I`m searching about bandwidth control down and upstream with vlans, i found many options but no one works good, follow some examples i have found on the internet
View 1 RepliesWe are using cisco ME 3400 E series switch. Which port we can use as CFM port ? We configured CFM in gig port.Is all the ports will act as CFM port or any separate CLI command is there for enable ?
View 0 Replies View RelatedOn Nexus 7000s I want to limit bandwidth of particular IP. I can do this using proper configuratio of IP ACL, policy map and class map. But what if I dont have information on interface? Can I apply bandwidth control for particular IP without knowing the interface?
View 3 Replies View RelatedI want to limit the bandwidth of my Catalyst 3750 series switch, I read the cisco documentation and I applied the commands but I didn't get the wanted results.
For the outbound traffic it's ok, but for the inbound traffic I used policing but I get an unstable traffic. I used, an access list and a class-map to classify the traffic and then a policy-map.(I followed the steps mentioned in this site: [URL]
We purchased ME 3400 switch and trying to implement it. But its quite surprising in the ME3400 configuration guide that the switch does not support VTP. When I checked in Feature navigator under feature "VTP" i could see ME3400 supports VTP. But when i get into CLI of ME3400, i am not getting any option of configuring VTP. I could see in some sites VMPS is supported in ME3400.
I would like to confirm the following:
1. Does VTP support present in ME3400 or not? If not, what would be the reason that it is not included in ME3400.
2. If not what is the alternative.
Network is already running VTP of around 30 switches.
I have a problem at a place where 5 ME3400 switches are connected in a straight line. I can't do much about the topology of that place, but the problem is they are all DHCP Snooping, but uni cast replies from the dhcp server further up the hierarchy gets eaten by the first switch! I can't really see why it not only inspects in and whines about it not being for itself - it then drops the message.
What have we done wrong (apart from the actual layout of that place, which I can't really change)?
Sep 28 13:49:29: DHCP_SNOOPING: received new DHCP packet from input interface (GigabitEthernet0/1)
Sep 28 13:49:29: DHCP_SNOOPING: process new DHCP packet, message type: DHCPOFFER, input interface: Gi0/1, MAC da: 7444.012d.debd, MAC sa: 0013.1a4a.65c7, IP da: XX.YY.186.7, IP sa: XX.YY.186.1, DHCP ciaddr: 0.0.0.0, DHCP yiaddr: XX.YY.186.7, DHCP siaddr: 0.0.0.0, DHCP giaddr: 0.0.0.0, DHCP chaddr: 7444.012d.debd
Sep 28 13:49:29: DHCP_SNOOPING: binary dump of option 82, length: 20 data:
[Code] ......
It really should just send it on, as with any uni cast not on the switch itself - it should go out Gi0/2 really. Why isn't it?
[core] -- [sw1] -- [sw2] -- [sw3] -- [sw4] -- [sw5]
All the trunks are trusted, DAI is on (I've tried shutting it off, as well), port-security is used but it's actually not dying on the switch having the client computer, but the first one in the chain with dhcp snooping.
I have a Cisco switch 3400-ME, it's running IOS1.bin file. Now i want to change the running IOS to IOS0.bin.I entered 2 commands:
boot system flash:dir1/IOS0.bin
boot system flash:dir1/IOS1.bin
But when i show running config, it has no any boot system commands. when i relboot that switch?
We just installed a Cisco ME-3400EG switch at one of our sites. A Cisco C3750X switch is connected to the 3400. When we run the command CDP NEIGHBORS, the 3400 shows no devices. We can access the 3750 via the 3400. Also, when we run CDP NEIGHBORS on the 3750 we do not see the 3400 (but other devices are displayed). How can we get CDP to display the devices on the 3400? We have already tryed CDP RUN.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have several computers connected to the network, can I restrict the download bandwidth on specific computer?
View 3 Replies View Relatedi have a 3550 catalyst and i configured it for bandwidth controlling i have used POLICE command its work fine and i saw it limit the bandwidth but there is a little problem when i limit the bandwidth at 1024000 and i useing all the bandwidth and monitor the bandwidth i see it shows the network uses half bandwidth.
View 6 Replies View RelatedI want to control bandwidth of our computers in network. We are using TPLINK routers. I already done ipqos setting in the main router but it doesn't really effective. I also tried ipqos in the routers(which is used as WAP) but it also not effective.
View 8 Replies View RelatedI have a router with 2 service providers connectivity with different ASN and running with BGP.I've announce few IP-prefix by ISP-A and Few Prefix by ISP-B.Both are working well with redundancy.But,Problem is here, that the all uplink bandwidth goes through ISP-A link.I want to make it that, ISP-A routed ip-Prefix's upload data will go through ISP-A & ISP-B IP-Prefix's Upload data will go through ISP-B Link.
View 9 Replies View RelatedI am using a win server 2008 in my company, recently my staff have being using internet a lot for downloading and many other unnecessary software therby redusing overall bandwidth.Is there any software solution i can use for controlling bandwidth of my client computer from server2008 computer.
View 3 Replies View Relatedwhat are branded include bandwidth control function , dual WAN port
View 1 Replies View RelatedThis has finally become a BIG problem. Any time I have iTunes running and downloading podcasts, it hogs all the bandwidth for the Internet (but not the local network). This is not only slowing down access from the machine running iTunes and the downloads but for every other device trying to web browse.I'm running two Macs and one Windows/Dell PC on the network. All are hard-wired (Ethernet) to the DIR-655. How to throttle iTunes? I did some research and found that I am apparently not the only one having this issue.I'm about to bail on iTunes entirely and try to get used to Miro, which does allow bandwidth control.
View 3 Replies View RelatedRegion : UnitedArabEmirates
Model : TL-WR941ND
Hardware Version : Not Clear
Firmware Version : 3.13.9 Build 120201 Rel.54965n
ISP : etisalat.ae
How to controller wireless bandwidth in WE941ND.
I would like to know about asa 5500-x. Does it supports application visibility and granular control for different applications. Moreover bandwidth control based on different users and different applications
View 1 Replies View RelatedWe have 3 sets of applications. The first does not require much bandwidth but is very critical, the other two is more bandwidth consuming but less critical. I would like to know if it's possible to reflect this priorities on the router configuration. Is it possible to set the ports 10000, 10001 and 10002 of the external IP have higher priority to be handled, for example? Also, is it possible to limit the bandwidth that goes through a set of ports?
I must prevent the 2 sets of less critical applications to strugle the critical ones. What router can provide this capabilities? Is the 1921 able to do this job?
Region : Spain
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version :
I have a TD-W8970. In settings "Bandwidth Manager" there is an option to put a value between 1 and 8, but does not specify which is better (1 or 8). What the value to give more priority to a computer to another?
Region : India
Model : TD-W8968
Hardware Version : V1
Firmware Version : 0.6.0 1.1 v0005.0 Build 120926 Rel.27100n
ISP : MTNL
After lot of troubleshooting and efforts I figured out there seems to be BUG with routers firmware 0.6.0 1.1 v0005.0 Build 120926 Rel.27100n.When you enable Bandwidth control, FTP stops working from Internet. However, it does work from local network. When you disable Bandwidth control, FTP starts working from internet as well as local network.
Region : UnitedKingdom
Model : TL-MR3220
Hardware Version : V2
Firmware Version :
ISP :
Looking at the manual for this router in regards to bandwidth restrictions.When you set up the Rules under Bandwidth Control does this setting shared by the IP range or does each IP in the range get that amount of bandwidth?
I would like to enable port security to hardcode the MAC address on the ethernet switch. There are 5 ethernet ports in the same ethernet switch to be assigned for one person (one note book), e.g. port 5, 6, 15, 16 and 23. The model of ethernet switch is cisco 2960S and one MAC address is configured on 2960S.
1. Does 2960S support this requirement to allow input the same MAC address to 5 different port?
2. If yes, can ethernet switch "smart" enough to forward the packages to "active" ethernet port which is connected to notebook and the rest of four ports are inactive.
3. if no, any solution or any work around to achieve this requirement
I met a strange problem after enabling flow-control in 2960s.my enviroment,
- 2 cisco 2960s 24ts-l have been created a stack
- IOS is 12.2(58)se2
- all ports have been enabled flowcontrol receive dersied
via show flowcontrol, I can see each Gigabyte Port have been enabled "flowcontrol receive desired" but, when I do the following tests
- connect equallogic ps4000xv to the port 21, I found the status of port is "input flow-control is off"
- connect one server with Broadcom Gigabyte Network adapter, which has been enable TX ON RX ON, or Auto, the status of the port is still "input flow-control is off"
I guess, the port status should be ""input flow-control is on". Test them with another port, I got the same result. why?
I will have this one router. Its f0/0 will be for the Internet connection with bandwidth of 30Mbps. Its f0/1 will be connected to a switch for internal networks. This link will be separated to 3 VLANs for 3 internal networks. I'm wondering if there is a way to gurantee 10Mbps for each VLAN but allow use up to 30Mbps when another two VLANs are not using any Internet bandwidth? I only worry about download bandwidth from internet.The 3 internal networks will all have public IPs and they belong to their own subnets. There won't be NAT/PAT.
View 18 Replies View RelatedI am in the process of setting up an interop lab for some engineers. The enviornment will consist of some 3750's, H3C's and ProCurves. My concern is that the end user will have Priv-Exec access for CLI usage on the 3750's and they can change the "en" password (I hope they don't but it has happened).Is there a way I can "break in" during the boot process to reset the password? The reason I am doing it this way is because I have an Altiris server with rebuild automation scripts in xpect and I would like to automate the process so I do not have to use a manual factory default reset.
View 5 Replies View RelatedI have 2 ME3600Xs and utilize Broadcast and Multicast storm control on client facing interfaces. One of my ME3600s is reporting a Multicast storm and that a packet filter action has been applied. The strange thing is that it is showing up on an Admin Down interface that has nothing connected to it. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedWe are facing a strange issue, our ACE 20 got failed due to power issue , after RMA once we are installing ACE 20 to 6509 , the status LED is showing ORANGE . The sh module shows it as " Others " ... The IOS is same as it was previously in 6509 .
View 2 Replies View RelatedI use a C2950-24 switch, with IOS 12.1(22)EA12 release.When I try to connect in console mode, I can see the "Press RETURN to get started!" message, but it's not possible to me to have the # prompt.An "authorization failed" message is displayed. And the same message is prompted.
I try to recover password by following the recovery procedure. After the boot command, I never see the message "Continue with the configuration dialog? [yes/no]: ".
We have around a dozen Catalyst 3560 and 2960 switches in a ring topology. We are considering adding storm control to our trunk ports. Up until now we have only used it on edge ports with default values and without error-disable.I am proposing that we also add storm control to trunk ports at a lower level and that we error-disable only the redundant links that make up our loops.
-storm-control broadcast level 25.00 20.00
-storm-control multicast level 2.00 1.00
-storm-control action shutdown [only on redundant links]
In a storm all links will restrict broadcast which should work accessing remote switches, but the redundant links should errdisable and block the redundant path. It is important that the action line is not applied to links that are not redundant as we could isolate parts of the network. Any reason not to use storm control on trunks?
I have 2 devices which need to communicate through Logical Link Control. Each device functions like this: they have a built in network switch that allows their internal components to communicate with TCP/IP which is then encapsulated inside LLC frames and sent out a special port. The LLC frames from each device all come from a single source MAC address and are broadcast out the network. The receiving deivce receives the LLC frames, unencapsulates the data and uses it directly.
Using it this way through a single 2960 (such that device 1 is connected to fa0/2 and device 2 is connected to fa0/23) with its own dedicated VLAN and no other traffic on the switch (all other ports shutdown), the two devices are unable to "connect". Using a SPAN session, I can clearly see them exchanging LLC frames, but if I connect my computer to the internal device switch and try to ping the other device through the LLC encapsulated link, I get anywhere from a 25% to 100% loss with response times between 2ms and 15ms.
When I connect the special ports of each device together directly with a straight through cat-5e cable, they can connect and I can successfully ping through the link with sub-millisecond response times. The same goes if I connect them through an old unmanaged Linksys switch. I have toggled everything on the 2960 I can think of, including STP, CDP, LLDP, storm control, keepalives, IGMP snooping, management interface VLAN1, and QoS. In general, the more of those that I turned off, the faster the ping responses became, but nothing seems to stop the data loss.
I need to configure the C3560-24TS, QoS control by IP or subnet.i tried to study books and videos many times but still feel i am not well known about QOs...
View 1 Replies View Relatedwe have configured SSh on our primary and secondry core switch , SSH is working on primary Switch but we are unabme to access secondry Core switch through SSH .
Error are as under :
ov 28 09:14:15.380: SSH1: starting SSH control process
ov 28 09:14:15.380: SSH1: sent protocol version id SSH-2.0-Cisco-1.25
ov 28 09:14:15.396: SSH1: protocol version id is - SSH-2.0-PuTTY_Release_0.62
ov 28 09:14:15.396: SSH2 1: send: len 280 (includes padlen 4)
ov 28 09:14:15.400: SSH2 1: SSH2_MSG_KEXINIT sent
[code]...
As per my understanding 6509 all slots are dual channel, so 9 slot * 40 per slot (20 g in and 20 g out) = 360 GB How cisco claim the 720 ?? What about the 6513 chassic switch fabric connection?
View 5 Replies View Related