Looking at migrating from the following:
PIX-515EPIX Security Appliance Software Version 8.0(4)Device Manager Version 6.1(5)51
to
ASA5515Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 8.6(1)Device Manager Version 6.6(1)
Is this migration directly supported, or do I need to downgrade first?
I need to redo the configuration on the new one?
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have recently procured ASA5515-IPS-K9 for my own R & D. In that device I want to achive following milestone: Perform static routing , relay DHCP, cache flowEnable IPS with auto updateQoS for Voice and WAN traffic Protect regional Campus/LAN, WAN, regional Servers from regional Campus/LAN, WAN and InternetAllow traffic from well-known and given portsSNAT for the regional servers with given portsACL for ssh only from admin PC with TACACAS rightMaintain SNMP with Cacti, Nagois, LMS, TACACASAll LNS servers to be added as name serversMaintain time with ntp.xxx.yyy.bd.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCould I get a validation that this config is correct in that it allows inbound access to the web server and that I should be able to ping it from my inside interface.
I tried to use the example code from Cisco DocID: 115904 for DMZ WebServer, but I found the object NAT parts did not work with my 8.6 IOS so I modified them as shown in my config.Example from 115904 doc.
!!!!
object network WebServerPublic
host 24.25.26.80
object network WebServerPrivate
host 192.168.1.80
nat(dmz,outside) static WebServerPublic service tcp www www ---> this does not code
!!!!
With the below code I do not get a ping reply sourcing from a 10.1.0.X host to 192.168.1.80 web server.And I cannot browse in from the outside to it either.I do see the MAC for 192.168.1.80 in the ASA's arp cache for the dmz interface.The web server is on a VMware ESX environment and I'm not sure it is set up correctly.
!
ASA Version 8.6(1)2
!
hostname A5515
!
interface GigabitEthernet0/0
[code]....
I was purchase ASA5515-K9 (Without IPS Edition) firewall and this is run smoothly our network. But right now i want to IPS facilities. Can i have any licnese purchase and upgrade from ASA5515-K9 to ASA5515-IPS-K9 abd use IPS edition ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI am setting up an ASA5515 to replace an existing Linux based firewall. Unfortunately the ASA5515 does not support source based routing.I have two internet connections currently used for specific connections - the second connection is NOT a failover connection.I have the default route to Internet connection 1.I want to route smtp out the second Internet connection.The routers connecting to the internet are a 877 and an 878The options I am considering is a layer 3 switch between the firewall and the routers to enable source based routing or replacing the 2 routers with a single router and the appropriate wic interfaces.
View 2 Replies View RelatedAfter pulling a brand new ASA5515 out of the box this morning, I spent countless hours scratching my head wondering why:
1. I cannot establish an HTTPS connection to the Management port - https://192.168.1.1/admin
2. When connecting via the console port I get prompted with a username and password sequence that I don't know
I get an SSL Version Error message when I try to connect with any browser. although I did find a way to resolve it, it requires a console port connection which is not working either.This is not my typical experience with the console or ASDM port setup.
As we are all aware that the ASA8.3 has quite some changes interms of configuration method.
I would like to know if it is possible to use the pix to Asa conversion tool for 8.3 purpose.
I have an Pix 515E firewall with Pix724-33.bin IOS. I just want to know that does this IOS support SNMPV3 or I will have to upgarde it with some other version.
View 1 Replies View RelatedIve got a problem with passing traffic through a Cisco 515e firewall.im trying to telnet to devices on the inside net, 172.16.x.x fom an outside net 10.x.x.x? ive configured a group called infrastructure and added the 10.x.x.x addresses.ive configured acl 101 inbound on the outside interface:
access-list 101 permit tcp object-group INFRASTRUCTURE any eq telnet
theres a route to the inside net:
inside 172.16.0.0 255.255.0.0 172.16.163.1
and theres a translation:
static (inside,outside) 10.4.4.34 10.4.4.34 netmask 255.255.255.255
when i try and connect, using a packet capture I can see traffic from 10.4.4.34 to the inside device 172.x.x.x on the inside interface but i cant see the traffic leave the outside interface ive used the same group infrastructure group before to connect to VM machines on the 172.x.x.x net on RDP and this wrks ok. access-list 101 permit tcp object-group INFRASTRUCTURE object-group VMs eq 3389
I am trying to set the PIX firewall to transparent mode.After I set it to transparent firewall, I allowed all icmp, tcp, udp traffics.Currently, any devices in the inside network can get the ip automatically from DHCP server in the outside network but cannot ping to any servers in the outside network either access the internet.Do I need additional confiration on the firewall?
Here's the configuration:
PIX Version 7.0(1)
firewall transparent
names
!
interface Ethernet0
[Code]....
I have old ASA with 8.0 configuration that includes huge number of ACL, NAT , VPNs , we got a new ASA with 8.6 , and we are planning to move the configuration to the new box , I'm wondering what is the best approach to do this , I'm thinking of one of the following scenarios1- downgrade the new ASA to 8.3 , the apply the config , remove the identity nat commands and names then upgrade to 8.6 and after that reconfigure the NAT rules and object groups .2- convert the old config manually to 8.6 code including NAT , object-group ,ACL and apply it to the new ASA ( this is going to be huge task). What are the commands that I have to look at when I convert to 8.6 and will the VPN configuration be affected ?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX 515 with version 8.0(3). We buy a ASA 5525-X for replace the PIX.
The question is, what is the better method to migrade the configurations? Manually?
What is the better version for 5525-X? 8.6.1?
I was trying to upgrade an ASA to from 8.2.4 to 8.4.4, and I began receiving the following migration errors (the IP addresses have been changed to protect the innocent):
ERROR: MIGRATION: The following ACE is partially/not migrated to Real IP, as it could result in more permissive policy. Please manually migrate this ACE. permit esp host 1.1.1.1 host 2.2.2.2
I got a TON of these, in fact the migration, and these errors ran for over 24 hours before I gave up, powercycled the unit and forced 8.2.4 to boot through ROMMON. This was a secondary unit, that's why I let it go this long.
What I don't understand is that we do not have anything in the configuration for ESP.
I don't seem to be able to find a migration utility for PIX rel 8.0.4 to ASA 8.6 is there one available will save a lot of time
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have ASA-AC-M-5520, can we migrate the license to ASA-AC-M-5585
View 1 Replies View RelatedI'm testing upgrading an ASA from 8.2.5 to 8.4.4. During the the upgrade, it change all of my ACL host entries to objects. But I noticed that the keyword "host" is still a valid option when creating an ACL.
I'm trying to understand why this change is made during the migration.
I am about to carry out a migration from ASA 5550 to ASA 5555-X, however I cannot find any detailed document or reliable tool for this migration.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe're migrating as mentioned in the subject and this new format is quite a departure from previous iOS versions so I thought I'd post the configs of the PIX and the ASA and ask if someone is willing to compare them and verify that it is correct and should be basically plug and play. The xxx.xxx.xxx are outside IP addresses and the yyy.yyy.yyy are inside addresses. .
Existing PIX config
PIX Version 6.3(4)
interface ethernet0 100full
[Code]......
I have Pix firewall 515e on inside interface its has configured with IP 192.168.0.254.And Global Nating is configured.
global (outside) 1 interface
nat (inside) 1 192.168.0.0 255.255.255.0 0 0
I want i configured Global nating only for only specific IP address E.g 192.168.0.0-192.168.0.30 and 192.168.0.200-192.168.0.254?How i do this?
Customer has a ASA5540 at their main location and need a new ASA5500 for a DR site.
Can I simply take a config file from an ASA5540 and easily drop it on an ASA5545-X or what ever?
They are going to be using it as a VPN concentrator primarily.
Or are there going to be issues since the 5540 is running 8.4(5) and the 5545-X? Or if they upgrade to 9,0(1) or higher, then they should be the same?
My company (in Healthcare) is going to be changing ISPs for our internet connectivity, and with this change comes a new external IP block. So I need a scheme to migrate over all of my existing VPN tunnels and other items over to new IP addresses. We do have an external router which I plan on doing a route-map to handle which traffic the ISP should go to based on IP. My big concern is for the ASA 5510. Can I setup a second outside interface on the new IP range? Then migrate my VPN tunnels over one-by-one? A drop-dead cutover date is just not possible with all of the external companies that I have to contact to get VPN tunnels updated with. If it's not possible, we have in our budget to get another 5510 next year as a redundant unit. I may be able to get that early and just migrate from one firewall to another.
View 3 Replies View Relatedin the ASA Migration Guide for Version 8.3 says about real ip address: "All of the access-listcommands used for these features are automatically migrated unless otherwise noted"
But my ACL's have not been migrated to real ip address. In my migration log:
INFO: NAT migration completed. Real IP migration logs: No ACL was changed as part of Real-ip migrationWhy?So, do I have to migrate them manually?
when I migrated the ASA config from 8.2 to 8.3, in all groups the group members has been replaced by the IP address object. However, the "name" for this object has been migrated, but there is the "object network name" configuration missing.
What I can do now is that I can open the new created object in the ASDM, search for the object with this IP address and then enter the object name I had before. When I apply the config, ASDM then creates the object and replaces all affected objects in all groups, by replacing the object group memeber "network-object host hostname" with "network-object object hostname".
Do you know if there exists an automated way, which checks all the groups for members "network-object host", creates the "object network" and replaces the "network-object hosts" with "network-object object" within the group? As long we have a lot of groups which contains partially > 50 members?
We currently have redundant FWSM's and are planning a migration to standalone ASA 5500 series firewalls. However, we have a complete VMWare environment and are looking at the Nexus 1000V. I understand the Nexus 1000V and VSG architecture and implementation, and I do understand that the ASA 1000V is designed for cloud environments. But I do have one question about the ASA 1000V.
Is it possible for an ASA 5500 series firewall to be replaced by an ASA 1000V? Basically, can an ASA 1000V be a sole firewall solution, or are ASA 5500's still needed? Is there a datasheet anywhere that compares the ASA 1000V and ASA 5500 series?
I have the following network.2 WAN links termination on my PIX 515e and all internal users connected to third interface.
Problem I am facing is that I have assign manual IP to users with some have full access to Internet while others have limited.
The users are changing their IP address while others are offline and I want to restrict them.
The only way I can think off is by binding IP to MAC as e.g ( Active wall software). But can it be done on PIX 515e and if so how?
I've recently migrated a PIX 525 to ASA 5520, but for some reason (through ASA) the users from OUTSIDE aren't able access services published in DMZ as well as some DMZ servers aren't able to communicate to some OUTSIDE services.
-INSIDE to DMZ is working fine. (through ASA)
-INSIDE to OUTSIDE is working fine. (through ASA)
Below is the configuration from my PIX (where everything works just fine) as well as the one on the ASA (where there is a problem), what could be the cause?In the below case the DMZ hosts from 11.1.10.0 aren't able to access SMTP services (through ASA) and the OUTSIDE users aren't able to access DMZ web server (11.1.10.40) through ASA, this all just works fine with PIX.
object-group network inside_subnet_all network-object object inside_subnet_a network-object object inside_subnet_b network-object object inside_subnet_c network-object object inside_subnet_d network-object object inside_subnet_e network-object object inside_subnet_f network-object object inside_subnet_g network-object object inside_subnet_.access-list OUTSIDE extended permit tcp any object host-11.1.10.40 object- group WWW-HTTPS access-list DMZ extended permit object SMTP object dmz_subnet any access-list INSIDE extended permit ip
I have just upgraded a ASA5510 from 8.2 to 8.3 using migration tool.All seemed to go well, still double checking the config as this is a bench test of upgrade prior to filed upgrades.
Anyway one thing that is slightly frustrating is that the migration has expanded all of my access-lists, so we maybe had 10 lines of config relating to access-lists based on access-groups, now we have hundreds of lines.On ASDM this is bad enough but on CLI with show run its a bit of a bind.
Is there any way to un-expand the access list or do I simply delete and start again using my access groups.
I have erased the Cisco image from my PIX 515E, and while i tried to load a new image its asking for activation key. I tried its old key. but no use.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a PIX 515 Ewhich does authentication for SSH via RADIUS protocol and fails over to the local database if radius server goes offline. But when the radius server comes back online, authentication still takes place through LOCAL and not the radius server. Following are the commands:
aaa-server RADIUS protocol radius
aaa-server RADIUS max-failed-attempts 3
aaa-server RADIUS deadtime 10
[Code].....
\I just configure my PIX 515E with version 7.0(4) and having problems to get traffic out on eth0 (if name outside). There is no problems between different VLAN ,all VLANs are configure on eth1. It is also possible to accass services on VLAN 10 (DMZ) from outside. The only thing I see in syslog is "Built Outbound" and "Teardown".
View 11 Replies View RelatedI have a Pix 515E running PixOS version 8.0.4 with two interfaces, inside and outside.On the inside interface, I have a Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits machine as an NFS server version 4 (NFSv4).On the outside interface, I have three (3) Redhat Enterprise Linux 5.4 64 bits as NFS clients.I am looking for the exact UDP and TCP ports to be added to the ACL in order to accomplish
View 1 Replies View RelatedI need ot upgrade a Cisco PIX 515 E to A Cisco ASA (not sure what type and modle yet!). the PIX currently has about 80 lines of ACLs and no VPNs. So only inside and outside interfaces and 80 lines of ACLs to be transferred over to the ASA.I was wondering if the ACLs can be transferred over to ASA as is?is there anything that I need ot watch for?
View 1 Replies View Related