Cisco Routers :: RV042 Stops Passing Traffic On WAN

Feb 12, 2012

We have a managed service provider voip network that requires us to use our own router for the data network. We wanted to use the RV042 for it's easy vpn setup. After installing it worked great for about 10 min. then the WAN port stopped passing traffic. 3 min. later it started working again. We tested the RV042 on a different network and it works fine. We tested an older Pix on the managed network and that works fine. But the RV042 will not work on the managed service provider voip network. The service provider says that on their end it shows our WAN port going up and down.

View 1 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: RV042 DMZ Is Not Passing Traffic

Apr 18, 2012

i am using RV042 router, i have configured DMZ in this,  DMZ is not passing the traffic, i am able to ping the DMZ ip from the server. but the server is not getting the Internet. 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2911 Multicast Traffic Stops Passing Through Multilink Interface

May 8, 2012

I have configured multicast (ip pim dense-mode) on two 2911 routers that are connected by a Multilink (3Mbps) Wan connection.The configuration work fine for awhile and sometimes all day but at some point one of the Multilink interfaces stop passing multicast traffic.I perform a sh multilink 1 on the interfaces and one interfaces show the multicast packets incrementing and the other does not, it just stops.The only fix for this is to hard reboot both routers and the multicast traffic begins to flow once again.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 3005 / L2L Tunnel Gets Built And Passes Traffic Then Stops Passing?

Aug 4, 2011

I have created an L2L tunnel between my self and a 3rd party. I am using a Cisco ASA 5520 and the other end is using a Cisco 3005 VPN concentrator. The tunnel will get established and pass traffic both ways for a little while, it varies, sometimes 1 hour or last time we built it it was working for 17 hours, but at some point my ASA will stop transmitting but it will still be receiving packets. These errors start to show up when I look at the traffic going through my ASA interfaces:

713042       IKE Initiator unable to find policy: Intf Outside, Src: 192.168.xx.16, Dst: 10.1.xx.30
 
Then when I try to ping their hosts .30 and .27 I get:
 
713041          Group = 68.23.xx.xx, IP = 68.23.xx.xx, IKE Initiator: New Phase 2, Intf private, IKE Peer 68.23.xx.xx  local Proxy Address 192.168.xx.16, remote Proxy Address 10.1.xx.30,  Crypto map (Outside_map)
 713041          Group = 68.23.xx.xx, IP = 68.23.xx.xx, IKE Initiator: New Phase 2, Intf private, IKE Peer 68.23.xx.xx  local Proxy Address 192.168.xx.16, remote Proxy Address 10.1.xx.27,  Crypto map (Outside_map)
 713050          Group = 68.23.xx.xx, IP = 68.23.xx.xx, Connection terminated for peer 68.23.xx.xx.  Reason: Peer Terminate  Remote Proxy 10.1.xx.27, Local Proxy 192.168.xx.16
 
When I first configured this tunnel it was with 3DES and SHA for phase 1 & 2, but when the tunnel would come up  my phase 1 would negotiate to an MD5 hash, even though I specifically entered SHA, so me and the 3rd party decided to bring all the hashes for phase 1 & 2 down to MD5, and that was when it was up for the longest, but the problem still came back eventually. My ASA config posted below:
 
ASA Version 8.2(3) 
name 192.168.xx.16 Server description  Server
name 10.1.xx.27 XYZ_01
name 10.1.xx.28 XYZ_02
name 10.1.xx.29 XYZ_03

[code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 (9.1.1) & Comcast Business Cable Stops Passing Traffic

Apr 18, 2013

I am trying to determine why Comcast Business Class modem configured with a static IP (IPV4) works with a laptop or Linksys Cable modem but not with a Cisco ASA 5505. After a few minutes, the 5505 stop passing web traffic. I am able to ping the default gateway even though I can not surf the web. Restarting the 5505 and the Comcast modem, web traffic flows for a short period of time, then stops. I can connect inside the firewall via ASDM 7.1.1 and via SSH. I can not connect via either from the outside.  Comcast tech support indicated their router is working and is configured in bridge mode. I swapped out the 5505's memory, and then with another 5505. Nothing seems to resolve the issue. I am trying to determine if the 5505 or the Comcast router is not configured correctly.
 
