Cisco Switching/Routing :: Enabling Port Security On C4507R Shuts Down Port
Aug 13, 2012
I'm trying to enable port security on several 4507R's. When I try to configure a range of ports the switch will randomly put 1 or 2 in err-disable. It's different every time I apply the config to the same group of ports. However if I do them one at a time it seems to work. But I really don't want to configure 6 fully populated switches one port at a time. We also have a lot of 3750's and they gave me no problem using a port range. [code]
View 4 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Sep 3, 2008
I have a 892 router configured on fa0 with vlan1 and a catalist 3560. On catalist all ports are in access mode and vlan1. When I'm connecting port fa0 from router to catalist, the catalist port is shuted down What should I do on router on catalist to make the connection working ?
View 4 Replies
View Related
Oct 25, 2011
Was wondering how to set port security on the 881. I have all the FE ports shutdown except one and want to limit that port to one specific MAC address.
View 7 Replies
View Related
Sep 8, 2010
configure port security Cisco 500 Swich ? There is no CLI mode in this switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Dec 15, 2009
One of my engineers issued a command to turn off port security on a number of ports using the range command. The command failed on the first attempt due to a tacacs auth failure which I suspect is due to a low tacacs timeout value. The engineer then reduced the number of ports in the range command and re-issued the config change after which the switch just crashed and rebooted.
The logging buffer on the switch displays the following:
000072: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: System previously crashed with the following message:
000073: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: Cisco IOS Software, C2960 Software (C2960-LANBASEK9-M), Version 12.2(50)SE3, RELEASE SOFTWARE (fc1)
000074: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: Technical Support: [URL]
000075: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: Copyright (c) 1986-2009 by Cisco Systems, Inc.
000076: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED: Compiled Wed 22-Jul-09 07:03 by prod_rel_team
000077: *Mar 1 00:03:00 GMT: %PLATFORM-1-CRASHED:
[Code]........
I have done some searching and this could be related to bug CSCsq71492. I have tried using the output interpreter but it is still down.
View 22 Replies
View Related
Aug 2, 2012
I have several SF300 switches deployed (SF300-08, SF300-24P). They are connected to IP Telephones (NEC) which communicate with the switch for auto voice VLAN on LLDP. The problem I am experiencing is that periodically the IP telephones are rebooted by the telephone vendor and when they do the switch puts that port into "Locked" port security mode and discards all traffic to the port. The IP telephones of course do not work. In other switch models, I have seen the ability to enable / disable port security switch wide or on a port by port basis. This model does not appear to have this feature. How to disable or why the phones would cause the switch ports to "lock"? There is usually one PC attached to each phone.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 23, 2013
I have network consists of more then 20 cisco 2950/2960/3700 switches. I have configured port security in my switches. initially when i configured on my switches it worked fine....even for copule of months it worked fine. but suddenly it start creating issues and now i am not able to implement port security on switches. the configuration is same but there is no effect now. Same switches were fine but now even having same configuration it is not working. please see the configuration: [code]
View 5 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2012
We have several 3750 stacks across our campus that we are unable to completely clear port security on. We have mac address stick set up on all access ports. When we clear the sticky address on the port, the mac address is removed from the running config like normal, but we keep getting port-security voilations. If port security is taken off the port completely, i.e. no switchport port-security, traffic still doesn't pass the port. Even clear port security across the stack doesn't work. If we try to reload the stack, only the master reboots, and the other switches in the stack lose switch capabilities.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Jun 6, 2012
I've just completed a port security project at a site on numerous Cisco switches and all works well, however they have 2 Nortel 5520 switches (which I left until the end) which they would like to lock down. I have logged a message on the Nortel forums and I have heard nothing for days. I just need to lock 2 ports down to the Mac address of 2 computers stopping any other computer being plugged in.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 1, 2013
I'm trying to test port-security in my c3550 but when I show port-security int f0/23 shows it only "Disabled" as below:
run
interface FastEthernet0/23switchport access vlan 200switchport mode dynamic desirableswitchport port-security mac-address stickyspanning-tree portfast
View 2 Replies
View Related
Apr 19, 2012
I try change the configuration the port in the switch catalyst express 500, i need disable switch port port-security, a try with http://10.1.1.1/exec and save configuration with wr command, if a check the configuration de port is correct but i reboot the switch and check the configuration the port appear the switch port port-security configuration again.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I configured port security on my 2960 switches with the following commands: [code]
The problem is that when I should change someone's PC, first I disable port-secirity, then I clear all the mac addresses learned on the interface, then I plug the new PC and enable port-security. The new PC couldn't connect to the network and it's mac address has not be learned on the interface. Why?Which commands should I use to clear an old mac address and enable port-security with the new mac address.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 20, 2010
For many years we've had the following vlan and port security config on our 3560s: [code] This has worked great on 12.2(37)SE1, 12.2(40)SE and 12.2(46)SE. However since 12.2(50)SE, and I've tried all the versions since then, we have a problem with 7900 phones and ATA186s taking upwards of 20 minutes before they can get a valid IP number.The problem on the newer IOSes seems to be related to the inactivity aging.On the older IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the voice vlan straight away.
