Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Hot Swap 100M Card With Gig Module
Oct 18, 2012If you hot swap a 100M card with a Gig module in a live 4500 switch, what happens to the running-config? Don't have the module versions to hand.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Unsupported Module Showing On 4506
Dec 4, 2011We ordered the wrong part number for a Cisco 4506 non-E chassis, the part number is: WS-X4624-SFP-E and the device is showing "Unsupported module"; What would the part number be for the non-E? WS-X4448-GB-SFP,Catalyst 4500 48-Port 1000Base-X (SFPs Optional) ?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Module Ws-x4548-rj45v+ And 4506 Switch
Oct 4, 2012 I have a problem with a newly bought ws-x4548-rj45v+ i've plugged in the module but when i do show modules all , it show as unsupport
Power consumed by backplane : 0 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------1 2 Supervisor IV 1000BaseX (GBIC) WS-X4515 JAE1048GAXQ2 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4448-GB-RJ45 JAB064806WN3 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4448-GB-RJ45 JAB063005DB4 0 Unsupported module WS-X4548-RJ45V+ JAE1545056U
M MAC addresses Hw Fw Sw Status--+--------------------------------+---+------------+----------------+---------1 0007.0e64.f880 to 0007.0e64.f881 5.2 12.2(20r)EW1 12.2(46)SG Ok2 000b.5fa4.da20 to 000b.5fa4.da4f 1.0 Ok3 0009.e844.d760 to 0009.e844.d78f 1.0 Ok4 ccef.4815.9bf0 to ccef.4815.9c1f 2.0 Unsupport
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Phones Connected To Module Went Down / Messages Logged On Console
Sep 25, 2011We are facing issue with one of the module installed on cico 4506 swicth. All of a sudden cisco phones connected to that module went down and the messages logged on the console. [code]
View 9 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 7000 10Gig Card Not Seeing Transceiver Module?
Nov 13, 2011I'm unable to get the N7K-M108X2-12L 10 Gbps Ethernet XL Module within our Nexus 7009 chassis to recognise the individual X2-10GB-SR transceiver modules. I have the same issue on another 7009 chassis.If I perform a 'show interface'. I get the following output saying SFP not inserted.
-Ethernet3/5 is down (SFP not inserted)
-Dedicated Interface
-Belongs to Po51
-Hardware: 10000 Ethernet, address: 7081.0599.d458 (bia 7081.0599.d458)
I also get the same result if I issue the following command. Are their any additional features I need to enable? or would this be a license issue?
Have already tried different X2-10GB-SR modules, reloading the card, re seating the card. [code]
Cisco LAN :: 6509-e Best Way To Swap Out Supervisor Module
Mar 28, 2012We have a 6509-e (WS-C6509-E V04) with (4) (WS-X6148-GE-TX) 48 port modules and a supervisor 32 (WS-SUP32-GE-3B).We purchased a supervisor 720 (WS-SUP720-3B) and (2) (WS-6708-10G-3C) 8 port fiber modules and (1) WS-X6748-GE-TX)48 port module to add to the switch. My question is what is the best way to swap out the supervisor module? Can the SUP720 be added as a standby module so that the config can be transferred? Probably a long shot. Is there anything in this swap that I should be concerned with? The other three modules should be pretty straight forward.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: How To Configure 4500X With GLC-T SFP To Work At 100M
Jan 31, 2013How to configure a 4500X with a GLC-T SFP so that it will work at 100M.The data sheets say it will work at 10/100/1000 but Im not seeing that happen can't set the speed and it doesn't negotiate with anything at 100M it will only work with auto to another switch set to auto and supports 1000M.
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 3945 - Connecting To 100M Single Mode Fiber Link SC To LC Conversion
Aug 4, 2012connecting a Cisco 3945 Router to an Ethernet WAN Link. The service provider has provided a 100M Ethernet Single Mode Fiber handoff to the customer premises with SC Connector. The CPE configuration proposed for this setup is like this. [code]
Since the SFP has LC Connector, i suppose i need to have an SC-LC Cable for connecting the Ethernet link. Do i need anything else, apart from above?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Installing WS-X6724-SFP Hot Swap?
Nov 20, 2011I'm adding another module, WS-X6724-SFP, to our C6506E core switches. I read that it is hot swappable.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Shutdown 4507r-e And Just Swap Out Blade?
Apr 2, 2012If i replace a card of the same type in the same slot will I lose the configuration for that card or does it live in the backplane of the device?Is there any special command I need to run to replace the card or can i shutdown the 4507r-e and just swap out the blade?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: C3560 Swap Out Not Ping Across Network
Jun 17, 2012Had a switch die over the weekend, a c3560, per our normal procedure I pulled the hardware put a very basic config on it(vlans, portchannel, uplink ports, ip of management vlan, con and vty security, snmp, enable secret, and hostname). Then I use solarwinds orion to upload a copy of the old config to bring the switch back to the same state as the one that failed. Its a system that has worked for us 3 or 4 times in the past. But this time when the base config was on the box it couldnt ping across the network.I have tried clearing the arp cache and the dynamic mac tables, i verified the routing tables and even removed the 10.1.185.128/27 route and re-added it, saw the routing update go across to the other 65k, tried bouncing the edge switch(i cant bounce the 65k's), took down the po between the edge and 65k.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Swap With Backup Switch WS-2950T
Jan 8, 2013my 2970 having intermittent problem. i would like to swap with my backup switch WS-2950T. when i try to configure the 2950 following the 2970 config, i unable to perform this command "switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q". does 2950T does not support this command??
View 8 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Access Layer Switching With 2960 / 3560x / 3750x And 4506
Jan 17, 2013My management has tasked me to give them a high level overview of the different switching we can choose for our new building.
This is what I know so far.4 Closets, each closet has 450 ports,One MDF room that is will contain one UCS Chassis and a Nimble iSCSI SAN.
I am working on the spreadsheet and it looks like this (Not totally filled):
2960s3560x3750x45064510Approx cost (Each, 48PORT, POE+, 10G uplink, Dual PS, IP BASE)
6K7K8K45K75KMax Capacity192432432192384Backplane speed206464520520ProLeast ExpensiveStackable to 9Stackable to 9ProDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSDual PSProLayer 3 opt
Layer 3 optDual SupsDual SupsConExpensiveExpensiveConNo Dual PSConLayer 2 OnlyCannot stack more than 4
For the MDF I would like to use 2 Nexus 5548's with FEX's, and the layer 3 daughter board. For the IDF's I was thinking of two 4010's.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4506 / Routing For Internal And Guest Network
Dec 19, 2011I am implementing a guest wireless network to work alongside my internal network. The guest network will use the existing switching network and will be separated by VLANs. I have the ASA set so that traffic can get to it and out to the Internet. I can set up a workstation on the same VLAN as my guest network and can route inside my network (strictly doing this for testing purposes). Where I am having problems is with the Catalyst 4506 switches and the ip routing. I had two separate "ip route" statements defined on my switches.
ip route 10.200.2.0 255.255.255.0 10.200.2.254
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.100.100.254
I have discovered that the traffic is always following the default route despite the fact that my IP address on my test workstation falls in the 10.200.2.x network. I was looking at documentation and found that it is possible to set up policy-based routing on the core switches. Can you have two "ip route" statements defined like this to segreate traffic or do I have to use PBR for routing (or a combination) in this case? If I define PBR then how does that impact my existing routing? I need to make sure that I can still route the existing traffic while I'm configuring this change.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Resilient Routing Design With OSPF
Aug 27, 2012We have 2 sites, each with 2 x 4506 switches which will be connected togther using an etherchannel. The switches will provide access ports for client devices and will be configured with HSRP to provide gateway redundancy. SW1 will be HSRP active.2 metro ethernet links will be installed in each site which will connect back to our HQ sites. OSPF will be used over the backbone to provide resiliency and to allow shortest path routing to each HQ and to prevent traffic over the HQ to HQ link.
The 4506 will be trunked togther with an SVI for providing OSFP adjacency.For the traffic flow from SW2 to HQ2, traffic will hit SW1 and then route back to SW2 and then to HQ2. Is this the best way to do this? Should a second link be connected between switches just for routing or should something like GLBP be used?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Connecting Switches Together With IP Routing
Aug 31, 2012CiscoSwitch1(4506) has 3 VLANs(12,13,14) and Switch2(4948) has 3 different VLANs(22,23,24) and IP routing has been enabled in both switches with SVI interfaces for each vlan. intervlan routing is works fine.Now there is a requirement to connect these switches together. Vlan 12 on the Cisco switch 4506 has to be made available from vlan 22 from Switch2(4948). basically Vlan 12 is having a multicast source (225.0.0.0 & 226.0.0.0) which should be accessabile from vlan 22 of cisco switch 4948.I got 2 ideas
1) Create a trunk between these switches and configure L2 vlan(12) in cisco 4948...i know theoritically it should work but what my concern is Ip routing enabled in both switches will it create any issues? is it a gud solution to this requirement?
2) Create a separate IP network on the ports connecting to both switches and set up routes to the networks.ex- console(config)#ip route 192.168.10.10 255.255.255.0 192.168.20.1.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 / 6506 - Multicast Routing
Mar 8, 2013I am configuring multicast in a environment where I have a 4506 at each site (4 total) and a 6506 as the core. Each 4506 is connected via layer 3 to the 6506. I have a mix of 3560s, 3548s, and 2960s connected to the 4506s and the 6506 via layer 2 trunk
I have multiple multicast sources and hosts communicating at a time (multiple cameras sending video / multiple computers receiving video). So this is not a scenario where there is 1 sender and many receivers. This would be many senders (~50) and some receivers (~10)
Sample Diagram:
->3560
|
6506 --> 4506 --> 3548
| |
| --> 2960
|
4506 --> 2960
|
-->3548
I configured ip multicast-routing on each of the 4506s and on the 6506. IGMP snooping is on by default on the 3560 and 2960 switches. CGMP is on by default on the 3548 switches.
I set up PIM sparse-dense mode and IGMP version 3 on each of the layer 3 interfaces for the 4506s and 6506 where they connect and on each VLAN that is sending or receiving multicast. Multicast is working throughout the network, however I am looking to verify the configuration as I scale this out to more clients on the network.
#1 - Is it correct to us sparse-dense mode in this configuration?
#2 - Do I need to configure a rendezvous points using AUTO-RP? (ip pim send-rp-announce INTERFACE scope TTL). Not sure here if I need to designate this and what to choose. Right now I do not have this and it is working, but documentation seems to infer that I need to designate this.
#3 - Is there any other configuration settings I should be considering? I hard to find real world configurations of multicast as examples or people that know multicast routing well.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 - Upgrading Sup V To A Sup 7 Engine
Jan 4, 2013I am currently running a 4506 with a sup V engine. I have purchased a sup 7 engine. Is there a guide on how to perform this task. I am sure I need to do an IOS update as well.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Replacing SUP 6L-E With 7L-E On 4506 Switch
Dec 6, 2012We have sup engine 6L(WS-X45-SUP6L-E) on two 4506 switch. both switches connected in LAN (HSRP primary and Secondary).
We are going to replace it with Sup7LE. What is the best procedure to get this done with minimal outage?Any other important thing to be noted ? Note : We have Lincence for SUP 7LE
Cisco Switching/Routing :: PXE Failing With DHCP On 4506?
Jun 11, 2012We are attempting to PXE boot from clients obtaining their DHCP lease information from DHCP pools configured on our 4506. The PXE server, and the client are configured in separate VLANs. We have configured option 66 to point to the PXE server IP address, and the bootfile option to point to the PXE boot configuration filename. On the client side SVI, we also have configured the ip helper-address command to point to the PXE server (which also acts as another DHCP server for redundancy).
The PXE boot continuously fails stating it is unable to find the configuration file. If we remove the DHCP pool from the 4506, and allow the client to receive their DHCP lease info from the secondary server (Windows 2k8 - same server as PXE server), they PXE boot with no issues.
We have no problem obtaining DHCP info, just completion of the PXE process.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4506-E With SUP 7E Connection
Mar 19, 2013Does SUP 7E is comatible with IOS? It came with IOS-XE preloaded and there are no IOS software listed under downloads.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Switch Is Not Booting With New IOS
Apr 7, 2012Yesterday I've faced a Problem that is not letting me boot with the new IOS.
Actually I'm planning upgrade IOS which supports SSH. As part of plan I've downloaded the new IOS image and uploaded via TFTP server to the switch.
After uploading to the switch. I've verified image and MD5 hash also. Everthing is fine. Then after I set the boot variable for the newly uploaded Image.
When I'm rebooting the Device it is not taking the new IOS. It's booting with the OLD image. Even It's not showing any error message while rebooting (ACTIVITY FILE ATTACHED FOR YOUR REFERENCE) I can't take risk by deleting the old IOS.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Enable Netflow Fo 4506
May 8, 2013I have 4506 with below sup, my requirement is to enable netfolw , but as i came to know that it is not supported in this sup, is there any additional option which can be explored to get the netflow working without replacing sup.
Card Type Model
-------------------------------------------------------------+-----------------------
Sup 6-E 10GE (X2), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP6-E
Cisco WAN :: Line Card WS-x4648-RJ45-E Not Supported On 4506 Chassis
Jan 4, 2013I have 4506 chassis whose sup engine is WS-X45-SUP6L-E and recently brought line card WS-X4648-RJ45E. When i inserted very same line card on chassis is not support.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: No Inline Power On A 4506-E Port?
Oct 24, 2010We have just purchased and installed a 4506-E chassis. It contains a supervisor, two POE blades and 3 non-poe blades. Version is 12.2(53)SG1. Anyhoo, one of the ports isn't providing power to an IP phone. We can plug the phone into any of the other POE ports and it works fine. Is there a way to test an idividual port for POE problems? What could the problem be? The port works for normal data but will not provide power.
View 12 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: LACP Over Dot1q Tunnel With 4506-E And IOS 15
Mar 14, 2013i'm desperately trying to get LACP working over a dot1q Tunnel. The "Service Provider" Switches are two 4506-E Switches with SUP7-E connected via a 10G Link, running on cat4500e-universalk9.SPA.03.03.00.SG.151-1.SG
sample config:
dot1q tag vlan native
interface GigabitEthernet3/1
switchport access vlan 2001
[Code].....
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Portchannel Between 6509 And 4506 Does Not Come Up After Reloads?
Jun 8, 2012a 6509 and a 4506 with 2, 1gb interfaces in a portchannel. Bring it up and everything is fine. Save the config and reload either switch and the interfaces stay in Not Connected state. Either doing a No Shut or a physical unplug the SFP and plug it back in will bring it up with no issues. Interfaces do not go into Err Disabled state they stay in Not Connected like there is no fiber plugged into it. No error mesages in the log. The Just the Interface is now up.Both are running very new code,
6509 - s2t54-ipservicesk9-mz.SPA.150-1.SY1.bin ( 15.0.(1)SY1 )
4506 - Version 03.02.00.XO
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 Install New Supervisor / IOS Will Automatically Set Everything Up
Aug 12, 2012I have "inherited" a Catalyst 4506 with IOS version 12.2(20)EWA1 and Supervisor IV already installed. We recently purchased a second Supervisor IV and I am looking to install this second supervisor for redundancy. Is there anything special with installing a second supervisor or so I just physically install the new supervisor and the IOS will automatically set everything up?
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Core 4506 HA And DHCP Redundancy?
Dec 18, 2012I have a setup with two Cat 4506E working as a HA,I used a bundle 4Gb interfaces working as ether-channel,I'm facing a problem with DHCP pools on the both SW's,There is no problem if I use the pools on one sw,But when I but the pool on both sw's then I faced a lot of conflict IP in the DHCP pools,How can setup a real DHCP redundancy on both SW's,
View 6 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 4506 Choosing Appropriate SFPs
Mar 25, 2013My inherited network has a Cisco Catalyst 4506 with a WS-X4124FX–MT fiber card that connects to twelve Cisco 2950 switches over 62.5 micron multimode fiber at 100 Mbps. I do not know my run lengths (or even where the conduits run), but the furthest switches are well over a thousand feet from the server room. Any appropriate test equipment to provide this information soon.
We are looking at upgrading the main switch to a Catalyst WS-C4507+E with two WS-X4712-SFP+E cards and the closets to Cisco 2960S-48TD-L switches. Assuming this is a reasonable move, my question is about choosing the appropriate SFP’s for our current and future needs.
I am aware that 62.5 micron multimode fiber is the least favorable for extended lengths, but I will not be in a position to replace it for at least a year. If I purchase 10 Gbps modules, like the SFP-10G-SR or SFP-10G-LRM, can they “throttle down”, either automatically or by setting a parameter, to communicate at slower speeds over distances that exceed their 10 Gbps maximum link lengths on multimode fiber?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Restricting Mac Addresses On 4506 Switch
May 14, 2013We want to permit certain mac addresses on the cat 4506 switch wherein only those mac addresses will get access to network.
Configuration Planned: For testing purpose we have created mac access list on cat 4506 and deny laptop mac address in this access list. The mac access group is applied to the port where the laptop is connected to cat 4506.Even after applying the mac access group on the port, the laptop is able to ping the vlan ip of cat 4506 [code]
laptop with ip address 192.168.10.2/24 connected to port 2/1 is able to ping 192.168.10.1 even after applying the mac access-group
Note-we have tested same configuration on cat 3560 and its working fine. We apply the mac access-group command on interface and clear the arp-cache and we are not able to ping vlan interface ip. The moment we remove the mac access-group,ping starts again.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 - Cannot Manage One Switch Via Network
Nov 30, 2011I have three 4506 switches with vlan 4 set as the management vlan. Switch 1 is connected to switch 2 and switch 3.
I can access switch 1 and 2 using telnet from the management vlan and both switches reply to pings. But from switch 1 or 2 I cannot ping or telnet switch 3. If I plug into switch 3 and I can ping and telnet switch 3 but not switches 1 or 2.
It is as if the management vlan 4 is not being passed to/from switch 1 and 3. The configs for the uplinks from switch 1 to 2 and 3 are the same. And the configs for switches 2 and 3 look the same apart from the port settings.
I have over 40 vlans running all that work fine between all the switches.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4506 - Interface Access-list
Nov 14, 2011I have one computer connected to the 4506 that management does not want this PC to have access to anything on our network except our DHCP server and the one printer that resides on our network. I created an extended access list as follows. Our network is the 10.10.x.x and the external addresses the PC needs to access is 11.1.x.x. Once this PC is rebooted, it is unable to access DHCP to get the needed IP address it bounces back to a 169.x.x.x address and stops working.
Extended IP access list 2000
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.200.1 (gateway)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.151 eq smtp (access from the pc to external server for smtp)
permit tcp host 10.10.200.242 host 11.1.2.149 eq 5721 (access from the pc to external server for remote access)
[ code]...
Then I applied the access-group 2000 on the interface the PC is connected to. What am I missing for DHCP to work and for this PC to always get the ip address that is reserved?
