Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 / Dual Trunks Between Stacks?
Jan 30, 2013
I have 2 3750 switch stacks which I would like to have redundant trunks between them. This will provide two physical connections traveling through different geographical locations for redundancy in the event that a cable is severed. I couldn't find anything in regards to setup/config. Does it matter if I go stack1/switch1 to stack2/switch1 and stack1/switch2 to stack2/switch2 or should they cross to opposite switches like a stack cable? I don't think that should be necessary, but couldn't find any documentation. Should there be an issue with loops?
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 27, 2012
I have a 3750 as core switch, adding 2 stacks of 2960S to connect. I want to establish etherchannel between the 3750 and each additonal 2960S stack, do the channel group numbers between the 3750 and the new 2960s have to match? 3750 has two channel-groups(1 and 2) already configured. Need to know, I would create 2 additional channel groups (number 3,4) for each of the etherchannels between the 3 2960S Stacks and 3750? OR channel-group # is local to the device.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
I have defined a trunk between a nexus 5k and cat 3750 as a pvlan trunk - now I would like to add redundance and performance and tried to establish a vpc between my par of nexus's and the 3750 stack - but the nexus tell me that the port-channel doesn't support pvlan's - and then - ehh - do I get any benefits of running the trunk as a pvlan trunk at all?
interface Ethernet1/4
switchport mode trunk
speed 1000
switchport private-vlan trunk allowed vlan 550-552
switchport private-vlan mapping trunk 550 551-552
[code]...
View 5 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I am trying to stack the following -
3750G 12S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Services) Running EIGRP & OSPF
with
3x 3750X 48P-S - 12.2.53(SE2 IP Base License)
Doing some research, the IP Base does EIGRP on the 3750X, does it do OSPF?
If not I will have to get licence for the 3750X?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 31, 2012
Currently our Cisco 3750 have one interface (port 1) that connected to our provider (Internap) with the IP 66.150.7.68 assigned. Now we want to upgrade to dual handoff L3 protocol. Below is the network configuration from Internap.
>>>> We have assigned the below /30s for each of the interfaces and will statically route the 66.150.7.0/25 down both interfaces.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.20/30
>>>> 63.251.162.21 - border1.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.22 - your side
>>>>
>>>> 63.251.162.184/30
>>>> 63.251.162.185 - border2.sef003 - Internap side
>>>> 63.251.162.186 - your side
tell what command lines do I need to input on my Cisco switch for port 1 and 2 in order for the dual handoff to work correctly?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2013
On first floor, I have two stack switches and each stack has got 4 switches. they all are working fine.Now the client would like to add one more stack on the 2nd floor. But the second floor switches are different when compared to the 1st floor switches.
can you have differnt IOS among different stacks. I knew in a stack we need all the switches should have same IOS version. But in between two stacks to communicate do we need same IOS or they can be on differnet IOS?
1st floor switches have 15.0 version and 2nd floor new switches has 12.2.58. Is this ok ?
1st floor switches are 3500 series ( Note: only one one Vlan 20 we are using on the both stack switches and we would like add same Vlan 20 on to the new stack)
2nd floor switches aew 2 catalyst 2960 switches.
Note: on the second floor switches one is 24 port switch and the other one is 48 port switch. so can i make them as a stack?
We have already done cabling from 1st floor to second floor. So no problem with that at all.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Apr 9, 2012
I have a customer that would like a 40Gb port-channel between two 3750-x switch stacks. When I try to activate four 10Gb ports in the channel, they go into error-disable. However, I am able to create a 20Gb port-channel without issue. I have had my configurations verified to Cisco best practice.
Is there a limitation on the amount of throughput that the 3750-x can handle? According to the data sheet the 3750X-48T can handle 101.2mpps, based on two 10Gb uplinks so if my math is correct then a stack of two 3750X-48T should be able to handle 202.4mpps.
[URL]
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I am beginning to implement OSPF into the network I work on. I have a network which consists of multiple 4500, 6500 series routers and 3560s. Each switch has its own set of VLANs. In other words VLAN X on one switch is not the same as VLAN X on another switch. I had envisioned connecting each switch via trunk links and then routing via the loopback addresses on each device. That didn't work. Then I created a VLAN 100 on each switch. Each one was configured with an IP in the same subnet range (10.3.0.1 and 10.3.0.2). I added these addresses to the OSPF process in area 0. It worked. However, this is not desired. I have not seen many examples of 4500 layer 3 switches configured with OSPF. The examples I have seen show the interfaces configured with IPs.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 20, 2012
I'm configuring two etherchannel groups (2 ports in each) on a 3560 switch. I need to trunk multiple vlans over each channel group.
I created the vlan trunks and allowed vlans on each physical interface. I notice that I can also configure the vlan trunks on the port-channel interfaces that were created. Should I configure them under those interfaces, or leave them on the physical interfaces? Relevant config is below:
interface Port-channel1
!
interface Port-channel2
[Code].....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 5, 2013
We have a Cisco 3750G Core switch which has physical connections, each configured as trunks to two HP Access switches. The client who uses these access switches would like to put a link between the two, but this would create a loop.
------- Core Switch -------
| |
| |
[Code]....
View 12 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
I would like to make a design with 4 Nexus 5596UP. 2 of them equipped with Layer 3 Expansion Module so they can serve as core layer and the other 2 Nexus used as Layer 2 for aggregation server layer.The 2 Nexus in the core layer will run HSRP and will peer with ISP via BGP for Internet connection The 2 Nexus in the aggregation layer will be configured as layer 2 device and have FEX and switches connected to them.What I am ensure of is how the vpc and port-channel configuration should look like between the 4 nexus. What I was thinking is to run vpc between the 2 Nexus in the aggregation layer and between the 2 Nexus in the core layer. Than I was thinking of connecting each Nexus in the aggragtion layer to both Nexus in the core layer using port-channel and vice-versa.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 30, 2012
Do I need the Universal image to perform stftp on a 3750 or 3750-X?
View 8 Replies
View Related
Oct 10, 2011
I'm looking at adding a Cisco 3750-X switch running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1 (IP base license) into a stack of 3750-G switches running c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin Given that the version and feature sets are the same I don't forsee any compatibility issues. Would there be any reason why a universal image wouldn't stack correctly with other switches running the single .bin file?
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2012
We have a stack of switches that is at the max number of members allowed in the stack. Problem is we are running out of port density and need to add more ports. So instead of adding a whole new stack I would rather replace 2 of the 24-port swicthes with 48-port switches.
If the two 24-port swicthes we are removing are stack members and neither of them are the stack master, I should be able to replace the 24-port switches with the 48-port switches without bringing the master offline? If the new 48-port switches are running the same IOS version as the current 24-port swicthes, they should add themselves to the stack?Would I have to tell the new 48-port swicthes what switch numbers they are replacing in order for them to be added to the stack since we are at the max number of members?Also since the 48-port swicthes are replacing 24-port switches will the master give the 48-port switches the configuration for only the 24-ports?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 22, 2012
At home I have a Cisco 877 router, I also have Optus Cable internet and Telstra Business Direct DSL. I have configured the ATM interface for the Telstra DSL connection through the onboard DSL interface. I have also configured Fast Ethernet port 0 as a vlan2 port, which is configured for use with the Optus Cable internet (this is connected through an Optus Netgear CG3000 router). The Nethgear has DHCP enabled (192.168.0.xxx range), as does my Cisco 877 (10.0.0.xxx range).Firstly, the Telstra Business DSL is due to be connected tomorrow between 9am and 1pm, so it is not physically connected as yet.From my laptop connected to fa3 and using Console connection, I can ping all of the 192.168.0.xxx addresses that exist, as well as my own laptop and a VoIP phone I have connected to fa2 (laptop is 10.0.0.100, VoIP phone is 10.0.0.101 both DHCP assigned, not MAC Reserved either).I can use internet explorer on my laptop to connect to the Netgear router, but no other internet pages. I also cannot connect to my Fuji-Xerox printer at 192.168.0.20 through the web browser, yet I can ping it from the router.I don't have a huge experience with Cisco as yet, and everything I have learnt has been basically self tought. I am looking into doing my CCNA, once I achieve enough funds Now, what I am trying to achieve ideally is, to combine both the Cable and DSL services to in effect double my speed? if this isnt available, a load-balancing type of scenario would also be good. Both DSL plans have a 500gb download limit, but the reason I needed the Telstra DSL is the VoIP phones I am using won't connect through Optus (Optus have locked nearly everything out), and Optus will not give me a STATIC IP address with the Cable, whereas I have on on the Telstra DSL, I would like to Remote Desktop into my main PC eventually.
The IOS on my router is: C870 Software (C870-ADVIPSERVICESK9-M), Version 12.4(6)T7
The Optus Cable Modem IP is 192.168.0.1, the Cisco 877 router IP is 10.0.0.1
The current config (complete, with username & passwords ### out) is below: (Bear in mind there's probably many things thats not needed.Once I get the router working, I will configure my 2960 switch and have all devices connected through this. All devices on my network do not need to stay in the 192 range, they can be 10.0.0.xxx. The DHCP could be disabled on the Netgear (Cable Modem) if that's required as well.
!version 12.4no service padservice timestamps debug datetime msecservice timestamps log datetime msecno service password-encryption!hostname N3813163R!boot-start-markerboot-end-marker!logging message-counter sysloglogging buffered 51200 warnings!no aaa new-modelclock timezone aest 10!crypto pki trustpoint TP-self-signed-116689578enrollment selfsignedsubject-name cn=IOS-Self-Signed-Certificate-116689578revocation-check nonersakeypair TP-self-signed-116689578!!crypto pki certificate chain TP-self-signed-116689578certificate self-signed 01 3082024F 308201B8 A0030201 02020101 300D0609 2A864886 F70D0101 04050030 30312E30 2C060355 04031325 494F532D 53656C66
[code]....
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 16, 2013
I would like to ask if there are dual WAN router models on ISR G2. The client doesn't want the RV042G. Any model from the 890 series up to the 2900 series ISR G2 routers? The connection from the ISP is via Ethernet. If a serial connection would be used then we can just add an HWIC-2T for this matter.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Oct 15, 2012
I have recently implimented an RV016 device into our network. We have a bonded T1 service with Paetec/Windstream (5 static IPs) and also a cable connection with Comcast (no static IP). The T1 has been our primary connection, and our MX and A records all use this IP address. I have the rules set and using a one-to-one NAT setup with our 5 IPs. Everything is working great with the T1 in place and email is flowing with no problems, however when I connect the cable into the WAN2 port and try to send email, its using that outbound connection, rather then the T1 and our spam filter is blocking it. So the email is rejected and we get this message below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups:
xxxx@gmail.com (xxxx@gmail.com)Your message wasn't delivered due to a permission or security issue. It may have been rejected by a moderator, the address may only accept e-mail from certain senders, or another restriction may be preventing delivery.
The following organization rejected your message: (our smtp spam relay)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
The reason for being rejected is just because it doesn't recongnize the IP address/gateway it is coming from.
My question is, how do I define that all email is sent out through our T1 connections IP address in the router?I see options for Advanced Routing or Bandwidth Management, but not sure what one I need to configure as I am not too familiar with these settings. I have Intelligent Balancer(Auto Mode) enabled as well by default.
The reason for adding the second internet connection is strictly for load balencing and getting some more bandwidth in our location.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 7, 2012
I have to upgrade a Nexus 7010 with dual Sup engines from 4.2(4) to 5.2 and am hoping it could be an ISSU. We are fine with an outage window.To upgrade from 4.2(4) to 5.2(5) I'll have to do a multi hop upgrade from 4.2(4) - 4.2(6) - 5.2(5) and each hop would take 40-60 minutes.do I spend 40-60 minutes for each hop, or just do a disruptive upgrade straight from 4.2(4) to 5.2(5)? Like I said, we are fine with an outage window.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2013
I have two Nexus 5596UP that will be connected together via VPC-Peerlink. From there I want to connect both 5596UP's to a 6509-VSS via VPC.The Nexus 5596UP's will be essentially layer 2 switches, all routing will be done the 6509-VSS's.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 9, 2012
we are trying to configure 1841 with dual Internet connection with failover using track.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
1. We now have SupA & SupB in the chassis, due to some mistake we have same IOS version but different feature set on them, although we configured redundancy mode sso, in the "show redundancy" we see Operating Redundancy Mode = rpr due to Software mismat, we now need to fix them as same feature set image, if I use "copy sup-bootdisk0:/xxxx slavesup-bootdisk0:/xxx", then write memory, does this cause any service/network interuption?
Available system uptime = 1 year, 1 week, 4 days, 9 hours, 21 minutes
Switchovers system experienced = 2
Standby failures = 0
Last switchover reason = active unit removed
[code]....
2. We did a failover test with this status, found that if we triggered supervisor failover, all modules will reload thus the services if interupped. How about after we make the Operating Redundancy Mode as sso, will this behaviour shows again? Or a stateful failover will happens, then modules no need reload?
3. We are using OSPF as our L3 routing protocol, after reference to the configuration, nsf should be enabled, we want to ask in the OSPF-domain nsf should be configured in all OSPF-enabled router or only 6500 which have dual-sup?
4. We also found that the interfaces(3 * Gig & 2 * TenG) in Standby supervisor cannot be use even enabled & configured, is it because we are running rpr mode now or will be the same even change to sso? Before customer have some older supervisor in 6500 non-e chassis, and they can use the standby supervisor interfaces as traffic forwarding, they use rpr-plus mode before, how about in sso mode?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 23, 2013
One of the two supervisors in an IOS 6509-E did not come back up after a power outage. The failed supervisor in slot 5 was replaced and it booted successfully. However, the supervisor in slot 5 only booted up to a "Cold" state. I did notice the Hw version of the replacement module in slot 5 is 4.9 while the Hw version in the supervisor module in slot 6 is 4.8. What command do I need to issue to bring the supervisor module in slot 5 from "Cold" to "Hot"? [code]
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jan 13, 2013
I am looking to implement VSS using our two 6500 series switches. The "Recovery Actions" when there is a Dual-Active situation says that the active chassis that detects a dual-active condition shuts down all of its non-VSL interfaces (except interfaces configured to be excluded from shutdown) to remove itself from the network, and waits in recovery mode until the VSL links have recovered. Does this mean that the Active chassis gets totally isolated thus triggering the modules on the Standby chassis to be active ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 23, 2012
We have CORE switch model : Cisco WS-C4510R-E with dual SUP 5 - 2 10GE. [code] Now We want to upgrade this IOS to the upgraded version.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2011
Will 2811 Router with 4 switch port module, How to do dual ISP configuration on this router.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2013
I've 3 interfaces on router:
Gb0/0-ISP01 with DHCP client
Gb0/1-ISP02 Static IP 192.168.2.x/24
Fa0/0 - LAN 192.168.1.1/24
I want to know, how to configure:1. Set the IP of interface Gb0/0 as dhcp client from ISP01 and make it as default route.
2. How to configure the ip nat.....overload?
3. How to use the ip sla to monitor internet connectivity to 8.8.8.8 for ISP01, if it fails, to go to ISP02.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
Doing a bug scrub on our dual core, dual Sup 720 6500s tonight. We are going from s72033-advipservicesk9_wan-mz.122-33.SXI4a.bin to SXI9. I want to get a second set of eyes on my script since I have not done this for about 1 1/2 years. Following this doc:[URL]
Script:
Backup
sh ver
remote command switch show version
[Code].....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 10, 2013
I would just like to confirm whether dual stack hsrp is possible or not on 3750X both stack and non-stack.
The following is that I have to take care of this on the stack?
[Catalyst 3750 Software Configuration Guide, Release 12.2(55)SE]
[URL]
%FHRP group not consistent with already configured groups on the switch stack
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 24, 2012
In IOS verson 12.X there was a Bidirectional Forwarding Detection configuration however in IOS 15.0 this isn't available at least not with the same syntax. Is this feature not available in 15.0?
In 12.X this was the syntax of the command:switch virtual domain <number>.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 9, 2011
some of our switches have the switchport mode trunk command configured between the 3750 switches but other 3750 switches connected to our 6509 core switch do not have the switchport mode trunk command to permit Vlans from going across the swtiches instead it has an ip address and says no switchport what is the difference between does two. Is trunking used only for Layer 2 and L3 is used to route interface vlans?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2012
I have a network with a Catalyst 3750 as the main switch and then some Catalyst 2960 switches that are plugged in to that. I have a server running windows server 2008 with a couple of virtual machines running in Hyper-V. I created 4 VLANS listed below and gave the 3750 the following IP Address.I would like the 3750 to only be configurable from VLAN 40 but currently every VLAN can connect to it, I noticed in the standard web page settings there was a setting for "Management VLAN" but it was set to 1 and would not let me change it, I kinda assumed that was for the management port in the back.-Now the tricky part, I was trying to set up routing between the VLANs and so far I have only been able to get a sort of "all or nothing" routing to work. I can turn IP routing on and add two or more VLANs to the routing and it works fine. But what I was hoping to do is create a couple of "junction vlans" that would only route to one or two other vlans. For instance, I wanted to create a VLAN 100 that routed to VLAN 20 and 30 but nothing else. I also want to route VLAN 1 just to VLAN 30, and so on. I am able to do each one of the cases but only one, it seems like the switch only supports one "routing table" am I missing something or is this just a limitation of the switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 8, 2012
Is a 3750 sw capable of handling full routing tables and what can you recommend in a small mutihomed BGP router or switch capable of handling full routing tables?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2012
I have a network with several catalyst 2960 switches and one catalyst 3750. I have created two VLAN and set up the proper routing and everything is working fine there. I have a client/server application that used multicast in the initial start up for the client to determine available servers, the issue is one of my clients is on a different VLAN then the server. I am able to route the multicast using MVR as long as both the server and the client are plugged into the 3750 by creating a static route, making the server a source port and the client a receive port. Unfortunately I need the client and the server plugged in to different 2960s. My question is how do I establish multicast routing between the two and perferably do it dynamically (always route multicast traffic from one VLAN to another).
View 2 Replies
View Related
