I would like to connect to a 1Gb routed uplink, and then impose bandwidth limits (via shaping/policing/whatever) on a per port basis. The ports could either be configured to route, or as switchports on separate VLANS. I'm trying to identify hardware that will let me do this. The set up I have in mind is shown below.
I am wondering if the IP Services Adv software on that switch will allow that functionality?
Now I have a 172.16.0.0/16 network with a def. gw. for internet where is a MS Forefront TMG 2010 with BSplitter for traffic shaping. I purchased an 2921, 2,5 GB RAM, security+data license and an EHWIC-D-8ESG.
I made 4 subnets in a test environment with some access-lists, nothing fancy yet. How can I use FF TMG for bandwidth management, where should I put it? For those 4 subnets the def. gw. is, normally, the 2921 router. TMG is splitting traffic by client IP.
I 3750 doesn't support "shape" command under policy map. How do I limit the bandwidth to 3 M? [code]
View 3 Replies View RelatedIf I have an interface configured as follows (on a Cisco 3750 Switch)
Interface gi 1/0/24
Bandwidth 100000
And then added the following command
srr-queue bandwidth limit 40
Would the result be 40% of the physical 1Gbps interface or 40% of the 100Mbps Bandwidth set under the interface bandwidth command.
I want to limit the bandwidth of my Catalyst 3750 series switch, I read the cisco documentation and I applied the commands but I didn't get the wanted results.
For the outbound traffic it's ok, but for the inbound traffic I used policing but I get an unstable traffic. I used, an access list and a class-map to classify the traffic and then a policy-map.(I followed the steps mentioned in this site: [URL]
how to go about config my bureau connected to HQ and separated by a WAN link of 60mb.
This is my plansplit into halves that is 30 mb for LAN connections, internet and file serving for strictly video streaming, bureaus have routers 2800 conected to HQ HQ has a router 3900
We have a low bandwith (15-20 Mbit/s) to the ASA from our Client vlan. If i connect the Client to the same vlan as the ASA is, the bandwith (90 Mbit/s) is good.
Here are the Layer 3 Design:
Client -> vlan 2 - Switch - vlan 7 -> vlan 1 - ASA 5505 -> ISP
The Layer 2 Design:
Client -> Gig2/0/13 - Switch - Gig4/0/43 -> Eth0/1 ASA5505 -> ISP
IP Address:
Client: 172.16.2.10Vlan2: 172.16.2.1Vlan7: 172.16.7.1ASA: 172.16.7.2
I assuming the switch has a problem with routing ?It is a stacked Switch with following members:
switch 1 provision ws-c3750g-12sswitch 2 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 3 provision ws-c3750g-24tsswitch 4 provision ws-c3750x-48
And we have following error message in the log from the switch:
%PLATFORM_UCAST-4-PREFIX:
One or more specific prefixes could not be programmed into TCAM and are being covered by a less specific prefix, and the packets may be software forwarded I first get the idea that the switch is overloaded with router traffic. Thats why i assuming i have to check the sdm templates, but i'm not sure if this resolves the issue.
Here are the relevant config:
ASA Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet4/0/43description ASA-inside LANswitchport access vlan 7switchport mode accessspanning-tree portfast
Client Interface on the Switch:
interface GigabitEthernet3/0/1switchport access vlan 2switchport mode accessswitchport port-securityswitchport port-security aging time 2switchport port-security violation restrictswitchport port-security aging type inactivitymacro description cisco-desktopspanning-tree portfastspanning-tree bpduguard enable
[code]...
Do I need the Universal image to perform stftp on a 3750 or 3750-X?
View 8 Replies View RelatedAs per my understanding 6509 all slots are dual channel, so 9 slot * 40 per slot (20 g in and 20 g out) = 360 GB How cisco claim the 720 ?? What about the 6513 chassic switch fabric connection?
View 5 Replies View RelatedI'm looking at adding a Cisco 3750-X switch running c3750e-universalk9-mz.122-55.SE1 (IP base license) into a stack of 3750-G switches running c3750-ipbasek9-mz.122-55.SE1.bin Given that the version and feature sets are the same I don't forsee any compatibility issues. Would there be any reason why a universal image wouldn't stack correctly with other switches running the single .bin file?
View 9 Replies View RelatedAny example to limit the bandwidth using the MAC address on 2960 ? I want to limit the bandwidth (IN / OUT) of a server only for Internet flows.
View 2 Replies View Relatedwill encrypting traffic: esp-aes 256 esp-sha-hmac across a WAN circuit drop a nics performance by half?
View 6 Replies View RelatedI have a 4500 and 6500 that I'd like to be able to limit the bandwidth of layer 2 switchports. So for instance I have all GB blades but certain servers I'd like only to have connections of about 5 Mb per second or 15 Mb per second etc.
View 1 Replies View RelatedThey have a /28 wan adress coming from ISP, that gives out 100Mbps, going to a Cisco 2960S switch (ver. 12.2) the switch is only holding 1 vlan. Connected to the 2960 are 3 firewalls/routers from other manifactors, each creating their own network. The customer wishes for a solution where each final FW/router gets minimum 33% and maximum 100% of the bandwidth, depending on how much each final Fw/router are in use.
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have a stack of switches that is at the max number of members allowed in the stack. Problem is we are running out of port density and need to add more ports. So instead of adding a whole new stack I would rather replace 2 of the 24-port swicthes with 48-port switches.
If the two 24-port swicthes we are removing are stack members and neither of them are the stack master, I should be able to replace the 24-port switches with the 48-port switches without bringing the master offline? If the new 48-port switches are running the same IOS version as the current 24-port swicthes, they should add themselves to the stack?Would I have to tell the new 48-port swicthes what switch numbers they are replacing in order for them to be added to the stack since we are at the max number of members?Also since the 48-port swicthes are replacing 24-port switches will the master give the 48-port switches the configuration for only the 24-ports?
Is there a way I can find out the amount of bandwidth i'm using on a particular interface on a 4507 cisco multi-layer switch? It is a gig port and I have it setup for monitoring (spanning) and I see packets being dropped in the "Total Output Drops" area. To me it looks like it must be exceeding the 1gig limit but I don't know a way to check to make sure. I also have the queueing strategy set to FIFO.
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have ciscl catlyst 2960 8port switch, (flash:c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.SE4/c2960-lanbasek9-mz.122-50.SE4.bin).
and in need to configure bandwidth limit for one of the port as a 1Mbps.
i have a small network with Polycom phones connected to the sf300 switch and have the pc's daisy chained via the second switch port on each phone. i have the pc traffic running on the default vlan 1 and the voice traffic running on the voice vlan 100. can i do bandwidth management on a vlan/port basis or is that not necessary. i want to ensure that the voice traffic is never impacted by the pc traffic on the same cable.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI need to know the Cisco 1841 Router FE Maximum Bandwidth Support and the Cisco 3825 Router GE Maximum Bandwidth Support. I cannot find this information in Cisco for these old devices.I would like to have the platform capability for all situation (only IP base, with QoS, with ACL, with encryption, etc.)
View 1 Replies View RelatedThe layout of the equipments are as such,other equipment <--> 2911 Router <--> Ether-Switch/3925 Router <--> 7206 <--> Internet,During certain times at night, the 2911 exhibits cpu load, high packet loss and an increase in bandwidth of at least twice it's normal amount. this results in packet loss in all the other equipment. I am attempting to locate who was demanding such a high burst but so far the graphs display normal rates for all the other equipment.Because the 2911 demands an increase from the 7206, the 7206 is able to accommodate this as it still has balance BUT my other equipment that are connected to the 7206 takes a drop in bandwidth as well. the graph shows that when the 7206 bursts higher, the rest of my other links take a slight drop in bandwidth.Also, the graph from Ether-switch to 2911 indicates the bandwidth hike BUT the graph from 2911 to ether-switch does not display the same thing as due to the cpu load, the data is somehow not captured properly.
View 2 Replies View RelatedOn Nexus 7000s I want to limit bandwidth of particular IP. I can do this using proper configuratio of IP ACL, policy map and class map. But what if I dont have information on interface? Can I apply bandwidth control for particular IP without knowing the interface?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI have a 2900 router at branch office. This router has a 4 port switch card and two gigabyte ports. The gigabyte port is use for wan connection and the 4 port switch card is use for lan connection. I have two separate networks on my lan side. (network 1 and network 2)
I have assigned port 0,1 of the switch card to vlan1 for network 1 Ports 2,3 of the switch card is assigned vlan 20 for network 2
My problem is I would like to applied a bandwidth restriction for all data coming out from vlan20 capping same to 384 kb.
Note I do not want use QOS because this will only kickin when saturation occurs,
I have cisco 2950 catalyst switch, verson IOS (tm) C2950 Software (C2950-I6Q4L2-M), Version 12.1(20)EA1a, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
So. for one of my port (FE 0/3) i need to put the bandwith limit 512 kbps, how to configure the above same.
Note:- I configured the below but no effect
1. interface FastEthernet0/3description * CONT TO B-CENTER *switchport access vlan 10switchport mode accessbandwidth 1024speed 10
2. and there is no srr bandwidth limit option for 2950, but the same is working for 2960.
I have CISCO 1720 with WIC 1 ENET installed. My ISP provides 20 Mbps internet bandwidth
Do I need to change the Ethernet interface to 100? .. if yes, what interface model should I use?
I`m searching about bandwidth control down and upstream with vlans, i found many options but no one works good, follow some examples i have found on the internet
View 1 Replies View RelatedI was looking at a problem where a traffic from certain sites have a restricted bandwidth, an ongoing problem for a year or so, apparently this throughput never exceeds around 25Mbps. My customer describes a situation where the end to end utilisation rises, eventually flat-lining at around 25Mbps. how many extra systems come on line, this traffic never exceeds this rate, and end users complain of poor responses.
During my investigation I found that one of the switches (Cat 6509) in the traffic path has a policer configured on a vlan interface, the policer has 3 sections for different traffic based on DSCP markers, and a default (unconfigured) class-default. Various people have had a poke about with this config over the years, with the result that all the traffic has the CoS and DSCP tags set to 0. All this traffic is hitting the class-default in the policer.The link that this traffic hits the Cat 6509 on is a 100Mbps link.
If I was designing this from scratch I'd probably configure a rate for the class-default.my question is, in the case where no specific configuration has been entered for the class-default, how much bandwidth is allocated to this class?
I have the following setup:
Cisco 1921 is my core router and connected to it is a 30 Mbit fiberline
VLAN1
VLAN2
Now, the thing is that i want VLAN2 to have a 5 Mbit bandwidth limit to Internet but full speed to VLAN1.
I have played around with Rate limit without success.
I also have access to cisco switches that can limit the bandwidth.
Any idea for limiting bandwidth on cisco 892F router? We have 2 VLANs through our LAN and one must be limited upto 1Mbps or 512Kbps.
View 2 Replies View RelatedI have the requirement to assign an asymmetric bandwith limit to each port on a switch (example: 4Mbps downlink, 1Mbps uplink). I've been searching and found the option to apply policers or srr-queue mechanism to achive this, however this only applies for one direction only as far as I know. Catalyst 2960 familiy is preferred, however if this is not possible, will possibly jump to the 3560X family.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCBWFQ kicks in when the interface becomes congested and there is no available space in the queue but I need to find a solution to the scenario below:Im using a Gigabit interface on the 3945 Router that connects to the ISP. The ISP limits bandwidth to 60Mb so I need to make sure when I reach the limit of the 60Mb the router starts using the BW percentages defined in the policy-map using classes. any kind of traffic go out as it wants but as soon as the 60Mb limit is reached, the priorities defined by the traffic classes will kick in just as if the interface ran out of queues (as CBWFQ usually works).
View 7 Replies View RelatedMy company is composed of three different campuses, all with a similar network topology. We currently are experiencing high bandwidth on our serial interface at one of the campuses in particular. The network is composed of about 20 VLANS routed internally using a Cisco 6509. Traffic to the outside is PAT’d by an ASA 5510 and then forwarded through our edge router interface. Each VLAN is PAT’d to a specific public address.Due to the PAT, how would you recommend determining what specific private addresses are consuming our resources on the serial interface. When I look at our NMS, it reports the public address, but that only narrows it down to a VLAN. For example, all the devices in VLAN 6 are translated to 146.34.118.245, and 146.34.11.245 is a top talker.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCurrently, we have a Cisco router (28xx), ASA 5520, and a core switch 4500. We have different vlans. We also have Auto QoS running for our Cisco IP Phones.My manager just asked me to see if I can either reserve some certain bandwidth for one vlan, or give that vlan higher priority on internet traffic than the others.
1.) Anyway we can reserve some more bandwidth for one vlan than other vlans?
2.) If #1 cannot be done, how can we provide higher priority on the internet traffic to one vlan than the others?
3.) Is #1 or #2 the same config? If not, which one would be easier (without changing our current QoS settings)?
4.) If 1 or 2 can be done, which device I should config the settings on?
5.) This question may be duplicate, but do we need to reset our current QoS to achieve the goal?
I have 2 links to 2 different departments switch with an up link of 10mb. I want to guarantee that both departments get at least 5mb, but can use part of the other 5mb that not in use. Is this possible?
View 3 Replies View Related
