Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6509 Interface Alarm?
Jul 10, 2012
I am getting alarms on Solarwind indicating interface down on "GigabitEthernet 4/7 - Gi4/d1" and "GigabitEthernet 4/8 - Gi4/d2" from our core switch 6509.Remote login to the switch does not show the interfaces when I do the "sh run" command. Now I am at site trying to identify and diagnose this fault.Looking at the numbering on the switch, it indicates to me the card where these alarms come from is from the 'intrusion dectection module'
how I may login and identify this interfaces and rectify these alarms.
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 9, 2012
I have a Cisco 5548 Nexus switch with 10Gbase-SR interface transceiver. This interface is connected to Server chasis.
The show interface transceiver details output shows High ++ alarm for Current. Additionally, i am getting output errors on this interface.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I'm receiving multicast traffic (400Mbps) on port 9/38 and sending it out on port gi9/48. I'm trying to achieve that traffic will stay within the card without using the switchfabric,
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 1, 2011
I came across a Catalyst 6509 switch configuration and have noticed some strange thing on the ether channel configuration side, it appears that it have interface port-channel 2 and port-channel 2A, what was that mean? its the ether channel not forming and joined together?
What wrong with the below configuration that cause it to automatic created another port-channel (2A) interface in this case?
[code]...
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 15, 2012
we have Supervisor Engine 720 10GE (VS-S720-10G) in slot 5 on Catalyst 6509-E. Slot 6 is free. We need to replace VS-S720-10G. Is it possible the following scenario
1. we will insert new VS-S720-10G into the slot 6
2. then we will remove the faulty VS-S720-10G from the slot 5
Will everything work without interuptions. Is any document where I can find step-by-step procedure how to replace VS-S720-10G ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
Our customer is willing to have a Cisco Nexus 5020 to provide server connectivity and this Nexus would go connected to their core switch 6509. They are concern about Spanning tree compatibility between the Nexus and the 6509. Are they fully compatible for Spanning tree?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 15, 2012
I have seen links out there for a conversion tool to convert commands on a Catalyst type switch (6509) to newer IOS type switches(4500-e) switches but they all error out on me on a 404. Any link where I can get this conversion tool?
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
I am doing image upgrade on Catalyst 6509-E. During TFTP image transfer to sup-bootflash I always see !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!o!!!!!!!!!! "o" out of sequence packet. Although the image size seems to be correct at the end but there is always some "o" packets.
I am assuming not, but I haven't tried loading with the image after seeing this.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2013
if a connect to the switch via Internet Explorer or every other browser I can't enter configuration because I receive a screen as you can view in image below. And I can view those errors:
message: 're_preFlt_txt33' is not defined
Linea: 31
Carattere: 1
Codice: 0
URI:
[URL]
If I connect in HTTPS with IE8 in compatibility mode I view the image as in attachment with_https.jpg.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 14, 2012
We are looking for a solution that to use Sub-interface on a routed port on 6509, instead of using a SVI on it.Are there any different when using Sub-interface?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2013
How (and is) it possible to rate limit pps on an interface (physical/logical), on a 6509-E?The porpuse is to protect from attacks which lead to very high pps, bypassing traffic rate-limits, and effecting the device's performance
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 20, 2012
At one of my sites, I have a 100mbit TLS. For this connection to work properly, the port on my end needs to be setup for 100mbit, full duplex. When I connect the TLS to an interface on my Cisco 2821, configured at 100/full, it works perfectly. Now the confusing part, I'm trying to connect the TLS to a Catalyst 2960. I configure the necessary port for 100/full, and get 'notconnect' on that interface. I set the interface to auto/auto, and it negotiates at 100/half and causes collisions and packet loss.
View 9 Replies
View Related
Oct 24, 2011
i'd like to configure OSPF on a Catalyst 6503 IOS 12.2.17.i habe an Gi1/9 with the ip address 192.168.97.30/24 and a VLAN 19 with the IP Address 192.168.19.0/24.I configured OSPF like this
router ospf 1
network 192.168.97.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
network 192.168.19.0 0.0.0.255 area 10.5.0.0
on the ospf peer is see that the adjaceny is established but i don't get the routes for the 192.168.19.0 network i checked the ip ospf interface vlan 19; i got ospf is not enabled on the interface then i tried to configure
int vlan 19
ip ospf 1 area 10.5.0.0
but it does not access ip ospf 1
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 13, 2013
One of my Catalyst 3750 switch have many out drops, I execute "sh mls qos int g2/0/3 statist" command, there are many output drops in queue3 threshold3. [code]
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jan 21, 2013
Platform:
cisco6509-E with FWSM
Supervisor Engine 32 PISA 8GE
sup-bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.ZY2.bin
command:
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
(config)#no ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
#clear ip nat tran *
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
%Port 14029 is being used by system
Or %Static entry in use, cannot change
But when I perform "sh ip nat tran" command,There is nothing
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
I have the follow error in a SW3750:
%SFF8472-5-THRESHOLD_VIOLATION: Te2/0/1: Voltage low alarm; Operating value: 0.00 V, Threshold value: 3.07 V.
I used the command:
#sho interfaces transceiver
If device is externally calibrated, only calibrated values are printed.
++ : high alarm, + : high warning, - : low warning, -- : low alarm.
NA or N/A: not applicable, Tx: transmit, Rx: receive.
[Code]....
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 12, 2013
Q. Does the Supervisor 720 support all existing Cisco Catalyst 6500 series interface and services module, protecting customer investments?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 20, 2013
Our customer get the problem that the switch count the 5mins input/output rate of connected traffic interface always ZERO.The problem only occur in the module 3,4 and 5 interface, module 2 has no problems.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Catayst 4506E
12.2(52)SG
Chassis Type : WS-C4506-E
Power consumed by backplane : 0 Watts
Mod Ports Card Type Model Serial No.---+-----+--------------------------------------+------------------+-----------1 6 Sup 6-E 10GE (X2), 1000BaseX (SFP) WS-X45-SUP6-E 2 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4548-GB-RJ45 3 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4648-RJ45-E 4 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4648-RJ45-E 5 48 10/100/1000BaseT (RJ45) WS-X4648-RJ45-E
[code]....+
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 6, 2011
i have an 2921 connected to an Catalyst 3560. My router interface shows quite a lot of input queue drops. Load is not too much max 5/255.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 15, 2012
I have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error:
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..
View 3 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3
I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis?Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 21, 2011
I currently have a couple of 6509 chassis (router/switches) with the following hardware blades:
x3 48 ports
x1 NAM
x2 Sup720
Running 12.2(18)SXF3.I am keeping the four Sup720 modules and have purchased new versions of the others blades including two new 6509-E chassis. Can I take my stand-by Sup720 out of the production machine and insert it into the new chassis?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 1, 2012
I have a Cisco ASA 5505 and I have my internal and external interfaces configured but I currently cannot ping from the inside to an IP Address on the outside. I had this setup and working and I have another set of equirement that I am replacing that is working with my service provider so I know it is a configuration issue. When I ping 4.2.2.2 for example I get:
Destination host unreachable
Do I need to add a static route from my inside interface to my outside interfaces?
: Saved
:
ASA Version 8.2(5)
!
hostname pxasa
[Code].....
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 18, 2011
I have the folowing nat configuration on my catalyst 6509-E with a sup720-10G that does not work, and gives a erros messague:
ip vrf testes
rd 6900:5
interface Vlan1111
description liga
ip vrf forwarding testes
ip address 192.168.63.91 255.255.255.248
ip nat inside
[code]....
This configuration generates the folowing error:
NAT: translation failed (A), dropping packet s=128.2.21.21 d=192.168.63.185
If i change the nat overload to a static nat, everything? Is there any wrong with this configuration ?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 11, 2012
we've had an issue with our network, we have 2 6509 connected with redundancy, which are connected with 2 x 4900 Switches, from which are connected to a ESX Chassis for visualization, the thing is that the ESX stopped working, and the 4900 switches, and the main core were suffering from overload, they hang on it very well, in order to stop the overload, one of the links to the ESX Chassis were disconnected from one of the 4900 switches. The CPU usage from the 4900 and the core(6509) went down below 40%, and then they started to migrate the virtual servers from the chassis to another 2 chassis that were added right after. They were actually working well, but suddenly the 6509 changed to the other supervisor after everything was OK. We were wondering what could have been the cause of this, maybe the virtual servers migrations, maybe the overload from the ESX ? We also had a few question, is there any need to reload the cores every few months as a planned task ? Because the cores have been up for more than 1 year. And also is there any kind of of tool to monitor the CPU status, or the status overall from the cores or the switches ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Apr 11, 2012
The have around 80 staff and I think the current infrastructure is overkill for the size of the company. The current kit is old and they have no GB ethernet ports. They currently have:-
Core Switch:
1x Cisco c6509with a 48 port fast ethernet module (WS-X6248-RJ-45)
and an 8 port fibre module (WS-X6408A-GBIC)
I'm looking to replace this with something with 72 ethernet ports and 8 fibre ports
Access Switches:
2x 3500Replacement needs at least 48 ports and 2 fibre modules each
and 2x 5500Replacement needs at least 72 ports and 2 fibre modules each.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
If client gateway = 192.168.64.9 then next-hop = 192.168.64.8 else use default-route 0.0.0.0
I know it's possible to do a route-map match ip-address ACL list. But is it possible to match on gateway?
Some info about hardware and config:
6509-E in VSS (IOS 12.2(17r)SX5) withVS-S720-10G supervisor.
All routes are static, IP for 192.168.64.9 is on SVI vlan.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 6, 2012
I have two ISPs. Each is on it's own subnet connected to the 6509 MSFC/Switch. FW1 is on 100.1.100.0/30 and FW2 is on 200.1.200.0/30 subnet. My goal is route all traffice going to the Internet from subnet 10.133.3.0/24 to FW1 and all other subnets across the organization to FW2. I am not sure if I need to use ACL / Static route combo, or just a static routes or ACLS?
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
We have a Catalyst 6509 switch, and we hope to use policy based routing to redirect http traffic to my proxy server, where I can find the configuration example?
View 11 Replies
View Related
Jul 1, 2012
I have a problem with the time synchronization via NTP between a Catalyst 2960 and Catalyst 6509. When I configure the 6509 switch as a NTP reference on the 2960, it does not synchronize with the 6509's NTP server. There is no reachability or ACL-related issue between both switches.
As soon as I configure a second Catalyst 6509 (which is completely identical to the other 6509 and in the same subnet) as a NTP server for the 2960, the time sync with the second 6509 happens immediality.
The first 6509 switch works as a NTP reference for at least 50 other switches and routers in the network - so why not for this one more switch? I checked some "debug ntp packet" and "debug ntp events" outputs and can clearly watch the NTP requests going out of the 2960, but on the 6509 just nothing happens - no debug outputs for this specific 2960, while requests from other devices come in all the time.
Maybe you have already experienced this strange behaviour in the past or got some deeper knowledge in the Cisco NTP server implementation. I could think of some sort of "maximum client limit" in the IOS NTP server, but could not find any mechanism like this in the standard NTP specification. Eventually, you can approve that this is a IOS-specific issue.
View 13 Replies
View Related
Feb 10, 2013
I need to configure on a cisco catalyst 6509 two VACL. On cisco 6509 there are already two SPAN ports configured, there are problems configuring other two VACL?
These VACLs send traffic to a Traffic Analyzer (SIEM), there are particular configurations to facilitate the operation?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Nov 8, 2012
I would like to ask you if it's possibile to block routing between some Vlan for just once of them.
Maybe I can explain better:
I've got a Cisco 6509 with 4 configured vlan interfaces
Int Vlan 10 10.10.1.0/24
Int Vlan 20 10.10.2.0/24
Int Vlan 30 10.10.3.0/24
Int Vlan 40 10.10.4.0/24
Vlan "10" is the phone voip Vlan and it must not talk with the others Vlan. The others Vlan can comunicate normally except with Vlan "10".
Pratically Vlan "10" needs to be isolated from the others.
This equirement comes becouse Vlan 10 is wireless and has the WEP key encryption (very weak protocol). Some Phone couldn't support the WPA2 key and I need to avoid an unauthorized external client, cracking the WEP key and connecting to this WiFi, could have free access to the others Vlan.
View 5 Replies
View Related
Nov 14, 2012
I have a problem on my catalyst 6509 on which I would like to do the following things :
I have some Vlans in which multicast is enabled.
In tose Vlan theres is a router which is default router for equipements.
I had enabled multicast routing because some Vlan needs to exchange multicast informations, but I wolud like to make difference between Multicast traffic. For example I have 5 vlans:
Vlan 1 and 2 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 3 and 4
Vlan 3 and 5 need to exchange Multicast informations but the don't need multicast information from Vlan 1 and 2
Vlan 5 is independant Vlan but doesn't need to have multicast information from all others vlan.
Last problem, equipement on differents vlan can use the same Mulkticast group address. In this case, Multicast routing is not working between Vlan 1 to Vlan 2 and Vlan 3 to Vlan 4.
View 6 Replies
View Related
