Cisco Switching/Routing :: Destination Host Unreachable 2400
Jun 8, 2012
My company has a Cisco IAD 2400 which is handling our phones and the internet (from Service Provider). We are adding a second router, a Cisco 1921, to our network,I think I have everything set up correctly. One department is using the 192.168.2.0/27 subnet. I can ping each computer within that subnet. Also, within this subnet, I can ping the router interface at 192.168.2.1. I can ping 192.168.1.2 successfully as well. This is the interface on the 1921 that goes to the 2400. However, if I try to ping 192.168.1.1 (interface on 2400), I get "Reply From 192.168.1.236: Destination Host Unreachable" I get the same thing if I ping 8.8.8.8.Within the 1921, I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 74.125.224.72 (random google ip) successfully.
View 1 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Dec 16, 2011
Im running 10 units of computers, anyhow my server has no internet connection, the other 9 units has net connection,when i ping the diagnosis is destination host unreachable.I'm using windows XP.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2012
My old router recently died and my ISP was kind enough to offer this Thomson one free. But ever since I got it, my PCs cant see each other on the homegroup. They can all get onto the internet - and by using programs like Dropbox or Teamviewer I can share info from one to the other- but I'd like to get my homegroup working again, Both my PCs are running Win 7, connecting wirelessly to the network. When trying to tracert from one to the other it gives this message: Tracing route to GLaptop.lan [192.168.1.79] over a maximum of 30 hops: 1 GDesktop.lan [192.168.1.82] reports: Destination host unreachable. The problem persists when firewalls on both PCs are disabled, and I've attempted to delete the homegroup on both PCs and re-create it.
View 5 Replies
View Related
May 11, 2012
My internet connection started to disconnect after an office mate used my PC. I thought it was just the cables but it's not. I pinged my ip address and its okay (sent=4; received=4). But when i ping Yahoo! and other websites, it said that "Destination host unreachable" (sent=4;received=0;lost=4;100% loss). What should I do to make my connection okay? I didn't ask assistance from our IT personnel bcoz they said if i want to reconnect/reinstall connection, I have to get an approved request from our bosses. And I don't like being asked bcoz they are like tyrant bosses.
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 7, 2011
I have 2 brand new systems, a desktop running Windows 7 Pro connected with a had line, and a laptop running Windows 7 Home Premium connected wirelessly. Both can access the router, both can access the internet, both can be pinged from the router. However, they absolutely cannot see each other on the network. If I try to ping by name, the addresses don't resolve. If I try to ping by IP, I get either no reply or the "destination host unreachable."I've disabled firewall completely on both. I've double, triple, quadruple checked all sharing settings (network discovery is enabled on both, sharing enabled everywhere, etc. etc.). I've tried disabling all other network adapters on the laptop, no difference. I've tried all of the online tips about repairing winsock.
View 8 Replies
View Related
Mar 17, 2013
ping 10.0.0.1 -t give me destination host unreachable in the same time when i wright ping 192.168.1.1 -t it give me the correct reply but the net doesnt work
View 3 Replies
View Related
Oct 17, 2011
when do we get Desteination host Unreachable and time to live exceeded while trying to ping .
From 10.1.1.1 icmp_seq=2 Destination Host Unreachable
From 10.1.1.1 icmp_seq=4 Destination Host Unreachable
From 10.1.1.1 icmp_seq=7 Destination Host Unreachable
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 12, 2012
Cisco Linksys E3000
I have different types of network clients connecting to both bands of router (5 ghz and 2.4 ghz), and both bands set to WPA2 only. Everything has been set up and working for the past year with no problems.
Suddenly this morning, none of the 2.4 ghz clients can connect and get authenticated. When I attempt to ping them from a Windows 7 desktop connected by a LAN cable, I get Destination Host Unreachable.
The 5 ghz clients are fine and have had no problems. I tested this with the New iPad connected to the 5 ghz band.
Rebooted the E3000 router and the Comcast cable modem, then installed the newest firmware on the E3000 using the web access portal at 192.168.1.1, and still not working.
Changed the WPA2 Personal security mode for the 2.4 ghz band to WPA2 Personal/WPA Mixed Mode, and now all the clients are connected and authenticated and working OK, albeit slower.
What happened? And how can I fix this so I can change the security mode for the 2.4 ghz band back to WPA2 Personal?
P.S. The types of clients that connect to the 2.4 ghz band are 2 Windows 7 desktops, a Windows 7 laptop, and 5 Cisco Wireless N Internet Home Monitoring Cameras. The camera feeds have slowed down considerably using this Mixed mode.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Mar 4, 2011
I am using the window server 2008 and configure tcp/ip properties correct ping locally reply successful when ping localy but when ping yahoo.com then reply destination host unreachable whereas gateway and dns ip is also correct configure so tell me solution about this problem because i am useing the internet.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 2, 2011
I attempted to upgrade the firmware on the WRT54G2 V1 (the newer, slim black model) but it failed. I let the upgrade run for about 10 minutes and it just sat there and link to router disconnected I run ping for 192.168.1.1 but response is "DESTINATION HOST UNREACHABLE". The router is now completely unusable and the ALL LAN ports lights are ON and Internet light is also ON.
View 9 Replies
View Related
May 12, 2012
i have my 9 computers 1 prolink modem/router h5200 and tplink switch...for 3 months my connection is quite good..but in the 4th month its starting to Reply 192.168.1.1 Destination net Unreachable..i called up a technician from the network..He changed my modem/router with the same model and it runs for an hour... 5-6 hrs..the problem starts again it begins to ping Reply 192.168.1.1 Destination net Unreachable...b4 my TCP/IP i configured it automatically but now i try to put it manually...my modem/router starts with 192.168.1.1 my first unit starts in 192.168.1.2 and so on.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 5, 2008
I am trying normal password recovery for (cisco routers) for IAD 2400 but iam unable to get in rommon mode ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jul 8, 2012
Up until recently one of my sites was able to get to a postilion subnet. Then we started receiving "host unreachable" e-mails. Posting told us SMTP traffic was not getting let in. I've compared the current config to a config that was saved before the issue popped up and found really no noticeable difference.
I tried a packet tracer trace with no luck: SiteB- Firewall# packet-tracer input outside tcp 11.2.2.36 12345 65.19.0.0 25.
Phase: 1
Type: FLOW-LOOKUP
Subtype:
Result: ALLOW
Config:
Additional Information:
Found no matching flow, creating a new flow
[code]...
Result:
input-interface: outside
input-status: up
input-line-status: up
output-interface: outside
output-status: up
output-line-status: up
Action: drop
Drop-reason: (acl-drop) Flow is denied by configured rule
Attached is a sanitized config. I'm not entirely convinced it's a firewall issue, but I need to some successful testing to prove otherwise.
View 19 Replies
View Related
Sep 26, 2011
I've tried everything that has been posted so far except for opening up the router itself which I will refuse to do.- Getting = Host Unreachable 192.168.1.20 (I am using 192.168.1.1 as the gateway)- No ping whatsoever even when turning on the router over and over.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 11, 2012
I have a strange behavior and a simple proble . I configured the following static route
ip route 10.84.22.0 255.255.254.0 10.84.23.254
That I advertsied in eBGP :
router bgp 65000
network 10.84.22.0 mask 255.255.254.0
the IP next hop 10.84.23.254 is cascaded on my customer LAN . At nominal time the router advertsed the route in BGP
pjnb1376#sh ip bgp nei 57.213.169.169 ad
Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path
*> 10.84.22.0/23 10.84.23.254 0 32768 i
When the lan interface of the router goes down , the router still advertise the route !!! Even if the IP next hop
10.84.23.254 is not reacheable anymore ....
The box is a Cisco 1941 using
1900-universalk9-mz.SPA.151-4.M1
View 17 Replies
View Related
Dec 13, 2012
The problem is that that the routers are not reachable form the corporate LAN after some time. Pinging the routers IP is not working anymore. When the network cable is unplugged and plugged in again the routers are responding again. The same applies when I connect my Laptop to the router. The interface is responsive right after I connect the cable. Also other devices on the network can ping the router. But after a few hours or sometimes 1,5 day the router is unreachable form the corporate network.
The problem first started a few weeks ago. The configuration did not change. The router 878 was not responsing and after changing all the cables and conncting it to another swith the problem remained. So I suspected a hardware failure and bought a replacement 888. After configuring the 888 it showed the same behaviour as the 878 router. The DSL connection is working all the time. I can even set up a vpn connection to the router and start a telnet session. than I can ping the internap IP of the router but pinging another device is not working.
What I noticed after the command sh int vlan1 is that the last input counter keeps increasing.whats causing this or how to debug?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
While working at a client site today, I was troubleshooting some ICMP connectivity for a network we have created.I turned on 'debug ip icmp" on the 3550 switch int he middle, and was inundated with the following debug output:
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
Jan 25 11:01:14.641: ICMP: dst (172.16.1.7) port unreachable rcv from 172.16.1.5
[code]....
This output fires several times a second, and based on how often it is firing, I am curious if it may be a culprit with respect to the fact that the client has indicated that they have some slow internet.Should the next step be to look at the workstation at 172.16.1.5?
View 10 Replies
View Related
Mar 7, 2012
Today one of our 9 Cisco switches a "WS-C2950S" (we also got 2 other WS-C2950S on same network) stop responding icmp ping packages. When i tried to telnet the switch its network was unreachable but i was able to see its existance from other switches by "sh cdp neig". So i decided to fix the situation on a suitable night time work, checking by console cable or even rebooting the device.
Then i started to wonder... what this could possibly be about?We have like 40 clients behind that switch and there was no communication problem during the problem.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 18, 2012
I have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1
View 8 Replies
View Related
Jul 9, 2012
I have a Cisco 2600. I would like to know how to redirect traffic going to a certain IP address three hops away to an IP address on a locally connected segment.
Ex. Packet leaves a device with source IP of 10.10.10.10 and destination of 20.20,20.20 When the packet hits the router (10.10.10.1) I want the router to redirect the destination of 20.20.20.20 to 30.30.30.30 (locally connected segment).
The router has two physical interfaces.I am thinking along the lines of creating a VLAN with an ip of 30.30.30.1 and then doing a NAT translation from 20.20.20.20 to 30.30.30.30.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jun 8, 2012
i have configured SPAN over cisco 2960 to monitor source port traffic but after configuration i dont able to get response from destination port as my NMS is attached on destination port so i lost its web interface.
Configuration is as under.
monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet0/5 (Source Port on Vlan 100) monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitEthernet0/1 (Destination Port on Vlan 200)
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 2, 2012
I want to know if there is way to tag traffic with DCSP tags without having to do all the other requirments of QOS setup. All i want to do is just tag traffic at different DCSP values via source and destination IPs. We do not have a need to be priortizing traffic on out internal switches. We just want to tag the traffic so our MPLS provider can distinguish the different types of traffic.
Our environments is primarily 3750s in all offices.
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 24, 2012
At present we are having a 4900 series switch where we are running one monitor session.Additionaly we are in need of capturing VLAN traffic and set the destination to 2 * GE ports , both are in the same switch.Due to the limitation of two monitor sessions per switch , we thought of putting the destination ports as port channel but it looks like it is not supported.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 29, 2012
I have a query on how the 6500s running in VSS mode would route the traffic over an OSPF environment where it has leant about two equal cost paths, but one via the 2nd chassis.Proposed setup - 2 6509s running in VSS. Switch-1 in VSS has a layer 3 connection (via a LES circuit) to one of a pair of Nexus 7Ks at another office. Switch-2 in the VSS has another layer 3 connection (via LES by another provider) to the other N7K at the other office. The L3 connections would use /30 ranges and allow each Nexus to form an ospf neighbour relationship with the VSS. We want to keep both offices environments separate so although we do have L2 circuits we're using these to provide L3 connectivity between sites & exchange routing info via them using ospf.
Each Nexus will advertise all the directly connected networks it knows about to the 6509s running in VSS. Thus I couldn't figure out if for example we have users/servers behind our VSS 6509s, these would need to go via their default gateway to get to a network located off the LAN, the default gw ip in VSS setup exisits on the control plane on switch-1 (in normal operation). Then to get to a network that is located off the Nexuses at the other site it would have 2 equal cost paths to it, however one of these paths would be via the VSL link and off the switch-2 chassis. I wasn't therefore sure if we'd actually ever see any transmit traffic via the 2nd L3 connection because I have a funny feeling that I've read the VSS always choses the local chassis egress rather than going via the VSL to use another port...
All of the above is theorectical at the moment as currently both circuits are connected to a single Nexus/6509 chassis however for improved resilence I want to move one of the circuits to be physically attached to the other Nexus & 6509 chasis at each site but I wasn't then sure how the traffic flows would be affected.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jan 16, 2012
In s SPAN session , normally the destination prt is used for monitoring purpose only. But could destination port be used to access the equipement or PC connected to that port , for a 2960 LAN BASE image switch .
View 2 Replies
View Related
Nov 5, 2012
i would like to monitor traffic between multiple source ports to multiple destination ports on a nexus 7k. i lknow when you set up monitor session is between source and destination (laptop or traffic analyser) but is there a way i can set up between source and multiple destination ports and capture that traffic ?
View 3 Replies
View Related
May 19, 2013
Basically I am trying to use Wireshark to do a packet capture on a Nexus 5010. I want to do a monitor session on on the switch so I can capture from a source port to a destination port on the same switch. I can configure the source port but when I go to configure the destination port I get "ERROR: Eth102/1/4: Configuration not allowed on fex interface". I have tried to reconfigure this port as a switchport but "switchport mode access" command does not take. I don't want to make any changes to any other ports but this one.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Aug 9, 2012
I'm trying to get ERSPAN working with an ERSPAN source on a Nexus 5548 and the ERSPAN destination on a Catalyst 6500.
The configuration on the Nexus is as follows:
[...]
interface loopback0
ip address 192.168.2.133/32
[Code].....
If I do a netdr capture I can see ERSPAN traffic sourced from the Nexus reaching the C6500, but there doesn't appear to be anything sent out the ERSPAN destination inerface (Gi4/6) and there's nothing being received by the probe connected to that interface. I know the traffic seen with netdr is definitely the ERSPAN traffic sourced from the Nexus as I've changed the TTL and DSCP values within the monitor session on the Nexus and can see those changes reflected on the C6500 netdr capture. The attached is a screen grab of the show netdr capture started with debug netdr capture soure-ip-address 192.168.2.133.
When I look at the interface I see it shown as up/down (monitoring), but no output or counters clocking up. If I run a local SPAN session on the C6500 it works fine.
I've tried changing the destination IP address from that assigned to the C6500 Loopback interface to an IP address assigned to a physical interface, but that still doens't work.
The hardware in the C6500 is WS-SUP720-BASE Hw version 3.2 with WS-F6K-PFC3B Hw version 2.4. The IOS version is 12.2(33)SXI6.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jun 10, 2013
Is there any way to have my Cisco 877W Router alter from using one static route to another static route when another router on the network is reporting destination host unreachable?
Router 1 (192.168.2.253)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to internet
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 (192.168.2.254)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to managed VPN (172.16.28.1)
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
Router 2 is connected to another network through a managed VPN and that network also has internet access. I want to be able to have two routes to the internet on Router 2. And when Router 1 internet goes down packets get routed through the VPN instead.
I currently have on Router 2
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.253
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.28.5 250
Which does nothing when Router 1 has its Dialer0 interface shutdown, or goes offline completely.I suspect I could reverse the setup and have everything routed through the VPN by default and then if / when Dialer0 interface goes down it would switch to using Router 2, but if the problem is in the remote network and interface Dialer0 stays up, it would probably do the same thing... nothing.All devices mentioned are Cisco 877W routers with ADSL and a bunch of fast ethernet interfaces.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 20, 2012
We have 2 6513 switches with SUP720/PFC3A and various POE modules and a 6748-GE-TX facing our servers. Additionally, we have a 4Gbps portchannel trunk interconnecting the switches. We have approximately 300 Nortel IP 1140e phones in use between the two switches.For the purpose of call recording, we've attempted to mirror the voice vlan using various approaches and have been met with limited success. We mirrored the VLAN using tx, rx, and both. When using both we appear to get duplicate packets at the destination interface.We seem to lose packets completely going in one direction or another for a given call. Packets are lost before they get to the destination interface?
View 2 Replies
View Related
May 22, 2013
I am attempting to filter a specific host(s) from my OSPF routiing table on a ASA 5550 (ABR) using LSA prefix lists. However, when I look at the other routers in that area, I notice that ALL LSA type-3's are being removed (10 hosts are now missing from the routing table). I have verified the filter is working on the ABR, but I can't figure why ALL hosts/routes that were coming into the area are now being filtered instead of the specific one that I want to filter out.
Here is the config on the ABR:
prefix-list pdm_pl_000 seq 10 permit 206.253.180.137/32
!
!
router ospf 1
network 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 area 0
network 10.150.10.0 255.255.255.0 area 10
network 10.150.252.0 255.255.255.224 area 10
[code]....
The 206.253.180.137 host is actually coming from Area '3'. Am I doing something that is removing all type-3 LSA's?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 22, 2012
I have a 1941W that has a connection to my ISP (Gi0/1) and another connection to a remote lab (Gi0/0). Everything is working fine how it is setup. All my traffic from my internal networks can access the Internet and devices on the 192.168.201.0 /24 can access the Internet and the lab 10.89.0.0/16.
Now I want to have two devices (192.168.201.51 & .147) use Gi0/0 when accessing host 63.85.190.67. There is no route to this subnet since it reside in the remote lab. Here is what I have right now. How would I setup a PBR to have those two host use Gi0/0 when accessing 63.85.190.67
interface Vlan192
ip address 192.168.201.1 255.255.255.0
ip nat inside
ip virtual-reassembly (code)
View 12 Replies
View Related
May 29, 2012
this is router 887, its vlan is 192.168.3.1/24. If I'd like to add a static route via different host within same vlan, rather than the router, like:
ip route 192.168.100.0/24 192.168.3.6
How can we achieve it? I tried adding it directly and failed:
(config)#ip route 192.168.100.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.3.6
%Invalid next hop address (it's this router)
View 6 Replies
View Related
