what would be the best method to limit some users/workstations from accesing the internet on a vlan that has access to the internet?
I was thinking of just creating a whole new VLAN for those few workstations that doesnt access the internet or using ACLs on the ASA.
I am using ASA Version 8.2(1) , I want to limit the vpn users to use less bandwidth of my Interlink to access something on inside network
example : source vpn pool
Destn : inside network
how can achive this with QOS config.
we have TACACS+ based AAA on our network equipment, authenticating against internal user database on a network of ACS 5.3s.What I want is to limit certain AAA users (namely automated tools) to be only permitted to authenticate from a list of known IPs.I can do this for authorization, easily, that isn't a problem. The problem is to only accept authentication attempts coming from certain IPs and ignore the rest. My problem is, as it is currently, the automated tools are prone to a sort of a DoS attack - if I attempt logging in to any device using the tool's user account and a wrong password, I can get the account disabled in five tries.
I want to ignore all authentication attempts, unless they are coming from well known source IPs.Ex: netmon user is the user for a tool running on server 10.20.30.40. If I try to log in from my own laptop with user netmon, it should fail, and the attempt ignored. Currently after five (or whatever is configured) failed attempts, the user will be disabled. Oly attempts from 10.20.30.40 should be considered for user netmon.I can't use ACLs on the devices, as I want other users to be able to log in from other IPs.
Is it possible to limit what users are able to do and view in the webconsole of a WLC 5508 via ACS. I have ACS setup to restrict what commands can be run depending on user on the CLI however when they log into the webconsole they can access everything?
View 2 Replies View Relatedhow to limit the bandwidth in digicom router?
View 2 Replies View RelatedIs it possible to configure WLC so that only one user can connect to wireless network at a time with one login? We have WLC5508 (7.2.103.0) web authentication with LDAP (Active Directory).
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a 2504 Controller (os version 7.0)with 7 access poins attached and with 2 vlans. one for regular users and another for gues users.
View 10 Replies View RelatedI've got an HP Microserver, running server 2008 R2 foundation, and I'm using it for file sharing. All files are in a single folder with subfolders, and located in drive C.
The problem is that the server limits the number of LAN connections to it to 31. I've already changed the max. number of connections to the maximum, but doesn't seem to work. Network discovery and file sharing are on, firewall is off, full access rights for everyone.
The error I get when trying to access the shared folder is: 'Microsoft Windows Network: No more connections can be made to this remote computer at this time because there are already as many connections as the computer can accept'
I used the following commands to limit users on my wireless network (WLC 5500) and a Nexus 7000. The previous cisco doc only covers the 6500 and some commands have changed. Tested and working except the PIR gives an error, post up if you know why, otherwise enjoy!
Note Wireless Network assumed to be 172.21.0.0/16.Note This will limit each wireless user to 1 MbpsNote The PIR (Peak Infomation rate, also know as burst) is ignored in following commands, unknown at this time why.Create ACLs:
ip access-list acl-wireless-downstream 10 permit ip any 172.21.0.0/16 ip access-list acl-wireless-upstream 10 permit ip 172.21.0.0/16 any class-map type qos match-all class-wireless-upstream match access-group name acl-wireless-upstreamclass-map type qos match-all class-wireless-downstream match access-group name acl-wireless-downstreampolicy-map type qos police-wireless-upstream class class-wireless-upstream police cir 1 mbps bc 200 ms pir 1536 kbps be 200 ms conform transmit exceed drop violate droppolicy-map type qos police-wireless-downstream class class-wireless-downstream police cir 1 mbps bc 200 ms pir 1536 kbps be 200 ms conform transmit exceed drop violate drop
1.Apply police-wireless-upstream on the incoming port from the controller.
interface port-channel130 description *** LAG for WLC1 *** switchport mode trunk switchport trunk allowed vlan 80,130,255,600 service-policy type qos input police-wireless-upstream
2.Apply policy-wireless-downstream on the uplink LAN/WAN ports.
interface port-channel101 description *** L3 Port Channel to Core VDC *** no switchport service-policy type qos input police-wireless-downstream ip address 10.70.10.18/30 ip router eigrp 10
I have cisco sr520 adsl router. I have configured two vlans i need in vlan 2 speed only 2 Mbit/s from 6Mbit/s (full speed).
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco SG300 small business switch and 541 APs. There are 2 VLANs in our network. One must be limited by bandwidth. How to configure vlan rate-limiting on SG300? And describe CIR & CBS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe need to have one connection with less internet bandwidth assigned to it than all other other connections. Basically it is a separate conection from all others, incoming just from one switch port and separate VLAN.I know this can be done on the switch by limiting the bandwidth allocated to a port,
however, is it possible to have the speed limited down, just before it goes to the internet, ie, on the ASA, rather than doing it on the switch?The firewall is an ASA 5505.
I have Cisco WS-C6509 with IOS version 12.2(18)I have several vlan interface on this device.Today I create new vlan intervace
interface Vlan165
description test5
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.252
end
and vlan:
VLAN Name Status Ports
---- -------------------------------- --------- -------------------------------
165 test5 active Gi7/14
But I can't ping this IP address and show ip route shows:
sh ip route 10.10.10.1
Routing entry for 10.10.10.0/24
Known via "static", distance 254, metric 0 (connected)
I have static route for this subnet /24?I can not see any error in logs, but looks like I reached vlan interface limit on this device or something like this.How can I check it?
Need to limit the amount of bandwidth a specific VLAN can use on a 802.1q trunk port. Situation is that we have a pair of Catalyst 4506 switches which have 802.1q trunk ports into a Checkpoint Firewall, this in turn is connected to a managed WAN router (to which I can't apply a QoS policy).If the 4506 was routing the traffic it would be easy to setup a class-map to match the IP traffic and then QoS the traffic, but the VLAN in question is trunked directly into the firewall (no L3/IP presence on the 4506 next hop for all clients on this VLAN is the firewall).What I need to do is restrict any traffic from this specific VLAN to 10Mbps on the uplink to the Checkpoint Firewall so it cannot impact the onward WAN.
View 1 Replies View Relateda number of vlan on trunk is 4096, can I limit this number? I need trunk pass only 10 vlans.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have an ASA 5505. I have configured Remote Access VPN so that users can connect to VPN and access my main VLAN (Inside). I would like to secure it so that when a user VPN's in, they are only allowed access to the HVAC vlan (Vlan 2) as seen in my configuration. Please note there is also a LAN- 2- LAN VPN which has been configured as well.
View 17 Replies View RelatedWe assign (reserve by MAC actually) static IPs to all of our devices. Over time we have gotten rid of some devices but haven't begun (or finished really) re-using the old IPs. On our WRVS4400N v2 routers we are able to set the max number of DHCP users per Vlan. This prevents unauthorized devices trying to connect to our LAN.For example. I set the range from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.103. IPs 100, 101, and 103 are in use (reserved via MAC address). We set max number of DHCP users to 3. This prevents someone from gaining access to 192.168.1.102. Does this make sense? Or at least this was the initial goal and it tested out successfully back when we implemented it.
How can I do the same for with the RV220W? I can set the range, assign static IPs (reserve IPs by MAC address), but can't keep others from gaining accessing to our LAN via the unused IPs (not assigned a static IP).My initial thought was to create static IPs (for the unused IPs) using dummy MAC addresses. I'm sure there is a much better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do.
We have Cisco Cat4503 series L3 Switch and Cisco L2 2560 Series Switches, some of the users want to have a dynamic VLAN membership, and connecting with the network as mobile users,
can it possible and create dynamic VLAN for specific group of users.
I am planning to buy a router for my hotel and I would like to know is it possible to limit the bandwidth limit to the guests? And the admin computer can utilize the maximum speed? it it possible to create a login page paper when some one enters my wifi connection?
View 7 Replies View Relatedneed to know the OSPF best design. I have a customer currently running their OSPF only in two area. Area 0 is provider reside and area 1 reside 700 hundred over of router including HQ router and remote branch router connecting to metro-E 10Mbps networks. Is this design have any weakness? Area 1 about 800 hundred router reside in, the HQ model is cisco router 7200 and remote end is cisco router 1841.Let's say they want a solution, for 3G remote router connect back to the HQ using Lease line with a fixed IP. Using DMVPN and OSPF communicating back to HQ. What should we aware when designing and implementing for the OSPF best practice. They have 700 hundred over remote branch need to terminate back to their HQ. I read cisco recommend an area should not be more than 50 router and per-area no more than 28 area.
View 4 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to config vlan 10 for data and vlan 20 for voice on the same port - port 1 of swtich SF300-24P to run both data and voice on different vlans.Do I have to add vlan 10 as an untagged vlan to port 1 and add vlan 20 as an tagged vlan to port 1?If I do not want to assign the native vlan 1 to port 1, how can I remove it ? The GUI page - assign VLAN to port does not allow to remove it.Aslo, what mode shall I set up on port 1? General, trunk or access ?
View 18 Replies View RelatedHow do I submit an RFE (Request For Enhancement) to the Cisco SBR team to encourage them to implement the missing support for VLAN to VLAN firewall rules that was available in the RVS4000 (See [URL]) and that was supposedly added to a beta release of the RV220W firmware (See [URL])?
View 1 Replies View RelatedBetween our hosting and a customer we have an extended vlan, traveling on a fiber, between two cisco 3560 switches.The thing is, that we want to create one or more vlans inside that extended vlan, in some way if possible?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have two networks at two sites with a dot1q trunk between the two L3 switches at both sites (no routers involved)
SITE A - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.10.50.0/24
SITE B - Cisco 3750 L3 - VLAN ID 50
10.20.50.0/24
I would like to extend the SITE A VLAN to SITE B so that I can move hosts from SITE A to SITE B without needing to change their IP address but the vlan ID is already in use. Obviously the easy solution is to change the VLAN ID for one or other of the sites but both sites contain hosts that run 24/7. Is there a way to join two VLANs with different IDs together.So for example I create a new VLAN 60 at SITE B and associate it with VLAN 50 at SITE A.
We have 6509 VSS with FWSM Module and we have created two context on it, one is INTERNALL CONTEXT othe is EXTERNALL Context? We have spanned various VLANS in switches and FWSM context level. All VLAN Gateways are configured in context level.
Activity description : We had planned migration of these devices into a new Datacenter, it was a planned activity. During migration of devices from one Dc to a new DC we broke the VSS and kept the primary running and removed the secondary switch and migrated this secondary to new DC and powered this device ON in the new DC and checked all the config was very much fine but this device was OFF network as secondary was brought to new DC just to limit the downtime during the primary switch movement.
During the activity ( Primary switch movement )We powered off the Primary switch and mean time before shifting into new Data center We had brought up secondary switch which was already existing in the DC was put live in the network and it was working fine without any issues.
Later we had moved Primary into new data center and tried to put into VSS with the secondary , during this period the secondary device into went into RECOVERY MODE and primary device was not responding and devices went off network and immediatly we removed the VSL link and brought up primary into production network without secondary online in the network ( Without VSS just stand alone switch ) network started working, but bringing up the primary we found that some of the VLANS in the FWSM was deleted and some VLAN had misconfiguration ( example : say original VLAN ip 10.200.112.1 has become 10.300.13.1 ) also some of the access list as well as SVI was deleted making configuration mismatch.
Wanted to know while syncronization b/n primary and secondary switch in VSS if we pull out VSL link would create this type of issues.
I have set up 2 DHCP pools and 2 VLANs (1 *the native* for data / 1 VLAN for voice). When I use the command "switchport voice vlan 20" the port disapear from the show vlan brief list. When I use the "switchport access vlan 20" it shows up in the show vlan brief in the correct VLAN and gives the phone an IP. I assume that using the access instead of the voice is wrong and the phones would not configure correctly. But when I use the access the phone goes to the next step and tells me the TFTP files are not found. Why does the port disapear from the VLAN list?
View 8 Replies View Relatedi need to solves this little problem on 2960S lan BASE but i dont know if it is possible.
Uplink port config for gi 1/0/28 is:
switchport mode trunk
switchport trunk alloved vlan 10,11
but on interface gi 1/0/1 i want to have data from vlan 10 tagged as VLAN 20.
At this time i have solved this issue very primitively
I have set up gi 1/0/2 as int mode acces, acces vlan 20 and i have connected gi 1/0/2 with gi 1/0/3 with eth cable. int gi 1/0/3 is switchpor mode acces, switchport acces vlan 10
I have a 3750G switch in my production network that only has VLAN 1 on it. All ports are in a default state and VLAN 1 is disabled. The switch is passing traffic but shouldn't having the default VLAN shut down cause the ports not to pass traffic? If I start to create VLANs will that cause the switch to stop passing traffic?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI'm wanting to setup a Virtual Office scenario. Everything is working fine except for 802.1x...I can get the 881 to authenticate things connected to it, but I don't have the options of guest-vlan or auth-fail vlan.Idea is if the users takes the router home and someone, either accidentally or on pupose, connects an unauthorized Laptop, they stay off the Corp network but can get to the internet still.I found this link on Cisco's site: [URL]That link shows them configuring a guest vlan right on the fa0-3 ports of an 881W. I dont have that option on mine. I can only configure 802.1x on the vlan interface. I have 802.1x working, for things that connect to vlan1, but I would like to have a "fallback" setup.
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#int fa1
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1?
dot1q
EZVPN_Remote(config-if)#dot1
[code]....
I am trying to setup a L2tpv3 VLAN-to-VLAN tunnel.My setup has two Cisco 890 router with Cisco IOS Software version 15.0(1) M4. These routers are connected directly on FastEthernet port 8.
One linux machine is connected on FastEthernet port 0 on each router. The two linux machines are on same vlan. I am trying to establish a vlan-to-vlan tunnel between the routers and send traffic between the linux machines.
I followed the case study 11.4 from [URL] and configured the l2tp-class and pseudowire-class. However, the vlan interface configuration is different on 890 router.
I configured a vlan interface as follows.
(config)#vlan 200
(config)# interface FastEthernet 0
#shutdown
#switchport access vlan 200
(config)# interface vlan 200
I don't see the 'xconnect' command in this context. What's wrong with my configuration?
We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
i'm going mad on following problem. I'm trying to get 2 networks seeing each other while one of the network is a non VLAN network and the other one is a VLAN network.They should use the same interface so i added VLAN e0/0.122 to the interface e0/0.Send a ping from my asa to both gw-IP's made me happy at first. In second in figured out that i cannot reach any client in the other network. For testing purpose i created an permit acl to any/any for both networks, but the packets still get dropped by the default implicit rule. (deny any/anyMaybe i'm to stupid for this
View 10 Replies View RelatedI am trying to set up a Vlan on an SF-302-08 small business switch. I would like two Vlans both with internet access but the two cannot communicate with each other. I am not really sure how to go about setting this up as its all fairly new to me. I have successfully set up the Vlans and the ports on each VLAN cannot communicate with each other however the internet access will only work when plugged into either VLAN but wont work on both together
View 1 Replies View Related