ASA 5510.I need to make a easy vpn tunnel between this to sites and I've made some configuration, but for now, the ikev1 isn't working.
I have a branch office set up with a cable modem and an ASA 5505 as an easyvpn hardware client with network extension mode enabled, and connects to a PIX515E at the headend.I'm working on a separate issue for why the Internet connection drops periodically at the site, but my main problem is as follows.In this location, I have an 1142 LAP. It can boot up, and join the WLC just fine. Performance seems a little slow when it's working, but it works. The real issue is, if the VPN connection drops and reestablishes for any reason, the wireless clients all cease being able to communicate. All wired clients seem to bounce back without a problem.
The access point still shows to be joined to the controller, the access point never goes down, just wireless clients can't access anything any more. If I reload the access point, clients reassociate and continue on their merry way. For now, I am experimenting to keep the connection from dropping, but I'd really like to get it where I don't have to babysit this thing all day and night, and it can rejoin and function normally by itself after an outage.We are changing to this configuration from wireless bridging due to interference and reliability issues - however, I never experienced any similar issues with this particular access point before, so it's not the access point itself.
I am installing 2 ASA 5505s at home offices with dynamic IPs. The EasyVPN server is a ASA585x. I am using the 5505s in NEM mode. I configured a unique DHCP scope on each 5505. I have a dynamic crpto map on the server. I configured unique tunnel groups, group policies and usernames for each site on the server. This seems to work fine. Is it normal to configure unique tunnel groups, group policies and usernames for each remote site?
When ASA 5505 was installed we selected Easy VPN Remote. Now we want to disable it. In ASDM we navigate to Configuration > Remote Access VPN > Easy VPN Remote and try to clear the Enable Easy VPN Remote checkbox but it will not uncheck.
We have a number of 5505 ASAs at remote sites all of which are configured to connect to one of two head-end servers.We need to change the primary head-end IP addresses. At the moment devices are successfully connected to the secondary.If we issue vpnclient server i.j.k.l e.f.g.h then the device drops off the network and won't reconnect until it is power cycled.If we make the changes in ASDM using the GUI to remove the old primary and add in the new primary the ASDM says "No changes made".Devices are running 8.2 and 8.4 code and behaviour is the same.
how to change head-end server IP addresses without the device disconnecting and not coming back up? According to the configuration guide the ASA should cycle through the addresses every 8 seconds until it can connect - but it doesn't seem to do this as it won't connect to the good secondary head-end either!
We have an ASA 5505 in our environment and currently two IPSec L2L VPN tunnels are established. But we are planning to connect using Easy VPN(Network Extension Mode) to another site as Client. Is it possible to configure Easy VPN configurations by keeping the currently active IPSec L2L VPN(Site-to-Site) tunnels?
Following is the warning that we get when tried to configure Easy VPN Client.NOCMEFW1(config)# vpnclient enable
I have a location where I have 2 WAN links, but without a dynamic routing protocol in between. I want to implement a kind of hub to 2 spokes VPN. But the spokes will actualy be on one single ASA firewall, each spoke on a different interface. One hub-spoke will be primary, the other one the secondary. When the WAN link for the primary VPN fails the secondary should be started on the hub to the other spoke.
Had a question regarding creating dial peers through sip trunks. It will be through verizon fios so it'll be terminated through the fa0/0 port. I know to the provider i'll implement something along the lines of this:dial-peer voice 1 voipsession target ipv4:18.104.22.168sipv2port fa0/0Many of the documentation I came across really only shows pots dial-peers will a voip dial-peer work the same? Something a long of the lines of this:dial-peer voice 2 voipdesination-pattern 91[2-9]..[2-]...... no digit-stripport fa0/0
I am trying to get a 2811 to accept two IPSec peers however can only get one working at a time. I have setup fa0/0 and fa0/1 with their own public facing IP addresses with crypto maps associated to each interface however can only establish connectivity to one interface at any one time.
I have one ASA with two tunnels. Each going to a different 3rd party Checkpoint firewall (site A, site B) Each site has two servers (A1, A2, B1, B2)I can only connect to A1 and B1. any connection to A2 and B2 fails. I have defined B2 and A2 in the crypto map to be protected.If I only have B2 or A2 in the crypto map ACL then the tunnel fails. Phase 1 does not come up. Its as if the ASA is ignoring the entries for B2 and A2.ASA running 8.4(2).I have also trashed the VPN and built via the wizard, same result.
At our organisation our routers all have at least 3 BGP peers, each from a different connectivity provider. The different providers that we use all have different internet transit CDRs. Is there a way that I can configure a priority for the 3 BGP peers on our routers so that outbound traffic to the internet is sent to the BGP peer from the provider with the highest CDR?
What is the reason of following NTP error. I am unable to configure further ntp peers on the router. Could not able to understand the reason of 100 peers. I am adding only 2nd peer on the router but getting this error. There is no problem adding peers in other 6500s .
I'm running 12.2(33)SXJ1 on a 6500 with several IPv6 BGP peers. Is there any way to monitor the BGP status of IPv6 peers? I've been through the BGP4 mib and cant seem find a way to check the status of IPv6 peers.
I am imagining a smallish networking (AS1234) with say three full BGP table peers that provide transit to the network (just to keep the maths simple here); Lets say AS100 and AS200 are preferred transit providers with AS300 as a backup/least prefered (AS prepends or similar stop us from using this network by default). So in this scenario our little network gets two different paths across the Internet, as not to rely solely on one provided, with a backup provider to hand also.
How do you mange issues like packet loss somewhere in AS100's or AS200's network? So lets say a host on our AS1234 network is talking to host in AS888 and the preferred route is through AS100 but somewhere deep in AS100 a link is flapping (for example) and I can't get to AS888 reliably through there anymore, but I can through to other peers of AS100 OK. We can postulate that AS100 is the best path for 50% of the Internet and AS200 for the other 50% (this is a best case fictional scenario). I can't ping 50% of the internet via AS100 and then in the event a ping fails (or some other more reliable test) tear down the BGP session to use AS100 until it's fixed again, nor vice versa with AS200.
First of all, I asume you don't know about the issue between AS100 and AS888 until someome moans about it to you? Secondly, do you then some how modify the route(s) to AS888 that come from AS100 (route map for example to change the weight or preference) so AS200 is now preferred for AS888? Do you infact shut down the AS100 peering and now use AS200 & AS300? How do you rectify these situations that are beyond you control using what is in your control?
I have a client that has a 5505 installed. They want to VPN in with their Win7 laptop, but they don't want to shell out $1000 for the 10-pack Cisco VPN client.I have successfully setup the clientless VPN, and they can, through a browser, get to their files, but they'd like to map network drives so it's just like they're in the office.I tried setting the IP Sec up on the 5505, and then using the built-in Win7 VPN network connection, but no go.I also do everything through the ASDM, but I realize some things cannot be done. I'd prefer to use the ASDM!Anyone else get this configured? 99% of what I see out here is how to connect the 5505 for site-to-site VPN.
We recently upgraded our 5505s to 8.2(5) 26 and noticed that each will crash after a cerntain amount of time. Some crash every 30 minutes other will crash every 4 to 8 hrs. The only difference would be the user's home ISP and/or home router, if they have one. They are configured with a dynamic dhcp IP address for the outside interface and the crash files starts with the following:When we downgrade back to 8.2(5) 13 the problem goes away. Any known bugs for this version? I haven't been able to find anything yet. We do have one 5505 that does not have this issues. The only thing that may be different is that it was never at 8.2(5) 13. We had downgrade it from a 8.3 version.
We have a RA Vpn split_tunnel setup in one of our locations which is working fine in all areas except for traffic destinged for one specific website using https. This vendor only allows the HTTPS connections to them to come from certain outside IP addresses. ssentially it should work like this:RAVPN_client (10.4.4.0/27) --> https request to vendor_ip (208.x.x.x) ---> ASA55XX --> NAT_to_outside_ip --> https request to vendor_ip (208.x.x.x) need to understand how you would go about NATing ONLY this specific https traffic from the RA VPN while not having to alter the setup otherwise. Internal hosts (aka behind the ASA physically) do not have any issue getting to this site, as its nat'd to the outside ip address as we expect.Here is what we are using for the NAT Exemption list he 10.2.2.x, 192.168.100.x and 172.23.2.x are other remote sites that we have. RA VPN users are using the 10.4.4.0/27 do not have any issues connecting to them, no matter the protocol.
Attached you find both configuration of the EzVPN server and remote. The tunnel is getting up and if I ping from the ASA to the Router, I see the packets getting encrypted:
ezvpn-asa# ping 172.16.100.1 ... ezvpn-asa# show crypto ipsec sa interface: outside Crypto map tag: _vpnc_cm, seq num: 10, local addr: 172.16.100.2
If I connect a client with IP address 192.168.1.2 to the interface eth0/1 and do a ping to the cme, I don't see any packets getting encrypted. I don't have any idea about VPN, I just need it for a wireless lab environment. What do I have to configure on the ASA, so the inside traffic is encrypted?