On the newer IOS versions the mac address of the voice device appears on the DATA vlan and seems to be stuck there until the inactivity aging removes it. It then gets re-learned, sometimes on the voice vlan, and sometimes on the data vlan. If you're unlucky and it gets re-learned on the data vlan you've got to wait until the inactivity time ages the address out again. Repeat until the mac address eventually gets learned on the voice vlan. I don't want to be stuck on 12.2(46)SE forever.
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 26, 2011
Im trying to follow along documentation i see via train single videos and some online resources. I am trying to enable port security.I have a Catalyst 3546 XL when i type in "rtr1# switchport ?""port-security" is not only of the options to choose from. I have already set this as an access port.
View 4 Replies
View Related
May 5, 2012
Our customer has a Cisco ME3600X with the IOS me 360x-universalK9-mz.122-52.EY3.They are saying that is not possible to configure the "switchport port-security mac-address sticky" in the interfaces and want to know whether any additional license is needed.As far as I know there isn't any extra license to activate this feature and also I believe the ME3600 switch should have this feature with the universal IOS, isn't that right?
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 2, 2012
I have connected a 10BaseT device to a CISCO Catalyst 3560xPOE switch with dynamic port security. All seems to work fine when the distance between the two devices is closer then 200ft. When I connect to 10BaseT devices farther out near 300ft the response from the attached device is lost. It works ok on unmanaged switches at the longer distance. Is there a minimum response time from attached devices for dynamic port security to work properly? Is there any other explanation why it would work on cheaper switches, but not on the Port Secured Switch?
View 2 Replies
View Related
Feb 29, 2012
I have a 1941 that I am going to deploy with a HWIC-D-9ESW switch module (I only need 3 switch ports but need the PoE). I am going to hang a 1262 autonomous AP off one of the ports but I need to configure MAC address port-security so that only that AP can pass traffic. I know the switch modules are 'almost' exactly like a switch for commands but I can't seem to enable or configure any port-security settings. Is port-security no available on the switch modules?
View 3 Replies
View Related
Mar 5, 2013
our C3750 like the one described here [URL]
We have the port on the switch set like this:
switchport port-security maximum 25
switchport port-security
switchport port-security aging time 2
switchport port-security violation restrict
switchport port-security aging type inactivity
In case a device connected to the port is inactive for more than 2 minues ( aging time ) the first frame/packet the device generates arrives to the port on the switch, but the switch does not forward it to the appropriate port ( discards it or whatever ).
So far I tested on
1 30 WS-C3750E-24PD 15.0(2)SE2 C3750E-IPBASEK9-M
2 30 WS-C3750E-24PD 15.0(2)SE2 C3750E-IPBASEK9-M
3 52 WS-C3750G-48PS 15.0(2)SE2 C3750-IPBASEK9-M
[Code].....
When we remove port security from the port, it works perfectly fine, as expected.
It seems this is not HW or IOS version related. It seems it is not a stack synchronization issue, it does not matter if a device is connected to the first or other stack member. I tested on C3560 too, here there are no problems, so seems it is 3750 related.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 28, 2013
I have 2 3560 switches that are running 12.2(25)SEE2. Port security is enabled on some of the ports. Whenever there is a power failure, when power is restored, 1 port on each switch goes to err-disabled. The mac address that causes this is a valid address for that port. Below is the configuration on one of the ports.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Oct 20, 2010
My group has recently started configuring traps on our switches to alert us of issues as they arise vs. waiting for the Helpdesk to receive user complaints and then responding.We have successfully configured the 2950 and 2960 switches to alert us when a port-security violation happens. However, the 3750 switches refuse to fire the port-security violation traps. The 3750's will fire an errdisable trap when the port goes down though.
Here is one of the port configurations:
interface FastEthernet1/0/45
switchport access vlan 5
switchport mode access
switchport port-security
switchport port-security mac-address sticky
[code].....
And here is the output of the port-security debug:
2522070: Oct 21 16:37:04: %LINK-3-UPDOWN: Interface FastEthernet1/0/45, changed state to down
2522089: Oct 21 16:37:05: %PM-4-ERR_DISABLE: psecure-violation error detected on Fa1/0/45, putting Fa1/0/45 in err-disable state
2522100: Oct 21 16:37:05: %PORT_SECURITY-2-PSECURE_VIOLATION: Security violation occurred, caused by MAC address 0012.3f07.95d3 on port FastEthernet1/0/45.
All of the 3750's are running C3750-IPBASEK9-M, Version 12.2(53) SE2. Wireshark also shows the errdisable traps, but no other traps so I've ruled out the traps being missed. All of the switches have been reloaded and power cycled.
View 3 Replies
View Related
Aug 1, 2012
I am looking to simply monitor Port-Security , Error-Disable and HSRP. I would like to receive an email when any of these are triggered.
Port Security - Port Is shut down
Err-Disable - Port goes into err-disable state (securedown)
HSRP - When HSRP standyby changes are detected
I need to receive emails with any of the able are triggered. What is the easiest way to do this? I know SNMP is the main option but I have never worked with SNMP and dont understand it too much.
Equipment:
2x Cisco 1921 series routers
3x Cisco 2960 POE switches stacked
View 1 Replies
View Related
May 8, 2012
On the supervisor card of a cisco 6500 series, according to the following link, [URL] it only has 2 uplink ports on the card. Would I be correct in assuming that I only have those to ports that I can configure IP addresses on?
The cisco that is being devlivere is coming with a 48 port switch and 24 port fibre switch. Could I change any of those ports into a router port and configure IP addresses on those?
The supervisor card is a ws-sup-720-3b the 48 port switch is a ws-x6748-ge-tx the 24 port fibre switch is ws-x6724-sfp
View 3 Replies
View Related
Jan 15, 2013
We just installed a hosted VOIP system using Cisco 7900 series IP phones. We are having a strange issue with a few computers where they pull DHCP information from our VOIP provider's DHCP server on the Internet and not our LAN DHCP server.
The switchports areconfigured as: switchport mode access
My rationale behind this is that the phones would use CDP to get their VLAN info from the providers Cisco router and the PCs would just ride on the default VLAN. But this is not the case. Computers randomly keep getting DHCP info from the provider's router. Do I have to use voice vlan x and make the switchports trunks?
View 6 Replies
View Related
Jan 30, 2012
I have an all gigE 3560. I don't use the management FE0 port on the back. I was thinking to use that for a 100Mbps WAN connection.
Seems to work just fine when I plugged in an test. But I am not routing across that link yet as I still need to setup the far end.
Is there any reason this would not work? I would like to not burn a gig port if the max throughput of the circuit is 100Mbps.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Feb 18, 2013
I have a 3750g connected to a "core" switch stack of 7 other 3750g's via 2 GigE ports in a trunk. This is currently in a switchport mode access port- channel so only the default vlan data is sent over. Now we have a need due to physical location of these switches, to allow vlan20 (DMZ) from this 3750g to the switch stack. I will configure a few ports on the switch stack for vlan20 and they need to be able to talk to the stand alone 3750g.To do this I will change the port channel on both endpoints to
-switchport trunk ecapsulation dot1q
-switchport mode dynamic desirable
also making the appropriate change on the interfaces belonging to this trunk.My question is, now that its a trunk port that carries multiple VLANs, how much is the bandwidth reduced on that 2gbps link?I have a very active VLAN (10) on the stand alone switch, but on the core I'm not going to be assigning VLAN 10 to any ports. So does traffic from VLAN10 even come across the trunk (wasting bandwidth) if no ports on the core side are assigned to it? I really just need vlan 1 and 20 (for now).
View 11 Replies
View Related
Oct 23, 2011
is it possible to shutdown a specific port on my 3750x and monitor this port at the same time .for example , im dealing with a mac authenticated network using port security , i want to shut down all the ports that are not used at the moment , however , if some one gets connected to the one of the shutdown ports i want to know the mac address of the user or atleast to know that i have someone who is just plugged in to the one of the shutdowned ports .
View 4 Replies
View Related
Jun 5, 2013
I'm fairly new to Cisco products am in the process of developing my network knowledge on a deeper level. I have a 3825 with a HWIC-4ESW and I'm struggling to fully understand how the two "see" each other. I've setup a V LAN with a layer 3 address on the HWIC and added the switch ports to it. This seemed to allow devices connected to the switch ports to talk to the built-in router ports. I thought this was all making sense until i applied an access-list to the router port. It's a simple ACL i'm just using for testing and the only thing it does is blocks telnet from anywhere. I know the ACL is setup properly because if I connect a device directly to the router port i cannot telnet to the port. However, if i connect a device to one of the switch ports, i am able to telnet to the router port successfully.
It seems that I'm missing something with how traffic flows from the switch port to the router ports and how the two "see" each other.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Sep 25, 2012
I have Cisco 800 series (888w) with BRI-ISDN port. Is there any way to change the usage of ISDN port to normal RJ45 port?I want to use this SOHO router to sharing connection.
View 0 Replies
View Related
Feb 26, 2012
I was looking for a way to connect an AUX port from a 1700 router to a 6500 switch module console port, to see the output of the Switch's on the 1700 router, in case there is a network downtime, I could see what's going on in the switch, what cable should I use ? Also, is there is any kind of documentation for this type of config what have I seen is very few info.
View 2 Replies
View Related
Jul 20, 2011
where I can find the OID for enabling and disabling a port for the RV016 router? I performed a snmpwalk but I couldn't find it.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 7, 2013
I am trying to open up port 32400 on my 881w Cisco router but I have not had any success I need to configure manual port-forward to enable my Plex Media server.
View 1 Replies
View Related
Apr 25, 2012
I have a WS-C4507R-E switch. The current SW Ver. on it is 12.2(53)SG4-IP-BASE-CRYPTO. I have been tasked with making sure all of our switches and routers have the most current IOS running on them.
So, with that, when I look at the software available for download for my particular switch, there are several. Some of the IOS description makes sense, but not even sure really if I do understand what I am looking at. How do I know which software package I need to use to upgrade the switch? This is our core switch..while yes, I would certainly back up the current switch, I would hate to be responsible for taking down the entire network due to a unfortunate misunderstanding of what I thought I read, even is it only last as long as it takes to restore from the back up.
View 7 Replies
View Related
May 21, 2012
We have a stack of switches that is at the max number of members allowed in the stack. Problem is we are running out of port density and need to add more ports. So instead of adding a whole new stack I would rather replace 2 of the 24-port swicthes with 48-port switches.
If the two 24-port swicthes we are removing are stack members and neither of them are the stack master, I should be able to replace the 24-port switches with the 48-port switches without bringing the master offline? If the new 48-port switches are running the same IOS version as the current 24-port swicthes, they should add themselves to the stack?Would I have to tell the new 48-port swicthes what switch numbers they are replacing in order for them to be added to the stack since we are at the max number of members?Also since the 48-port swicthes are replacing 24-port switches will the master give the 48-port switches the configuration for only the 24-ports?
View 11 Replies
View Related
