Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Cannot Talk To Remote Networks Connected

Mar 20, 2012

We have an inside interface, 192.168.10.0/23We have an outside interface, public ip...We have the ASA connected to 5 site to sites, this is working fine and through the internal interface can access all remote sites and vice vera. These are 192.168.20.0/24, 192.168.30.0/24, 192.168.40.0/24, 192.168.50.0/24 and 192.168.60.0/24,When a user connects via Cisco VPN Client they can see the inside network but can't talk to the remote networks connected, for instance 192.168.40.0/24... whereas an internal user can. I understand that the VPN client connection is seen as an outside connection, not an inside connection... but then I read [URL] and I am confused even more.

View 8 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Two Subnet Unable To Talk To Each Other On Same Inside Interface

Mar 8, 2011

I have setup two different subnet 192.168.1.0 and 192.168.2.0 on the same 'inside' interface. They are unable talking to each other. I can ping from firewall to both subnet. Both side unable talking to each other unless I add route on the both side systems.I have added the followings in ASA5510. [code]

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510s / Remote VPN Users Need To Access Networks Connected By Static VPN

Oct 23, 2012

I have five (5) sites all connected via static VPN tunnels.  They are all using Cisco ASA 5510s running 8.4(4)1. Any internal IP on each site can ping any IP on a remote site, because of the static VPN tunnels.  I have the external IP (routeable) addresses connecting to each other.

Site A: 10.1.0.0 /24
Site B: 10.2.0.0 /24
Site C: 10.3.0.0 /24
Site D: 10.5.0.0 /24
Site E: 10.10.0.0 /20

I have remote users who connect using Cisco AnyConnect 3.1 to Site E.  They get a static IP within the 10.10.100.0 /24 subnet (vpnpool00) and can access anything in the 10.10.0.0 /20 subnet. So far, so good.No management wants users to access devices within the other sites, specifically Site A using teh same AnyConnect connection.  In other words, they get an Ip address of say, 10.10.100.5 and now need to access a server on Site A's subnet or 10.1.0.5.I have checked my NAT statements and they appear to allow this, but so far when I do a ping I get the following:  Routing failed to locate next hop for ICMP from outside: 10.10.100.5/1 to inside: 10.1.0.5/0 What am I missing?  Is there a NAT statement that is wrong, or an access-list statement or possibly a static route?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco 800 / Sonicwall Tz170 - Allow Two Networks To Talk?

Jan 11, 2012

I have my modem then a switch, and two gateways a Cisco 800, and a sonicwall tz170.The Cisco isn't managed by me, it's on a 172.18.2.x subnet and I only have about 12 addressable IPs.I manage the sonicwall and have all 254 addresses open. The computers have to stay behind the Cisco because it connects to a VPN that the line of business software uses.

I can't connect the two gateways by VPN because I cant control the Cisco.How can I get these two to talk? I have a new server on the sonicwall network and an old server on the Cisco network. I want the computers to be able to see both servers

View 13 Replies View Related

Talk Talk Router - Connection Is Suffering Idle Timeouts Daily

May 21, 2012

I've got an aol engineer visiting Thurs.to examine connection loss (since last Weds). But I'm convinced the problem is with the router. But from the tone of the aol tech questions I suspect he's already briefed his engineer to do his best to represent the problem as being either with my computer or positioning of router/filters/condition of wall-sockets - usual getouts.The talktalk router is neww, issued Feb 12, after my original router, speedtouch, started suffering idle timeouts every day.

View 3 Replies View Related

Atheros AR5007EG TO Talk Talk Echolife Hg520b Router

Feb 20, 2011

I can connect to this router via Lan and have no problems.Via Wi Fi it connects but will not communicate with the router or see find the router vias ip address..I have turned on auto ip finding in network settings for Lan and for Wireless but wi fi still does not allow access to internet. It just says local only.when i go to Command prompt and do ipconfig /all it says all DHCP enabled are off!!

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Unable To Communicate Between Interface Networks

Apr 20, 2011

I have an  ASA 5510 working in Routed mode for a company with the following networks. everything works fine as desired. Below are the interfaces, security and  ip addresses .
 
Ethernet0/0   DC_SERVER   security-level 100
ip address 172.16.11.12 255.255.255.0 
Ethernet0/1  Branches  security-level 50

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / Unable To Get Internal Networks Talking To Each Other

Apr 22, 2012

I am tasked with transferring all clients from one subnet to the other. I figure the nicest way to do this is to temporarily have the subnets talk to each other in an endeavour to avoid as much downtime as possible. The two internal subnets are:

192.168.0.0/24
192.168.43.0/24 (the intended migration network)
 
I am beating my head against the desk here as I dont seem to be getting anywhere after the changes I have made. The current configuration is as such:
 
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname ciscoasa
domain-name *****
enable password ***** encrypted
passwd ***** encrypted
names

[code]......
 
Upgrading the firmware is not really an option?

View 3 Replies View Related

Linksys Wired Router :: RV016 - Allow Other Networks Connected To Firewall To Access Internet?

Nov 24, 2011

I have a sonicwall firewall connected to the LAN port of the RV016 router and two DSL modems connected to the WAN ports.
 
Ip address allocation:

Firewall
192.168.50.9
RV016
LAN  - 192.168.50.10
WAN - 192.168.60.1
WAN - 192.168.61.1
 
What configurations do I need to enter into the RV016 to allow other networks connected to the firewall(192.168.3.0, 192.168.2.0) to access the internet?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 871 - Cannot Ping Or RDP Remote Stations Once Connected

Jun 6, 2011

I've setup a CISCO 871 which receives DHCP IP address on WAN interface Fa4 and DHCP-assigned static IP Address on virtual-ppp1.  The static address is used for site-to-site VPN's, while I've planned the DHCP address for standard web access and CISCO VPN Client dial-out.
 
Internally, I've created 2 VLAN's, one for standard PC's with access to the remote sites via site-to-site and cisco client, and the other for a 'secured' area with only HTTP/S allowed out. [code]
 
Clients in the PCLAN should also be allowed to dial-out using CISCO VPN client to remote sites via the OUTSIDE interface.  This is partially working because the client does log into a remote site, however I cannot ping or rdp remote stations once connected."ip inspect log drop-packets" does not reveal dropped packets when trying to ping or rdp. [code]

View 5 Replies View Related

Cannot Connect To MSi Talk Talk Router

Dec 21, 2011

i am having trouble connecting my msi laptop to my talktalk to router i have another laptop that i cant really use however i turned it on to c if i can connect it to internet and i can but can not not matter what i do connect this one.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: NAT Route For Remote VPN On ASA 5510

Nov 15, 2011

I have configured a remote access VPN on my Firewall ASA5510. Everything worked fine and I can successfully connect through the VPN. The problem is I cannot ping or connect to any of my internal network resources. I tried to add a new NAT route from outside to my internal servers using the defined pool but due to a new ASA version there are many changed I see in the NAT routes

View 37 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / ASDM Access With Remote VPN

Apr 18, 2012

I have a cisco ASA 5510 that I have set up currently to access via ASDM through the Inside interface. When I VPN in using our older VPN server I can connect to it fine.  I recently set up the ASA to also be a VPN server which will eventually replace the older server for our HQ.  I noticed that when I'm VPN using the ASA as the VPN server, I can only ASDM to the public which I prefer not to allow.  Access to the inside doesn't seem to work this way. What configurations if any would be causing this.  I'm assuming it's some thing I need to adjust in the VPN configuration.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Adding Remote Routers To ASA 5510?

Jun 13, 2012

I am pretty new to Cisco networking and setting up a test router to use from home to connect into our network. My organization would like for us to provide upper management with home office setups to give them the ability to work from home. We will provide all of the equipment of course (router, phone and workstation). my boss wants me to use some of our old decommissioned equipment to set up a test home office to see how efficient and feasible it would be. I have a Cisco 1700 router, Altigen IP720 phone, and Dell Optiplex 380 workstation.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - PCI Scan For Remote Access VPN

Jul 2, 2012

We got the below alert when we ran the PCI scan on our VPN firewall (use it for remote access VPN).
 
OpenSSL SSL_OP_NETSCAPE_REUSE_CIPHER_CHANGE_BUG Ciphersuite Disabled Cipher Issue
 
Solution- Upgrade to OpenSSL 0.9.8j or later.
  
ASA 5510 running  8.2(2)

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Remote Access VPN / Change The Outside Interface IP

Dec 19, 2012

I have a Cisco 5510 which has remote access VPN configured.Now I have new block of IP address, is there a way I can just change the outside interface IP so that people can remote in without doing anythng else?Or if I coulds be taught to create a new one.Or best way to approcah this issue?For example: it was 67.64.x.x now I need to change to 64.44.x.x.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Remote VPN On ASA 5510 Failing To Hit Public Servers?

Mar 12, 2012

I have a Cisco ASA 5510 that was set up as a VPN server for working remote.  I have disabled split tunneling so that all traffic created while VPN'd in goes through the ASA.  The problem I'm having I believe would be resolved if I enabled split tunneling but I would prefer another solution.  Now..for the problem.When a user is connected via VPN, they can hit all intended devices both public and private accept servers that have static NATs in the FW.  So Server A has a public of 1.1.1.1 which is one to one mapped to private address of 10.1.1.1.  Now if the remote user brings up a browser and goes to 1.1.1.1 it wont work.  The FW gives me a error which is posted below.  However, using the private IP of the server works.  I thought about trying to manipulate DNS to resolve this as the remote users are using URLs and not IPs when trying to reach these servers but again, was hoping I could resolve the NAT problem that the FW seems to be having.
 
Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src Outside:192.168.202.100/49238 dst INSIDE:1.1.1.1/80 denied due to NAT reverse path failure 192.168.202.x/24 is the remote vpn ip given via the ASA. 

Here are some configurations on the ASA:
 
static (INSIDE,Outside) 1.1.1.1 10.1.1.1 netmask 255.255.255.255
 access-list INSIDE_nat0_outbound extended permit ip object-group DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2 192.168.202.0 255.255.255.0 
object-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_2

[code].....
 
Outside with 4.4.4.4 as the public ip traffic gets NAT'd do dynamically Inside with 10.1.1.x network on it.The ASA is running 8.2

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Access List For Remote Vpn Users

Apr 5, 2011

How to designate access-list for the remote access vpn users in order to let them access specific subnet or host,asa 5510 and acs is in the picture

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: VLAN Tagging To ISP Through ASA 5510 To Remote Site

Oct 25, 2012

we have a base license ASA 5510, and been trying to get ICMP working to check that we're routing and not hitting any NAT translation. We have a VLAN280 setup to ISP for VPN link to remote site and another VLAN281 for internet access for internal users.
 
Users can browse internet from (name _inside interface e0/1 access port) which is fine. When I do a ping to remote office through the VPN I get a response pinging from VLAN280 name VPN_Link. When I do a ping from name inside interface I don't get a response both are security level 100 with same-security-traffic permit inter-interface configured.
 
Config:
 
!
interface Ethernet0/0
speed 100
no nameif

[Code]....

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Connection Refused By Remote Host

Apr 26, 2011

I am trying to telnet to my asa 5510 from the core swith,however i received the below msg,how enable it?
 
 172.30.1.100 is the inside interface of the asa
 CITYCORE#telnet 172.30.1.100Trying 172.30.1.100 ... % Connection refused by remote host
CITYCORE#

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - History Of Remote Access VPN For Last Week?

Apr 7, 2011

is there any method on the asa 5510 let u see the history of the remote access vpn connection for the last week

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Set Up Guest Wireless Network For A Remote Office?

Jul 8, 2012

I have been tasked with setting up a guest wireless network for a remote office.  They would prefer that the guest network be on a different VLAN than the trusted network, and they want to use a different outside IP address for the guest network. 

I am trying to figure out how to configure the ASA so that it supports two different LANS, each with it's own outside IP address.  Is this possible?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / Internet Access For Remote VPN With Split Tunneling

Jun 23, 2011

I have a remote VPN with split tunnelling enabled. Currently, users connected to this VPN browses internet with his/her internet connection. Now, my requirement is that a roaming user connecting to the vpn must use our company's internet connection for his browsing purposes. How can I do this?Equipment we are using: ASA 5510

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Voip Pbx Resides On Separate LAN / Not Connected To ASA 5510

Oct 18, 2011

The Voip pbx resides on a seperate lan, not connected to the ASA.  Users from behind the ASA (inside) try to connect to the VOIP pbx using a soft phone. The Voip connection is established, however users cannot here conversations on either end.Im assuming this is possibly a Sip and Pat issue?  The ASA firewall is using a seperate Global IP for PAT.  Also I have opened ports on the outside interface for SIP udp 8081, 2088,16000-16010 and 15000-15511.  I have both SIP and H323 h225 inspection in place as well. 

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 EtherChannel Connected To 3740 Stack

Feb 13, 2013

I have a single 5510 ASA and a paired of 3750 Stacked Switches. I was trying to create an Ether channel on the ASA and connected to the SW Stack port channel to support different VLANs sub interfaced at the ASA.  am confused with the following statement from doc. [URL].
 
Section Guidelines and Limitations :

"The ASA does not support connecting an  Ether Channel to a switch stack. If the ASA Ether Channel is connected  cross stack, and if the Master switch is powered down, then the  Ether Channel connected to the remaining switch will not come up. 
 
What "If the ASA Ether Channel is connected  cross stack"? or better. Is it possible to use the ASA 8.4 Port-Channel to connect it to the 3750 ether channel stack?

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Unable To Access Remote Network After Connecting ASA 5510 And 5505

Sep 24, 2011

I am using two firewalls to connect two different offices. Firewall 5510 is running ASDM 6.3 and 5505 is running ASDM 6.2, Problem is that even after connecting two sites, i am unable to ping remote network from either side. I am mentioned static route as tunneled.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / Can LDAP-authenticated Remote User Be Assigned A Connection

Jun 30, 2011

ASA 5510 ASA 8.0 ASDM 6.1 I want some remote users to have split-tunnel connection, others not.  I used Cisco Document ID 100936 "Allow Split Tunneling for AnyConnect VPN Client on the ASA Configuration...".  I created a new Group Policy with split-tunnel enabled.  I created a new Connection Profile and assigned to it the new Group Policy.  When I authenticate at the AnyConnect client I get a dropdown of the 2 connecton profiles, to choose the one I want.  Each of them works, enabling or disabling split-tunnel.  But I want to assign a connection profile to the particular user, not give the user a choice.  The problem is I'm using LDAP authentication.  The Local Users I set up before LDAP are obsolete, assigning them a Group Policy does nothing.  I really don't want to give up LDAP and force people back to another local password.  But the LDAP authentication to Active Directory just says yes or no, it won't assign a connection profile.  At the AnyConnect Connection Profiles page I have set a switch "Allow user to select connection profile, identified by its alias, on the login page.  Otherwise, DefaultWebVPNGroup will be the connection profile".  If I clear that switch every user will be assigned the same default profile, which does not work.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 RADIUS Based AAA For Remote Access Tunnel Groups

Nov 22, 2011

How would I go about configuring RADIUS based AAA for remote access VPN users?  I have an OSX RADIUS server and an ASA 5510
 
(I want to keep console and SSH using LOCAL, so I keep this: "aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL", right?)What does the rest of the config look like to get RADIUS based AAA for remote access VPN users?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Connected To MPLS And LAN Via 6506-E Core Switch

Apr 19, 2011

I am attempting to install an asa 5510 at my hq.  Our MPLS network is provided by our ISP and the routers are managed by them.  They will be working with me to add the needed routes to the routers. Using version 8.4.1  That said, here is my challenge:
 
I am connecting the MPLS routers and WAAS device to my core switch(also performing inter-vlan routing) in VLAN 2. There are 3 connections needed for the mpls equipment and they are all in vlan 2 on my core switch.  The firewall (ASA 5510 with security plus licensing) also has an interface (outside) in vlan 2.

e0/0
shutdown
no nameif

[Code]....   
 
configuration guides or suggest TAC as they have been a bit inconsistent with this issue thus far.  What am I missing because I cannot get to where inside interface of the firewall is pingable by the lan and the outside interface of the firewall is pingable by the lan.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Users Are Unable To Pass Traffic When Connected Through Vpn

Sep 12, 2011

I am migrating over from and old PIX to an ASA 5510. After configuring the new device everything else is functional (Internet) but users are unable to pass traffic when connected through the vpn, they are able to authenticate and I see their session connected on the ASDM but no data is passed..[code]

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Zbot Infection - Using ASA 5510 To Detect Computer Connected To IP

Sep 27, 2011

Is there any way to use an asa 5510 to detect which computer on the inside of my network is connecting to ip 87.255.51.229.  I am being blacklisted for w win32/Zbot connection, I need to identify this computer and get it disconnected from the network ASAP.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 - Get Clients To Talk To Active Directory Servers?

Nov 9, 2011

I'm trying to get a couple clients to talk to my Active Directory servers. I've created sub-interfaces on my ASA. So, my clients are on Gi0/1.139 and my two Active Directory servers are on Gi0/1.132. I've enabled traffic on TCP 53-5000 port range according to Microsoft. My clients still can't join the domain. What ports I need to open up? My AD servers are Windows 2003.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Identity NAT Configuration For Remote Access VPN And Site-to-Site

Mar 9, 2011

I am try to configure ASA 5510 with 8.3 IOS version.My internal users are 192.168.2.0/24 and i configured dynamic PAT and are all internet .

i want configure identity NAT for remote access VPN.Remote users IP pool is 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10
 
i know to configure NAT exemption in IOS 7.2 version. But here IOS 8.3 version. configure NAT exemption for 192.168.2.0/24 to my remote pool( 10.10.10.0 to 10.10.10.10).

View 6 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved