Cisco Firewall :: Have Checkpoint But Want To Add ASA 5505 SSL VPN?
Dec 10, 2011
I have 5 static public IP addresses at my disposal. A checkpoint firewall with VPN access provides remote access for mobile users. How would I go about integrating the ASA 5505 SSL VPN into this network so some mobile users could continue using the checkpoint VPN client while others could have SSL VPN remote access? Attached is a graphic of the network.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 6, 2011
I have set up a VPN tunnel using pre-shared keys between my ASA5505 and a Checkpoint firewall (another company).
I can initiate the tunnel from my side, but they cannot open it from their side. We get Phase2 failures.
The other company is saying:
"Your ASA is expecting my CheckPoint to negotiate the phase 2 timeouts in both seconds and kilobytes. Enabling kilobyte timeouts is not something that is currently realistically feasible on my side, so I ask that you disable/turn off kilobyte timeouts on your side"
However, I do not have a kilobyte timeout specified in the security association for the tunnel, only a seconds.
Is there a hidden default setting I have to turn off? If so, how do I do this?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
what's required for the migration from Checkpoint R75-20 Splat install to the Cisco ASA firewall, links to documentation - step-by-step.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 5, 2012
how to configure ACS 5.2 for device administration of Checkpoint firewalls and security management servers?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Dec 18, 2012
I am working on a project to migrate a single Checkpoint firewall over to a single ASA 5510, no VPN, just firewall. The checkpoint firewall has 8 physical interface so the ASA 5510 also support physical 8 interfaces so thiw will be a one-to-one swap. At the moment, I don't have an ASA 5510 to test my theory so I am going to throw it out here. The checkpoint firewall is a SPLAT running on an powerfull IBM Server with 8 CPU dual cores with 32GB of RAM and it has 1200 rules with over 120,000 objects with some of the crazy NATs but it works so we will just leave it at that. There are not that much traffics going across the firewall so there are no need to put in an ASA 5585
I use the cisco conversion tool to do the policy conversion from Checkpoint to Cisco, I get about 1.5 million lines in the configuration. A lot of it has to do with Checkpoint having no concept of interface security level while ASA does. I am sure I can optimize it to cut down the number of lines in the configuration; however, that is not my main concern at the moment. The customer goal is that at the time when cutover from Checkpoint to Cisco ASA, they want everything to be perfect, meaning that it will work like magic.
My question is that can the ASA 5510 handle 1.5 million lines of configuration? Are there any limitations on this? I know there are limitations with FWSM but since I don't have an 5510 to test.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2011
Running EIGRP on network. Hub router connects to remote router via EIGRP and then I have 2 static routes getting traffic to the switch behind the checkpoint firewall(Edge-1 UTM). Some switches I can access while others I cannot.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2011
I am trying to migrate checkpoint configs to ASA 5585 using SCT tool, this tool asking me to feed it *.W file from checkpoint which is suppose to be a rule definition file on CP, but I cant find it
View 14 Replies
View Related
May 16, 2013
we are trying to configure the vpn with our provider we are on Asa and the use Checkpoint , vpn seem to be established on phase 1 and phase 2 too.bur when i send ping packets seem to los on tunnel and other side do not see them.Asa is after a onother firewall and outside interface of this asa is nated on this perimeter firewall.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Feb 17, 2011
I have a problem with a L2L VPN between ASA and Checkpoint R71 VPN I can ping it up to the network that is behind the checkpoint but they can not make me pin.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2012
I am trying to get a simple IPSEC VPN between a Cisco 800 router and a CheckPoint firewall.The Phase 1 negotiation is working fine.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 11, 2011
I have an ASA running 8.4(2) code.
I have been trying to get a VPN tunnel established between this device and a Checkpoint R70 firewall, but have been getting nowehere.
The settings are:
Encap: ESP
Encryption: AES256
Hash: SHA1
DH: Group 2 (1024)
Authentication: pre-share
lifetime: 1440 min / 4096000 KB
I can open the tunnel from the ASA to the Checkpoint, but the Checkpoint cannot open a tunnel with the ASA. It looked like the issue originally was the KB timout which was turned off on the Checkpoint side. They have since added that (4096000), but we are getting Phase2 failures.
How to create a tunnel between an ASA running 8.4(2) and a Checkpoint R70?
I am beginning to think that I have incompatible systems Is it a PFS issue? If so, how do I enable that in the policy section?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2012
I want the vpn device for about 320 users
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2013
We are setting up a vpn between a cisco RV082 and a checkpoint device. From the Cisco device we have set up (as remote IP) the public IP 85.xxx.xxx.xxx but when we try to start the tunnel the VPN log (from RV082) report the error "INVALID_ID_INFORMATION" as described below.
Jun 11 11:38:41 2013 VPN Log (g2gips1) #894: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 85.xxx.xxx.xxx:500
Jun 11 11:38:41 2013 VPN Log (g2gips1) #894: we require peer to have ID '85.xxx.xxx.xxx', but peer declares '10.yy.yy.yyy'
[code]....
The IP 10.yy.yy.yyy. reported in the log is the natted ip of the Checkpoint device.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
How I can actively monitor the interfaces and overall status of 2 x ASA 5500s in an Active/Standby configuration?
I can setup monitoring of the interfaces on the Active member but I'm not sure how to manage the Standby member?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 24, 2012
We were having a discussion of ios firewall vs. asa for smaller clients(less than 50). On using ios firewall(zbf or cbac)and an asa 5505/5510. One of the arguments brought up on using ios firewall on the router is that a router will do an ip sla failover. I have configured a number of isr's for this and i know it works good.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 19, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 in our office. We are currently using Interface 0 for outside and 1 for inside. We only have 1 Vlan in our environment. We have two three switches behind the firewall. Today the uplink to Interface 1, to the firewall, on the switch went bad. I want to setup a second inside interface on the firewall and configure it as failover incase this happens again. I want to attach it to the other switch. Can I do this? If so, what do I need to do? would it only be a passive/standby interface?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 23, 2011
setting up an ASA 5505 to be used as a firewall between a BT internet router(BTNet service) and a Cisco 3560 Lan switch. BT have presented me with a cisco 3800 series router with the following details:
Network Address Network Mask BTnet NTE Router LAN Address
There are 2 Gigethernet ports on the back of the router port Ge0/0 is connected to the BT NTE and the status light is flashing green. Int ge0/1 is connected into port int e0/1 of the ASA but i am unable to get any connection.
View 21 Replies
View Related
Feb 27, 2013
I'd like to see some REAL LIFE comparisons of ASA firewall throughput (a bit like this one for ISR G2 Routers - [URL].
The reason I ask is that I recently upgraded a firewall from an ASA5505 to an ASA5520 on a small network where the only outside connectivity was a single 10meg Internet circuit with an IPSEC VPN (not landed on the firewall but on a router) to another site.
When I swapped out the firewall the users noticed a big improvement. The firewall is not doing anything out of the ordinary - no IPS or VPN, just standard state full inspection.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Dec 22, 2011
Trying to set up a asa 5505 in transparent firewall mode. I cannot set the management ip address:
ciscoasa> enable
Password:
ciscoasa# config term
[Code].....
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 3, 2011
I have been working with ASA 5510,20,40,80 but not with 5505 this vlan and its interfaces are quite confusing.Just want to know how it works and its connectivity to Cisco Switch.Do i have to put the interface of the switch in the same vlan as i am creating the interface vlan in firewall ?Now the switch port connecting to this Eth1 interface should also be in the same vlan ? i.e vlan3 ?? or it will be in trunk ? The default configuration shows the eth0 with no access vlan and interface eth1 with access vlan 2... does it mean the eth0 is in vlan1 ? (Nativ Vlan ) ???
