I need the following ports forwarded for a single ip address Port 88 (UDP)Port 3074 (UDP and TCP)Port 53 (UDP and TCP)Port 80 (TCP) .Is there an easy way to to it with service objects/groups?
View 7 RepliesIs there a way to forward a single port, while leaving the others alone? For instance I want to forward all https traffic on a public IP to an internal server on port 4443. At the same time traffic on all other ports for this IP needs to be forwarded on the original port. It looks like creating a Network Object will allow a single port to be forwarded, but what happens to the remaining traffic? I attempted to create Service Objects that I then assigned to NAT statements.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have Cisco ASA 5505 Firewall with security plus license, Currently I open ports on 25,80,443 on public IP address 1.1.1.1 and perform static nat between the inside and outside IP address Such as i configured via CLI
access-list OUT_IN extended permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 80
access-list OUT_IN extended permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 443
access-list OUT_IN extended permit tcp any host 1.1.1.1 eq 25
[Code]......
I am trying to correctly configure our ASA 5520 and our Mitel Border Gateway in our DMZ. In the documentation for the Mitel border gateway it wants me to set up 2 external IP's on my ASA one to allow 443 traffice into the MBG, and another for 443 traffic that needs to be forwarded to port 4443 for the MGB in the DMZ. My problem is I don't know how to do this. the MBG only has one IP, and I need to have 2 different URL's mapped to two different external IP's both externally using port 443, and one of them forwarding to 4443 on the DMZ interface.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI cannot add or modify the informations in the Single Port Forwarding . I get a message saying: Invalid Character(s) found. All characters are good. I get the same message when only click on the "SAVA" button. I have the latest firware V2.0.2.7
View 1 Replies View RelatedHow to forward a single port to a different port to a specific computer for the WRV210 router?
I would like to forward port 10100 to port 25 to my mail server. There are times when our people are at a hotel and they block port 25 and I have done this in the past on a BEFSR11 and BEFSR41 router. There does not seem to be a Single Port Forwarding setup page and the Port Forwarding setup page only allows you to forward a range to a specific computer, it does not give you a different port you can assign an incoming port to.
I have the most current firmware revision, 2.0.0.11, and Hardware Version WRTR-221G_V01.
I was wanting to port forward a port that was 25565 for a game of mine, but everytime I try it won't work.
By the way, it's 7AM and I didn't sleep yet so i'll explain more detailed in the morning.
I'm using a E2000 Router.
At the E4200 there is a limit of (free to make) 15 Single port forwarding and 15 port range forwarding to fill in.I get as suggestion that I must give up a total range of ports where all the ports I use where in.But for security reasons I will not do that.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'll try to keep it short. On this Games For Windows Live game (Dawn Of War II) I can connect to and play on the internet just fine. Enabled port 3074 and 88 so that GFWL wouldn't have any problems connecting to my computer. Port 3074 has an issue however.With the PortForward testing program (Open Port Check - PortForward.com), whenever I check port 3074 outside the game, both UDP and TCP show green and are forwarded correctly. However when I'm in the game, alt-tab, and run the test again, it shows UDP red after testing, indicating it's not forwarded correctly.I think I know precisely what the problem is; either something in GFWL or the game itself is blocking port 3074. But why it's doing this, and how to find out what it is, I really have no idea.
View 4 Replies View RelatedI did read the thread entitled ''WRT160N Can't save settings'', but I believe this might be different. My router is actually communicating with my computer (physically plugged in), since I can save all other settings EXCEPT the port-fowarding ones.I am trying to save settings for a gaming application in the Single Port Forwarding section of my router settings. After clicking both ''save settings'' and ''continue'', it simply returns to the Single Port Forwarding section, except everything is blank, as though nothing was saved.
Here are my specs:
WRT160Nv1
Firmware Version: v3.0.03
Here are the steps I have already undertaken:
1- Erase browser cache and cookies
2- Updated to latest firmware (v3.0.03), 10-second reset button, 20-second power cycle.
Type: WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router with VPN.I bought it last week. Its single port forwarding has an issue. I can only use that function for a couple or hours. Then the forwarding does not work. I have to reboot the router to make it available again.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am trying to forward both TCP and UDP ports 3074 but it looks like I can only have either TCP/3074 or UDP/3074 open one at a time. When I try to enter the UDP/3074 NAT statement, I get "ERROR: NAT unable to reserve ports". [code]
View 4 Replies View Relatedi need to Forwarding to IP Address 192.168.11.61 [code]
What is the command should i give and how can i apply in my router as per my above mention required ?
We have a single 4500 connecting to two non-cisco devices. We need to enable port channelling or link aggregation between these two.The links are carrying mulitple vlans , hence are trunked and the ip address on either side is used for routing.
From each of the two non-cisco device, i am taking 2 ports each to connect to the 4500.On each non-cisco device side, two ports will bundle together as one aggregated interface (ae1) and the other will be called ae2.
my query is how do i do the configuration for etherchannel on the cisco 4500 side , as it will need two different Po's( port channels).I need a single ip address on both sides of port channel to be present for routing.
I have a RV042 using (for now), just the single WAN interface. I am trying to forward all packets to port 9000 from the WAN to a single IP address on the network. I've set up both forwarding rules under Setup -> Forwarding and under the Firewall -> Access Rules.I cannot connect to my device from the outside world, however. Is there something I'm missing?
View 4 Replies View RelatedAt one of our client premises they have an Cisco 1841 router. We need to connect from outside (other location in another country) with Remote Desktop connection port 3389 to an internal IP address ( a server).From any IP address it have to permit a connection on port 3389 to be forwarded to the server.
View 2 Replies View RelatedSo here is my network.
ASA5505--->Cisco1841--->Cat2960
Code
ASA asa831-k8.bin
Cisco 1841 c1841-adventerprisek9-mz.151-4.M2.bin
Cat 2960 c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin
and here is my dilemma.
I can SSH from the internet to my ASA on default port 22, directly to my public IP. I can SSH from the internet to my Cisco 1841 on port 2001. I can not however, SSH to my Cat 2960. From what i can tell, on the Cat2960 i can't change the default port 22 for SSH to different port, just like i did on the Cisco 1841. I looked to see if I can change the default port for SSH on he ASA, it does not look like this is an option.
The bottom line is that i want to be able to SSH to all three devices from the internet. I only have one public IP. As of now, what i can do is only SSH to the ASA on default port 22 directly to the public IP and Cisco 1841 on port 2001. It appears that changing the default SSH port on Cat 2960 is not an option. It also appears that I can't change the default SSH port on the ASA, if i could, i would and then i should be able to SSH to the Cat 2960 on port 22. No matter what i did on the ASA, it always listens on port 22 for SSH connections.
show asp table socket
TCP 001f549f <<pub IP>>:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN
how do i make it listen on different port?
Here is relevent config for SSH for cisco 1841 (port forwarding)
ON ASA
object network ROUTER
host 10.10.1.1
[Code].....
I've just changed my router to a Belkin N+ Wireless Router (F5D8235uk4) My home network is on the 10.0.0.0 ip address range.
I changed the routers IP address to 10.0.0.2 (same as my last one) and the subnet is set to 255.0.0.0
My problem is that whilst my PC's are in the 10.0.0.10 to 10.0.0.20 range my NAS ip is 10.10.10.10 and when I go into the port forwarding (virtual servers) settings on the router it only let's me set the last octet with the first three octets set to 10.0.0. and these can't be changed so I can't port forward to my nas.
Surely the virtual servers should be able to forward to any PC in the subnet, not just those in a 255.255.255.0 subnet? I don't want to change my nas IP address even though that would fix this issue.
I have a RV120W; configured to perform port forwarding. I have Configured a Port Forwarding and Access Rule
* Sample Firewall: Access Rules:
Action | Service | Status | Connection Type | Source IP | Destination IP
[Code]....
Everything works, but in my destination server, i see as remote address the IP for the RV120W. I want it to forward also the originating IP address of the client (the remote address)
Is it possible to configure this?
I have also configured DMZ for my server, but see same behaviour
Firmware: 1.0.3.10
We have an ASA5510 running version 8.25. This is in our central office in London. The London network has an ip address range of 10.110.128.0/22. Connected to this via a site-to-site VPN we have a satellite office that has an IP address range of 172.16.148.0/22.
We have now connected to our parent company via another site-to-site VPN connected to the same ASA5510. Their network has an internal range of 10.110.18.0/24. It was our parent company that issued us with our range of addresses a long while ago so that it all fits in with the rest of the company.
We have resources (web servers) on their network that we use which work just as it all should. We now want to allow our satellite office to view those same web servers. The problem is that only 10.110 addresses can flow to our parent company.
I have configured the firewall at our central office and our satellite office to route across to our parent company via our network network and the packets are flowing just fine except that obviously once they reach our firewall they cannot go to our parent company because the 172.16.148 range cannot be routed there.
My idea is to NAT traffic from our satellite office to one of our local addresses before it goes over to our parent company network.
For example: If someone in our satellite office with an IP address of 172.16.150.5 attempts to request a resource from 10.110.18.12 then the request would go via the VPN to our firewall and then get NATed to 10.110.131.200 before being passed on to our parent company network.
My question is what would the NAT configuration be to achieve this. I just cannot work out what type of NAT I would need or how to construct the command. It's probably PAT as it will be multiple addresses to a single address. Essentialy, all traffic from 172.16.148.0/22 destined for 10.110.18.0/24 should get NATed at our firewall to 10.110.131.200 before being passed on.
Just to add, we already have this working from our Cisco 3000 Concentrator which is now going to be phased out hence trying to get this to work on our ASA. The satellite office has now been moved to the ASA and as of today our parent company has been moved to the ASA.
When I try to set a port for forwarding and set the IP address to forward to:192.168.1.108 (of course, I only type in that last number, 108)I get an error message that the number must be between 1 and 65535. It is! Why am I getting this error message?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI am trying to open up port 32400 on my 881w Cisco router but I have not had any success I need to configure manual port-forward to enable my Plex Media server.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a private network behind a configured Cisco ASA 5510. I need to send data back and forth between a server on the inside network and a device on the outside network on port 44818. No amount of configuration is allowing this to happen. The packet tracer always fails on of the implicity "deny" rules, even though my other rule should explicitly permit it. I also realize I need to set up routing from my outside network to the inside network, but I cannot see from the documentation how to do that on this particular port without simultaneously breaking my outside connection.
The inside IP for the ASA is 192.168.25.1
The outside IP for the ASA 192.168.11.54
Here is my current configuration:
: Saved
: Written by enable_15 at 08:49:25.956 UTC Thu Feb 2 2012
!
ASA Version 8.2(5)
[Code]....
We are migrating from a nother brand to an ASA Cluster running 8.4.5
We have a web-server on an inside interface listening on a non standard port - 20111. We have created a static NAT translating the public ip to the private, so If I do http://public-ip:20111 it works. (we are using a seperate public IP for this service only).
Now I need to create a NAT rule that will forward requests on BOTH port 80 and 443 to the same private ip and the same port number (20111)
The Private address is 10.99.250.20 and the "public" (I've replaced it in this example) is 172.16.16.16 I have managed to create a NAT that will translate 443 to 20111:
object network 10.99.250.20 nat (Private-DMZ,Outside) static 172.16.16.16 service tcp 20111 https
But if I try to add another rule like: nat (Private-DMZ,Outside) static 172.16.16.16 service tcp 20111 http It will simply replace the first one.
Is it possible to redirect both 80 and 443 from outside to the same port number and same IP on the inside?
I have been using static NAT to map between a single server behind an ASA 5505 and a single public IP address. In other words, I've been doing this:
object network NAT_ME
nat (inside,outside) static interface
Now I would like to start using the clientless VPN feature of the ASA, so I of course don't want that particular port forwarded to the server. Is there a way to define such an exclusion? I've tried several things, including setting up a separate NAT rule to direct that port back to the ASA's interface, without luck.
If that is not possible, what configuration would I need to move to in order to get the behavior that I want? It is important that all (non-VPN) traffic is passed exactly as it arrives at the firewall (whether it is coming from internal or external), with the exception of changing the IP address (i.e., I need static port mappings for some of my services).
I have a cisco 5520 with 8.4.4(1) and I already have a NAT for an email server on it.Here is the IP and ports on current configuration:
Email Server Private IP: 1.1.1.1
Email Server Public IP: 2.2.2.2
Email Server Local Ports : 25, 587
Right now I have ports 25 and 587 opened for 2.2.2.2 so, now I need to add a port redirection for another port:
New Port : 8925
I need to redirect 2.2.2.2:8925 to 1.1.1.1:587
i'm having a problem portforwarding/redirection for the pix 501?I'm trying to open the ports 49003 and 40085 in order to view our dvr remotely and i'm not exactly sure how to it.
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have an issue with portforwarding in my teleeye cctv behind asa 8.4. I can browse the DVR outside via http however when i attempt to login, "server busy" will prompt afterwards. Note: Theres no issue when acesssing the DVR locally.
Heres my config.
OUTSIDE INTERFACE:
interface Ethernet0/3
speed 100
duplex full
[Code]...
I'm new to an ASA 5510 running 8.4(3) and am trying to figure out something regarding time ranges in ASDM. I simply want to allow a single port during business hours only (I'm not concerned about open sessions needing to be closed). So as an example I add a rule something like:
(RULE1 on the internal interface) SRC=INTERNAL DEST=ANY SERVICE=RDP ACTION=PERMIT with a time range set for weekdays 8:00-16:59. I did a test after 5pm on a weekday and was still allowed to do RDP to a server (from INTERNAL), and after using the packet trace tool saw it was still passing through due to a rule a couple lines down (rule 4) that allowed a port range that happened to include port 3389. So my question is if I specify an "allowed" time range and someone attempts access outside that time range, why doesn't it drop it right there? I guess I'm assuming that anything outside the "allowed" time range would be dropped but that doesn't seem to be the case. I'm also assuming the rule base is processed top to bottom.
Does the FWSM v 4.1.3 is capable to forward return packets to the MAC address that sent them to it first?
View 6 Replies View Relatedi have a asa with a outside IP address of 140.32.121.5. behind this firewall i have a cisco MWR 2941 that i would like to connect to via telnet. its inside ip address is 10.10.10.2. my reasoning for this is because i cannot SSH or telnet from a ASA so i need to have the ASA push my telnet request to the router on its inside interface.i have tried some NAT examples but i am very green with NAT. i have also built access lists that look like the follow " access-list 101 permit tcp any 10.10.50.2 eq 23. and then tied the access-group 101 with the outside interface. this also with no success.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need to open port range 554 - 558 to a DVR on the internal network. Also, I need to NAT one of my public IP's to the DVR. How is this accomplished in 8.4? I was able to do it in an older version ASA software.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI've tried setting up some simple port forwarding on my ASA, where I want to forward one port on the external interface for both UDP and TCP to the same port on an internal server.
It works fine for UDP, but all TCP packets are dropped on the outside interface, even though the configuration for UDP and TCP is basically the same! This is my config:
object network MY_SERVER
host 10.10.1.4
object service TCP_MY_SERVICE
[Code].....
Port count goes up on line 2 (UDP) but never for line 1. I just see the packet denied instead. Same thing happens in the packet tracer, a packet destined for my external interface on that port for UDP is allowed and NAT'd just fine. TCP it gets dropped by the ACL on the outside interface.