Cisco Routers :: How To Establish Tunnel Between Rvs 4000 And Rv042

Dec 16, 2011

how to establish tunnel between rvs 4000 and rv042 ?

View 2 Replies


Cisco VPN :: RV042 / Establish A IPsec Tunnel To A Large Organization

Jul 18, 2012

I have a client that needs to establish a IPsec tunnel to a large organization. They will not forward any traffic to an IP using private reserved IPs. However I am not finding another way to accomplish this. I tried ipsec to the router and using a second IP to a 1:1 Nat but it will not pass the traffic and would seem really insecure from the public internet. 1:1 Nat does work from the public internet but not over the tunnel.I have an RV042 a /29 block of IPs. I am at a loss of how I can accomplish what they want without allowing a private IP.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Cannot Establish PPPoE But PC Can

Jun 17, 2012

I have a RV042 and want to establish one WAN connection via PPPoE. I enter Username and Password, Keep Alive, MTU=Auto. The router does not get an IP address ( and the log says: "[pppoe] sending PADI", "last message repeated 5 times". What is confusing me is that a PC connected to the RV042 (and a DSL-Router operating in Modem-Mode "PPPoE Pass-Through") can establish a PPPoE connection with the same Username and Password. Why can the PC connect via PPPoE, but the RV042 can not?

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV180 - Establish Permanent Vpn Tunnel Between Each One Of Remote Sites

Apr 28, 2012

I'm dessigning a network and this is my scenario:

5 - Remote sites (no static IP there)
3 - Remote users (comercial)
1 - Central building (using static ip address)
Is it possible to establish a permanent vpn tunnel between each one of my remote sites to the main building, even if I have no static IP address in the remote sites?
Do you think that RV180 is the best choice to mannage vpn connection between remote sites and the central building securely and faster?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: SRP521W VPN Site-to-Site Tunnel Doesn't Establish

Dec 19, 2011

As you can see i have problems with connecting 2 SRP521W together for an VPN tunnel. I tried as much as I can but now i dont know what to do or how and where is the mistake? the connection between these two devices was there last week, after weekend (nothing changed in configs) the connection suddenly was interrupted, without any reason or warning. another day it worked again and 20 mins later connection was dead again...and now it wont establish at all.. here are some screenshots from the vpnconfigs of my devices. one has a static IP the otherone uses FQDN. These are the IKE policies: Here the IPsec Policies: and the GRE policies:

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: VPN Tunnel Between 2 RV042 / SSH Drop Packet

Dec 14, 2011

here's my setup :
office 1 :
rv042 hw3
ISP:Obtain an IP automatically
office 2 :
rv042 hw3
VPN tunnel between both rv042, everything's fine but when i try to ssh from office 2 to an office 1's server, my connection drops.
When it drops, i can still ping pc in office 1, this is really strange!if i change the office 2 ISP to another provider (obtain an IP automatically) everything's ok !
i try to use another PPPoE ISP for office 2 and it's doing the same thing!I've also tried other rv042 in both locations with the same setup and it's doing the same thing, so it's not a router issue.
i've tried older firmware and it's doing the same thing, so it's not a firmware issue!

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 - VPN Tunnel Between Two Remote Locations

Jun 27, 2012

I have configured a VPN tunnel between two remote locations using static IP addresses on two RV042 routers. The tunnel seems to work but the problem is that when the two hosts attempt to ping each other only one can successfully ping. One PC with IP address can ping across the network but the second PC with IP address cannot. These are laptops seperate from the intranet used to test the tunnel. Someone had suggested NAT may be the issue so I enabled NAT Transverse on the routers but still no luck. The following is the results from a ping test.

PC 1
Pinging with 32 bytes of data:
Reply from bytes=32 time=116ms TTL=63
[Code] ......

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 VPN Tunnel For Multiple Subnets?

Aug 5, 2011

We have 4 RV 042 routers and  cisco router at HQ, we have Site to Site VPN tunnels in between, All branch offices are connected to HQ via S2S VPN tunnels 24 HQ Branch 1 Branch 2 Branch 3 Branch 4
now lets say i am branch 1, i can access network but cant access network, means i dont have branch to branch connection, it should be through HQ, means my RV042 at brnach  should fwd all traffic to HQ for another branches also. Under VPN tunnel if i try to configure remote destination its not allowing me it says network overlaping with local network, how i can sole it, I know how to do in cisco, we can permit those networks in access lists.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 Hangs On Reset If VPN Tunnel Is Established?

Sep 15, 2011

I was hoping that the latest firmware would fix my (2) 'bugs', but it did not.  We are using the RV042s at our remote medical clinics as an end-point VPN router to our Nortel 1700 VPN router, replacing our old Nortel Contivity 100s.When I try and do a reset when connected remotely via the WAN interface, the RV042 hangs and will only reset by re-powering.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 To RV082 Tunnel / NAT-T And Slow Performance?

Feb 18, 2013

I have an RV042 VPN tunnel with an RV082.The RV042 has a public IP Address obtained by PPPoE, the RV082 has a public IP Address obtained via Static IP.The problem I see is a really slow performance. Both internet conections are idle and the performance is about 2 or 3 kbyte/s My question are if I should I enable any of this:

- Agresive mode
- NAT Traversal
- IP Compresion
- Dead Pear Detection
How can I troubleshot this slow performance?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: ASA 5510 / RVS 4000 - VPN Tunnel Reset

Nov 7, 2012

I have an ASA 5510 at V8.2(5) with something near 20 site to site VPN tunnels. I am having a problem with 1 tunnel to a RVS4000. The tunnel is completely closed and reset during Phase2. Here is a small snipet at the time of the tunnel reset
x.x.x.x, Username = x.x.x.x, IP = x.x.x.x, Session disconnected. Session Type: IPsec, Duration: 7h:36m:30s, Bytes xmt: 333755, Bytes rcv: 86281, Reason: User Requested
Followed by Group = x.x.x.x, IP = x.x.x.x, Active unit receives a centry expired event for remote peer x.x.x.x.
We use a number of connection oriented sessions and this blowing them out of the water. all other tunnels are up for DAYS to more than a Month.

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: ASA5520 And RV042 - Tunnel Get Connected But No Ping / No Traffic Between Both End Network

Sep 13, 2011

I configured ASA5520 and RV042 for site-to-site IPSec VPN tunnel.Tunnel get connected, but no ping, no traffic between both end network.
======= -ASA--------public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet -RV042-----public, static IP address------Cisco 2821--------Internet
ASA5520 config:
name VPN
interface GigabitEthernet0/1
nameif NET
security-level 100
ip address


View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RV042 VPN - Create Tunnel But Unable To Connect Using Windows Connection?

Jul 18, 2011

Im able to create a gateway tunnel with two rv042 routers in different locations  ( i can see the tunnel connected in the router) but the quick vpn utility is not working , i also tried to use the pptp as server as an alternative( im able to connect using windows connection to the pptp server but whenever I browse any of the four ip's allowed for the pptp server \ it takes me to the documents of the local computer....I attached the configuration for one of the routers it is the same as the other end , just the information is flipped.
Message was edited by: Adrian Torres

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: RV042 Establish VPN Gateway Connection

May 31, 2012

I have successfully connected two RV042s to establish a VPN gateway to VPN gateway connection. I have the follow questions:
1. I would like to keep the VPN tunnel connection time indefinite. Is it sufficient by checking the "Keep-Alive" box on the VPN -> Gateway To Gateway -> Advance page? Or, I have to ping the RV042 periodically?
2. Do the "Phase 1/Phase 2 SA Life Time" (on VPN -> Gateway To Gateway page) settings have any impact on keeping the VPN connection time indefinite? What are the optimal values for them?
3. Is there an API, command, or script to replace a manual clicking on the "CONNECT" button to establish the VPN tunnel from the VPN -> Summary page? Or, is there a way to accomplish this at power up?
4. Is there a way to establish a VPN tunnel without going through login and clicking the "CONNECT" button? (Auto connect at power up?)

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: How To Establish IPsec Tunnel Using DNS With ASA 5505

Aug 22, 2011

I´m getting a dynamic public IP from my provider and what I´m trying to do is to establish a remote vpn tunnnel using IPSec which I achieve but every time the sessions resets or the ASA 5505 resets I get a new public IP and I need to put the new IP on the remote client so I can establish the vpn... How can I establish an ipsec vpn  using DNS?  For this scenario the remote vpn client is a vpn phone but it could be for any vpn client. 
Private IP                       Public IP                                       Private IP
PBX ---- (LAN) ---- ASA 5505 ---( Internet ) --- Remote Site ( Router ) --- (LAN) -- VPN Phone

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establish Tunnel From Client To ASA 5520

Oct 2, 2012

I have remote branches that connect to the corporate office as a site-to-site VPN. Now the clients at the branch are getting an application that is using an unsecured port (tcp/23). I would like to use a set of ASA 5520's that I have at the corporate office, with the AnyConnect license on them. I want the client machines to establish a tunnel from the client to one of these ASA's. The ASA' then would have a connection to the VLAN that the receiving server is housed on. The trick is to just establish the tunnel from the client to the ASA that will allow the IP of the client to not be translated. So I would use the ASA as a security 'pass-through' for the clients that use this new application.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco :: Can't Get Any Client To Establish DTLS Tunnel When Connecting

Nov 25, 2012

I've been labbing on my asa5505 at home, setting up different VPN solutions for testing purposes. However, I can't get my anyconnect client to establish a DTLS tunnel when connecting (anyconnect only shows tls, and does not display any errors about not connecting with dtls)I have set dtls port to 444 and this port is open on the other side.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: Establish A Tunnel (LAN-to-LAN) From A VPN 3000 Series?

May 31, 2001

Is it possible to establish a tunnel (LAN-to-LAN) from a VPN 3000 series Concentrator with a static IP address to another VPN 3000 series concentrator (or an IOS router) with a dynamic IP address.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establish IPSec Tunnel Between 2801 And Cyberoam Equipment At End Point?

Mar 31, 2011

i'm triyng to establish a vpn ipsec tunnel between my cisco2801 and a cyberoam equipment, at the end point.Debugging isakmp, i have this output, where is the remote peer address, and yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy is mine.What can i try?
Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): SA request profile is (NULL)Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Created a peer struct for, peer port 500Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: New peer created peer = 0x661C2D4C peer_handle = 0x80000003Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: Locking peer struct 0x661C2D4C, refcount 1 for isakmp_initiatorApr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: local port 500, remote port 500Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP: set new node 0 to QM_IDLE      Apr  1 14:48:12.542: insert sa successfully sa = 66DF4F5CApr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):Can not start Aggressive mode, trying Main mode.Apr  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0):found peer pre-shared key matching  1 14:48:12.542: ISAKMP:(0): constructed NAT-T vendor-07 IDApr 


View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 - WAN Abnormal Operation?

Feb 21, 2013

System Information Firmware Version:V2.0.2.7CPU:STAR 9202 Router is operated 2y. No problems till now.There is sometimes abnormal lost of Internet connection, detected by LAN devices. I found it 3 days ago. This dysfunction is occasional 2-5 per day in occasional time.Nothing was changed/upgraded/updated in my WAN cable router or LAN or in the Cisco router. Nothing was changed on computers site (OS,LAN cards, drivers, ...). Just the problem is discovered on the router side.LAN operatation is correct, no problems was founded. Just the devices on LAN lose the internet connection (Win7, Lnx, Mac).
This is status of my WAN - does not matter if the internet connection was lost or not. It is still same:

Interface: UP
IP Address is assigned (checked by provider - correct)
Default Gateway and DNSs are assigned too(checked by provider- correct)
What was checked by me:

1.  A. I disconnected the cable router from Cable modem

B. I connected the Cable router directly to laptop. Internet connection was right.
2. I called to my Cable provider to check my connection:

- with direct laptop connection to Cable router - Right

- with Cisco router connected to Cable router - Right, but no Internet connection on LAN side behind the Cisco router
3. Standard procedure was tested:

- Unplugged (electricity & cabling) all devices - Cable modem, Cisco router as well.

- Restart of Cable modem, +30 sec. connection of IP cable to Cisco router, start of Cisco router Still same. No Internet connection.

- SETUP/SUMMARY/Network Settings Status - DHCP Release or DHCP Renew was tryed - Still same.After several minutes - was Internet connection Renewed. Just by itself. how?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS-4000 Dropping Ip Connections

Apr 25, 2012

I have my RVS-4000 configured using static IP addresses in the LAN configuration.  The users use DHCP to get their addresses (for the most part, a couple may have static IPs set on the computer). I have the maximum number of DHCP users set to 1 to restrict the ability of people to log in to the system. That one address is locked down.
The internal address of the router is set to  It doesn't conflict with anything on my network. I have 35 static IPs. About half of them are uing IP Based ACL to limit their access time but that doesn't seem to bear any relationship to what drops off.  
Almost daily one or more of the users will lose their IP address and a hard reset of the router is required.  The user this happens to seems random and it may be more than one but seldom all of them.  The network includes Windows7 (Home & Pro), a FreeNAS, Macs (Leopard and Snow Leopard), iPad, iPods, an iPhone and an AirPort Extreme used as a WAP (DHCP is disabled).  The AirPort is plugged directly into the router and has a staic ip on the RVS-4000 but is set to DHCP.  It seems to be the most common problem child.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 IPS V1.5 Rejected By Router?

Mar 10, 2012

I attempted to load and received an error message "Signature file is not the correct type of version for this device". I have firmware version, and and current IPS version 1.42. why IPS v1.5 is rejected?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: Unable To Connect To RVS 4000 Behind Another One?

Nov 16, 2009

I'am using a modem/router to conncet my lan to internet. unfortunetly it is impossible to switch off the router of my modem. So i connect my RVS 4000 on the modem/router and i assign it static ip as my modem has i disable the DHCP function on my RVS 4000. I m still using it because of its gigabit ethernet capability.

My problem is i am unable to connect to my RVS from the outside. inside the LAN no problem I just use its STATIC IP. I have a NAS on this LAN. I write a NAT/PAT rule in my modem/router to route HTTP and FTP and the port for the interface to my NAS. It's just working smoothly. But not for my RVS. I have checked the remote management and translate the traffic incoming on this port to the same port on the !!. ok that can't be considered as external I disable remote management and all the protection firewall, DOS,BLOCK WAN REQUEST. I route the HTTP port 80 to port 80 I try to connect to /home.htm....unsuccessful !!

View 17 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 Drops LAN Devices?

May 13, 2011

I recently updated my network with the following:
RVS 4000 v1.3.2.0 - Linksys by Cisco version
AP541N [WAP]
All devices have the latest version of firmware.Users only connect laptops via wireless, they are a mix of MAC and Windows users, devices such as printers and network storage are all wired connections.The RVS 4000 would drop the internal Lan after several hours or sometimes days, there would be no reason to the periodicity it would retain and then drop the LAN. By dropping the Lan I mean:
Internet Access would cease, devices such as laptops would lose their wireless connection, a laptop requesting an IP address would be ignored. Effectively we were down.Connecting a laptop to the network via a cable connection would eventually get an IP address but all other wired devices such as the NAS Storage and printers would be unreachable and require powering off and on to get an IP.
A reboot of the RVS 4000 by powering off the router would have to happen to restore the LAN quickly. I followed advice on the Internet and this forum by upgrading the firmware and resetting to factory defaults and then reloading the configuration.The only change that seemed to make any sort of differnece was connecting the  AP541N directly to the RVS 4000 rather than the SG200-26. Throughput  increased and the period between LAN drops extended but the RVS 4000 would ciontinue dropping the LAN eventually.
When it dropped the LAN during a work day, that was it!I read a lot of negative feedback on the version of RVS 4000 firmware and as the version 2.0 will not install I purchased the Cisco version of the RVS 4000 v
The new RVS 4000 also drops the LAN! The period between drops is much longer, but it still drops the Lan.Ventilation is good and it is sitting on its edge using the platsic feet that come in the package.The AP541N is still directly connected to the RVS 4000 rather than the to fix the RVS 4000 or an alternative... I would like to stay with Cisco, an alternative, if the RVS 4000 is unfixable should have a browser based admin facility!

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 - Block IP Numbers

Nov 26, 2011

I would like to block IP numbers. When I tried with one the router festively walked straight through it!

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: No Internet Access With Static IP And RVS 4000

Oct 26, 2011

I have an RVS 4000.  I have several PC's to which I have assigned static IP addresses.  I have recently upgraded most of the PC's to Win 7 (64) machines.  I updated the firmware on the RVS4000 to in conjunction with this.  After such update (and actually before as well) I could not assign a static IP address to a PC and have access to the internet.  It connects fine to my LAN, just no internet access.  This is also affected on several other machines running Win XP and Win 2003 Server, so it's not just this computer. 
I have:
1.  Shut down (powered off/unplugged) everything, router, DSL modem, switches, server, etc.

2.  As I said firmware is current.

3.  Yes, DNS servers and gateway, subnet, etc. are all correctly specified on the PC.

4.  Router is set for gateway mode.

5.  Set to only IPV4.
The only way it allows internet access is to use DHCP.  I've even tried taking the IP address via DHCP and manually assigning the DNS servers and that works fine, but as soon as I assign a static IP internet access is immediately gone.
There must be something I'm missing, but I can't seem to find it.
Everything worked fine prior to the conversion of the Win 7 machines, i.e. I had several PC's with static IP's and no problems.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 Features Eat Loads Of Bandwidth?

Nov 29, 2011

After configuring the router and enabling a load of functions to secure our LAN, the download speed halved! Even disabling AcitveX "eats" 10Mbs! I understand that enabling IPsec will drag the speed down to 25Mbps, but I have disabled this.
Even setting the QoS to speeds equal or higher then the ISP's promissises drags the speed down!

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RSV 4000 - Additional License For IPsec VPN?

Jan 4, 2012

RSV 4000 bundle with IPSECVPN.  Any additional license for IPSECVPN ?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 - Allow Radio Button Stippled Out

Jan 17, 2012

This type of issue has been posted time and time again by others.  In this particular instance the ability to deny and allow access based on a time and day for one or more MAC id or IP address or range of addresses does not work.  Because the code is so "weak" that it cannot handle a policy which passes the midnight threshold into the morning (the test is actually commented out in the code), one is forced to write one, perhaps two inverse permit rule(s).  In this case, it cannot be done because the "allow" radio button is stippled out.
Some simple digging reveals that the file AccessRes.htm gets to the browser with the "allow" radio button stippled out because the token "disabled" appears in the generated html.
<input type="radio" value="allow" name="f_status2" onclick="setBLOCK()" disabled="">
I have several of these devices.  They are all new V2 units. They all have the latest version of the firmware and they are all broken the same way.  This behavior is the same on various flavors of browser.  As an experiment, based on SOP responses I've read, I downloaded and flashed with the latest firmware (same version as delivered), and then performed the factory reset.  No change.  It's broken.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Routers :: RVS 4000 Firmware Update Intermittently Going Offline

Mar 10, 2012

My RVS 4000 v1 router firmware version has been intermittently going off-line ... a reset of the power resolves the issue temporarly. My plan was to update the firmware but I haven't been able to download an uncorrupted version of the firmware file on the Cisco support site. The file downloads as a zip file but the winzip program says that the file is not in a valid zip format and cannot open it.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Can't Establish Site-to-site VPN Between RV042 And RV220W

Sep 3, 2012

I'm trying to establish a site to site VPN using ipsec between an RV220W in the UK and an RV042 in Italy to no avail.The RV042 tells me it's "waiting for a connection" and it gives as the remote address (i'm using Dynamic addressing at both ends). I can ping the remote address with a response.The basic parameters I'm using is 3DES with SHA1, but the RV042 offers an option for Perfect Forward Secrecy which the RV220W does not (I've tried toggling this) and the RV220W offers and Extended Authentication mode which I can't see on the RV042.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Security :: Can Configure A PIX (515) As PPTP Client To Establish A Tunnel With PPTP Server

May 15, 2006

Can I configure a PIX (515), as PPTP client to establish a tunnel with non-Cisco PPTP server ? Can my PIX initiate this type of connection ?Today, I use a PC with PPTP client to establish this and I want replace this with a PIX and I don´t want depends of a PC.

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Establish Site To Site IPSec Tunnel Between ASA 5520 And 3030?

Feb 17, 2013

We have configured a site to site tunnel from our ASA to another organizations Cisco 3030.  It appears to have just one way initiation.  We can do a ping to a device on the remote site and it will ping just fine.  however, when the tunnel needs to be initiated from the remote site, it will not work until we have initiated the tunnel and then everything works.
I continue to see Error processing payload: Payload ID: 1 errors on the ASDM logs.It appears that all the configuration is in place because we can in fact establish the IPSec tunnel unidirectional.  And once established, traffic can flow bidirectional.

View 1 Replies View Related

Copyrights 2005-15, All rights reserved