Here are the parameters: The 5505 was reset to default factory settings via the command: config factory-default. Configured the outside interface with static IP Address followed by the no shutdown command, then removed DHCP features from outside interface.  Added Comcast DNS servers, default route, ntp servers, configured DHCP features on the inside interface. Enabled HTTP/SSH (inside & outside interfaces) and ICMP echo-reply (outside only).
 
I believe the Comcast modem is not configured correctly. The show version and show startup output are below.
 
ciscoasa# show version
Cisco Adaptive Security Appliance Software Version 9.1(1)
Device Manager Version 7.1(2)

[Code].....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: Catalyst 4510 / Switch Port In Dot1x Multi-auth Mode Stops Passing Traffic?

May 6, 2010

I am experiencing a problem on a Catalyst 4510 (cat4500-ipbasek9-mz.122-53.SG.bin) with 802.1x configured. Client PCs are connected via a mini desktop switch to a Cat 4510 switched port in multi-auth mode. The configuration of the port follows:
 
!interface GigabitEthernet2/34 switchport mode access ip arp inspection limit rate 30 authentication host-mode multi-auth authentication port-control auto authentication periodic authentication timer reauthenticate server dot1x pae authenticator dot1x timeout tx-period 5 dot1x max-reauth-req 6 spanning-tree portfast ip verify source vlan dhcp-snoopingend
 
It happens from time to time that the Cat 4510 port stops passing traffic. Reconnecting the mini switch recovers the communication. Client PCs connected to the mini switch seem to be authorized at the moment when the problem occures. The RADIUS Termination-Action attribute is set to RADIUS-Request. The problem is not present if "authentication periodic" is disabled.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV180W - All Traffic Passing Through Router Is Seen As Ip?

Mar 7, 2013

Beta Firmware: 1.0.2.3
 
Web server log showing the issue:
2013-03-08 05:39:21 192.168.1.102 POST /somewebpage/somefile.htm - 80 - 192.168.1.1 - 404 0 0 6098 410 457
 
ISSUE: 100% of the traffic forwarded through the router is taking on the IP address of the router when it arrives at the web server. In this case, 192.168.1.1
 
My email server and FTP servers are having fits due to the anti-hammering issue that this creates.
 
I simply got the run around and they told me to call level 2 support and did not provide me with a contact number. For some reason, he refused to escalate the call. They simply told me to contact someone from a previous issue in which they gave me the beta firmware to download and I spent a lot of time on the phone to get that far. I do NOT want to speak with the same person who addressed my last issue.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Slows Down And Finally Stops

Dec 20, 2011

I recently took over at a company as IT Manager.  All through my career I have heard about the quality of Cisco equipment.  Over the past few years I have used a few different Cisco products with good success.  When I took over they were using an assortment of old D-link DI-604UP's & DI-804HV routers.  The problem is that most of the DSL Internet connections now are faster than the 10 megs that these units WAN connections support.  Since they were working fine other than that I felt that replacing them with the RV042 would be a good step.  So far I have purchased 6 & implemented 5 of them.  The sites vary in number of network devices from 10 to about 50.
 
The problem is that 4 of the 5 routers start to slow down & finally stop responding after a period of time.  If I unplug them, count to 10 & plug them in again they work fine again for a period of time & then quit.  The length of time varies between sites & even varies on the same unit.  They may go for 2 days or 2 weeks.  I never know what I'm going to get.  When they go down I don't even have local access to them.  It's like they overload & can't accept any more data.  I can't tell you what version of firmware they originally had but I can tell you I had upgraded 3 of them to version 4.0.4.02 & then to version 4.1.0.02.  I reset & manually re-entered all the settings after I did this.
 
I have read through the posts & have changed the MTU settings & tried disabling the SPI firewall setting to no avail.  The D-link routers ran flawlessley until I replaced them & have done so since I put them back.
 
I now have over $1000.00 dollars worth of routers that I can't use.  I have a boss that is on me because I talked him into spending the money when the $200.00 dollars worth of routers I replaced were working fine.
 
I have 10 locations to upgrade the total infrastructure in.  Routers, switches, etc.  If I don't get this resolved quick there is no way in the world I be buying any more Cisco equipment.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Stops Working During Long Transmissions

Apr 1, 2012

When my RV042 is accessed for long transmissions (svn check out, usually after 20 minutes ) the client receives a message "Gateway not responding, do you want to wait".
 
When this happens I see the following in the RV042 system log (the first 3 lines of the log below are normal):
 
Apr 2 17:36:53 2012Connection AcceptedTCP 192.168.2.2:8888->192.168.1.5:50046 on ppp1Apr 2 17:36:54 2012Connection AcceptedTCP 192.168.2.2:8888->192.168.1.5:50046 on ppp1Apr 2 17:36:54 2012Connection

[Code]....

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Does Not Load Web Interface / VPN Stops Working?

Aug 12, 2011

We bought an RV042 at the end of June. It is used as a gateway and VPN router. DHCP server is disabled and all IPs are configured manually.Every once in a while (Tuesday night, then Friday night - yesterday, it has hapened once or twice before that) the router appears to restart (see log below) then comes back up with system time of Jan 01 2010. At this point the router will no longer load its configuration page (https://10.29.238.197:16443/) and VPN connection to our customer in Africa drops. However, devices behind the router can be reached and can access the internet. The only way to fix this is to power cycle the router at which point everything starts working flawlessly again.The PID VID is RV042 V03 running firmware v4.0.3.03-tm (May 12 2011 21:27:37). Our RV042 is a newer one with Cisco SMB Router branding not the older Linksys branding.
 
From the log when the router reboots:
 
Aug 12 22:38:42 2011VPN Log(g2gips0) #141: retransmitting in response to duplicate packet; already STATE_QUICK_I2Jan 1 01:00:05 2010System Logheart : System is upJan 1 01:00:13 2010System LogWAN connection is up : 10.29.238.197/255.255.255.192 gw 10.29.238.225 on eth1Jan 1 01:00:15 2010VPN Log(g2gips0) #1: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Send Main Mode 1st packet 
 
I looked at the log more and all the usual messages assosciated with VPN being established are there - the last thing in the log before the router coming back up again is:
 
Jan 1 01:03:49 2010VPN Log(g2gips0) #4: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel ConnectedJan 1 01:03:49 2010VPN Log(g2gips0) #4: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] Quick Mode Phase 2 SA Established, IPSec Tunnel ConnectedJan 1 01:03:49 2010VPN Log(g2gips0) #4: sent QI2, IPsec SA established {ESP=>0x575a01c0 <0x6534ae4e 
 
So it even claims the tunnel should be up but I can never reach anything on the far side.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Port Forwarding Stops Working When Firewall Is Enabled

Jun 4, 2013

I have a RV042 router on a single WAN and an internal LAN. I have configured port forwarding as follows: HTTP[TCP/80~80]->10.0.0.6HTTPS[TCP/443~443]->10.0.0.6IMAP[TCP/143~143]->10.0.0.5IMAP SSL[TCP/993~993]->10.0.0.5SMTP SSL[TCP/587~587]->10.0.0.5
 
Everything works just fine when I have the firewall DISABLED. However, when I enable it the behaviour is erratic. 1 out of 10 attempts to connect to ANY port forwarded works. Almost all attempts time out. Notice that this happens even if using only the default firewall rules (which should be bypassed by the port forwarding as I read in other posts).
 
My second try was to create firewall rules manually, overriding the default ones. I tried adding rules from source WAN1 (where my connection is) to ANY and to SINGLE IP's on every port. Nothing seems to work.
 
I don't know what I'm doing wrong, this is really bugging me. I had to turn the firewall off so we can access our servers from outside the office. This shouldn't have to be done.
 
Just found out that my firewall is getting LOTS and LOTS of Blocked - SYN Flood entries. I think this is why we are having trouble with the firewall. Could this be the problem? I have no idea where all these SYN packets are coming from since they appear with spoofed IPs or come from different bots all over.

View 1 Replies View Related

Belkin Routers :: F9K1106 Stops Responding / Won't Pass Any Traffic

Feb 9, 2013

I run a AirPort Extreme router. I have my F9K1106 range extender set up and working. works awesome. I get home from work the next day and the range extender seems to fall asleep , it won't pass any traffic. I power cycle it and its back up and running. this happens everyday no fail for a week now.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Traffic From One VPN Subnet To Another

Dec 2, 2012

We connected to locations to the RV042 by setting up 2 Gateway - to - Gateway VPNs - both locations can communicate with the RV042 and devices within the local LAN of the RV042 - however at the moment it is not possible to send traffic from 1st VPN Location to the 2nd VPN location

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 No Traffic Moves In Or Out Via WAN Interface

Sep 3, 2012

I'm having some problems blocking IP blocks.  I have several blocks of IP's that I want blocked.I want to block 77.0.0.0/8 from communicating with a server on my lan.So I make a rule in the RV042 to deny all traffic from 77.0.0.0 to 77.255.255.255, source wan1, destination lan, my server's ip,As soon as I move that rule above the traffic forwarding rules I have created, no traffic moves in or out via the wan interface.  It seems to just cut off all traffic. 

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Firewall Slows VPN Traffic

Sep 9, 2011

Replaced an older RV042 that had damage from lightning. The new RV042 is V03 with firmware 4.0.0.7. This router supports 7 branch offices using site-to-site VPN to other RV042 routers. After connecting the new RV042 at the main office, three of the branch offices had very slow response over the VPN tunnel. I disabled the firewall on the new RV042 and the problem resolved. The three branches with the problem have Windows 7 systems and the other 4 have Windows XP. I confirmed that the Windows firewall was disabled on the Windows 7 systems.I did try leaving the firewall enabled and disabling SPI, but that didn't work. Have to have firewall disabled to resolve the problem. I would not expect the firewall on the main office RV042 to affect VPN tunnel traffic, but apparently it does. Do we need specific access rules to fix the issue. It works fine with firewall disbaled, but I'd be more comfortable with it enabled.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Looking For Internal Traffic Monitor For RV042

Jul 31, 2012

I have an RV042 router and I'm looking to monitor the total upstream and downstream traffic from within the router.

I know there is tons of software that I can put on a network computer to monitor traffic, but is there any software that I can put on the router itself that will monitor the traffic from within the router?                  

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: How To Redirect Internet Traffic From RV082 To RV042 Through A VPN

Feb 24, 2013

We have offices in USA and Venezuela.In our USA office we have a RV042 router and in Venezuela we have a RV082 router.We have connected a VPN tunnel (gateway-to-gateway) between both offices.
 
The point is:How   could we redirect the internet traffic from our Venezuela office   (RV082) to the USA Office (RV042) to navigate using USA public IP's?
 
The   reason for this is that we need to use online streaming services which   are only available for IP's from USA and we can't use them from the   Venezuelan IP's.
 
We  can not use the PPTP option since the  equipment which will use the  streaming services (like hulu, crackle,  etc.) in Venezuela is a Google  TV device which doesn't allow the  configuration of proxy navegation or  PPTP VPN connections itself. That's  the reason why we need to do that  through the routers.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Randomly Blocks Traffic To Internet?

Dec 19, 2011

We have a VOIP system from AT&T with T1 internet access. I have a RV042 setup as the default gateway for the network and the router randomly (usually over the weekend loses the internet). I have updated to the latest firmware and have check all logs on the server. When the internet access goes down we can still access the internal network. I have been power-cycling the router and then everything works fine. Is there a known issue with this router radomly blocking internet access in or out? This device should remain working at all times so that our remote users can access the company network.

View 0 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 - How To Direct Traffic Through Specific Wan Port

Aug 1, 2012

I have an RV042. I understand and have created the services I need. The documentation is just not clear on how to direct traffic for these services to a specific wan port.
 
Can this even be done with this router? If so, the how? Use rate control or priority? Does checking a wan port mean that it will only go through that port?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 - Direct Browsing Traffic To Only One WAN Port?

Jan 2, 2013

I have a RV042 (firmware 1.3.13.02-tm). Is it possible to configure so traffic from a specific domain (incl. its sub-domains) is directed exclusively to one WAN port?

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Sending All Traffic To VPN And Blocking Internet On Other End - RV042

Dec 28, 2012

I wonder if I can have a RV042 VPN Tunnel to a RV082, and in the RV082 block all traffic to the internet that comes form the PCs that are behind the RV042.
 
Remote PC -> RV042 -> VPN -> RV082 -> RV082 Firewall (block internet traffice, allow intranet traffic)

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: ASA5520 And RV042 - Tunnel Get Connected But No Ping / No Traffic Between Both End Network

Sep 13, 2011

I configured ASA5520 and RV042 for site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel.Tunnel get connected, but no ping, no traffic between both end network.
 
Network:
=======
 192.168.113.0/24----------192.168.113.6 -ASA--------public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
 192.168.10.0/24-----------192.168.10.1 -RV042-----public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
 
ASA5520 config:
----------------------
name 192.168.10.0 VPN
 !
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif NET
security-level 100
ip address 192.168.113.6 255.255.255.0

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Setup To Grant HTTP Traffic Minimum Bandwidth?

Jul 24, 2011

I am trying to set up my router to grant http traffic a minimum bandwidth of - for example - 5,000 kBit (if there is any http traffic).
 
So I set http min. rate to 5,000 while I set nntp min. rate to 1 However, when I run nntp downloads on several connections (e.g. 10) my single http download never goes above 1,000 kBit. Without any other connections I reach 8,000 kBit.

I am using a single 12 MBit line.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: VPN Not Passing Traffic

Apr 30, 2011

I've looked at many others having this same problem, but can't seem to figure out what my problem is. Same issue as most, I can connect fine, I get an IP, but it won't pass any traffic, I can't ping anything or access anything.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 871 Passing Traffic Between Two VPN Devices Within A LAN

Sep 21, 2012

I have a vendor that currently uses a Cisco 871 as a VPN router in our company network, they use it connect to provide services to one of the servers in our LAN for our customers. Recently, we are going to be setting up a 24/7 call center with this vendor, they will be accessing a server in our network through the VPN to provide customer service during after hour periods.We have a problem however, with an application that is hosted by another vendor that is critical for our regular company call center. Access is reached with this application through this vendor by way of IPSec VPN tunnel that is built in our company's Cisco ASA 5510. This application is accessed via Internet Explorer that goes across to access the application at the endpoint
 
I need to figure a way by which the vendor that will be running the 24/7 call center coming through their tunnel in our network to connect over to the tunnel on the vendor on my ASA. Im likely going to have to set some routing of traffic in my internal default gateway router for this to work.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Traffic Not Passing Through On ASA 5505

Sep 7, 2011

I've got a client that recently got an ASA 5505. E0/0 is connected to the outside, E0/1 connected to the internal server (Win 2008). The ASA "local network" is 172.30.1.0/24; my internal network is 192.168.1.0/24. I'm able to connect from home through AnyConnect and get a proper address (which I've got a pool of 172.30.1.64/26 assigned for VPN users), but no traffic from my computer will go to the internal network, nor will the internal server (or the ASA for that matter) can't talk to my VPN'd computer.

On the firewall settings on the ASA, I've got it all open: any/any on both inside and outside, just to try and get anything to go through. I've even got split-tunneling working, but not traffic-passing! The config is below (redacting local AAA users).

[Code] .....

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Passing Traffic From Lan To Wan In C1921 Router

Jan 26, 2011

Traffic Generator TG connected to R1 via switch SW . One end of the R1 is LAN1 interface and other end is WAN1. LAN1 is connected to switch SW. WAN1 is connected to R2 WAN0 interface..
 
 TG ------------- SW ------------------------------(LAN1)  Router R1   (WAN1)------------------------------(WAN0)Router R2
 
I have to pass traffic to R2 WAN0 interface.
 
Wen I pass traffic say 5000 from TG, I'm to recieve 5000 at R1 lan1 interface but I'm not to recieve at R2 WAN1 interface and hence not to R2 WAN0 interface.
 
Config at TG:'
-----------------
Destination IP : R2 WAN interfavce IP
Destination MAC : R1 LAN mac

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 7200 - Traffic Is Not Passing Through Tunnel?

Nov 17, 2011

I have set a tunnel between Cisco pix 6.3 and Cisco Router 7200. Show Isakmp sa showing below detail on Pix
 
Total     : 1
Embryonic : 0
dst               src        state     pending     created
xx6.x71.x29.x68   x2.1x7.52.1x1    QM_IDLE         0           0
  
Is tunnel is UP ? Traffice is not going throgh the tunnel . why ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 1841 / ASA Not Passing Inside Traffic Though Vpn?

May 2, 2012

I am about to pull my hair out. I have a 1841 router at one end with 3 ASA's for teleworkers working great. I'm connecting a 4th one that I can not get to work for the life of me. The tunnel is comming up, but its not passing any traffic. I don't see any glaring errors in the VPN debug. The router comes up, reverse route injection does its thing... all looks great. Am I totally overlooking somthing? I must have rebuilt this a dozen times.
  
: ASA Version 8.2(1) !hostname ciscoasa104domain-name default.domain.invalidnames!interface Vlan1nameif insidesecurity-level 100ip address 192.168.104.1 255.255.255.0!interface Vlan2nameif outsidesecurity-level 0ip address dhcp setroute! interface Ethernet0/0switchport access vlan 2!interface Ethernet0/1!interface Ethernet0/2!interface Ethernet0/3!interface Ethernet0/4!interface Ethernet0/5!interface Ethernet0/6!interface Ethernet0/7!boot system disk0:/asa821-k8.binftp mode passivedns server-group DefaultDNSdomain-name default.domain.invalidsame-security-traffic permit inter-interfacesame-security-traffic permit intra-interfaceobject-group network DM_INLINE_NETWORK_1network-object 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0network-object 192.168.4.0 255.255.255.0access-list outside_1_cryptomap extended permit ip 192.168.104.0 255.255.255.0

[code]....

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: ME3400 Switch Not Passing Traffic

Jan 17, 2011

I have an Cisco ME3400-24TS-A Switch with is not behaving normal.
 
I have already erased its flash, uploaded new IOS but  could not fix the issue. However it boots normally and pass all tests show in boot process. Issue is this the i cant access or ping the computers attached to its ports from one to other.

However i can ping the switch vlan 1 IP from all computers attached to it.

When i tried Debug All Command, its shows the following:

debug all 
This may severely impact network performance. Continue? (yes/[no]): yes
All possible debugging has been turned on
Switch#
*Mar  1 00:03:41.467: special_oce_change_vectors: select debug vectors

[Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: 5520 - Tunnel Up But Not Passing Traffic

Jan 15, 2012

I have a site to site tunnel between two 5520 ASAs.  Tunnel is up but when I try to talk to the other side, the implicit deny on the inside interface of the local ASA blocks the traffic.  When I ping, the tunnel comes up but in the logs it says it is blocking icmp from inside to outside.  I have tried the sys opt connection permit-vpn but it is not working.  The traffic is from 5 specific machines within the local sub net that I put in a network object group called Celerra_Replication.

I want to them to be able to talk to 5 machines on the far end of the tunnel in a seperate sub net.  They are in a net wrok object group called GP_Celerra_Replication The ACLs I created for this appear to be created correctly allowing IP from Celerra_replication to GP_Celerra_Replication and the opposite on the other side. 

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2900 - Traffic Not Passing From One Interface To Another

Jan 15, 2013

I am facing a very big problem with site to site vpn on cisco 2900 ios.
 
I configured the vpn and when i ping  from router itself to destination ip with source as lan interface , VPN works, no problem.
 
but when i connect any computer directly to router's lan interface to initiate traffic , it doesnot work at all. and on computer's lan i see yeloow sign.
 
mtu is 1500, speed is auto (I tried changing also) , duplex is auto ( i tried changing also) , through firewall on pc should not affect but still i disabled it.
 
since their is no problem with vpn config as vpn comes up when i initiate ping from router itself but i dont know why it is not working from lan.
 
do we need any inspect icmp on this router also ? or any policy modification to pass traffic across the interfac on router is required ?
 
I was useinf c2900k9-15.0(M4).bin and i upgraded it to 15.3 which is lated to get reed of any bug .
 
I connected two laptops directly to router's gi0/0, g0/1 interface to ping from one laptop to another but this also did not work.

View 3 Replies View Related

D-Link DIR-655 :: Passing SQL Server Traffic?

Jan 24, 2012

I have a server with SQL Server 2008 on it.  It listens on the default ports 1433 & 1434.  But traffic is not making it through my DIR-655 to the LAN so that SQL Server can respond to the request.  I am using DynDNS and have confirmed that the traffic is getting thru DNS and finding the router, but after watching the syslog I can see that I'm getting multiple of the following error messages when a request is initiated from a client (Microsoft Access app) outside my network:

01-24-2012   22:28:24   System3.Info   192.168.1.1   Tue Jan 24 22:28:28 2012 D-Link Systems DIR-655 System Log: Blocked incoming TCP connection request from 67.167.87.109:53284 to 67.167.87.109:139 01-24-2012   22:28:24   System3.Info   192.168.1.1   Tue Jan 24 22:28:28 2012 D-Link Systems DIR-655 System Log: Blocked incoming TCP connection request from 67.167.87.109:53282 to 67.167.87.109:445

In Port Forwarding I have specified a rule to allow/pass port 1433 & 1434 TCP traffic to my internal server IP.

Also I'm confused by the ports shown above since I was expecting to see 1433/1434 in there...seems this is a factor in the traffic never getting to the SQL Server to process the request?

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved