Cisco Routers :: RV220w / 2951 - VLAN ID On WAN Interface

Nov 10, 2011

We have a new optical fiber connection from a new ISP (only for Internet) and we found that our Cisco router RV220w won't work with this new connection because is not possible to add the V LAN ID 20 for the WAN traffic, as required by our ISP/connection. Now we would like to know what Cisco routers can support this feature and that can be "similar" to the RV220w or if there is another way to solve this problem and maintain our actual RV220w, because the features on this particular router (apart of the V LAN ID on Wan) are more than enough for us -

We would like to have a “simple” router and with firewall and VPN features as RV220w, because the one that our provider says that works seems to be too much for us Cisco 2951-SEC K9 – We are a small company with a network of around 10 computers and we only need some VPN connections for our sales companies in Europe and workers when traveling (3-5 VPN connections are OK).

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Routers :: WAN / ISP Configuration - RV220w Versus 2951-SEC/K9

Sep 26, 2011

We are planning on testing a new ISP provider in our company but we have the following doubt: This new provider is using a Optical Fiber line (GPON – PT Prime) for this new internet connection and we already have a Cisco RV220W router but they are not sure if that can be used, so they just informed that they a capable router is the Cisco 2951-SEC/K9, that they are selling of course. So our actual doubt is if the Cisco 2951-SEC/K9 can have some “extra” WAN configurations/authentications that are not available in our Cisco RV220W and that can implicate that we cannot use our RV220w router?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W VLAN Services From ISP?

Sep 7, 2011

My ISP sends various services through VLAN. Internet, TV and Telephone.Now I wonder, is it possible to use this router to distribute these VLANs through the wan port to eg my IPTV box?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Second Vlan DHCP

Jan 2, 2013

I have a Cisco RV220W router (firmware version 1.0.4.17).

I would like to have two separate networks with the following specifications:
 
Netwrork1: address range for the network is 192.168.0.1-254. All devices should be able to reach eachother within this network and connect to the internet either on LAN or through Wifi. From this network I should also be able to reach the device management page of the router. Also the devices should get the ip addresses throgh DHCP.
 
Network2: address range for the network is 192.168.5.1-254. All devices within this network should not be able to reach the devices in network1. All devices on this network should reach the internet through Wifi only. Device management page should not be available on this network.
I have configured the router as shown in the attached screenshots but the problem is that in Network2, devices get IPs from the 192.168.0.1-254 range and not from the 192.168.5.1-254 range. Also there is no internet on these either.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Connect To Web Interface

Jul 18, 2011

I have an Cisco RV220W and I can’t connect to web interface. The router is new, I receive the error in Mozilla: Cannot communicate securely with peer: no common encryption algorithm(s). I used also Internet Explorer, Chrome , I tried to disable SSL 3.0, TLS 1.0 but the problem persist. The PC obtained IP address from the router, I have ping on it ,also the SSID is up with open network I reset to factory default but the problem persist.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - How To Force All Traffic From VLAN To Go Through VPN

Nov 21, 2012

Just setup two RV220Ws with a IPsec VPN connection.  All working well.  However, I have a question regarding how to force ALL traffic from a VLAN to go thru the VPN.IPsec from site A (EU) to site B (USA) working good.  On Site A I have a dedicated VLAN that needs to have ALL traffic (internet included) be sent thru the VPN tunnel.  The main purpose of this is to have internet presence as if in the USA.  This is necessary to access some sites available only in USA specially for the kids -their web sites will not display content because they're not in the USA at the moment.  How do I accomplish this?   I tried to setup a Static Route for the VLAN but you cannot setup a 0.0.0.0 destination route.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - How To Restrict Inter VLAN Or DMZ Traffic

May 9, 2011

I just received my rv220w and perhaps I haven't got enough experience with cisco routers. How can I restrict traffic between different VLANs?

For example: Hosts in one VLAN shall only be allowed to access a web server in another VLAN. All other traffic should be blocked. I've created two VLAN with Inter VLAN Routing enabled. But it seems there's no way to install a firewall rule between VLANs.

View 12 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Max DHCP Users (Max Connections) Per Vlan

Nov 19, 2011

We assign (reserve by MAC actually) static IPs to all of our devices.  Over time we have gotten rid of some devices but haven't begun (or finished really) re-using the old IPs.  On our WRVS4400N v2 routers we are able to set the max number of DHCP users per Vlan.  This prevents unauthorized devices trying to connect to our LAN.For example.  I set the range from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.103.  IPs 100, 101, and 103 are in use (reserved via MAC address).  We set max number of DHCP users to 3.  This prevents someone from gaining access to 192.168.1.102.  Does this make sense?  Or at least this was the initial goal and it tested out successfully back when we implemented it.
 
How can I do the same for with the RV220W?  I can set the range, assign static IPs (reserve IPs by MAC address), but can't keep others from gaining accessing to our LAN via the unused IPs (not assigned a static IP).My initial thought was to create static IPs (for the unused IPs) using dummy MAC addresses.  I'm sure there is a much better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Not Working With PPTP Server On One VLAN Only

May 5, 2012

I possess a RV220W (firmware 1.0.3.5) but I can't seem to work with the PPTP server on one VLAN only.
 
My default VLAN is in 192.168.1.1/24. I created a VLAN ID 10 in 192.168.50.1/24 inter-vlan routing : disabled and Device Management : disabled. (Menu Networking > LAN > VLAN Membership and Multiple VLAN Subnets).
 
Then I configured a PPTP server on the IP range 192.168.50.200 to 192.168.50.210.

To finish I created my user. (Menu VPN > IPSEC > VPN Users).
 
The PPTP tunnel is working, but on all my local network and not only the VLAN ID 10.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Rv220W / Assign Vpn Traffic To A Vlan When Setup An Ipsec Tunnel?

Apr 7, 2012

i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
 
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
 
 This is what i need:  - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 1T3 / E3 / 2951 - No Interface Corresponding To Module When Show IP Interface Brief

Feb 13, 2012

I have a 1t3/e3 card in a new 2951. When I statred the router, I found no interface corresponding to this module when do "show ip interface brief"

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Gateway-to-Gateway Inter VLAN Routing?

Jul 6, 2012

I picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly.  What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there.  For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
 
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site.  Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
 
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up.  Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
 
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected.  But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me.  I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
  
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
 
 Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs

[URL]

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: Interface Flapping Lost Carrier With 2951

Nov 1, 2012

Having an issue that we have with a CISCO2951/K9. It connects to Internet through the GigabitEthernet0/1 interface. Since a few days ago, the Gi0/1 interface is flapping many times in a day:

100468: Oct 30 12:16:28 CST: %LINEPROTO-5-UPDOWN: Line protocol on Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
100469: Oct 30 12:16:29 CST: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to down
100474: Oct 30 12:17:08 CST: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface GigabitEthernet0/1, changed state to up
[Code]....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Cannot Remove Embedded Service Engine Interface In 2951

Mar 5, 2012

I have removed an embbedded service engine modole from an 2951 router, after reboot the rouiter. the service engine interface still appears; any command can I use to completely remove it.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2951 - QoS For Voice On Multi-Link Frame Relay Interface / Subinterface

Jan 10, 2012

QoS on an MFR interface/subinterfaces. We have a remote site with two bundled T1's terminating on a 2951 router for a total bandwidth of 3072. The circuit is provided by Paetec and the subinterfaces are designated for internet and MPLS traffic respectively. The issue we are facing is with outbound voice quality. It seems that no matter how we apply QoS, either to the main MFR interface or the MFR subinterfaces, voice packets do not seem to be prioritized. We tried FRTS, which slowed the entire link down to a crawl, we tried applying a class map to the main interface as well as a service policy, none of which seemed to affect anything.

class-map match-all VOICE
match ip dscp ef
class-map match-any SIGNALING
match ip dscp af31
match ip dscp cs3 (code)

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco :: 2951 - Interfaces Send Netflow Data Despite No Flow Config Under Interface

Aug 17, 2011

Cisco 2951 w/ HWIC-4ESW
IOS 15.0(1)M5 
#sh ip flow int
Vlan533
ip flow ingress
ip flow egress
#
 
The SVI sends the flow data just fine, however I also continue to receive flow data from most other interfaces.
 
I have attached a screenshot of one of our netflow collectors indicating that many of the interfaces are sending flow data even though not configured to do so. We have two different netflow collectors, from different vendors and both confirm the same interfaces sending flow data.
 
Normally I wouldn't care and ignore it, however one of them uses a license limit by interface and is a bit problematic.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Routing Traffic From Non VLAN To VLAN On Same Interface?

Nov 21, 2012

i'm going mad on following problem. I'm trying to get 2 networks seeing each other while one of the network is a non VLAN network and the other one is a VLAN network.They should use the same interface so i added VLAN e0/0.122 to the interface e0/0.Send a ping from my asa to both gw-IP's made me happy at first. In second in figured out that i cannot reach any client in the other network. For testing purpose i created an permit acl to any/any for both networks, but the packets still get dropped by the default implicit rule. (deny any/anyMaybe i'm to stupid for this

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2951 / 1841 - Backup Setup With 2 Routers And BGP?

Aug 20, 2012

I am looking to setup a solution for backing up a Metro Ethernet connection on a 2951 using an 1841 and 2 T1's in a Multilink. The Metro E will be primary, and if the BGP peer goes down, I want it to switchover to the 1841. Can it be done and is there an example of the BGP setup to work off of?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 2951 - ROM Error Crashes Two Routers At The Same Time

Oct 30, 2012

We are a medium-large sized company with approx.100 offices located across North America. Every single office connects to each other and the data center via a DMVPN overlay network. The DMVPN hub router (Cisco 2951), R-Q9-1, is located at our data center and is the "workhorse" of the company. We also have a redundant hub router, R-Q9-2, at the data center with exact same hardware specs.
 
Each office builds an EIGRP Tunnel0 and Tunnel1 to R-Q9-1 and R-Q9-2 respectively. All data traffic flows over Tunnel0 to R-Q9-1 until it fails, at which point traffic starts to flow over Tunnel1 to R-Q9-2. This has been working seamlessly for last 1 year of implementing this design, until yesterday, when both R-Q9-1 and R-Q9-2 rebooted all of a sudden at the same time right in the middle of a production day. I confirmed there was no power failure at the data center. A show version of both routers gives me this:
 
R-Q9-1 uptime is 1 day, 1 hour, 24 minutes
System returned to ROM by address error at PC 0x5C92E28, address 0x5DF36FE9 at 11:52:23 EDT Tue Sep 21 2010
System image file is "flash0:c2951-universalk9-mz.SPA.150-1.M3.bin"
Last reload type: Normal Reload
[code]...
 
I Google that error but can't find anything specific other than it's saying it's some kind of bus error. What I also found a bit off is the time it's showing on both routers' show version output (Sep 21, 2010 and Jan 10, 2012). Here are the current clock settings on both routers at the time of this writing.
 
R-Q9-1#sh clock *16:53:31.216 EDT Wed Oct 31 2012 
R-Q9-2#sh clock *16:59:44.220 EDT Wed Oct 31 2012  
 
I checked my Syslog server and did not find anything specific during the time of the crash, however, syslog was filled with errors similar to this one
 
2469: * Tunnel0: NHRP Encap Error for Resolution Request , Reason: protocol generic error (7) on (Tunnel: 10.10.200.1 NBMA: IP address ommitted)
[code]...
 
I have never seen these errors before and all of a sudden they seem to have stopped since this morning.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Wipe 2000+ 2951 Routers

Sep 4, 2012

My  company is doing an nationwide upgrade of it's leased 2951 routers. For  security sake I need to wipe everyone of them before being sending them  back to the leasing company. I would like to somehow boot to a USB  drive and call it a day.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: VLAN To VLAN Firewall Rules Support Missing On RV180?

Jan 12, 2013

How do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to  implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See  [URL])?

View 1 Replies View Related

Routers / Switches :: Netgear GSM7248R - How To Route From Vlan To Management Vlan

Jan 20, 2011

I have a Netgear GSM7248R switch with 5 different Vlans including th management Vlan. Each of the vlans are connected to my layer 3 switch for routing. I want to access the management vlan form any of my Vlans so my layer two switch can be detected by my snmp manager.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W / What Exactly Is QuickVPN

Apr 2, 2012

what exactly is QuickVPN?Is it a IPSec VPN?Is it a PPTP?Is it a SSLVPN?can I resolve my local hostnames? That means, can I configure a lokal DNS Server?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W VPN Setup

Aug 24, 2012

I am trying to setup and configure a VPN on the RV220W that uses IPSEC so I can use the Cisco VPN Client I use at work, I have gone through the user manual 11 or 12 times now but still cannot work it out. I cannot find where on the Rv200W iset up the phase 1 authentication username and password which will then lead me onto the phase 2 stage of asking for a username password to allow me access.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Static IPs Behind RV220W

Jul 3, 2012

Picked up a pair of RV220W's for a project I'm working on.  I have several IP's available, 4 of which are assigned to/in use by a server behind the RV220W.  All 4 of these IP's are static external IPs.  How I can configure the RV220W so that requests to those 4 IP's get routed to the server.
 
Prior to purchasing this, I was under the impression what I was trying to do was called one-to-one NAT, but after reading the 'Help' document on the one-to-one NAT page, I don't think this is right.  Emphasis added below: Cisco RV220W Wireless-N Network Security Firewall Help FirewallOne-to-One NATOne-to-one NAT is a way to make systems behind a firewall and configured with private IP addresses appear to have public IP addresses.One-to-One-NAT Rule TableThis table lists the list of available One-To-One NAT rules configured by the user. Private Range Begin: start ip address in private (LAN) ip addressPublic Range Begin: start ip address in the public ip address (WAN IP), Public IP Subnet Mask: The Subnet Mask of the public IPRange Length: Range length maps one to one private address to public address up to the given range.Service: This column shows service to be accepted by LAN Host.The actions that can be taken on One-to-One-NAT rules are:(Check Box At First Column Header): Selects all the entries in the table.Add: Opens the One-To-One NAT Configuration page, to add a new entry. Edit: Opens the One-To-One NAT Configuration page, to edit the selected entry.Delete: Deletes the selected entries.
 
So according to their documentation, the server in question would need to be configured with a private IP.  Unfortunately, one of the applications I use is licensed via IP address and my understanding is that I cannot use the software with private/non-routable IP addresses.
 
Is the RV220W capable of not only securing the line (firewall, access rules, content filtering, port trigering & forwarding etc) but also doing what I was hoping to do (keeping the external IP's on the server, and routing appropriately)?

View 9 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Dynamic DNS With RV220W

May 15, 2012

I'm using a RV220W router, and recently got shifted to a dynamic IP solution.Now, I've got a no-ip.org address, but the update service seems to be on no-ip.com. So, I try to enter mydomain.no-ip.org OR mydomain.no-ip.com in the dynamic dns settings, under Host and Domain Name, but when saving the settings it says
 
'The hostname specified does not exist in this user account' ,which seems to indicate that it manages to login to the update service but gets a negative reply.Is it possible to use the RV220W with no-ip.org/com?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Won't Allow Web Access Across VPN

Dec 12, 2012

We have 2 sites connected thru 2 RV220W routers via VPN and most things are working fine. I have noticed however, that any device that has a web interface, i.e. our Sharp Copier and our Freenas server, is inaccessible. The page tries to come up but then I get the Cisco "server is down" page generated by the RV220W.
 
I can pull up the web interface pages if I use a machine on the local LAN but not on any machine across the VPN. The only commonality I can think of is the RV220W blocking that traffic for some reason..

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W IPsec VPN On Mac OS?

Sep 28, 2011

Cisco support write down manual (workaround), how to setup IPsec VPN connection on Mac OS 1.7?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Associate Name To IP - RV220W

Nov 27, 2011

Is there anyway to associate a name to an IP in the RV220W?  I am coming from a WRVS4400N v2.  Folks are complaining that they can't connect, for example via Real VNC, via the PC name any longer.  They have to use the IP address.  In the past I put the names of the PCs in the WRVS4400N when I reserved IPs via MAC addresses (some call this assigning static IPs).  There isn't any place in the RV220W to put the name.  Even when I look at the DHCP list a lot of them show up as "unknown".  I am sure this is a NETBIOS thing but I'd rather fix this in the router as I have always done in the past.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Firmware - Getting 1.0.2.1 Or 1.0.2.3?

Jul 22, 2011

i have a RV220W  and absolutely nothings functional on this stupid Router, no NAT , no Port Forwarding and I cant access my Network from Outside. Any firmware link for downloading. This address works, its handling special webrequest.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Set Up PPTP VPN With RV220W

Jul 19, 2012

I set up a PPTP VPN with an RV220W recently.  It was working flawlessly until a recent power outage and now users are getting the 807 error when attempting to connect.  I have PPTP passthrough enabled and TCP/UDP 1723 open.  As far as I can tell GRE 47 is open as well. Why it was working and is not working after a power outage?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W Just Disappears

Jun 23, 2012

Having a strange problem that just started this week and got worse this evening. I have a RV220W that is feeding my network. The RV220W sits behind a broadband modem and acts as the DHCP for the network and those computers access the internet that way. Anyway, tonight started an issue where the the RV220W just disappears. Becomes unpingable. I recycle power, and within anywhere from 5 to 10 minutes, it's gone. No longer pingable.  Even if I plug a latop directly into it.If I power cycle the RV220W it comes back and I can ping it and access it and its settings. 5 to 10 mins later, I again lose it. Nothing was done. Its been working fine for a few weeks. Had a similar outage last Tuesday, but a recycle of everything brought everything back into line. After I lose connection to it, the lights I expect to be lit remain lit.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV220W - UPnP Does Not Work?

Jan 26, 2012

I am unable to make UPnP to work on the RV220W. I am forced to use port forwarding.

View 10 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved