I have an ASA 5505. I have configured Remote Access VPN so that users can connect to VPN and access my main VLAN (Inside). I would like to secure it so that when a user VPN's in, they are only allowed access to the HVAC vlan (Vlan 2) as seen in my configuration. Please note there is also a LAN- 2- LAN VPN which has been configured as well.
View 17 RepliesI have configured and tested an ASA-5505 that will be deployed at a customer's home. The ISP cable modem will connect to the E0 (outside) interface of the ASA. All other interfaces on the ASA are configured for the inside network 192.168.5.0/24. I have created a VPN site-to-site tunnel between this ASA and the UC540 to allow 192.168.5.0/24 subnet access to the internal networks on the UC540.
The user has requested that all the network devices used by the rest of the family will only need to connect to the Internet. They will not need access to the VPN tunnel and they will not need access to the computers on the 192.168.5.0/24 inside network. I was planning on performing the following tasks to get this to work.
I have a issue that i am at a loss as how to solve it. I have an ASA 5505 as my firewall. I have users from other companies who visit from time to time and are unable to use their outlook email to send messages. They can however receive messages without a problem. I also have a situation where users who use windows live to access gmail are unable to send messages.
I have narrowed it down to the fact that these uses are using ssl/tls to send the mails. I did some research and found out about the inspect esmtp setting in the ASA. I have disabled it and i still have to problem. I have also removed all outbound deny statements and still no luck.
Of note is that i can send emails without attachments. They take a long time to go out ( from minutes to hours) but eventually they do. Emails with attachments of even 10k do not go at all.
I was running image 8.2.3 and i downgraded to 8.0.5...still did not work...i upgraded to 8.4.3...still did not work. I am now back at 8.2.3.
My Firewall config is attached. I am at my wits end as to what else to try. The company has not renewed support for the device so i am on my own here!
i have a asa5505 and sf300-48,in the sf300 have ip defult-gateway 192.168.1.93 and have internet in vlan2 but vlan 3 not work. ping from "vlan3" to "vlan2" its ok.
View 5 Replies View RelatedASA 5505 and DMZ and Base License,"For example, you have one VLAN assigned to the outside for Internet access, one VLAN assigned to an inside business network, and a third VLAN assigned to your home network. The home network does not need to access the business network, so you can use the no forward interface command on the home VLAN; the business network can access the home network, but the home network cannot access the business network." Page 6-17.
This is exactly what I need. Mail server in DMZ, full access from internet to DMZ, and from inside network to DMZ, no access from DZM to inside network. If I good understand, this is possible with base license.
I successfully configure, internet Access for DZM and inside network, Mail server can be accessed from internet, as well as RDP on inside network. But I have problem to configure communication from inside network to DMZ. [code]
I've got an ASA 5505 running 6.3 I've connected the management interface to our management vlan (which contains switch IPs, ilo's etc)Is there a way to allow access to this vlan from another?
View 1 Replies View Relatedwhat would be the best method to limit some users/workstations from accesing the internet on a vlan that has access to the internet?
I was thinking of just creating a whole new VLAN for those few workstations that doesnt access the internet or using ACLs on the ASA.
We assign (reserve by MAC actually) static IPs to all of our devices. Over time we have gotten rid of some devices but haven't begun (or finished really) re-using the old IPs. On our WRVS4400N v2 routers we are able to set the max number of DHCP users per Vlan. This prevents unauthorized devices trying to connect to our LAN.For example. I set the range from 192.168.1.100 - 192.168.1.103. IPs 100, 101, and 103 are in use (reserved via MAC address). We set max number of DHCP users to 3. This prevents someone from gaining access to 192.168.1.102. Does this make sense? Or at least this was the initial goal and it tested out successfully back when we implemented it.
How can I do the same for with the RV220W? I can set the range, assign static IPs (reserve IPs by MAC address), but can't keep others from gaining accessing to our LAN via the unused IPs (not assigned a static IP).My initial thought was to create static IPs (for the unused IPs) using dummy MAC addresses. I'm sure there is a much better way of accomplishing what I am trying to do.
I am using ASA5505 and I would like to block certain websites such as facebook.com on some users only
View 3 Replies View RelatedThere are 10, 50 and unlimited users profiles for the ASA 5505, reason for that restriction? Does that mean for example that only 10 users can go through a 10-user 5505?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI am trying to configure a Cisco ASA 5505 so that users can authenticate via Radius or via a Local account using the Cisco AnyConnect client. In the AnyConnect Connection profile, the basic tab, it has Authentication Method. We have this going to an AAA server group with Use Local if Server Group fails option is checked.Each time, I see where the user has failed while attemtping to log in to the domain via the radius servers and thus bypasses the local user database all together.
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have an asa 5505 firewall with asa version 8.2(1). my asa connected on wan port over isp router on internet.inside users connected over dlink switch and the allied telesis 24 ports switch on this asa. the inside users are blocked and they can't communicate. all inside ports of asa 5505 are in one vlan and all ports are switch ports. the configuration of my firewall is
: Saved : Written by xxxxxx at 11:26:22.109 CEDT Thu Jul 7 2011 ! ASA Version 8.2(1) ! hostname asa5505 domain-name dri.local enable password 8Ry2YjIyt7RRXU24 encrypted passwd 2KFQnbNIdI.2KYOU encrypted names ! interface Vlan1 no
[Code].....
We have Cisco Cat4503 series L3 Switch and Cisco L2 2560 Series Switches, some of the users want to have a dynamic VLAN membership, and connecting with the network as mobile users,
can it possible and create dynamic VLAN for specific group of users.
I am using my ASA 5505 to remote VPN. I use both windows and Macs. I use the Cisco VPN client software on the windows machine, on the Mac I have used both the Cisco VPN software and the built in OS X VPN client.
I am able to VPN with all machines, but randomly the VPN will disconnect all users. I know there is a setting that may fix this which I think I tested in the past and it did not work, but I have now forgotten it.
I am facing Tear down problem on cisco asa 5505.Users are always disconnecting 25-30 min from outside server. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedI am having problems with a customer's ASA 5505 with Anyconnect 3.1 - it is generating captive portal false-alerts which are stopping users from connecting. This issue began when I upgraded from Anyconnect 2.4 to 3.1, and it appears like this: A user downloads and installs the Anyconnect client and is able to connect fine, to begin with. However, once they reboot their computer and try to reconnect, the VPN session will not come up and they receive the error message below."The service provider in your current location is restricting access to the internet. You need to log on with the service provider before you can establish a VPN session. You can try this by visiting any website with your browser."
Reading other posts, it seems this message appears when a captive portal is restricting internet access. It must be a false alert in this case as there is nothing of the sort here. Apparently, Anyconnect 3.1 can generate a false alert like so if the name of the firewall's SSL certificate doesn't match the CName listed on the Client Profile. I've set this up to match, to no avail. Although users can connect by reauthenticating through the SSL VPN login web page, I am stumped as to how to get rid of this captive portal error that pops up when they try to use the Anyconnect client.
Based on my diagram, my computer A (192.168.100.11) can ping and access my computer B (192.168.10.14). But, when i'm home and i use remote access vpn (192.168.200.x) in cisco asa 5520 to connect to my computer A is okay. But, when i try to ping my computer B is not okay. I already do the exemption for 192.168.100.x and 192.168.10.x in nat rules for inside interface (192.168.100.2) ...
Should i put routing from outside 1.1.1.2 to 192.168.10.x by using 192.168.100.1 as a gateway?
I've got a 5505 and I'm getting a DHCP address from a cable modem. How can I show the DNS that the ASA is getting? show int vlan 2 is only givving me the IP and net mask.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn our ASA 5505 We have a DMZ configured to use 2 ports, which are used by the mail and Web servers. So far everything works perfectly and this router has been very stable. Now I need to add more ports in order to accomodate prototype Web servers in the DMZ, but no more ports available on the Cisco. Looking through the ASDM though I noticed the DMZ seems to be configured as "VLAN 5", sure enough with VLAN ID 5. So I tried creating a VLAN with ID 5 in my ProCurve switch, isolated from other VLANs. My theory being that plugging on of the the router's DMZ interfaced onto this VLAN would allow me to add my test servers. Well, this seems to work, but for only a very short time. I can get the landing page from my test server to display, and then everything slows down to a crawl and communication seems to be blocked. Out of curiosity, I tried to put my prod server and email server on the VLAN, together and separately, but the same thing happens. At first, I can ping the machines, then after a few request, everything stops responding.
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have a Cisco ASA 5505 that I have configured. The outside interface is vlan 2 and the inside interface is vlan 1. Port 0 of the ASA is configured to be in vlan 2 and is connected to the ISP provided subnet. Port 1 is connected to my private LAN subnet. I have an additional router connected to Port 2 for guest connectivity. Port 2 is configured to be a member of VLAN 2 so that it can access the ISP provided subnet. From the device connected to port 2 I can ping the vlan 2 interface address of the ASA and from the ASA I can ping the Default gateway of the ISP provided subnet. For some reason the router on port 2 cannot ping the default gateway of the ISP provided subnet. If the vlan were working the same as a vlan in a switch, I would expect to be able to do this. why it is not working or what I can do to get it working?
View 4 Replies View RelatedI have IOS 8.0(4) and the base 50 User License...will this config work? I have two networks; my home network, and my lab. I want to split my Internet connection between them, but keep the networks separate for the most part. Will my license allow this config since I can't do DMZ?
interface Ethernet0/0
switchport access vlan 3
!
interface Ethernet0/1
switchport access vlan 1
!
interface Ethernet0/2
switchport access vlan 2
[code]....
I'm trying to set up a Guest VLAN for wireless at a client site, and I feel like I'm missing something small in the configuration, since I can't ping any of the VLAN interfaces from my laptop when the address is statically set to something in the 172.20.100.x range.
I've pasted the configs for the ASA 5505 and the 6 switches below for convenience. Near as I can tell, all should be well. The ports are in trunking mode, the "show cdp neighbors" command returns the proper information, VLAN 100 exists on all the switches, etc.
Code:
ASA Version 7.2(4)
!
hostname ASA
domain-name xxxx.local
enable password Cj3LF.ehxXN3xVkxWcxd encrypted
passwd Cj3LF.ehxXN3xVkWcxd encrypted
[Code] ......
Remote-access users aren't able to reach our remote network through a site-to-site VPN tunnel between two ASA 5505's.
I've seen several threads about that here, I've run through the walkthrough at [URL] I've taken a stab at setting split tunnelling and nat exemption, but it seems I'm still missing something. Remote-access users can reach the main site, but not the remote site.
Remote-access (vpn-houston) uses 192.168.69.0/24.
The main site (houston) uses 10.0.0.0/24
The remote site (lugoff) uses 10.0.1.0/24
I am working on ASA 5505 with Base License that uses 3 VLAN's.
-My VLAN 1 is for used for my home network.
-VLAN 2 is connected to the public Internet and my IP gets assigned by ISP dynamically.
-VLAN 3 is DMZ where I will have few VM's that would need access to and from the Internet.
I am looking to work with following:
1) 172.16.0.2 that sits on DMZ will need to access public Internet over port 80
2) Permit access from the Internet over port 3389 to 172.16.0.2
3) Permit any host on private VLAN (192.168.0.0 network) to access 172.16.0.2 over the port 3389
4) Permit second VM on the DMZ VLAN let say 172.16.0.3 to access public Internet on all ports. Access in to this host is not permitted.
5) For some reason DHCP hosts are NOT getting DNS (8.8.8.8) entry when IP hets assigned or renew. I have a statements below but it is not working.
Also, if ACL rules for VoIP are written correctly. The goal is to permit these ports (SIP related) to access VoIP router. [code]
Site A:
ASA5520
VLAN data subnet 172.16.10.x/24
VLAN Voice subnet 10.0.0.x/24
Site B:
ASA5505 Base license
VLAN data subnet 192.168.10.x/24
VLAN Voice (restr) subnet 10.0.1.0/24
The callmanager is located on site A and needs to sent out DHCP-offers to site B through the VPN so the IP-phones can register to the callmanager. I got the VPN up and running for the data-subnet but i can't get traffic through the voice-subnet/VLAN.
Can the ASA's do the job or do I need to route traffic before the ASA's on both sides and sent it through the tunnel, configured both subnets as interesting traffic? Ofcourse the last situation I need to upgrade the license for the 5505 to gain more VLAN's.
Ive been readin all over the internet (including this site) trying to figure out if the asa can handle intervlan routing. Im not sure what I am missing on my config to get this to work. Ive read that it can work and Ive read that it cant work. How to get this to work on my asa 5505.
Here is my setup
Cable Modem ---> ASA (eth0/0)
(eth0/2) -->unmanaged switch for LAN connectivity
(eth0/3) --> Access point for wireless LAN connectivty
My config is attached
What I would like to do is be able to communicate between vlan3(LAN) and vlan4(Wireless LAN)
Whats strange is I can RDP between the two vlans but I cant ping or anything else.
ASA 5505, I got a security plus license which allows multiple VLANs.I want to be able to configure the ASA to allow only RDP session (One way) to another Switch where all the VLANs are. I've attached a pic of what I want but I'm struggling.
I looked at documentation saying you should have inside and outside interface but I'm not sure on this scenario.I've configured inside interface on ASA e0/1 and interface VLANs but not sure what to do between ASA and Switch?
This is for an ASA 5505 with the base license...I have a situation where I will not have one interface in my outside VLAN, but instead I want to have interfaces 1-7 in my outside VLAN and interface0/0 in my inside VLAN.
Is this supported with the Base license, and if so how would I do this? Do I still just need to assign one IP address to the outside VLAN?
Or will I need to upgrade to the Security Plus license and put each interface in a separate outside VLAN, so in essence I would have 7 outside VLANs each with the same security level (0)?
My situation is that I have several partner networks that i want to "aggregate" thru my one ASA 5505. So each outside interface represents a separate partner (outside) network, each of which I want to get to from my inside network. Hence the many outside to one inside.
How can i enable Netflow for each Vlan Or interface indvidually in Cisco ASA? currently i have setup Netflow and only 2 interfaces are shwoing traffic for Netflow which are not even as my physical or Vlan interfaces . (see screen shot )
EscapeASA# sh interface ip brief
Interface IP-Address OK? Method Status Protocol
Internal-Data0/0 unassigned YES unset up up
[Code].....
I have ASA 5505 with base license. I created 3rd vlan on it.it was created. but i am unable to assign IP to it. i assign ip address it takes it. But when i do sh int ip brief it does not show any ip.
Code...
We need to have one connection with less internet bandwidth assigned to it than all other other connections. Basically it is a separate conection from all others, incoming just from one switch port and separate VLAN.I know this can be done on the switch by limiting the bandwidth allocated to a port,
however, is it possible to have the speed limited down, just before it goes to the internet, ie, on the ASA, rather than doing it on the switch?The firewall is an ASA 5505.
I'm new to Cisco equipment much more familiar w/ Sonicwall w/ that said......I have a 5505 w/ Security Plus licensing
I have set up multiple VLANs as follows
VLAN 1 inside - still setup as 192.168.1.1 (will not be using this for our lan)
VLAN2 - outside
VLAN100 - LAN 10.1.1.1/24
[Code]....
If I do add all the VLANs above I understand I will probably have to make a trunk port since I only have 5 usable interfaces
I have a customer with an ASA5510. We have an SSL VPN (tunnel-based, or "SVC") that we use for remote access. That works great.They want to be able to use this same functionality, but add users who will not have the full access that the current SSL VPN users have. So in other words we currently have a small group of users who get full access to the LAN. Then they want to have a second group of users who will only have access to certain nodes.I'm wondering if there's some way to do this using LDAP between the firewall and the Radius server? The user gets put in a different tunnel group depending on what the FW learns from the server?We only have the Anyconnect Essentials license, so unfortunately we can't do a clientless SSL VPN, which otherwise might work well here.
View 3 Replies View Related