Cisco Firewall :: Multiple Static Port Translations On ASA5505
Aug 15, 2011
I am at a loss on configuring a new ASA5505 for multiple static port translations.I would have expected to simply add several service command to a network object to complete the task, however, the service command overrides the previous and replaces rather than adds to the translations. [code] However, if entered in that order the 8443 overwrites the 8080 static translation.What is the correct procedure to establish multiple translations? If someone could also provide the "old" style for pre 8.2 release, I'd like to compare because I thought I used to do this with an access-list somewhere.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jun 21, 2012
ASA 5505 Firmware 8.3(4), ADSM 6.4(2).I have a public IP address of 168.87.3.4.I need to forward ports (5060, 5080, etc.) to one internal address. (192168.1.1).I need to foward different ports (10020-10080) to a different internal address (192.168.1.2) Everything I read tells me how to do this in a 1 to 1 static NAT.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 24, 2012
We are trying to utilize a 5 ip block of addresses provided by our ISP. What we have assigned from them is like this: 10.10.10.46 - 10.10.10.50 is our ip range. 10.10.10.45 is the gateway. Subnet is 255.255.255.248. If we assign 10.10.10.46 to the outside interface how do we accept inbound traffic from the other addresses?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 9, 2013
I have three public IP:s from /24 network like 83.x.x.10, 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 all using netmask 255.255.255.0.
I'm using 83.x.x.10 on ASA outside interface and trying to do static nat for inside servers with those other IP:s, but not yet solved it.
Using Cisco ASA 5505 software v9.02
Config:
object network obj_guest
nat (guest,outside) dynamic interface
object network obj_any
nat (inside,outside) dynamic interface
object network w2008
host 192.168.1.10
[code]....
This works other networks that are like whole network with /29 mask and have router in front of ASA using bridge. But in my case i just have DSL modem bridged in front of ASA. This static nat works like should if i use like Zywall USG series fw and this same configuration works in my customers, but they have those scenarios i said having mask /29 and router in front...
It seems that the problem is in ASA, like i won't show those public IP:s to public router from my operator. Because if i roll those other public IP:s on my ASA:s outside interface: i will use 83.x.x.25 and 83.x.x.41 on outside interface and after that put back my original 83.x.x.10 then my static nat is working just fine, atleast few hours, but not in next morning because ISP router flushes ARP cache.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
I am having difficulty following the logic of the port-translation. Here is the configuration on a 5505 with 8.3,So I would have thought the outside access-list should reference the 'mapped' port but even with 3398 open I cannot remote desktop to the host. If I open 3389 then I can connect successfully.
View 12 Replies
View Related
Oct 28, 2011
I have been working on a configuration for single IP address (on outside ) of ASA5505.I am trying to utilize the outside address 192.168.0.249 to PAT/NAPT to 10 inside machines [code]
What I am not sure of (actually that could be considered all encompassing) is the mapped services/real services.Any constructive comments assistance?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2011
I am setting up a Cisco ASA 5505 first time for My organisation, I usually setup Cisco Router, I have 10 Static IP, & Have 6 Server (S-1, S-2, S-3, S-4, S-5, S-6), Traffic Should be pass through the ASA and is distributed to the destination server that is specified in the packet. LAN servers can be separated into discrete networks for security. For example, a private LAN for internal traffic accessed only via remote dial-in VPN sessions and Want to Configure DMZ for Server (S-4, S-5, S-6) that allows public web traffic.
I have Attached My Network Diagram I have some question,
1:- Can we Configure Multiple Static IP On ASA 5505 ?
2:- If Diagram is wrong what change need to be done ?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 12, 2012
We have a need for an inside address to have more than one static NAT outside addresses. I know this wasn't possible before 8.3.X code. I still can't quite get it to work with 8.4.X code yet.
Here is what I had with 8.2 code.
static (inside,outside) 10.21.197.0 10.17.197.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
our inside network is 10.17.197.X/24. the current NAT we have in place is 10.21.197.X/24.
we need to add an additional NAT of 10.22.197.X/24 and I also have networks that will need to hit the address with no NAT.
I do know the source networks where I need each of the three cases:
from 172.20.X.X I need to hit the inside of 10.17.197.X natively, no NAT.
from 192.168.X.X i need to hit the inside of 10.17.197.X with 10.21.197.X NAT
from 10.10.X.X I need to hit the inside of 10.17.197.X with 10.22.197.X NAT
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2012
I need to replace an ASA with an IOS firewall router, and am not sure how to migrate the NAT configuration. Specifically, there is an interface "3rdparty" that has onward connectivity to other private addresses, so our internal addressing is hidden. For some reason there are static NAT rules in different directions across the interface, but at present I cannot see why. Thinking in router terms, all that springs to mind is the inside and outside tags for the interfaces, but also that it might need "overlapping" NAT to be configured.
[code]...
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2013
I am trying to set up my ASA5510 the fail over of ISP when it can't ping three different IP. I create three different tracking to three different IP using sla monitor & track rtr. But when I do
route isp2 0 0 yy.yy.yy.yy 50
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 31 track 1
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 32 track 2
route isp1 0 0 xx.xx.xx.xx 33 track 3
the last route will replace the previous two and only the last route command takes effect.Is there anyway I can set up the fail over to ISP2 only when it can't ping three different IP from ISP1?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 7, 2011
I have interfaces defined on the 5505:
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 2
interface Ethernet0/1
[Code].....
I only need one interface to connect to a single host on the inside (VLAN1) and then connect E0 to a DSL.
Is it possible (are what are the commands required) to take one of the other interfaces and create a Management port on the local office LAN?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 25, 2011
I have a Windows 2003 server running a L2TP VPN server on it. I'm putting theASA5505 in replacement of an open source firewall.
My question is that, I can't seem to forward the ports correctly for L2TP to the internal address of the 2k3 VPN server. It seems to me that the ASA is trying to negotiate the VPN connection rather than forward it internally.
Cisco ASA5505
WAN 216.136.1.2
LAN 10.1.1.1/24
Windows server - 10.1.1.14
I've added the NAT and ACL and still nothing.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 6, 2012
I'm not able to access my Slingbox from the outside. I've set up port forwarding on port 5001 to allow outside connections in, but port forwarding isn't working. Am I missing something?
object network INSIDE-HOSTS
subnet 10.10.10.0 255.255.255.0
object network Slingbox
host 10.10.10.254
object-group protocol TCPUDP
[code].....
View 13 Replies
View Related
Mar 26, 2013
I just bought a Cisco ASA5505. I'm trying to opening a port range through CLI, but it doesn't seem to be working.
Background:I have an FTP Server running behind the firewall and need to allow port ranges 30000-30100 for data connections. I have been using FTP through the command prompt and its working. However, I cannot use it through the FileZilla client as it fails to query the directories. I have the ASA forwarding to port 1125 from 21 in passive mode.
Access-List:
access-list Outside_Access_In line 3 extended permit tcp any any eq ftp-data (hitcnt=0) 0xfa8ed43d
access-list Outside_Access_In line 4 extended permit tcp any any eq ftp (hitcnt=17)
[Code].....
View 14 Replies
View Related
Jun 1, 2011
I have an ASA 5505 on a job. It is a smaller business that would have done better with an RV082, but they have what they have. It is running firmware 8.4. The client needed ports forwarded for their FTP server. The port range in this config is tcp 43333-43339. The FTP server ip is 192.168.1.2. [Code] ......
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 10, 2011
I've had a Cisco ASA 5505 firewall connected to a cable modem (Virgin Media, UK) for the past 3 years. In the last 6 months or so I have noticed that the ASA would drop the outside (internet) connection intermittently, usually at least once every 1-2 weeks - the interface still shows as being up but no traffic crosses it, and computers on the inside network abruptly lose internet connectivity. Rebooting the ASA or administratively shutting down the interface and bringing it back up again would cure the problem straight away until the next time it happens.
In the last couple of days however despite nothing having been changed in the configuration the frequency of this connection drop has increased to the point where I would lose access to the internet within an hour of rebooting the ASA. It does not seem to matter whether or not there is traffic currently going out or not, inside computers just appear to suddenly lose internet connectivity.
I have tried the following without success:
1) I completely wiped the configuration (configure factory-default)
2) I changed the port the cable modem was connected to (eth0/0 -> eth0/7, changing switchport vlan accordingly)
I thought perhaps 2) had fixed it but it lasted a whole 2 hours before I woke up this morning to find that none of the internal equipment had internet access despite the fact eth0/7 was showing as up/up in ASA CLI.
This morning I manually set the eth0/7 port to "speed 10" (10Mbps, full duplex). It was previously set to be auto-negotiation (default) on both speed and duplex. As of this post it has managed to keep the outside connection up for 3 hours - but I'm not optimistic that it is fixed.
Interface counters have never shown any collisions, errors, etc - only packets input and output as expected.
Since the problem persisted across ports (eth0/0 -> eth0/7) I'm wondering whether or not the problem could either be faulty memory, or some kind of speed/duplex incompatibility between the cable modem and ASA.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Apr 18, 2012
How to configure this setup.I have an ASA5505 with dual wan failover, FiOS (eth0) & Cable (eth1). how to configure the port forwarding for all my devices so it doesn't matter what external interface the traffic is coming from. For example, I need web traffic on port 80 forwarded to 192.168.1.150 regardless of whether it is coming through eth0 or eth1.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2012
ASA5505 port 3306.I have been fighting for days to open the port 3306 on my appliance, I have read carefully all the forums and no success.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Dec 20, 2011
I have installed ASA5505 in the network. Port forwarding has been done for one of the server in our LAN. Public users are able to access the server successfully. I am trying to access from inside using the same Public server IP, but unable to access it. Can I have this feature in ASA5505(I think it is loopback configuration). If so, may I know the configuration detail?
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 30, 2011
I'm trying to migrate from olda PIX to newest ASA 8.4.1. Everything seems to be good except the static NAT. [code]
The inside interface uses implicit rule. ( permit any less secure network )
Although te above config the ASA logs the following.
TCP access denied by ACL from 94.94.94.94/2003 to outside:86.101.228.221/80
The 86.101.228.221 our public Internet IP whic are used as outside IP also.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Dec 30, 2012
I am a total Cisco novice who has just had a ASA5505 installed to replace a linux freeware firewall (smoothwall).I'm told that the 5505 can't port forward traffic (e.g. ssh) from two external IP addresses to two internal destination machines via the same port # (22 in this example).
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 31, 2012
I thought I had the configuration to allow bi-directional traffic for my Blackberry server. I have a second fw with the same config and it worked on that one. But right now, my blackberry server is down, and all the users are upset.
ASA Version 8.2(2)
!
hostname asa5505
[Code]......
View 4 Replies
View Related
Nov 24, 2012
configuring the ASA particulary after the change to how NAT is implemented. What I am trying to accomplish logically seems fairly simple, yet I cannot get it to work. I have a Synology NAS at home that I am trying to reach via the internet. Prior to using my ASA, I had Verizon's FIOS router as my gateway and everything forwarded with no issues. The ports I need forwarded or reachable via the internet are TCP port 80 and 5000.I can also configure it via command line if that's the easier/preferred method.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 15, 2011
This problem applies (in my case) to our ASA5510. The issue here is that the http service on the ASA is runnnig off of the standard port 80. Login to the firewall and run the following.no http server enable http server enable 8080,Now you should be able to add a NAT/PAT on port 443 to another server of your liking. Just remember when you attempt to use ASDM to manage the ASA in the future to specify the new port 8080.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 22, 2011
I have an 8.3(2) ASA with a single outside IP. Dynamic PAT translates inside addresses to the outside interface address. I would like to use static NAT with port translation to access an inside syslog server. I got an error when I tried using the outside interface address. Can I use both dynamic PAT and Port Translation with the same outside address?This is what I would like to use but I receive an error saying there is an overlap using the outside interface address.(192.168.1.0 is my inside network. 10.10.1.10 is the outside interface IP.)
object network inside-net
subnet 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
nat (inside, outside) dynamic interface
object network SYSLOG_SERVER
host 192.168.1.50
nat (inside,outside) static 10.10.1.10 service tcp ssh ssh
View 6 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2012
I have been using static NAT to map between a single server behind an ASA 5505 and a single public IP address. In other words, I've been doing this:
object network NAT_ME
nat (inside,outside) static interface
Now I would like to start using the clientless VPN feature of the ASA, so I of course don't want that particular port forwarded to the server. Is there a way to define such an exclusion? I've tried several things, including setting up a separate NAT rule to direct that port back to the ASA's interface, without luck.
If that is not possible, what configuration would I need to move to in order to get the behavior that I want? It is important that all (non-VPN) traffic is passed exactly as it arrives at the firewall (whether it is coming from internal or external), with the exception of changing the IP address (i.e., I need static port mappings for some of my services).
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2013
We are migrating from a nother brand to an ASA Cluster running 8.4.5
We have a web-server on an inside interface listening on a non standard port - 20111. We have created a static NAT translating the public ip to the private, so If I do http://public-ip:20111 it works. (we are using a seperate public IP for this service only).
Now I need to create a NAT rule that will forward requests on BOTH port 80 and 443 to the same private ip and the same port number (20111)
The Private address is 10.99.250.20 and the "public" (I've replaced it in this example) is 172.16.16.16 I have managed to create a NAT that will translate 443 to 20111:
object network 10.99.250.20 nat (Private-DMZ,Outside) static 172.16.16.16 service tcp 20111 https
But if I try to add another rule like: nat (Private-DMZ,Outside) static 172.16.16.16 service tcp 20111 http It will simply replace the first one.
Is it possible to redirect both 80 and 443 from outside to the same port number and same IP on the inside?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2013
We have a HUB ASA5505 SEC+ with a few other ASA's connected to it via L2L VPN. We have 1 active Static L2L, 1 Active Dynamic L2L, and I'm currently trying to add a Second Static L2L Tunnel.I verified that each WAN Interface can ping each other, and both devices have full internet connectivity. There is no double nat or content filtering going on either. I did notice that my Cisco Remote Access VPN Client won't connect properly through the ASA despite full internet connectivity, but when I connect directly to the modem I was able to connect properly. So apparently the ISP isn't blocking IPSEC traffic AFAIK.
Static2 is currently using a Temporary TAC License since our license is currently awaiting arrival, but a show version output shows that all VPN/3des features are enabled. [code]
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 14, 2011
Got a problem routing trafic to my L2L tunnel...
Got an ASA5505 Sec+ with ip 10.45.10.1 on inside interface. Firmware 8.3(1). Got another Cisco router (From my ISP) with ip 10.45.10.254 - This one creates an L2L tunnel - To the 10.45.20.0/24 net.
On the 5505 ive got "route inside 10.45.20.0 255.255.255.0 10.45.10.254 1", and trafic is being directed to 10.45.10.254 as it should.
I know cause I can ping everything one the 10.45.20.0/24 net - But thats it... Cant RDP, connect to fileshare... Nothing.
When i test a PC and set it to gateway 10.45.10.254 I can access everything on the remote network. Do I need some NAT command or an access-list? I've setup AnyConnect VPN on the ASA and I can connect to both networks without any problems.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
I'm having problems configuring an IPSEC VPN between an SRP521 with a dynamic IP and a ASA5505 with a static IP. Static to Static is fine between these devices and I can configure that without problems. Dynamic to Static however.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Sep 20, 2011
For a branch office we have an ASA5505 connected to the ISP with an DHCP provided public IP "locked" to the local MAC This works ok!Now - the ISP may provide up to 5 public IP's (all DHCP assigned).Is it possible to configure 2-5 public interfaces in the ASA?? As IP's are DHCP assigned there must be something (a interface) to request the address.Would this be possible, and if so - what license would be required??NAT routing on the inside should be possible as well.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Feb 9, 2012
I have just purchased an ASA 5505 for my remote users to access our internal network. I have followed all the setup instructions I can find. I am able to establish a VPN connection using the Anyconnect client and can see some of my internal network. (Basically, only the subnet of the internal interface) However, I have several subnets inside my LAN which are routed by another switch inside my LAN. I have built in the correct static routes so that the ASA will send traffic to that intenal routing switch for any subnets not part of it's inside interface subnet. I can see and ping those subnets from the ASA itself but the AnyConnect clients cannot.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Aug 12, 2012
I currently have a "hub" ASA 5505 that links to 4 sites running 877 routers. From the hub network i can connect to all sites fine but what i would like to do is to almost compartmentalise the various VPN links into little clusters.The hub ASA 5505 basically provides IP telephony through the VPN's from a PBX allowing the users at the other end of the VPN to make outgoing calls and recieve incoming calls. However, a couple of the sites would like to be able to call between eachother internally via the hub. This obviously requires traffic to be allowed between their various networks. Currently when you attempt an internal call it rings but there is no audio either way. I assume this is due to access list restrictions. I am not even sure whether what I am trying to achieve is possible. I've attached the hub and 2 spokes below. The ideal end result would be interconnectivity between the two spokes via the hub, from reading up it would seem that its possible but i can't quite get my head around it! Would it involve using different subnet masks at the hub?
View 1 Replies
View Related
