Cisco Routers :: RV220W Max DHCP Users (Max Connections) Per Vlan
Nov 19, 2011
We assign (reserve by MAC actually) static IPs to all of our devices. Over time we have gotten rid of some devices but haven't begun (or finished really) re-using the old IPs. On our WRVS4400N v2 routers we are able to set the max number of DHCP users per Vlan. This prevents unauthorized devices trying to connect to our LAN.For example. I set the range from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.103. IPs 100, 101, and 103 are in use (reserved via MAC address). We set max number of DHCP users to 3. This prevents someone from gaining access to 192.168.1.102. Does this make sense? Or at least this was the initial goal and it tested out successfully back when we implemented it.
How can I do the same for with the RV220W? I can set the range, assign static IPs (reserve IPs by MAC address), but can't keep others from gaining accessing to our LAN via the unused IPs (not assigned a static IP).My initial thought was to create static IPs (for the unused IPs) using dummy MAC addresses. I'm sure there is a much better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do.
View 3 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Jan 2, 2013
I have a Cisco RV220W router (firmware version 1.0.4.17).
I would like to have two separate networks with the following specifications:
Netwrork1: address range for the network is 192.168.0.1-254. All devices should be able to reach eachother within this network and connect to the internet either on LAN or through Wifi. From this network I should also be able to reach the device management page of the router. Also the devices should get the ip addresses throgh DHCP.
Network2: address range for the network is 192.168.5.1-254. All devices within this network should not be able to reach the devices in network1. All devices on this network should reach the internet through Wifi only. Device management page should not be available on this network.
I have configured the router as shown in the attached screenshots but the problem is that in Network2, devices get IPs from the 192.168.0.1-254 range and not from the 192.168.5.1-254 range. Also there is no internet on these either.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2012
I need a name resolution within my pptp users. How do I configure the dns settings of a pptp user client.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2012
i have 8 users in my office. i want to enable the URL Filtering for only 5 users in my office and 3 users will have no URL Filtring.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Jun 25, 2012
how can i configure the SSL VPN users connexion to connecte from my remote PC (Windosws 7 32 & Internet Explorer
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 2, 2012
I have Ports open, with DNS named defined for internal services..
When extertnal they work by name just fine, so the firewall's working Ok. But when on the LAN they fail.
When I look at the port forwarding rules, I see Outside -> Inside, but there's no Inside -> Inside..
How can my LAN users use DNS Names/Ports that are on the WAN interface,,. so when they come between the WAN and LAN their apps continue to work ?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Dec 3, 2012
I have a RV220W setup with SSL VPN users, authenticating to an internal Active Directory. Maybe 5 ports forwarded and 8 external IP addresses. Besides this i have 1 data VLAN and a voice vlan on my network.
The reboots are on different times on a day, even on Sundays at 7 AM when noone is logged in to the network.FW is at 1.0.4.17.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 2, 2012
is it possible to share the same network segment like my LAN for mobile users? In a so called bridge mode? I got a VPN tunnel to a customer from my local network and i need to access it within the mobile access. I can not change the VPN Site to Site tunnel.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 21, 2012
I have two offices connected with an IPSEC VPN tunnel using RV220W routers. The Tunnel works fine for local users between the two sites(Site 1:10.0.0.x; site 2 is 10.0.2.x). I have also set up PPTP users for remote access. PPTP users that connect to site 1 cannot access site 2 and vice versa. The PPTP users have no trouble accessing the resources on the site that they connect to. I have tried activating RIP and adding various static routes with no success. If I PPTP connect to site 1 and I tracert to an IP address on site 2 the route goes to the site 1 router and then goes to the internet(connected to the site 1 router) where it stops.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2013
I have an RV220w in office, which I have configure it for ipsec vpn connections. Behind router there is a NAS for file storage. [code]I have managed to connect to router from my home with ShrewVPN and I can ping every client connected to RV220w.The problem is that I can't connect to neither to router's web interface nor to NAS web interface or any other intranet web page ( the browser doesn't give any error, but keeps loading without showing the web page). Although, I can access web pages from my laptop.Also, in windows file explorer when I connect to NAS, although I can browse folders I can't copy files from my laptop to NAS and vice versa, I always get timeout error (I have checked the permissions to NAS and in addition I succeed to copy a small txt file 1kb, but no luck with bigger files).I also tried with QuickVPN client, but I had the same results. When I connect with pptp from windows everything works like a charm.My laptop has windows 7 64bit.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 5, 2011
I have setup port forwarding on the RV220W, to allow outside connections on RDP. I have tested that LAN RDP works fine, but when I test using an outside address trying to connect to an inside windows PC with RDP nothing happens.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Sep 7, 2011
My ISP sends various services through VLAN. Internet, TV and Telephone.Now I wonder, is it possible to use this router to distribute these VLANs through the wan port to eg my IPTV box?
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 23, 2011
My ISP waits a definite host name from me to return my white IP address via DHCP. Can I set this parameter in RV220W router? I don't find such parameter in IPv4 WAN configuration page.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2012
Just setup two RV220Ws with a IPsec VPN connection. All working well. However, I have a question regarding how to force ALL traffic from a VLAN to go thru the VPN.IPsec from site A (EU) to site B (USA) working good. On Site A I have a dedicated VLAN that needs to have ALL traffic (internet included) be sent thru the VPN tunnel. The main purpose of this is to have internet presence as if in the USA. This is necessary to access some sites available only in USA specially for the kids -their web sites will not display content because they're not in the USA at the moment. How do I accomplish this? I tried to setup a Static Route for the VLAN but you cannot setup a 0.0.0.0 destination route.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 10, 2011
We have a new optical fiber connection from a new ISP (only for Internet) and we found that our Cisco router RV220w won't work with this new connection because is not possible to add the V LAN ID 20 for the WAN traffic, as required by our ISP/connection. Now we would like to know what Cisco routers can support this feature and that can be "similar" to the RV220w or if there is another way to solve this problem and maintain our actual RV220w, because the features on this particular router (apart of the V LAN ID on Wan) are more than enough for us -
We would like to have a “simple” router and with firewall and VPN features as RV220w, because the one that our provider says that works seems to be too much for us Cisco 2951-SEC K9 – We are a small company with a network of around 10 computers and we only need some VPN connections for our sales companies in Europe and workers when traveling (3-5 VPN connections are OK).
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 9, 2012
I have a Cisco RV220W running the latest firmware (currently 1.0.4.17), and I have noticed that after about a week of use, wireless clients can no longer acquire IP addresses via DHCP.
I have used Network Monitor on both the DHCP server, and the WiFi client, and can see that the server is receiving the requests and sending a reply, but the client never sees the response from the server. So far the only way to resolve this is to reboot the router.
View 10 Replies
View Related
Jun 4, 2013
We have
1-A wireless link (pre-wimax) that provide me with 2 Mb internet connection (tagged Ethernet frames) throught RJ-45
2-have 6 real IP _one of them as Gateway
What i need now is what is the best and cheapest device to do NAT and DHCP to allow users to access the internet , i am trying to do this using Cisco AP 1141 and the link is working fine with static ip configuration on my lap (give my wireless NIC real IP) but now i just need device to do NAT and DHCP
My suggestion is can i use Cisco RV220W Wireless-N Network Security Firewall to do this function. is the WAN port on this router support tagged Ethernet frames ??? or even untagged frames and can i give this router one of those public IPs and give the rest of those IPs statically to other devices on the network.
View 4 Replies
View Related
Apr 13, 2012
I have a Cisco rv220w. I just tried updating the firmware. I used RV220W-Firmware-1.0.3.5.img. It rebooted, and now there is no DHCP and no access to anything. I tried the reset button for 10 seconds. That didn't do anything. The WAN and all the LAN lights light up. Power is on and solid. The light blinks alternating between the DMZ and the blank space to the right of wireless. How can I get this back to factory defaults?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 9, 2011
I just received my rv220w and perhaps I haven't got enough experience with cisco routers. How can I restrict traffic between different VLANs?
For example: Hosts in one VLAN shall only be allowed to access a web server in another VLAN. All other traffic should be blocked. I've created two VLAN with Inter VLAN Routing enabled. But it seems there's no way to install a firewall rule between VLANs.
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2012
I possess a RV220W (firmware 1.0.3.5) but I can't seem to work with the PPTP server on one VLAN only.
My default VLAN is in 192.168.1.1/24. I created a VLAN ID 10 in 192.168.50.1/24 inter-vlan routing : disabled and Device Management : disabled. (Menu Networking > LAN > VLAN Membership and Multiple VLAN Subnets).
Then I configured a PPTP server on the IP range 192.168.50.200 to 192.168.50.210.
To finish I created my user. (Menu VPN > IPSEC > VPN Users).
The PPTP tunnel is working, but on all my local network and not only the VLAN ID 10.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 19, 2011
Can add feature "release" and "renew" to wan dhcp client? Is it WOL not possible in RV220w? i tried forward broadcast magic packet from wan side, change broadcast IP and through VPN tunnel (PPTP & IPSEC)...got failed i change from draytek 2130n to rv220w, 2130n much better. except SSL VPN.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 17, 2012
I have an out of the box configured RV220W and was wondering if it supports local DNS resoltuion for DHCP addresses it issues. I have a few reservations and a custon search domain configured ('local') but it will not resolve a name fromt the terminal using the search domain (see below):
It resolves freenas but not freenas.local.
macbookair:~ brantwinter$ dig freenas
; <<>> DiG 9.8.1-P1 <<>> freenas
;; global options: +cmd
[Code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2012
i'm using an rv220W and i whant to know if is it possible to assign vpn traffic to a vlan when i setup an ipsec tunnel?
example:
Im using different vlans on my rv220W.
Vlan 10: engineers (ex: 192.168.1.0/27) no intervlan routing
Vlan20: sales (ex: 10.0.123.0/24) no intervlan routing
This is what i need: - An engineer is on the road and when he makes a ipsec vpn connection => assignd to the vlan "engineers" so he can access the server/pc's in that vlan.and when someone from the sales group starts a vpn connection he needs to be in the vlan "sales" so he can access his pc/data,...
View 15 Replies
View Related
Mar 28, 2012
I was trying to set a DHCP pool with 127.16.0.0/16 with RV220W, however, RV220W UI can't save it. It displays "IP Address Range -"Step to reproduce: (it is 100% reproducible)
1. login into RV220W admin web
2. Create a VLAN, id 201
3. Go to "Multiple VLAN subnets", select the VLAN, click edit
4. Enter following info:
IP Address: 172.16.0.1
Subnet Mask: 255.255.0.0
DHCP Mode: DHCP Server
Domain Name: Cisco
Starting IP Address: 172.16.2.100
Ending IP Address: 172.16.10.254
Primary DNS Server: 172.16.0.1
Leave rest of settings with default value.
DNS proxy is enabled
5. Press Save button. The UI shows text "IP Address Range -".
Expected result: RV220W shall save the setting and make use of 172.16.0.0 subnet in IP pool. By the way, the error message "IP Address Range -" seems incompleteI tried same setting on netgear FVS318N (very similar settings to RV220W), it accepts 172.16.0.0/16 as DHCP IP pool and works.RV220W has great feature set meets my needs. Its UI is slow and sometime dashboard freezes, which I can live with comparing to features. But DHCP server IP pool can't be class B is huge limitation to me.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jul 6, 2012
I picked up a pair of RV220W's and before I spent loads of time at a remote site, I figured I'd go through some VPN testing at home to make sure I could get it setup properly. What this means is I've plugged the Internet uplink into a switch, then from the switch into both routers & configured them (using unique static IP's for each) from there. For what its worth: While I have some IT experience, I don't have strong networking experience.
I setup several VLAN's on the local RV220W, and the end result is to make it so that an asset at the remote site with an IP in any of the ranges (192.168.121.0/24, 192.168.131.0/24, 192.168.141.0/24 and any future VLANs) can communicate with/access resouces at the local site. Likewise, an asset at the local site with an IP in any of the ranges (.121, .131, .141 + any future VLANs) should be able to reach the remote resources (currently just 192.168.181.0/24, but future VLANs as well).
This evening I tried to focus on the relevant VPN pages of the Administration Guide to get the VPN up. Leaving the defaults I got as far as establishing a link between both sites and it seems that things are working right: From the remote site (.181) I can access the local site (.121, .131, .141); and from the local site I can at least ping resources (a laptop) on the remote site. (Yay!)
However, when I physically connected an asset that had a 192.168.121.X, 192.168.131.X and 192.168.141.X IP addresses to the remote RV220W (which is 192.168.181.0/24), I couldn't see it from the remote or local sites.I assume this is expected. But I'm reaching out to the community to see what other possibilities might be available becuase networking is a weak area for me. I figured it might be something like a Static [or Dynamic] Route but I really am not 100% sure.
'TECHNICAL' SPECS
Local Router LAN/WAN Settings:
LAN IP: 192.168.121.1 on default VLAN (1)
VLAN 13 defined 192.168.131.1 with DHCP enabled; Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
VLAN 14 defined 192.168.141.1 with DHCP enabled, Reservations created outside of DHCP scope
Inter VLAN Routing enabled for all VLANs
[URL]
View 7 Replies
View Related
Dec 23, 2011
I have two Cisco RV220W routers and I would like to realy DHCP from the home office to the remote office accross the IPsec Tunnel. Is this possible and if so how?
I have already gone into the IPv4 LAN (Local Network) settings on the remote router and set the DHCP mode to "DHCP Relay" providing the internal ip address of the home office router as the remote DHCP server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 24, 2011
Here's what I'm trying to figure out:
My network is set up such that I have a Wireless Network in VLAN 1, which is the primary network that we use. The subnet is 10.5.1.x.
My goal is to set up a completely isolated Guest Wireless Network, however it would work best. What I am trying to do now is I created a seperate VLAN (VLAN 2, IP range 10.5.2.x) and turned on DHCP on the WRVS4400N. However, in the Guest Network, it is always picking up a 10.5.1.x IP which is handed out by the DHCP server (10.5.1.5, Win 2003) and still routing all of the traffic to/from our private network.
Here's What I have set:
Wireless>Security Settings>Guest Network (SSID 2)
Wireless Isolation (between SSID w/o VLAN): EnabledWireless Isolation (within SSID): EnabledSetup>LAN>VLAN 1
Router IP 10.5.1.1, WLAN IP 10.5.1.3DHCP Relay for 10.5.1.5Setup>LAN>VLAN 2
Router IP 10.5.2.1DHCP Enabled for 10.5.2.x subnetDHCP Relay option is grayed out (not sure why)Setup>Advanced Routing
Inter-VLAN Routing: Disabled
Any way to solve this would be fine. I just do not want traffic routing through our internal network. Ideally, if I could get the Windows server to hand out 10.5.2.x addresses, that would be perfect, but I'm not sure how to configure it for such.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Dec 14, 2011
I have a new Cisco 2951 router and I am trying to configure it for external users to connect to an internal ftp server. I created a firewall and added rules so as to allow ftp connections from the outside to the internal ftp server. I configured NAT so as to allow incoming connections through the router. I have been unsuccessful so far in trying to make this ftp connection work.I am using a zone-based firewall and for the particular ftp rule, the action is inspect so as to allow stateful inspection of packets.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 8, 2013
what would be the best method to limit some users/workstations from accesing the internet on a vlan that has access to the internet?
I was thinking of just creating a whole new VLAN for those few workstations that doesnt access the internet or using ACLs on the ASA.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 17, 2012
I have an ASA 5505. I have configured Remote Access VPN so that users can connect to VPN and access my main VLAN (Inside). I would like to secure it so that when a user VPN's in, they are only allowed access to the HVAC vlan (Vlan 2) as seen in my configuration. Please note there is also a LAN- 2- LAN VPN which has been configured as well.
View 17 Replies
View Related
Feb 3, 2011
Our Guest access system seems to be having problems with DHCP. It seems to take a while to deliver an IP address making the client device show the "limited or no connectivity" message, which of course makes the users complain. On one occassion I have seen my own client eventually picking up an address even after the limited connectivity message appeared. On another I saw the debug showing "Dhcp request for autoconfig address", which I suspect is a symptom of the problem.
Our Anchor Controller is the DHCP server and is a 4402 running 7.0.98.0 - I've attached some DHCP packet debug.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2011
I have an ASA 5540 cluster that is configured as my remote access VPN point. Users connect using IPSEC Profiles with Cert based authentication, the profile is configured to query two DHCP servers (infoblox appliance servers).
The problem I am encountering, is that I need to make reservations on the DHCP server for some users for specific business needs. What happens is that the ASA passes the request to the DHCP server with it's own MAC address and not the MAC of the remote host.
Is there any way I can configure the ASA to pass the request using the hosts actual MAC address?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2013
We have 2 nexus 7010 switches configured with HSRP in the network. For all the vlans core1 is Master and Core2 is standby. In the current setup we have external dhcp server and dhcp relay is configured for all the vlans on Master and standby switch. The setup is running the IOS 5.2
Activity Done: During the Maintainacne activity, we isolated core1 switch in the network by disabling the vpc/keepalive and all the uplinks from access switch. The core2 switch was master for all the vlans.
Issue observed: It has been observed that new users were not getting ip address from the dhcp server. The ethereal capture showed that dhcp server was not getting the dhcp requests from the core2 switch. We disabled the dhcp feature in core2 and enabled again with dhcp relay again configured on vlan interfaces .even after doing this no change was observed in behaviour. Finally we got core1 back in network by enabling all the links.
Observation: The moment VPC link came up between the core switches, users started getting ip's from dhcp. Then we started enabling all the uplinks on core1.Core1 again become master for all the vlans and users continued getting ip’s. Network running fine.
Further Testing
1. For one of the vlan, core 2 switch has been made primary and for new users checked the dhcp functionality and it was working fine. The aim was to identify if anything wrong on core 2 related to dhcp relay
2.Again we changed the priority for this vlan and made core1 master for the same. This time we disabled this vlan on core1 and tried new user with core 2 became master and dhcp functionality worked fine for new user. Actually in this case we have simulated the same behaviour when we observed the issue with only difference of VPC was not available during the issue time as core 1 was isolated form network
Inputs needed.
Is there any known behaviour for dhcp functionality when VPC is unavailable? If we see the test scenario2 (wherein core1 was master for the vlan and we disable this vlan on core 1 and core 2 was able to relay dhcp requests for new users in this vlan.) it was actually same as scenario we observed during issue time..
View 7 Replies
View Related
