Since the change from TeamViewer 6.x to TeamViewer 7.x my router's (WRVS4400N V1.1, latest firmware V1.1.13-ETSI from 2009-02-24 and latest IPS definitions 1.50 from 2011-08-09) IPS blocks its connections to my remotely supported computers claiming a "P2P Vagaa connection attempt - 2". This is not happening with TV 6.x.Who does the error, TeamViewer or Cisco?
View 4 RepliesWhat would be an acceptable number of wireless connections to a WRVS4400N router? I'm working in the IT department for a new company, and one of the offices complains that using VoIP and doing large file transfers are constantly a problem. They are all connecting wirelessly to the WRVS4400N. I managed to vpn in and connect to the web interface of the router, and it shows that there are 30 devices connected wirelessly to it. However, when people plug into the wall jack VoIP and data seem to work fine.I can't find any info on what a best practice would be for number of wireless connections to the router. There's no Vlans setup on it from what I can tell, so that may be my next step, to separate data and voice traffic.
View 2 Replies View Relatedi have with my Edimax router. I could not make any progress with Edimax personnel in Taipei.
If i connect my vista box directly w/o the router, i can see that port 21 (Filezilla) is open, using WhatsMyIP.org | Port Scanners/Sniffers
When I insert the Edimax br6215srg router, the port is in timeout as reported by aforementioned site (guess the port scanner gets no synack nor reset back to the syn it sends)
The router is set to "disable firewall" or to "enable firewall and DMZ enabled" with as client's ip the one that is configured in the router's dhcp table for the vista box. The NAT module is set to forward port 21 to the same ip. ipconfig confirms that i do get the ip programmed in the router's dhcp table.
I do not want to believe that this edimax box is unable to forward connections!
I am trying to get up to speed on this topic as quickly as possible.
Here is my issue:
1) We are able to access the webiste
2) We are able to upload data packets
3) We allow the website to time out while we are uploading data packets
4) When we attempt to re-access the website the ip is blocked a) this includes pinging and trace
5) After an undertermined period of time the ip is unblocked and we are allowed to access it again.
The ASA 5505 router is the last forward facing stop before entering the VPN tunnel. We have tested by circumventing the ASA and we are unable to duplicate the disconnect. We have reviewed the config file and have not been able to identify what rule/settings could be affecting this.
when tracing port usage, the actions use 2 tcp ports and 1 udp port, the 2 tcp ports open and close by each transaction, when the ip block occures the 2 tcp ports are "dead" the udp port remains open (appearhently sending the remainder of the data packets)
CE IP - 172.18.10.10 /30PE IP - 172.18.10.9/30 I had configured some floating static route on the PE towards CE .The routes were installed correctly till PE - CE link was UP as next hop IP was showing as connected .Now the link has been removed and I am receiving a supernet of 172.16.0.0/12 from PE2 via MPBGP. Although the 1st static route for 10.10.0.0 is showing in routing table, the other 2 ( 172.17.0.0 & 172.24.0.0 ) donot show. I believe that as both the routes and next hop fall under the supernet , the static route is not installing. But I don't know why is this behaviour. I tried to remove the distance 250 from both the routes , but still the static route does not install. I tried this on GNS3 but got the same results .
View 14 Replies View RelatedI have a sip gateway connect to the LAN side of RV180 router which has ALG enabled. I have no problem to make and receive calls but sometime I see the router does not forward the 'Bye' message from the VOIP service provider to the sip gateway.
[Code]....
In the capture frame 4292, a 'Bye' message reaches the WAN of RV180 but it never forward the 'Bye' to the sip gateway with internal ip. All settings in RV180 are default with only ALG enabled. I tried to setup Access Rule or Port Forward but none seems to work. Not sure if they are over-ruled by ALG? With ALG enabled, is it possible to have individual Access Rule? If there are conflicts between ALG and Access Rule, which has higher priority?
anything I put into my hosts file, will not go through the Cisco RV220W router. This is part of the set up:
192.168.1.10 << RV220W
192.168.1. 15 << A client machine
192.168.1.99 << Internal DNS with forwarder to OpenDNS (208.67.222.222 & 208.67.220.220) + a laptop that's not on the internal network at all.
Now, the client machine and the laptop both have an entry in their hosts files:
174.156.12.81 insight.hello.com
From the laptop, I can both browse to insight.hello.com, and I can ping it in Xterm.
From the client machine (192.168.1.15) which is behind the Cisco Router/FW, I can ping insight.hello.com, but I can not browse to it. This is especially strange since the ping goes through the Router every bit as much as the http traffic does, so why is the router giving me a DNS error on that, but the ping goes through just fine?
The hosts file is supposed to supercede any other information from anywhere, so it out to not be a problem for the router either. Yet, it obviously is.
I have tried to disable the internal DNS server as well as OpenDNS and just run the ISP's DNS servers, but no change - I still get that blue DNS error screen from the CIsco router.
Above IP's & hosts are fictitious.
The hosts file doesn't get blocked in a sense, but what happens is that if you have "Content Filtering" checked - even without any rules - the router can not verify that 174.156.12.81 is in fact insight.hello.com in this case, since it doesn't exist in the public DNS system.
So, I unchecked Content Filtering and now it works as it should.
We have a VOIP system from AT&T with T1 internet access. I have a RV042 setup as the default gateway for the network and the router randomly (usually over the weekend loses the internet). I have updated to the latest firmware and have check all logs on the server. When the internet access goes down we can still access the internal network. I have been power-cycling the router and then everything works fine. Is there a known issue with this router radomly blocking internet access in or out? This device should remain working at all times so that our remote users can access the company network.
View 0 Replies View RelatedI really need to know a way to block teamviewer through asa. Knowing that teamviewer uses https port.
View 3 Replies View RelatedWe are trying to get Teamviewer to work on our WAN, from the log traffic from the PC's to our Cisco IronPort Web Filter it looks like the ASA Firewall is blocking the traffic. We have opened everything we can open on our Cisco IronPort Web Filter and I have a Cisco TAC case open and they said it appears the ASA Firewall must be blocking the traffic.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have the below policy-Map in my firewall,according to this policy map how can i block teamvirewer via asa 5520, i don't want the outside users to connect using teamviewer to their servers which is already ready up for teamviewer actions
i want to allow only 1 ip address to use team viewer (172.30.30.100)
class-map inspection_default
match default-inspection-traffic
!
!
[Code].....
i want to block teamviewer for certain ip adds
View 6 Replies View RelatedRight out of the box, the WRVS4400N [firmware v2.0.1.3] I just purchased says the WAN interface is DOWN; and it simply will not obtain an IP address from the Arris TM602G cable modem it is attached to. Internet still runs great on the old WRT54G. Is this WRVS4400 DOA? Or is there some arcane setting the quickstart guide overlooks? OR?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI'll just use the 4400n to provide DHCP to my two VLANs and then a new problem cropped up. I am unable to add a default route to the 4400n's DHCP server. It uses the 4400n's vlan IP as the default route. What I'm trying to ultimately achieve is to configure the 4400n as an access point for our "private" network on vlan1 and also "guest" access to the internet on vlan2.
View 12 Replies View RelatedI'm having problems trying to establish a IP Sec tunnel from the office to home. All of our machines are Macs so I have been using the directions described in "How to create an IP Sec tunnel for MAC Clients, A QVPN alternative" but I still can't get it to work. My setup is as follows:
The office is connected to the outside world through a MODEM (Sagemcom 2864 Connection Hub). This MODEM is also a wireless router. It's DHCP server provides addresses 192.168.2.x.The WRVS4400N's WAN port is connected to one of the LAN ports on the MODEM. It's IP address from the MODEM is 192.168.2.x. The WRVS4400N provides addresses 192.168.21.x to devices connected to it.We have a DynDNS account and are using the DDNS client on the WRVS4400N router to connect to it.At home, we have a DIR-655 router with IP Sec Passthru enabled. The router provides IP addresses 192.168.1.x for all devices connected to it. I am fairly sure there are no issues with the router setup at home since I am able to VPN into the office of my full-time job without any problems. I have tried just about everything I can think of but have not been able to get this to work. setting up the Local and Remote Group Settings on the WRVS4400N and the IP address settings in IP Securitas?
Ive setup a few WRVS4400N over the past 6 months, and have been receiving the below message from some of them every couple of hours.What does the message indicate?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have successfully got QuickVPN working from Windows 7 64bit into my WRVS4400n. The router is sat behind another router/modem (Belkin) as the UK uses PPPoA and the WRVS4400n doesn't.So I set up DMZ and changed the DHCP to always allocate 10.x.x.2 on the Belkin which is the WAN side for the WRVS4400n as it is the only thing attached.I have now noticed, and I'm not sure whether it was the case before, that the DNS that the WRVS4400 is showing is the LAN address for the Belkin Modem/Router (10.x.x.1), not 192.x.x.1 for the WRVS4400n itself. I assumed setting the Static DNS 1 on the WRVS4400n would do it, but it didn't?When I connect into the network with QuickVPN, the computer names do not show even though I have selected the option in QuickVPN?
View 1 Replies View RelatedOur business was looking at purchasing one of these Cisco routers and were curious if it supported WPA2 EAP-TLS?
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have 2 WRVS4400N's available to be. One is running my network and security connected to my WAN.I want to use the other one stricly as a switch or even adding wireless repeat of my current wireless LAN.
View 1 Replies View RelatedRecently installed a WRVS4400N router on my home network. Prior to that I was using the wireless built into my FIOS router. I wanted something more secure so I went with the WRVS4400N. I turned off the FIOS wireless and am only using the cisco wireless.
Im having intermittent issues with the wireless. I have many things hooked up to my wireless including a HP printer and a Sonos system. Most of the time if I just open my ipad I cannot see anything else on my network including the printer. If I try to see the Sonos system can cannot, sometimes I can open the app on my iphone and then I can see it.
Sometimes I can see the printer and sometimes I cant. Sometimes when I do see it and then print to it, it will be gone before it even prints.
I don’t seem to have any issues thru the LAN connections.
Also, ive noticed that the wifi is much slower than the old FIOS box.
FYI, when I remove the cisco and fire back up the FIOS wifi I don’t have any problems at all at any time. And its much faster.
I have tried channel 6, 11 and auto. Also turned off IPC and still no change.
I have a gateway to gateway vpn (home-office) working fine for almost an year btw 2 wrvs4400n routers, This morning, the VPN tunnel was down. I clicked "Connect" from the web based interface, but it does not reconnect.
I tried setting up a new tunnel using the VPN setup wizard, but it says it can't connect to the remote router. Which is strange, since I can ping there normally.
I'm having a heck of a time connecting the WRVS4400N VPN to another WRVS4400N VPN. both of the routers have the current firmware version V2.0.2.1: Router 1 is below, and router 2 has the matching configuration with as it should be the local group being that routers local information and the remote crew set up being router ones information. the status is up on both of the routers, but I'm unable to ping the remote gateway or any device behind it.[code]
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have 2 internet connections in my office one via Verizon Fios and another one via the local cable company. On the fios connection I have an RV042 VPN router and on the Cable company connection I have an rvs4000 router, I would like to know if there is a way I can connect the 2 so I can share a printer I have on one of the 2 networks from the other network without using the VPN feature, like via an ethernet cable connected between the 2 and some kind of static route maybe?
View 6 Replies View RelatedAfter a few months of trouble-free ... the Cisco WRVS4400N V2 stopped working. i have tried to reset by holding the reset button for 30 seconds ... but nothing changes the red DIAG light remains on at all times
i have also tried two different versions of the Firmware Rescue Utility but all i get is "unable to scan"
How to setup VPN connection,
Head office : fortigate 200b firewall - SSL, IPsec
Branch office: WRVS4400N Wireless-N Gigabit Security Router with VPN
Both side have the public IP.
This is a new device, just initially installed about a week ago. I updated to the latest firmware. We have iphones, ipads, and Samsung Galaxy smartphones all trying to connect to this WAP at this office, but cannot seem to connect. If I power cycle the WAP, we can connect for about 5 min, then it loses it and cannot connect again. I have strong signal, device says "connecting" then immediately "disconnected"... does this on loop forever.WPA/WPA2 PSK.I don't know what to do. About to go buy an Apple WAP.
View 3 Replies View RelatedMy WRVS4400N is not letting my VPN client through the router. I have checked the passthrough boxes for all 3 protocols. I have port range forwarding for my VPN connections to my SBS2008 box on port 1723.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have a Linksys E4500 as the main router and would like to use the WRVS4400N as a bridge to extend the range of my network and also attach a NAS to it. Is this possible? I've been trying different options but have been unsuccessful.
View 1 Replies View RelatedLooking for a working Cisco VPN client for Windows 7. There seems to be an availabel download for a ver 5, but you have to be a reseller etc.. Where do I download the Windows 7 supported VPN client to access my WRVS4400N router? If none, should I use 3rd party - IF yes to 3rd party, which one would you suggest?
View 1 Replies View RelatedI bought a WRVS400N v2 to be used as an access point. Currently it is hooked up on my switch via a trunk port and is able to communicate with my gateway. Whenever I try to access an IP subnet other then the local IP address of the WRVS, I get a network unreachable error. To fix this for my local networks, I added the appropriate static route to cover my local LANs and that seems to work now. I tried to add route 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0 using the web interface for internet access, but somehow it does not recognize this as a default route (quad zero!?). Does any know how I can set the default gateway in this router? Maybe, but hopefully not, I have to use the WAN port to create some kind of uplink and use one of the LAN ports to connect using the trunk port and route traffic for the clients over the WAN port .
View 1 Replies View RelatedI have three locations using the linksys wrvs4400n router with IPSec VPNS. They all work fine and point back to a Server2003. I just added a fourth location with the same router but this new router has firmware v2.x, where the others have firmware v1.x. When I connected the new router into the VPN network, it caused the other tunnels to go down. When I take the new router with firmware v2.x offline, everything else seems to work fine.
Can the v2.x firmware cause the other VPNS on v1.x firmware to go down and not work properly? Do I need to upgrade the firmware so all 4 linksys wrvs4400n routers are operating the same version number so not to cause the tunnels to disconnect?
I have looked through the forum for answers to my problem, but does not look like I'll find it.The problem: Router randomly freezes.When this happens:No IP/DNS,No response to ping,No contact at all (wifi or cable),Works fine after reboot for some time.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have a E3000 router (wireless N and gigabit ports) and a 50mbps download/8mbps upload Internet connection with machines attached directly to the ethernet ports on the E3000 I can get full speed 50mbps download doing speedtest
now I have a cisco WRVS4400N connected to the E3000s etherenet port going to the WAN port of the WRS4400N.
I'm able to get intnet access on my device/computers fine. Problem is that when I did a speed test from devices attached to the Cisco WRS4400N router my max download speed is only 26mbps out of the 50mbps (it's not network congestion as I did the same test from devices attached to the E3000 and I can get full 50mbps)
Is there any setting on the WRVS4400N that might speed things along? or is the WAN port maxing out the download speed at 26mbps?