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 28, 2012
I have a cisco asa 5505 firewall. Is it possible to block secure websites in it like [URL]? I have already tried regular expression filtering but it filters only http traffic.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2011
I am trying to configure our ASA 5505 so that our users can access our ftp site using [URL] while inside the firewall. Our ftp site is setup so that you can reach it by either browsing to the above url or by browsing to ftp://99.23.119.78 but we are unable to access our ftp site from either route while inside the firewall. We can access our ftp site using the internal ip address of 192.168.1.3.
Here is our current confguration:
Result of the command: "show running-config"
: Saved:ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname ciscoasaenable password qVQaNBP31RadYDLM encryptedpasswd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encryptednames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.1.1 255.255.255.0 !interface Vlan2nameif ATTsecurity-level 0pppoe client vpdn group ATTip address pppoe setroute !interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!ftp mode passiveobject-group service DM_INLINE_TCP_1 tcpport-object eq ftpport-object eq ftp-dataport-object eq wwwaccess-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any host 99.23.119.78 object-group DM_INLINE_TCP_1 access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp-data access-list ATT_access_in extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq www access-list 100 extended permit tcp any interface ATT eq ftp
[code]....
View 6 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
New to the ASA 5505 8.4 software version, but here is what I'm trying to do:
-Single static public IP: 16.2.3.4
-Need to PAT several ports to three separate servers behind firewall
-One server houses email, pptp server, ftp server and web services: 10.1.20.91
-One server houses drac management (port 445): 10.1.20.92
-One server is the IP phone server using a range of ports: 10.1.20.156
Basically, need to PAT the ports associated with each server to the respective servers behind the ASA 5505. Is anything missing from this config? Do I need to include a global policy for PPTP and SMTP? [code]
View 11 Replies
View Related
Apr 27, 2011
I'm integrating a Cisco ASA5505 with a Websense proxy. I have a configuration setup where we have four routers which are used for Internet access. There are two VLAN's - Guest and Private. What I would like to achieve is making the use of available bandwidth by load distribution via GLBP, and filtering users web traffic. Two routers will be used for a GLBP group in one VLAN, and the other two routers will be used for GLBP in another VLAN.The users are connected to a Cisco 2960 switch and are in their respective VLAN's. I'm planning a 802.1q trunk to a Cisco ASA from the 2960 switch, carrying both VLAN's.What I would like to know is if there is a CSC module (or similar) which has Websense installed on it, and if it is possible to setup the ASA5505 in transparent mode to filter the traffic in this way? Hopefully this would allow multiple users to take advantage of the additional bandwidth, and not be restricted by using a traditional proxy setup which where all web traffic would be originating from a single MAC address.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 30, 2012
I have an issue with my firewall,each time i configured a trunk port in the firewall and connect a sw 2960S with a trunk port also, all the interfaces in the Firewall go down ( virutal intertaces, inside, outside , dmz) , also another switch 3750 that is connected to another port in the firewall( access port only) it start to a new negotiation of spanning tree.What could be causing this problem? the firewall didnt sedn bdpdu i think the IOS of the firewall its a 8.2
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 12, 2012
we are planning on connecting a new aquired company to ours soon?We will connect the remote site to the HQ via a D3. I've been told we will need to have a firewall between them and us for a time. I was thinking of terminating the D3 connection at the remote site of 80 users. Can I use the asr as a firewall as well, to protect the HQ from the Remote site - or should I use a seperate appliance?I was thinking of a asa5505 but, am concerned with bandwidth limitations of the box?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2007
I want to configure an ASA 5505 in transparent mode (7.x). Somehow, I got it to work.. but i need some kind of step by step description. I just want to connect it with outside on a route .. inside in my LAN. Its working now with one ASA. But in the Web Interface the Interfaces inside and outside are down.. but its working.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 11, 2011
When I upgrade the ios on switches, I just create int vlan1 assign it an ip and subnet, then tftp to my pc that is plugged into the switchport using the download-sw command.
I am not sure how to do this on the asa. Do I just plug my pc into port 0 which the documentation says is mapped to vlan 1 with and ip of 192.168.1.1? I tried this by making my pc's ip 192.168.1.2 but am unable to ping the asa. Do I have to change the security level or anything?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 18, 2011
I’ve been using a Cisco ASA 5505 Security Plus bundle for two years now without any problems. My previous Internet Service Provider was routing the external IP I was leasing directly through to my internal network without NAT which my ASA 5505 was working well with. Thus, I had configured my 5505 to provide NAT to my inside network which includes two subnets one for my workstations and internal "private" resources and a DMZ to provide access to my webserver, email server and two domain name servers; but restrict access to my internal; resources. i recently changed my ISP to Verizon FiOS (which is providing me with 25 Mb bandwidth at a fraction of the cost of my old T1) which is set up to provide 5 Static externally facing IP numbers for my email, webserver and name servers;. The problem is the Verizon router doesn’t support my use of the ASA Appliance (at least not the way it is currently configured. Verizon recommend I purchase a business class router and use it in place of the one they provided with my installation. With this in mind, I bought a Cisco RVS4000. I have configured it to use the primary external IP number and have internet access; however, the new router is providing NAT addressing which the ASA is in conflict with (they are both using the same NAT IP range). I'm assuming the ASA 5505 is expecting to have access to the external IP addressed (since that is what it was getting before) and NOT NAT address. How to configure the new router to either provide access to the five static external “real world” IP to my Cisco ASA Firewall. However, I just need to get my ASA 5505 back in the loop and would prefer to do this rather than go back to the Verizon router combined with a low end firewall. So, my questions are: Does the ASA 5505 expect real world External IP numbers? Or can it work with NAT addresses being fed to it from the router? And, if so, how do I configure the access rules and other items which are currently mapping to external numbers?
View 27 Replies
View Related
Sep 21, 2012
I am configuring a Cisco ASA 5505 firewall.In the office there is 1 x SBS 2008 server and 5 x PCs, all sat behind a Netgear DGN1000 ADSL router.We want to implement a ASA 5505 for added security.I have configured the internal interface of the Cisco ASA 5505 to be 192.168.0.1 - this is connected to local switch. The client PCs use 192.168.0.1 as their default gateway.I have configured the external ASA 5505 interface to be x.x.x.217. [code]Change the current router status from Router/Firewall/Modem to Modem only (Bridge mode). The ASA 5505 has its outside interface connected into one of the LAN ports of the netgear. The lan port has an IP of 192.168.0.254.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 6, 2013
when i am booting ASA firewall i am getting the following error.
<0>Kernel panic - not syncing: Attempted to kill init! and it stops and will not work. check below the whole log file
how can i solve this issue?
Log file:
Evaluating BIOS Options ...Launch BIOS Extension to setup ROMMON
Cisco Systems ROMMON Version (1.0(12)11) #4: Thu May 1 14:50:05 PDT 2008
Platform ASA5505
Use BREAK or ESC to interrupt boot.Use SPACE to begin boot immediately.
Launching BootLoader...Boot configuration file contains 1 entry.
[Code]...
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 19, 2012
Over the course of the past three days, our ASA 5505 firewall has shut down twice. I looked through the Field Notices and it looks like this was a problem identified several years ago that was resolved for units built after June 1, 2007. The serial number on our unit is not in the "effected" range.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I will be setting up a VPN with a client soon. They are shipping 2 Cisco 861's that are planning to go behind our ASA 5505. They are set up to be NATed.I am trying to understand what the best way to do this would be as I seem to keep running into limitations of the ASA 5505. Our ASA has a public IP of 2.1. 2.14/30 assigned to it's outside interface.The public IPs to be NATed to the 861's are 2.1.2.218 and 2.1.2.219/29.
1. How can I assign this seperate public IP block to the ASA? Is it even possible?
2. If not possible, what would other options be?
3. Would an upgraded license that allows for additional interfaces make this easier? (I would not do the NATing then, just assign the new public IP block to another interface)
View 4 Replies
View Related