Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 VSS Architecture With Two Equal Cost Paths To A Destination?

Apr 29, 2012

I have a query on how the 6500s running in VSS mode would route the traffic over an OSPF environment where it has leant about two equal cost paths, but one via the 2nd chassis.Proposed setup - 2 6509s running in VSS. Switch-1 in VSS has a layer 3 connection (via a LES circuit) to one of a pair of Nexus 7Ks at another office. Switch-2 in the VSS has another layer 3 connection (via LES by another provider) to the other N7K at the other office. The L3 connections would use /30 ranges and allow each Nexus to form an ospf neighbour relationship with the VSS. We want to keep both offices environments separate so although we do have L2 circuits we're using these to provide L3 connectivity between sites & exchange routing info via them using ospf.

Each Nexus will advertise all the directly connected networks it knows about to the 6509s running in VSS. Thus I couldn't figure out if for example we have users/servers behind our VSS 6509s, these would need to go via their default gateway to get to a network located off the LAN, the default gw ip in VSS setup exisits on the control plane on switch-1 (in normal operation). Then to get to a network that is located off the Nexuses at the other site it would have 2 equal cost paths to it, however one of these paths would be via the VSL link and off the switch-2 chassis. I wasn't therefore sure if we'd actually ever see any transmit traffic via the 2nd L3 connection because I have a funny feeling that I've read the VSS always choses the local chassis egress rather than going via the VSL to use another port...
 
All of the above is theorectical at the moment as currently both circuits are connected to a single Nexus/6509 chassis however for improved resilence I want to move one of the circuits to be physically attached to the other Nexus & 6509 chasis at each site but I wasn't then sure how the traffic flows would be affected.

View 2 Replies


ADVERTISEMENT

Cisco WAN :: Load Balance Between 2 3750 Switches With Equal-cost Paths

Jan 16, 2012

I have two offices in rural area with a quite distance between them. Offices are connected with private wireless 100Mbps and cooper 100Mbps links provided by different ISP. Wireless connections are delivered as a private L3 Ethernet link but cooper as private L2 Ethernet trunk link. In both offices I have Cisco 3750 L3 switches. I would like to use both link (equal-cost paths) in load balanced configuration but not sure how. Both switches running EIGRP. Asymmetric routing is not an option. Per-destination load-balancing or something else?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Catalyst 6500 Switch Architecture

Jul 16, 2012

one of the most widely deployed switches in the world. The "Swiss Army knife of network", can do routing, switching, security, wireless and almost everything that you would want your core switch to do. Remember to use the rating system to let Akshay know if you have received an adequate response. 
 
Akshay might not be able to answer each question due to the volume expected during this event. Remember that you can continue the conversation on the Network Infrastructure sub-community LAN, Switching and Routing discussion forum shortly after the event.  This event lasts through July 27, 2012. Visit this forum often to view responses to your questions and the questions of other community members.

View 22 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: ERSPAN Source On Nexus 5548 And Destination On Catalyst 6500

Aug 9, 2012

I'm trying to get ERSPAN working with an ERSPAN source on a Nexus 5548 and the ERSPAN destination on a Catalyst 6500.
 
The configuration on the Nexus is as follows:
 
[...]
interface loopback0
ip address 192.168.2.133/32

[Code].....
 
If I do a netdr capture I can see ERSPAN traffic sourced from the Nexus reaching the C6500, but there doesn't appear to be anything sent out the ERSPAN destination inerface (Gi4/6) and there's nothing being received by the probe connected to that interface. I know the traffic seen with netdr is definitely the ERSPAN traffic sourced from the Nexus as I've changed the TTL and DSCP values within the monitor session on the Nexus and can see those changes reflected on the C6500 netdr capture. The attached is a screen grab of the show netdr capture started with debug netdr capture soure-ip-address 192.168.2.133.
 
When I look at the interface I see it shown as up/down (monitoring), but no output or counters clocking up. If I run a local SPAN session on the C6500 it works fine.
 
I've tried changing the destination IP address from that assigned to the C6500 Loopback interface to an IP address assigned to a physical interface, but that still doens't work.
 
The hardware in the C6500 is WS-SUP720-BASE Hw version 3.2 with WS-F6K-PFC3B Hw version 2.4. The IOS version is 12.2(33)SXI6.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco WAN :: 6500 Traceroute Command Output For Routes With Equal Metrics

Aug 31, 2010

=>Routing Protocol in Question EIGRP.
=>Two equal metric routes for destination A(through R1 and R2-SVIs on two upstream 6500s)

Traceroute Output, is the output that alternates between 1.1=>10.1=>1.1 normal granted the two routes are "equal metric routes for the same routing procotol in use" or is that "round robin behavior" indicative of a routing problem?

View 11 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750x Equal Functionality But Lower Model?

Apr 20, 2013

i'd like to know if there's a routed switch lower than 3750x?  also 2960s? but have equal functionality like switchport mode access, trunking, spanning-tree, etherchannel, etc.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: How To Have 3750 With 2 Paths To Internet

Mar 20, 2012

We have a 3750 at the center of one of our offices. This office has two internet connections, and applications that we want to use the seperate Internet connections, but not both. Currently we have an ip route statement on the 3750 sending Internet traffic to one of the Internet routers. Whats the easiest way to send speciffic applications to the other using the 3750?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4096 / Path Cost And Priority For Spanning Tree

May 8, 2012

May I know how to manually set the priority (root ID and bridge ID priority) and  for spanning tree? Which one should I use based on the command below? and how does it affect the path cost of it?
 
set spantree root 1
spanning vlan1 priority 4096

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade 6500 Non Modular IOS To Normal 6500?

Dec 21, 2011

how can we upgrade 6500 non modular ios to normal 6500 ios?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Destination Port Protocol Is Down In 3750

Jun 18, 2012

I have configured SPAN in cisco 3750 switch as below mentioned. but the destination port protocol is down.switch(config)#monitor session 1 source interface gigabitethernet1/0/1switch(config)#monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitethernet1/0/11 ingress vlan 1

View 8 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Destination Host Unreachable 2400

Jun 8, 2012

My company has a Cisco IAD 2400 which is handling our phones and the internet (from Service Provider). We are adding a second router, a Cisco 1921, to our network,I think I have everything set up correctly. One department is using the 192.168.2.0/27 subnet. I can ping each computer within that subnet. Also, within this subnet, I can ping the router interface at 192.168.2.1. I can ping 192.168.1.2 successfully as well. This is the interface on the 1921 that goes to the 2400. However, if I try to ping 192.168.1.1 (interface on 2400), I get "Reply From 192.168.1.236: Destination Host Unreachable" I get the same thing if I ping 8.8.8.8.Within the 1921, I can ping 192.168.1.1 and 74.125.224.72 (random google ip) successfully.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2600 / Destination IP Address Redirection

Jul 9, 2012

I have a Cisco 2600.  I would like to know how to redirect traffic going to a certain IP address three hops away to an IP address on a locally connected segment. 
 
Ex.  Packet leaves a device with source IP of 10.10.10.10 and destination of 20.20,20.20   When the packet hits the router (10.10.10.1) I want the router to redirect the destination of 20.20.20.20 to 30.30.30.30 (locally connected segment).
 
The router has two physical interfaces.I am thinking along the lines of creating a VLAN with an ip of 30.30.30.1 and then doing a NAT translation from 20.20.20.20 to 30.30.30.30. 

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 2960 -Destination Port Not Responding Over SPAN

Jun 8, 2012

i have configured SPAN over cisco 2960 to monitor source port traffic but after configuration i dont able to get response from destination port  as my NMS is attached on destination port so i lost its web interface.
 
Configuration is as under.
 
monitor session 1 source interface gigabitEthernet0/5  (Source Port on Vlan 100) monitor session 1 destination interface gigabitEthernet0/1 (Destination Port on Vlan 200)

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 3750 - Tagging Traffic By IP Source And Destination?

Dec 2, 2012

I want to know if there is way to tag traffic with DCSP tags without having to do all the other requirments of QOS setup.  All i want to do is just tag traffic at different DCSP values via source and destination IPs.  We do not have a need to be priortizing traffic on out internal switches.  We just want to tag the traffic so our MPLS provider can distinguish the different types of traffic.
 
Our environments is primarily 3750s in all offices.

View 6 Replies View Related

Protocols / Routing :: Two Paths To Internet One Network

Jul 27, 2011

I have a local DSL line in our remote office. We are connecting a microwave antennae that carries our main office internet to the remote office.I want to be able to connect both paths to a Layer 3 switch and route traffic through the main office with the router connected to the DSL as a fail-over solution.I would really like to stick with HP Procurve's if possible.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 4900 Capturing VLAN Traffic And Set Destination To GE Ports

Jan 24, 2012

At present we are having a 4900 series switch where we are running one monitor session.Additionaly we are in need of capturing VLAN traffic and set the destination to 2 * GE ports , both are in the same switch.Due to the limitation of two monitor sessions per switch , we thought of putting the destination ports as port channel but it looks like it is not supported.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: SPAN / Monitoring Destination Port Behaviour - 2960 LAN

Jan 16, 2012

In s SPAN session , normally the destination prt is used for monitoring purpose only. But could destination port be used to access the equipement or PC connected to that port , for a 2960 LAN BASE image  switch .

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Monitor Traffic Between Multiple Source To Destination Ports On Nexus 7k?

Nov 5, 2012

i would like to monitor traffic between multiple source ports to multiple destination ports on a nexus 7k. i lknow when you set up monitor session is between source and destination (laptop or traffic analyser) but is there a way i can set up between source and multiple destination ports and capture that traffic ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Nexus 5010 - Capture From Source To Destination Port On Same Switch

May 19, 2013

Basically I am trying to use Wireshark to do a packet capture on a Nexus 5010. I want to do a monitor session on on the switch so I can capture from a source port to a destination port on the same switch. I can configure the source port but when I go to configure the destination port I get "ERROR: Eth102/1/4: Configuration not allowed on fex interface". I have tried to reconfigure this port as a switchport but "switchport mode access" command does not take. I don't want to make any changes to any other ports but this one.

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 877W - Multiple Static Routes / Same Destination Dialer0 And Vlan1?

Jun 10, 2013

Is there any way to have my Cisco 877W Router alter from using one static route to another static route when another router on the network is reporting destination host unreachable?
 
Router 1 (192.168.2.253)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to internet
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
 Router 2 (192.168.2.254)
Dialer0 -> ppoe to managed VPN (172.16.28.1)
Vlan1 -> local 192.168.2.0/24
 
Router 2 is connected to another network through a managed VPN and that network also has internet access. I want to be able to have two routes to the internet on Router 2. And when Router 1 internet goes down packets get routed through the VPN instead.
 
I currently have on Router 2
 
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.2.253
ip route 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 Dialer0
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 172.16.28.5 250
 
Which does nothing when Router 1 has its Dialer0 interface shutdown, or goes offline completely.I suspect I could reverse the setup and have everything routed through the VPN by default and then if / when Dialer0 interface goes down it would switch to using Router 2, but if the problem is in the remote network and interface Dialer0 stays up, it would probably do the same thing... nothing.All devices mentioned are Cisco 877W routers with ADSL and a bunch of fast ethernet interfaces.

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6513 Monitor Session Source Vlan And Lost Packets At Destination

Feb 20, 2012

We have 2 6513 switches with SUP720/PFC3A and various POE modules and a 6748-GE-TX  facing our servers.  Additionally, we have a 4Gbps portchannel trunk interconnecting the switches.    We have approximately 300 Nortel IP 1140e phones in use between the two switches.For the purpose of call recording, we've attempted to mirror the voice vlan using various approaches and have been met with limited success.  We mirrored the VLAN using tx, rx, and both.  When using both we appear to get duplicate packets at the destination interface.We seem to lose packets completely going in one direction or another for a given call. Packets are lost before they get to the destination interface?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 Switching Fabric Bandwidth 720 Is Calculated?

Jan 21, 2012

As per my understanding 6509 all slots are dual channel, so 9 slot * 40 per slot (20 g in and 20 g out) = 360 GB How cisco claim the 720 ?? What about the 6513 chassic switch fabric connection?

View 5 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 / High Switching Processor Utilization?

Sep 20, 2012

I am seeing a strange situation on my 6500 switch?By having snmp walk on '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3' (== cpmCPUTotal5sec), I came to know that there are two processor and the cpu util for switching processor is gone to 88 % and some time creeps to 99 %.
 
snmpwalk -v2c -c "removes"  sw6500 '1.3.6.1.4.1.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3'
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.1 = Gauge32: 12 (--- this is for CPU of Router Processor )
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.9.9.109.1.1.1.1.3.3 = Gauge32: 99 (--- this is for CPU of Switching Processor )
 
but when I do sh process cpu on the console, all looks normal as it shows cpu utilization of RP.  why the value is so high on the switching processor ?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP Routing On 6500 Series Versus 3750?

Jan 24, 2013

For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?and on 3750 switches, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 / Restricting Inter-VLAN Routing?

May 9, 2013

I'm looking to restrict Inter-VLAN routing through L3 switch (cisco 6500) and wanted to know best possible way to do it. I used VACL and achieved success to some extent, but my config is making clients take up to 5-6 mins to authenticate IP address from the DNS (bootps).My VACL config was as follows:
 
Subnet to restrict is 10.100.15.0 (VLAN 15)
 STEP 1: Created extended ACL to allow bootpc/bootps through DNS
ip access-list extended EACL_DNS
permit udp any eq bootps any
permit udp any eq bootpc any
 
STEP 2: Created standard ACLs to allow only relevant subnet, server VLANs & some IPs from other subnets for printers/scanners etc.

ip access-list standard SACL_VLAN_15
permit 10.100.15.0 0.0.0.255 (the subnet I'm restricting)
permit 10.100.50.0 0.0.0.255 (server VLANs)
permit 10.100.25.45 0.0.0.0 (printer in another VLAN which has to have access in VLAN 15)
 
STEP 3: Created VLAN access list

vlan access-map VACL_15 10
match ip address EACL_DNS
action forward
 vlan access-map VACL_15 20
match ip address SACL_15
action forward
 
STEP 4: Applying VLAN Access list on VLAN 15 vlan filter VACL_15 vlan-list 15 Though the above works, below is noted:

1. I'm still able to PING 10.100.15.2 (the switch virtual interface) from outside the subnet, which I don't intend to do so. Howeve all cients in the subnet have no connectivity from outside the VLAN 15.
 
2. As mentioned its taking quiet some time to negotiate with the DNS server at system boot time.

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco VPN :: Multiple Site VPN Architecture 2811s

Aug 9, 2012

We are currently in the process of planning our move to fiber.  We have a corporate location and 15 remote offices.  I would like to create VPN tunnels from each remote office back to the corporate location. 
 
Our remote offices mostly use 2811s.  The core at our corporate location is a 3750.  I am wondering if the logical step is to just create IPSEC VPN tunnels from the 2811s to the 3750?  Will this be too taxing on the 3750 to have 15 separate VPN tunnels?  I have a cisco background, but I am fairly new to handling massive architecture changes and adjustements.       

View 1 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 MSFC No IP Routing Command

Jun 2, 2012

I used to "ip routing" command in order to enable inter-vlan routing, for example with 3750 cisco. I have a 6503 cisco with SUP720 MSFC3. I was able to create some vlans but I can not configure inter-vlan routing.
 
sw#conf t
Enter configuration commands, one per line.  End with CNTL/Z.
swsur(config)#ip routing

[Code]....

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP Routing On 6500 Series Vs 3750?

Oct 30, 2011

For intervlan routing, Is 'IP routing' command enabled by default on a 6500 series switches based on the IOS?hes, do we need to enable the "ip routing" command manually for intervlan routing?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: IP Routing Command In 6500?

Mar 16, 2013

Where is the "ip routing" command in Cisco switch 6500  series?

is the ip routing enable by default accoridng to the: [URL]

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Difference Between 6500 SXJ And SXI?

Nov 25, 2011

i would like to check out what's the difference between the naming convnetion for the 6500 IOS.
 
I read the data sheet to support my POC deployment to support NCS v.1 the 6500 IOS need to upgrade to 12.2 (33) SXI
 
Is it able to work if i using SXJ instead of SXI, with the same IOS version 12.2 (33)?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: TFT On 6500 Using Different Vlans And VRF

Jul 24, 2012

I have tried to test copy tftp: numerous time with no success.  I believe the reason it is failing is my laptop to Ethernet port is in vlan 62 and the tftp process operates in a different IP space.I am using gig 7/1 and configuring my laptop nic for x.x.x.254 mask 255.255.255.0.  I can ping from laptop to gateway) and I can ping from the switch to my laptop using ping vrf production x.x.x.254. Can you tell me what vlan I need to set my laptop connection in or if there is something else I need to change to make tftp work on vlan62?Does TFTP only work in vlan1 or can it be changed?

View 2 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: Upgrade IOS In 6500 VSS?

Mar 25, 2012

how to upgrade IOS in switch 6500 connect in VSS from 12.2(33)SXI IOS to 12.2(33)SXJ?

View 3 Replies View Related

Cisco Switching/Routing :: 6500 ACL Using QoS Not Working

Jul 16, 2012

We are setup like a hotel style workers camp.  We have wings full of rooms and residents with 3750 stacks in them.  Those switches connect back to our core 6500's.  The network is mostly all Layer 3, interfaces are routed with IPs.
 
When it was built before my time they included an ACL for each wing so that residents couldn't access internal devices (IE SSH to 6500) but I've come to notice it's not working.
 
I see hits on the ACL for accepts but nothing is hitting the deny rule at the top.Here is the configuration below:
 
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET1 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET2 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
mls qos aggregate-policer INTERNET 24000000 80000 80000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
[Code] ....

View 5 Replies View Related







Copyrights 2005-15 www.BigResource.com, All rights reserved