Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Object-Groups Not Working

May 9, 2012

I have an ASA 5510 and have just started using object-groups which are super handy in theory, but not working in reality. I have a service object-group with a mix of tcp, icmp, and udp ports. Let's call it Sample_Port_Group. I'm trying to apply it to my dmz_access_in ACL. Here's the line giving me problems:
 
access-list dmz_access_in extended permit object-group Sample_Port_Group 192.168.1.1 any
 
The asa throws up an error between 192.168.1.1 and any. When I put up a ? after Sample_Port_Group, it gives me the option of putting in an IP address, any, etc. When I put in a ? after 192.168.1.1, it only gives me the option of putting in an IP address.URL

Those posts gave me the impression my line was possible, especially the "access-list outsideacl extended permit object-group myaclog interface inside any" line, which is at the end of the 2nd article linked.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 Object Groups / Creating New ACL

Jul 20, 2011

I have an ASA5510 where I have defined object-groups and then associated them with a specific ACL.  Our ISP is pulling their point of presence from where I live and I am force to move to a new ISP.  I am in the process of setting up another interface for the ASA5510 to connect to the new ISP.
 
My questions is can I create a new ACL lets call it new_access_in and use it with the same object groups that I have already defined?  I know that I can only have one ACL bound to an interface, and will bind this new ACL to the new interface I am setting up, but I wasn't sure if I could use the same object groups and connect them to a different ACL.  I really don't want to have to create new object groups if I don't have to.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 8.4 DNS Names In Object-groups

Jun 8, 2011

Is it possible somehow to define externally administred DNS namese in ASA 8.4 in within object groups?i know that we can use name XXX, but some idea popped up using this kind of configuration.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASDM 5.0.7 Creates Duplicate Network Object Groups

Aug 5, 2011

We are facing the problem in ASDM 5.x creates duplicate network object groups in the configuration when PIX with software 7.0.7 is used.
Audit report its showing below commands :
 
asdm group SALES_ref dmz2 reference SALES object-group network SALES_ref network-object 172.20.7.8 network-object 172.20.10.3 network-object 172.20.11.2
 
no access-list dmz2_access_in extended permit tcp object-group Network_10.10.1.0 object-group SALES object-group SALES_Ports access-list dmz2_access_in line 200 extended permit tcp object-group Network_10.10.1.0 object-group SALES_ref object-group SALES_Ports
 
i was created SALES object group 2 month back after that ASDM Automatically created the duplicate object with SALES_ref name and changed the old ACL.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Using Object-Groups For Easy Maintain ASA 5520 Configurations

Sep 19, 2011

After reading the post titled "ASA 5520 nat access-list query for internet access" I realized the object-group command could and should be used to make a more efficient and cleaner configuration. My current environment is very small and straight forward consisting of one FTP server in the DMZ. Though the guide: [URL] is straight forward, my inexperience hinders me from seeing how to use the commands effectively. A summary of the configuration is at the bottom of this post
 
Question: How can I clean up my current configuration? I have two references to the same server, dmz-rdp and dmz-ftp, created for port forwarding ports 3389 and ftp through the outside interface. I can combine them into one object statement, right? for each port I want to forward through the outside interface?
 
object network dmz-rdp
host 10.10.10.4
nat (DMZ,outside) static interface service tcp 3389 3389

[Code]....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Named Objects Or Object Groups In ASR 1000s?

Mar 5, 2012

Any way of doing named objects or object groups for ACLs on the ASRs? (1000 series in this case.) I'm setting up an ASR with a zone-based firewall and writing out all the addresses, ports and protocols for the ACLs associated with the various zones is creating huge, unwieldy ACLs in the config.

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 - Create Network Object For IP To NAT Through? 

Jan 30, 2012

I have recently upgraded my ASA 5510 to 8.3 code and honestly I am confused on the best and most efficient way to do many nat translations through it.  I have a group of about 100 IP's that need http/https/and sqlnet allowed through for our web farm.
 
I have a text file with the real and translated IP addresses and in 8.2 I could simply modify it and dump the thing in and make the NAT rules and access-lists.  Now with the new object based model I am having a hard time wrapping my brain around how to do this using as few lines of code as possible.
 
Do I have to create an network object for each and every IP i want to nat through? 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Object Group Network Limit With Asa 5510

Oct 29, 2012

We have Cisco ASA 5510, I am about to add another 2 Objectgroup network  groups on the firewall to our already growing list. Under this Object-group Network xxxx , we are planning to add about about 500 network-object host xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx . This objectgroup will then be applied to an ACL. Just wanted to know if thats possible - meaning addnig 500 hosts? If it is whats the limit?
 
Also are there any other things to keep in mind before i go-ahead with this huge object group?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Object-groups In Access-lists On 3750X?

May 29, 2013

I have started to use ip extended access-lists on several 3750X-switches to filter inbound and outbond traffic on the VLANs. But it seems that the use of object-groups is not supported, is this correct? Is it really no way to group different ip-addresses into groups and then use these groups in the access-lists?
 
I am running sw version 15.0(1)SE2.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5520 - Object-group With Network-object Containing IP Address Range

Apr 7, 2013

Does the ASA treat an object-group with a network-object containing a range of IP addresses as a netmask? For example, I can apply this configuration without the ASA throwing any errors though the configuration calls for a 'net mask':
 
object-group network test
network-object 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255
?
network-object-group mode commands/options:
A.B.C.D  Enter an IPv4 network mask
sh run ob id test
object-group network test
network-object 192.168.0.0 192.168.63.255
 
I found that in the documentation it requires a netmask as oppose to a range. Is this a bug in the code? I am running code version 8.0(5)23 on a 5520. If this is not a bug how does the ASA treat this type of configuration when applied to an access list? When I ran a quick packet trace and denied access from that range it looks like the ASA doesn't read that configuration properly.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 RADIUS Based AAA For Remote Access Tunnel Groups

Nov 22, 2011

How would I go about configuring RADIUS based AAA for remote access VPN users?  I have an OSX RADIUS server and an ASA 5510
 
(I want to keep console and SSH using LOCAL, so I keep this: "aaa authentication ssh console LOCAL", right?)What does the rest of the config look like to get RADIUS based AAA for remote access VPN users?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 / Ip Service Object And Service Group

May 16, 2011

When I create a service object or group and add the object to a new rule it never works.I mean the traffic match not the rule. I see not hits.I placed the rule on top of my access list to check if I do somethink wrong but it is not working. When I place only a service for example tcp/23 it is working.
 
my ip service object
object-group service g-as400 description access client 2 as400 machine service-object tcp-udp destination eq 397 service-object tcp destination eq 137 service-object tcp destination eq 2001 service-object tcp destination eq 3000 service-object tcp destination eq 445 service-object tcp destination range 446 447 service-object tcp destination eq 449 service-object tcp destination eq 5010 service-object tcp destination eq 5544 service-object tcp destination eq 5555 service-object tcp destination range 8470 8476 service-object tcp destination eq 8480 service-object tcp destination eq

[code]...

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Vpn Client Groups Configured / DHCP Server Stops Giving Network Service

Feb 20, 2013

I have a asa 5510 vpn client groups configured and connected to the internal network DHCP server stops giving network service dhcp and the network goes down.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: ASA 5510 Object-group And Range Option

Feb 6, 2013

I have 3 ASA 5510s; two of which are in production and the 3rd one is new. I inherited the two in production and was trying to configure that 3rd one using some of the existing object-group network statements.  The problem is that when I try to create a range of IPs in one of the object-groups; the range command is not available. Here is one of the statements extracted from one of the production ASAs:  object network REMOTE range 62.77.130.14 62.77.130.208.Both ASAs have the same image ver (asa842-k8).  Is there something that I am missing to be able to enable the range option on the new ASA?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - SSH Is Not Working

Jul 1, 2011

I configured ASA 5510 with IOS 8.4.2 version. I configured SSH to outside and backup interface with any any permission.
 
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outside
ssh 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 backup
 
configured password with command
 
passwd < Password>
  
While connecting from outside through Putty i am not able to authenticate the password.
 
Aftter entering user name as pix its asking password. After entering its not authenticating.
 
I taken output by telnetting to inside after connecting to the firewall from outside and entering username as pix
 
PM-ASA-5510# sh ssh sessions
SID Client IP       Version Mode Encryption Hmac     State            Username1   122.169.252.112 2.0     IN   aes256-cbc sha1     KeysExchanged    pix                            OUT  aes256-cbc sha1     KeysExchanged    pixSPM-ASA-5510#

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Twice NAT Not Working With 5510

Aug 22, 2012

Our NOC is trying to configure a site to site tunnel to one of our customers. The tunnel is up and operational, however we can't get our NAT rules to match what we want.
 
We are running ASA version 8.4(3)
 
The traffic is sourced from 172.16.1.50 (inside1) and destined to192.168.2.9 (outside), the nat configuration is posted below:
 
NOC-ASA5510-01# show run nat
nat (inside1,inside2) source static ng-noc-networks ng-noc-networks destination static ng-inside2-networks ng-inside2-networks
nat (inside1,outside) source static test test-EXT destination static otherside otherside
object network obj_any
nat (inside1,outside) dynamic interface dns
object network servers-noc
nat (inside1,outside) static 192.168.1.68
 
Here is the output from the show nat detailed:
 
NOC-ASA5510-01# show nat detail
Manual NAT Policies (Section 1)
I left off entry 1 but it doesnt have any translated hits either

2 (inside1) to (outside) source static test test-EXT   destination static otherside otherside
    translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 624
    Source - Origin: 172.16.1.50/32, Translated: 192.168.1.67/32
    Destination - Origin:192.168.2.9/32, Translated:192.168.2.9/32
 
Auto NAT Policies (Section 2)
1 (inside1) to (outside) source static servers-noc 192.168.1.68 
    translate_hits = 0, untranslate_hits = 187
    Source - Origin: 172.16.1.101/32, Translated: 192.168.1.68/32
2 (inside1) to (outside) source dynamic obj_any interface   dns
    translate_hits = 58417, untranslate_hits = 1511
    Source - Origin: 0.0.0.0/0, Translated: 192.168.1.66/29
 
Here are the network objects:
 
object network test
host 172.16.1.50
object network test-EXT
host 192.168.1.67
[Code]...

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 NAT Doesn't Appear To Be Working

Mar 8, 2012

I've got an ASA 5510 running 8.4.I have a host on an inside interface, with a static NAT configured on the ASA. The inbound/return half of the NAT doesn't appear to be working. [code] I run a ping from the host (192.168.100.98) to something on the outside (1.2.3.4)Running captures, I can see the outbound ping leaving, having been NATed OK. I can see the reply coming back in to the outside interface with the correct IP address, but I never get the final NATed packet appear on the inside interface. The packet just disappears inside the ASA.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 8.4 - Internet Is Not Working?

Nov 14, 2011

I implemented a ASA5510 with latest software version. I configured outside interface, default route, PAT to the outside interface. I am able to ping and telnet to the inside interface of the ASA.But internet is not working.Did i miss any configuration?i enabled icmp to outside,. i did a ping to the next hop from ASA. but it is not working.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: SSH Stops Working To ASA 5510?

Feb 5, 2013

I find are steps to turn on SSH access.  I have quite a few customers with ASA5510's installed.  SSH is set up and working fine on every one.  After a period of time, you are no longer able to SSH into the firewall.  Using Putty, it just sits there on a blank screen without giving a "denied access" message or a login prompt.  Rebooting the firewall will solve the issue and SSH access works again.  Today, I had a customer with and active/standby configuration where I had to reboot both of them to be able to log in.  Most of my customers are on 8.2.software as most don't want to reconfigure for the new NAT, etc. 
 
I'm sure others have seen this before since it appears to be occuring on almost every ASA that I have access to.  Is there any fix to eliminate this or is there something that can be run from the ASDM that will grant SSH access again without just doing a reboot?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 EIGRP Not Working

Sep 24, 2012

We have 2 ASA5510 and 2 ASA5525. Got a very weird error; up to release 8.4 eigrp works fine, after upgrading to 8.6 eigrp stops working.Can't see any neighbors; but same command from another asa on same network but with release 8.4: [code] I want to put the 5525 on production but would like to do it with latest release; could this be a bug on 8.6?

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - HA No More Working After Upgrade To 8.4.1(11)

Jun 2, 2011

we recently upgraded our ASA 5510 active/standby cluster from ASA Version 8.3.2 to 8.4.1(11). Unfortunately the standby ASA is now crashing a few seconds after the configuration was synchronized from the active ASA.
 
Also completely disabling HA, bringing the default config to standby ASA again and activating HA afterwards did not work. Also tried through the Wizard provided by ASDM to be sure to have no errors with requirements.
 
How to solve this without doing a downgrade back to 8.3.2. ?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Vpn Tunnel Not Working From One End

May 9, 2013

I have an ASA 5510 and I am building a site-to-site vpn tunnel, peer on the other end is a sonicwall. I can initiate the tunnel from my end, but when he tries from his end it fails on phase 2 with this error in the logs:
 
"Rejecting IPSec tunnel: no matching crypto map entry for remote proxy"
 
Obviously our crypto map's don't match, i have it restricted to specific ports on my end and he had it wide open on his end, but said he is not sure how to restrict it down to specific ports. My question is why would I be able to bring the tunnel up on my end if the crypto map's don't match and he can't bring it up?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: VPN Tunnel Not Working From One End ASA 5510

Dec 5, 2012

I have an ASA 5510 and I am building a site-to-site vpn tunnel, peer on the other end is a sonicwall. I can initiate the tunnel from my end, but when he tries from his end it fails on phase 2 with this error in the logs:
 
"Rejecting IPSec tunnel: no matching crypto map entry for remote proxy"
 
Obviously our crypto map's don't match, i have it restricted to specific ports on my end and he had it wide open on his end, but said he is not sure how to restrict it down to specific ports. My question is why would I be able to bring the tunnel up on my end if the crypto map's don't match and he can't bring it up?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA-5510 - SIP ACL Traffic Not Working

Jun 11, 2013

I have an ASA with an outside ACL that is configured to allow 208.84.248.95 SIP/5060 to 1x.x.x.46.  I show no hits.  I added an ACL to do a packet capture, it sees the packet coming into the ASA but not going to the Serv Prov interface.  I see hits on the vuong ACL but not the production acl_out ACL..  What is up?
 
NOTE:ACL_out is the ACL we use to allow outside traffic to enter our network. 
FW1(config)# sh access-list | i 1.x.x.46
access-list acl_out line 1 extended permit ip host 63.x.x.140 host 1x.x.x.46 (hitcnt=0) 0xc09a9387  (*NO HITS)
access-list acl_out line 658 extended permit udp host 208.84.248.95 host 1x.x.x.46 eq sip (hitcnt=0) 0x0f327179  (NO HITS)
[code]...

It was tested and verified from the inside network to make sure the server is listening on that port. Below we created an ACL to allow all IP from another test PC to the Server IP 1x.x.x.46.  We did a telnet to port 5060 and it showed hits but not on the acl_out ACL.
 
ccess-list vuong line 1 extended permit ip host 63.x.x.140 host 1x.x.x.46 (hitcnt=0) 0x2759fa92
FW1(config)# q
FW1# capture capture1 access-list vuong interface outside
[code]...
 
Below we applied the same ACL to the ServProv interface to see if traffic was going where it was supposed to .  By trying to telnet to the 1x.x.x46 IP from 63.x.x.140 IP.  Looking below, no traffic appeared on the capture2.
 
FW1# capture capture2 access-list vuong interface ServProv
FW1# sh capture capture2
0 packet captured
0 packet shown
[code]...
 
Capture 1 above shows the last 3 incoming messages initiated from 63.x.x.140 to the 1x.x.x.46! Vuong ACL belows shows 3 more hits.....nothing on the acl_out ACL???
 
FW1# sh access-list vuong
access-list vuong; 1 elements; name hash: 0x29df3e90
access-list vuong line 1 extended permit ip host 63.x.x.140 host 1x.x.x.46 (hitcnt=6) 0x2759fa92
[code]...

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - Static NAT For Outside Access Not Working?

Sep 19, 2011

I've got an ASA 5510 that has been working like a charm for some time now. Until now we've not had to nat any resources to the outside. I created network objects for an internal host and an external host. The internal host has to respond to requests on tcp/2001.
 
The internal host has no problem accessing the internet, but when I attempt to access the internal host from the outside, I get the following:
 
4    Sep 20 2011    16:20:33        fw_outside_ip    62678    outside_host    2001    Deny tcp src outside:outside_host_ip/62678 dst inside_host:inside_host_ip/2001 by access-group "outside_access_in" [0x0, 0x0]
 
When I try to use the packet tracer to simulate the outside traffic, I get the following
 
5    Sep 20 2011    16:17:41        inside_host    2001            Asymmetric NAT rules matched for forward and reverse flows; Connection for tcp src outside:outside_host/1065 dst inside_int:inside_host/2001 denied due to NAT reverse path failure
 
I've got over my NAT statement and access rule and can't find anything wrong with either.
 
Here are the pertinent NAT and access rule...
 
static (inside_int,outside) tcp interface 2001 inside_host 2001 netmask 255.255.255.255
 
access-list outside_access_in extended permit tcp host outside_host host inside_host eq 2001

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 With Inside Interface And DMZ Not Working

Feb 5, 2012

i have here a ASA 5510 sec k9.
 
I build a Config with a DMZ,INSIDE and OUTSIDE Interface. My Plan is to use the IP-Address of the OUTSIDE Interface with PORT to setup a HTTP Server In the DMZ
 
But my Config doesn't work. And I have no Plan why .....
 
The Inside Interface have to work normal. The Traffic to the Internet is TRiggert from Inside with Dynamic PAT
 
ciscoasa(config)# exit 
ciscoasa# show run
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.4(1)

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5510 - LAN Based Failover Not Working

Jun 23, 2011

I have ASA 5510 connected as shown in attached diagram.Ideally when ASA 1 is active and if I boot Switch-1, ASA-2 shood take over. But that is not happening.When I boot SW1 , ASA-2 shows "Failover LAN Interface: failover Ethernet0/0 (Failed - No Switchover)" and remains standby.Fail over works properly If ASA-1 boots.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco :: LMS 4.1 No User Defined Groups Shown In Fault Notification Groups?

Dec 12, 2011

I created some User Defined Groups in LMS 4.1, now I want to apply certain fault notification groups to Event Sets.
   
Unfortunately the Groups I configured are not in the Group Selector of the Fault Notification Group: Admin > Network > Notification and Action Settings > Fault Notification Group

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Object To Twice NAT Configuration ASA5505 8.4?

Dec 18, 2011

We have an ASA5505 that we need to enable hairpinning on.... In the old firmware versions, we used to be able to configure a public to private static mapping along with hairpinning by using
 
static (inside,outside) outside_ip inside_ip netmask 255.255.255.255
static (inside,inside) outside_ip inside_ip netmask 255.255.255.255
 
In 8.4, if I use object nat, the hairpin functionality works perfectly,
 
object network obj-insideip
  nat (inside,inside) static publicip
 
however, since object nat only allows a single nat statement, I was attempting to use a twice nat to enable the hairpin functionality, but have been unsuccessful in coming up with the right combination of parameters for the functionality.
 
nat (inside,inside) source static private_object public_object destination static public_object private_object
 
allows hairpinning to successully work from the same machine.  Meaning on any given host, I can ping itself using the private or public ip, but I can't get the right combination for hairpinning from any private host to another private host via the public ip.  Other combinations have yielded icmp responses, however, they specify the private IP as the source of the reply instead of the public ip.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 8.4 Network Object NAT Ordering

Aug 19, 2012

There is something wrong with the ordering of our NAT-rules.We are running ASA Version 8.4(2)8 and the nat config is pasted below.
 
I want outgoing smtp-traffic to be translated to xxx.yyy.zzz.18, but instead it's translated to xxx.yyy.zzz.20 (the outside-interface address).The same goes for ftp-traffic, according to packettracer this is also translated to the xxx.yyy.zzz.20.
 
Ciscos manual states that static nat rules takes precedence over dynamic nat but that doesn't seem to work for us. [code]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Inter Interface Communications Not Working On Asa 5510 V 8.2.2

Aug 20, 2012

I have an ASA 5510 attached to 2 internal networks.  Everything is working except communications between the 2 internal interfaces.I can ping the FW from either interface and I can ping hosts on both networks from the CLI but can't get any traffic to pass.I'd like to open the connection to all traffic. [code]

View 33 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: Command Authorization In ASA 8.4 For Object Network

Apr 28, 2012

I just tried to do a quick privilege level setup for a user to limit access to asa. User should be able to add nat's to configuration.ASA 8.4 is in question and trying the following does not seem to work:

privilege configure level 3 command object,gives me ,ERROR: specified command 'object' not found in any mode.It looks like localy this cannot be done or I am doing something wrong?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: 5510 Exchange Active Sync Stops Working

May 8, 2012

I know that I've run into this before but I can't remember the fix.  I have a 5510.  The 3 interfaces involved are INSIDE, OUTSIDE, and GUEST. Corporate users are allowed to put their iPhones on the Guest network, but the problem is that their Exchange ActiveSync stops working.  It is tied to the external DNS name of the OWA server (we'll say webmail.abc.com).  So the users are funneled out one public IP on the OUTSIDE interface and are trying to communicate with the outside of the OWA server, which is NATed to another public IP on the same outside interface.  What do I need to do on the ASA to allow users on the guest network (behind the GUEST interface) to access the mail server using its public IP (behind the INSIDE interface)

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved