Cisco Switching/Routing :: Use Sub-interface On Routed Port On 6509

Mar 14, 2012

We are looking for a solution that to use Sub-interface on a routed port on 6509, instead of using a SVI on it.Are there any different when using Sub-interface?

View 3 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750E / Applying ACLs When Routing Between SVI And Routed Interface?

Mar 12, 2013

Quick question here. Using 3750E series switches with multiple VLANS configured. These switches serve as our 'core'. I have SVIs configured for the different VLANs and add inbound ACLs in each of the SVIs to control traffic between VLANS. This switch also terminates a P2P Ethernet link which connects to our Colo facility. The port used for this is configured as an L3 port. I noticed today that I was able to send traffic across this L3 link that I thought should have been blocked by an ACL I had in place but it wasn't. So the traffic flowed from a port in say VLAN 20 across this L3 link (assigned with an IP address). Would this traffic flow not cause traffic to be checked against an ACL applied in the inbound direction on the SVI of VLAN 20 (int vlan 20)? Traffic does get checked when routing between SVIs. Why would it not get checked when routing between SVI and L3 interface?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6509 Fwsm Multiple Subnets Routed On One Port From 3750

Dec 20, 2010

We have a 6509 that was connected to 2 other locations(location A and B) and our local lan (location MAIN).  We wanted to move the location A and B to a 3750 switch and only allow the traffic that needed to access our location MAIN to come through the firewall.  The only problem I ran into is that before location A and B were on different interfaces so in the 6509 firewall the routes for traffic to our MAIN location was done by static routes.
 
I.E.
static (MAIN_intf,A_intf) 192.1.1.72 10.94.10.72 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0
static (MAIN_intf,B_intf) 192.2.2.72 10.94.10.72 netmask 255.255.255.255 0 0

[Code]....

because it has a static overlap, which makes sense to me, but my question is how do I configure the network to get this to work?  Do I have to reconfigure my network and access-list?  Do I need to add more ports between the 6509 and 3750?  I'm not sure if this is the best way to do what we want. If something is not clear I'll try my best to explain the setup, but I just took over for our I.T. guy when he left.
 
I put 10.10.10.72 instead I should have put 10.94.10.72. the routed port is on a different subnet than the computer I'm trying to access.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 Switch - Routed Interface / Traffic Composition

Feb 21, 2012

On a router I can use IP Accounting or Netflow to see what kind of traffic is moving over an interface.  Are there any tools on a 3750 switch with a routed interface which would tell you who is hogging the bandwidth on that interface?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3550 / Routing Protocol Neighbor Between SVI And Routed Port?

Apr 18, 2012

I have a collapsed core design with routed ports between all components. Access layer switches, data center switches, core/aggregation. All routed (no spanning-tree at all).Now...I have to add an IBM BladeCenter with a BNT layer 3 switch to my topology. However, those nasties don't seem to support routed ports.How can I have a routed port on my cisco switch and a standard access port on the BNT and still establish an adjacency with an SVI? I am running OSPF, but I am labbing this in my home lab with 2 x 3550s and EIGRP.
 
On SW2:
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711: EIGRP: Received HELLO on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1
*Mar  1 00:57:00.711:   AS 999, Flags 0x0, Seq 0/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303: EIGRP: Sending UPDATE on Vlan100 nbr 10.1.1.1, retry 9, RTO 5000 tid 0
*Mar  1 00:57:02.303:   AS 999, Flags 0x1, Seq 17/0 interfaceQ 0/0 iidbQ un/rely 0/0 peerQ un/rely 0/1

[code].....

View 10 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 7600 - Assign Vlan On Routed Port?

Apr 12, 2013

Actually i have 7600 router and all trafic passes through Gi0/1(Routed port) interface to 6500 series switch. I need to create  a vlan on this router  eg. vlan 10 Any how it is possible assign a vlan to routed port and traffic of wan interfaces and the vlan traffic  passed together.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3560G Routed Port Connected To E1 Converter?

May 25, 2013

I have made a routed port on 3560G Switch and defined a pool 172.28.4.62 255.255.255.192 and connected to E1 converter RAD (4E1 to 4 FE) the E1 media is through Microwave on the other end same E1 converter is connected through layer 2 switch and defined a pool as of routed port configured in 3560G switch.
  
The port is generating lot of giants and after a while it also distrubs other routes ( Port1 to Port 16), configured with Vlan11 and port 22 as routed port.I have checked the routed port through wireshark the maximum frame size is 1514 and configured the MTU to 1514, giants are not showing any more but after 10 to 12 hours switch gets hang. Either to shut the port or to reload the switch to get switch and other layer routes to be normal.
 
I have checked speed and duplex settings same as E1 converter. Full duplex. 100 Speed. Why switch is not behaving normal. If I shutdown the routed port it is normal.
  
1. interface GigabitEthernet0/22
no switchport
ip address 172.28.4.62 255.255.255.192
flowcontrol receive on
end

[code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Possible To Configure QoS On 4500 Sup7 On Layer 3 Routed Port

Apr 26, 2013

I want to know if is it possible to configure QoS on a 4500 Sup7 on a Layer 3 routed port like the following example (Similar to CBWFQ on IOS Router)?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Duplex Mode On HSRP Routed Port On 3750

Nov 15, 2012

What should the duplex mode to be set on a routed port gi0/21 that are running HSRP ? I try setting the gi0/21 to full, but it caused the port to be down. The only way for the port to be up is setting it to half duplex.
 
Cisco 3750 Switch
==============
interface GigabitEthernet0/21
no switchport
ip address 10.200.104.34 255.255.255.248

[Code].....

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 4506s - Switch Virtual Interface (SVI) Versus Routed Physical Port

Feb 28, 2012

What are the pros and cons of configuring a Switch Virtual Interface (SVI) versus a routed physical port between layer 3 switches?For example, if I have two 4506s and have a need to run HSRP and route between them which feature is better and why?
 
switch_a
!
interface vlan 25
ip address 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
!
interface fa0/1
switchport mode trunk

[code].....

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 5520 Configure Traffic Flow Between Computers Inside VLANs And Routed Port

Jul 7, 2012

How to configure traffic flow between  computers inside VLANs and a routed port? Here is the setup details:
 
1. Switch 3750-X
2. VLAN 100 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.100.1 /24)
3. VLAN 200 - ( SVI IP address 192.168.200.1 /24)
4. routed port gi1/0/48 (IP address 192.168.150.1 /24). Note: this port is directly connected to a firewall ASA 5520 port IP 192.168.150.100 /24
 
Ip routing is enabled on the switch and inter vlan traffic is flowing ok. I can ping the routed port gi1/0/48 from  any computer connected in the VLAN 100 or 200. For example computer with IP 192.168.100.25 can ping the routed port 192.168.150.1. Switch can ping firewall port 192.168.150.100 and the 'sh ip route' command shows the network 192.168.150.0 /24 as directly connected network.
 
any computer in the two VLANs CANNOT ping firewall ASA port 192.168.150.100   Is it because inter VLAN routing does not work with a routed port on L3 switch? I looked up fallback bridging, but it is meant for non IP traffic.The goal is I am trying to set the ASA port as an internet gateway for VLANs. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6509 Interface Alarm?

Jul 10, 2012

I am getting alarms on Solarwind indicating interface down on  "GigabitEthernet 4/7 - Gi4/d1" and "GigabitEthernet 4/8 - Gi4/d2" from our core switch 6509.Remote login to the switch does not show the interfaces when I do the "sh run" command. Now I am at site trying to identify and diagnose this fault.Looking at the numbering on the switch, it indicates to me the card where these alarms come from is from the 'intrusion dectection module'

how I may login and identify this interfaces and rectify these alarms.

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E - Rate Limit PPS On Interface?

Jun 8, 2013

How (and is) it possible to rate limit pps on an interface (physical/logical), on a 6509-E?The porpuse is to protect from attacks which lead to very high pps, bypassing traffic rate-limits, and effecting the device's performance

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E / Unable To Perform (ip Nat Inside Source Static Tcp Xxx Interface)

Jan 21, 2013

Platform:  
cisco6509-E   with FWSM
 Supervisor Engine 32 PISA 8GE
 sup-bootdisk:s32p3-adventerprisek9_wan-mz.122-18.ZY2.bin

command: 
 
(config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
 (config)#no ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
 #clear ip nat tran *
 (config)#ip nat inside source static tcp 10.10.8.147 14029 interface g7/8 14029
 %Port 14029 is being used by system 
 Or %Static entry in use, cannot change
 
But when I perform "sh ip nat tran" command,There is nothing

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Edit Port On 6509

May 15, 2013

I am very new to configuring ports on a switch. My boss usually does the port configurations but I am starting to learn some of the basic commands. The commands I know how to do are; close a port by typing config t, int gi0/port# and typing shut. I know how to enable a port, but how can I add info to a port or copy settings from one port to another?

We have some ports that are configured for 192.168 addresses but most are 10.128 addresses. I need to configure a certain port to be able to receive 192.168 addresses.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Trunk To Port Channel

Apr 22, 2012

I have 2 Cisco 6509 switches linked together via single Fibre as a trunk.I want to change this to a port channel where I will add another 3 fibre ports to the port channel but what order do I do this to minimise any disruption.

1-Configure PortChannel and add the 3 new ports, this will bring up the Port Channel but what effect will this have on traffic currently going over the single Trunk link? Will spanning tree go mad, how will switches react?

2-Convert existing Trunk link to Portchannel then add in new ports to PortChannel, I guess in doing this there will be a small hit on traffic as it changes to a port channel.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E VSS 10gb Port Count?

Jan 15, 2012

Created two 6509s as VSS with just one 10gb connection?I know it is recommended to use both the 10gb connections on the sup-720 from below configuration guide
 
"
Information about VSL Topology  
#
A VSS contains two chassis that communicate using the VSL, which is a  special port group. Configure both of the 10-Gigabit Ethernet ports on  the supervisor engines as VSL ports.
"
 
But will the VSS come up if I use just the one?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Sup32 Upgrade On 6509 - Priority Command Not Supported In Output Direction For This Interface

Nov 15, 2012

I have 1x Cisco 6509 with Sup2 and MSFC2 and it is running on IOS (c6k222-jk9sv-mz.122-17d.SXB11). I have following policy map :
 
Policy Map VOIP
Class IP PHONE
priority percent 75
 
and the following command on each interface: service-policy output VOIP those configuration are working fine on SUP2 with MSFC2 but last week I tried to upgrade the SUP2 to SUP32 on the switch and upgrade the IOS to the latest version (s3223-adventerprisek9-mz.122-33.SXJ4) but when I try to put service-policy output VOIP on each physical interface I am getting the following error: 
 
"Priority command is not supported in output direction for this interface" and when I try to add service-policy output VOIP on a V LAN interface I am getting following error:
 
MQC features are not supported in output direction for this interface. Will I need to change something after upgrading to SUP32..

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 Vlan Flapping Between Port-channels

Mar 10, 2012

We have a pair Cisco 6509 switch in which 2 * 48 Port 1G line cards and 1 * 16 Port 10G line Card, FWSM and Sup 720 are installed.We have Cisco UCS and HP Blade servers.Cisco UCS servers are connected to Cisco 6509 switch using Fabric Interconnect, and HP Servers are directly connected to core switches.Recently the team made many changes in the network. Upgraded the IOS in Cisco 6509 switch, Configured Port profiling , MAC Pinning , HBA Cards to UCS / Nexus 1000V Infrastructure. After this change they lost the connectivity to UCS and HP Serers. Every tower is checking at their end.
 
The Network Team has reverted back the core switch with old IOS , but still the problem persisit.I could only see the following error log in the core switch. There are two port-channels one between core 1 and core 2. The other is between core switch and FWSM module. [code]

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Set Port Vlan On 6509 Running In Vtp Client Mode

Jan 14, 2013

I'm working at a company that has several 6509 switches running CatOS.  They have two of the 6509's running in vtp server mode and the rest as clients.  I set up a new vlan from one of the vtp servers and it propagated out.  The problem comes when I try to assign a port on one of the vtp clients to this new vlan.  It gives me an error that the switch must be in vtp server mode to add/delete vlans.  I'm not trying to add/or delete a vlan just trying to add a port into an existing vlan.  I'm hesitant to put the switch in vtp server mode.  Is this a CatOS thing or is there a specific command to accomplish this?             

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Can't Change Native Vlan On Trunk Port?

Jun 6, 2012

I have several closets with Cisco 3560 on the edge that I'd like to change the vlan that's used for the management vlan on each. In the core I have a Cisco 6509 with Sup720's.
 
I'd like to do this by changing the native vlan on the trunk port on the core 6509 interface that connects to the 3560. and leave the management vlan on the 3560 as vlan 1.
 
Seems trivial but what I tried didn't work and I didn't have the window to troubleshoot. I'll paste the simplified configs for  the interfaces  below
  
!
6509 configs:
!
interface Vlan50ip address 172.16.50.2 255.255.255.0!interface FastEthernet

[Code]....

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509-E Switches Interconnected On Layer 3 Port Channel

Oct 3, 2012

We are currently designing  Layer 3 to the edge EIGRP solution  for our customers. The network is a hybrid of collapsed  core (Core to access) as well as a three layer design (Core/Distro/Access) for connectivity to the Data Centre, Internet, Wireless Blocks etc.The  core of the network contains two 6509-E switches interconnected on a  Layer 3 Port channel (no VSS). Access Layer switches (3750-X series running Stackwiseplus protocol)  connect to the core switches over p2p routed links and Distribution layer switches (3750X stackwiseplus) provide connectivity to the  Data centre, Internet, wireless blocks etc.
 
The access and distribution switch stacks(Cisco 3750-X) are set up with two or three member switches with uplinks multihomed to the primary and secondary core switch with each uplink included in EIGRP. In each of the stacks, one of the switches controls the operation of the stack, which will be  the stack master.As the Cisco Stackwise architecture is not SSO-capable but NSF aware, all Layer 3 fuctions must be re-established during a master switch outage. To minimize control plane impact and improve Layer3 convergence, uplinks should be diverse and originate from the member switches instead of the Master switches in the respective stack. This is as per Cisco recommended design solution.The above solution can be setup if there are more than two switches in the stack. i.e. uplinks are configured on the backup member switch modules.
 
1.But what about stack with two switches..Which switch should be set up as the Master for a two member stack with uplinks to the core primary and secondary from each switch(Master and Backup)
 
2. For Layer 3 routing, does the routing takes precedene over switch failures? Say for eg. In a two member stack, the master switch with uplink to primary fails, does EIGRP provide a fast convergence to route traffic via backup secondary and does not wait for the control plane on the switch stack to converge? All the access to core links will be set up for ECMP.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / WS-X6704-10GE Module And Port Status?

Dec 7, 2011

We have two 6509 switches with one WS-X6704-10GE module in each of them. There is an optical cable between the two switches plugged in  WS-X6704-10GE module on both sides. When you shut down the port on one side the other port still stays as up and you need phisycally to unplug the cable to have it down. The same behaviour is seen no matter on which of the two switches you shut down the port, the opposite one always stays as up and only removal of the cable makes it go down.
 
The ports are configured quite simply:
 
interface TenGigabitEthernet1/1
switchport
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1-10
no ip address
udld port
 
The IOS version is 12.2(18)SXF8

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 - Block All FTP Traffic On Port 21 From Servers In Network

Oct 3, 2012

I am attempting to block all FTP traffic on port 21 from the servers in my network, and only allow FTP from one server to go out.
 
I have created the following ACL
  
access-list 101 Permit ip any any
access-list 101 Permit 21 1.1.1.1 0.0.0.0 any
access-list 101 Deny 21 any any
 
and have applied it to my truck VPN that goes up to my firewall
 
int Vlanxxx
ip access-group 101 out
 
But when i test ftp is still allowed by all servers.

View 6 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Limit For Creation Of Port Chanel In Core Switch 6509 And 6513

Feb 20, 2012

How much is the limit for the creation of PortChanel in a Core Switch 6509 and 6513?Is there a limitation byu hardware?

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6509 / Layer 3 Port Channel Between Sites Connected Over Dark Fiber?

May 21, 2013

Has anyone configured Layer 3 port channel on Cisco 6509 switches which are connected over dark fiber between two buildings?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: WS C2960G LAN Port Speed Interface Is Low

Sep 19, 2012

I am facing port speed issue on WS-C2960G-48TC-L series switch.This switch gig0/X ports connected to onother switches (Cisco and HP both switches are also gigbit ports and directly connected ).but interface is giving only 100mb/s output.ios on WS-C2960G-48TC-L is 12.2(44)SE6

View 15 Replies View Related

Cisco Application :: ACE 6509 In Routed Mode Design For Deployment

Sep 4, 2011

Current topology in network is such: web servers with content needing to be load balanced are in vlan 35 and these servers are directly connected to Core switch (two 6509 VSS) via 20 Gb EtherChannel. Vlan 35 also spans some other switches with other servers residing in this vlan. Additionally, there are dozens of another vlans (including external users) that need to communicate with web servers. IP addresses of these two web servers are: 192.168.35.1/24 and 192.168.35.2/24 accordingly with default gateway 192.168.35.254/24 (SVI on Core switch). Currently these ip addresses are used by management and other purposes and need to be reachable for same purposes after configuring load balancing with ACEs - it is needed to have direct access to servers behind ACE. How I can do that using ACE in routed mode?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 - Use One Ethernet Port (G0/0) As Primary And Other (G0/1) As Backup Interface

Jan 20, 2013

Here's my problem.  I'm going to be using Cisco 1941 routers at a bunch of remote sites.  All of these sites have 2 comm paths out.  Some of them have 2 IP/VHF radios and some have 1 IP/VHF radio and a copper link using Patton ethernet extenders.  From the VHF radios the data hit our MPLS network back to our HQ and the sites with copper go directly back to our HQ.  Everything ends up at a Cisco 4948 switch. The problem I'm having is that I want the routers at the remote site to use one ethernet port (G0/0) as the primary and the other (G0/1) as the backup interface.  I've tried the backup interface command but the problem is that depending on where an outage occurs the ethernet link to either the radio or Patton stays up so it never switches over. We're using OSPF as our routing protocol and I'm sure there's something that can be done with it but I'm not sure what. 

View 4 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: C3500 XL Version IOS 12.0 / Error Add Interface Port-channel

Jan 15, 2012

a Customer ask me  to configure a etherchannel between two Switches C3500 XL Version IOS 12.0 follow the first configuration what I done and the output error show me by switch:

Sw01(conf)# interface port-channel 1  % invalid input detected at '^'  marker.   

I have to do something before add an new port-channel interface ?? why the Sw01 does not accept my configuration ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 / Port-channel Down But Duplicate Interface Created With (A) Up?

Nov 12, 2012

I have created 5 new 2 Gig port channels on a 6513 WS-X6516A-GBIC blade connecting to 5 4510R+E switches. 3 of the 5 Port-channels show up/up. 2 show down/down. However, for the 2 showing down, a duplicate Po interface was created with an "A" appended to the name that shows up/up. E.g:

Port-channel26             unassigned      YES unset  down                  down      
Port-channel26A            unassigned      YES unset  up                    up
 
Each of the 4510s has a second 2Gig PO to another 6513 with an identical config and all of those come up fine.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Configure Port-Channel Or Physical Interface On 3750

Jan 12, 2012

how to configure this. I did it in the past but kind of forgot how I did it.I have a stacked 3750 (two physical switches) connecting to a 2960.
 
I am creating trunk ports with limited access to VLAN 300, 600, and 700.
 
There is two interfaces connected from the 3750's(one on each physical stack member) to the 2960.I have the physical interfaces configured exactly the same.
 
3750 Config:
 
interface Port-channel2
!
 interface FastEthernet1/0/46
switchport trunk encapsulation dot1q
switchport trunk allowed vlan 1, 300,600,700
switchport mode trunk
speed 100

[code]....

Should I keep the configuration on the physical ports and not configure the Port-Channel Interfaces? Do I need to configure port-channel load balancing? Is the channel-group mode sufficient? Goal is to basically create 2 links to the 2960 to double the bandwidth and provide redundancy.

View 7 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Interface Resets Causes Port Channel To Flap Nexus 5010?

Feb 20, 2012

Here is an example of what each switch logs when a server drops offline.  Sample logs taken between 5:32am and 5:35am on Feb 20.   This particular one was having problems all weekend.  Switch #1 encountered over 2000 interface resets.  The corresponding VPC port on Switch #2 only had 13 resets.
 
NEXUS SWITCH #1
 2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-FOP_CHANGED: port-channel10: first operational port changed
from Ethernet1/10 to none
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: Ethernet1/10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETH_PORT_CHANNEL-5-PORT_DOWN: port-channel10: port-channel10 is down
2012 Feb 20 05:32:09 q91-sw01-5010 %ETHPORT-5-IF_DOWN_PORT_CHANNEL_MEMBERS_DOWN: Interface port-channel10 is down (
No operational members)

[code].....

View 1 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved