Cisco Switching/Routing :: HSRP / BGP / Site To Site VPN On Router 2811
Apr 2, 2012hsrp+bgp+site to site vpn on router 2811.
View 2 Replies
ADVERTISEMENT
Cisco VPN :: 1841 And 2811 Routers - Site To Site Tunnel
Apr 26, 2013I have 2 Cisco routers , 1841 and 2811 , I need to setup site to site VPN , but i dont now some how it just does not seems to be working ,
Find attached the Configuration along with the
<----- 172.31.1.0/24----- DG:172.31.1.1>Cisco 2811<Dialer1 -----//Internet//----------Dialer1>Cisco1841---< DG:10.236.5.254-------------- 10.236.5.0/24--->
Find attached command executed on each router in the below order
1) show ver
2) Show run
3) show logging
4) show crypto ipsec sa
5) show crypto isakmp sa
Debugging enabled on routers are
1)Debug Crypto Isakmp
2) Debug Crypto Ipsec.
Cisco VPN :: 2811 - Site-to-site IPSec L2L Tunnel
Aug 18, 2011I have a asa and Cisco 2811, needs to build a site-to-site ip sec tunnel between them. Due to a requirement need to encrypt inside traffic, i need to apply on the inside interfaces on both devices to build the tunnel.
I don't see a problem but just want to check if it would work on terminating on Inside interfaces on both ip sec peers.
Cisco VPN :: Site To Site VPN No NAT In Intranet 2811
Jul 20, 2011I need an answer from a man who really understands how to configure Cisco routers. I have specific problem. First of all there is no test enviroment, I have two Cisco routers 2811 in production enviroment, so I must be very careful (Routers are constantly working 24/7).
My problem is that I need to configure site to site VPN without NAT between these two routers, but with NAT in the one or the other side For the Internet trafic.
Right now I have site-to-site VPN up and going between two branches but when I am trying to access site (in the other branch) using local ip or (DNS name) I can't because of NAT'ing in the second branch.
Example:
from subnet 10.10.10.0 I am trying reach 10.10.11.211. I can ping it but I can not connect throught browser (80 port). I can reach this site only using public address. So I need to exclude NAT'ing for this site from intranet but leave this site accessable for public users.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: 1941 / K9 Unable To Ping Over Site To Site IPSEC
Jul 12, 2012I am trying to set up a site to site ipsec connection. AT site A, I have Vlan's 652-10.55.216.0/24, Vlan653 -10.55.217.0/24, Vlan 654-10.55.217.0/24 and Vlan655-10.55.219.0/24 and at site B, Vlan650-10.55.214.0/24 and Vlan651-10.55.215.0/24.The problem is that I am unable to get any associations when i do a "sh crypto isakmp sa"/"sh crypto ipsec sa" on either router at each site.I am also unable to ping by pluging in a laptop into the site at each site. Laptop at site A is set to access vlan 655 and laptop at site B is set to acess vlan 651. I can ping all the devices from one end to the other.I have turned on debug crypto isakmp, debug crypto ipsec, debug crypto ipsec errors but dont get anything at all as output.I have attached the sh run for each router Cisco (1941/K9) and switch (Catalyst 3750) at each site.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: ASA 5525 - Configure Site-To-Site IPsec VPN To 3 Peers
Nov 21, 2012I have an ASA 5525 and need to configure site to site ipsec vpn to 3 peers. I currently have an existing /28 public address from my ISP that is used by other services.Is there a way to use this existing ip range to configure IPSEC tunnels to 3 peers ?
View 10 Replies View RelatedCisco Switching/Routing :: 2851 / Site-to-Site VPN Through EVPL?
Mar 26, 2013I have been tasked with creating a VPN tunnel between our site and a vendor's support center. I successfully created the tunnel, which negotiates fine, but I can't seem to get the traffic flowing properly. The issue that I think I am having is that the vendor is using a public IP address for their remote internal network instead of a public one. At least that's what I think the problem is, but I'm probably wrong Here is a diagram of how the traffic should be flowing:
Office #3 Office #3 Office #1 Office #1 Vendor Vendor
Desktop PC Gateway Gateway Firewall Public IP Private LAN
192.168.5.158 -> 192.168.5.1 -> EVPL -> 192.168.0.11 -> 192.168.0.5 -> Internet -> 68.x.x.x -> 192.68.48.0/22
Cisco 2851 Cisco 2851 ASA 5510 Cisco 7206
When I trace a route from the desktop PC to an IP address on the remote vendor end, instead of going to the ASA the traffic goes to another office. Here is what is happening to the traffic:
1 <1 ms <1 ms <1 ms 192.168.5.1 (Office #3 Gateway)
2 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 172.20.254.5 (Office #3 EVPL VLAN to Office #2)
3 3 ms 3 ms 3 ms 192.168.1.14 (Office #2 Gateway)
4 4 ms 4 ms 4 ms 173.xxx.xxx.xxx (Public Internet)
The office with the desktop PC has no local internet access, so all internet traffic gets routed to office #2 (192.168.1.0) as shown above. I'm asuming this is happening because the vendor is using a public IP address instead of a private IP address for their network. The routers look for the shortest route, which would be the internet, and then route the traffic there. Instead they should be routing the traffic to office #1's ASA and then on to the remote vendor site. The 2851 routers are using EIGRP. I don't know if that is causing this to happen but I tried adding static routes and the traffic always goes to the same place. I can provide configurations on any of the devices mentioned, save for the vendor's.
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Do VPN Site-to-site Between Two ASA 5505?
Jan 29, 20121. Is it possible to do vpn site-to-site between two ASA5505?
2. Is it possible to do vpn site-to-site between ASA5505 and MS ISA 2006?
3. Is there "Traffic shaping" in ASA5505?
Cisco Switching/Routing :: Site-to-Site VPN Routing On 5510
Oct 28, 2012I'm really struggling to setup the routing through a site to site vpn to another site using subnet 212.xxx.xxx.0/24 10.1.1.2 is a gateway that has access to the site. If I add to any server on the 10.1.1.0/24 subnet route add 212.xxx.xxx.0 mask 255.255.255.0 10.1.1.2 it is able to connect to any system on the 212. xxx. xxx.0/24 subnet. However it doesn't work for computers connected via remote access vpn. I need to have all the servers on 10.1.1.0/24 subnet have access to 212.xxx.xxx.0/24 subnet and also any computer connected via remote access vpn to the 5510. [code]
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: 5510 Site To Site VPN Access To Servers With Overlapped Remote Site
May 18, 2012I have a requirement to create a site to site vpn tunnel on ASA 5510 from a remote site to my HO, ihave already other site-to-site tunnels are up and running on the ASA.The issue is my remote site has got the network address which falls in one of the subnet used in HO(192.168.10.0/24).My requirement is only My remote site need to accees couple of my servers in HO which is in 192.168.200.0/24 subnet.
View 2 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: 5520 Requirement To Terminate Site-to-site VPN From Remote Site
Jun 17, 2012We have ordered a pair of Cisco ASA5520 (ASA5520-BUN-K9).Now there is a requirement to terminate site-to-site VPN from remote site. Do we need VPN plus licence for this and how much it cost?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: 877 / How To IPsec Site To Site Vpn Port Forwarding To Remote Site
Jun 13, 2012The scenario where a Site to Site VPN tunnel has been established between Site A and Site B. Lan on Site A can ping Lan on Site B. My problem is a Printer behind Site B needs to be accessed by using the WAN IP address of Site A. Also i could not ping the remote lan or printer from the router.
Below are my configure on the Cisco 877 in site A.
Building configuration...
Current configuration : 5425 bytes
!
! Last configuration change at 15:09:21 PCTime Fri Jun 15 2012 by admin01
!
version 12.4
no service pad
[code]....
Cisco VPN :: 5505 - Site To Site Connected But Cannot Ping Remote Site
Oct 11, 2011cisco products and am struggling getting a VPN going between an ASA 5505 and 5510. I have a VPN created (using the VPN wizward on both) and it shows the VPN is up, but I can't ping the remote site (from either side).
View 11 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: ASA 5505 / Site To Site Vpn With One Site Always Initiate A Tunnel?
Feb 7, 2011I have ASA 5505, i configured site to site vpn between central site and remote site and is working. Now the problem is we use remote site for troubleshooting purpose, so we need to create a tunnel from remote site to central site. I need to configure such a way that remote site can craete a tunnel to central site, but central site not able to create a tunnel, it just respond to remote site.
View 3 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: ASA 5505 Site To Site Connection / Remote Site?
Mar 6, 2011i have 2 router asa 5505 with base license i wanna make site to site vpn connection and remote site using vpn client to connect first i have hdsl router with 5 public ip i wanna try it by giving 1 public ip to each router and try the vpn but nothing work?
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: RV082 - SRP527W Site-to-site VPN - Routing Table?
Sep 2, 2012i'm trying to create a VPN IPSEC link between 2 offices. The VPN link is created, and i can communicate but only one way. Clients in Office B seems to have routing problem.
Details :
Office A :
- SRP527W router.
- Client Network : 192.168.0.0 / 24
[Code].....
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 - Routing Traffic Between Two Site To Site Tunnels
Feb 24, 2013I am trying to establish routing between two Site to Site vpn tunnels, both of which are terminating on the same outside interface of my Cisco ASA.
find attached Network Diagram for the same. All Firewalls used are Cisco ASA 5520.
Both VPN tunnels between Point A and Point B, Point B and Point C too are up. I have enabled Same security level intra interface permit command also.
How do i enable traffic originating from LAN Subnets behind Point A to reach LAN Subnets behind Point C without having to create a Seperate tunnel between Point A and Point C
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 / Routing Site-to-Site VPN To Remote Users?
Oct 29, 2011We have a site-site and remote vpn configured in same interface in ASA 5520 ( software version 8.3 ). When Remote vpn users try to connect to computers located on the distant end of site-site VPN, their request failed. I tried No-Nat between remote vpn private IP to the remote site private IP, also stated the same in Split tunneling. I cant find even the tracert, ping also timed out.
View 7 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: Routing All Traffic To Vpn Site-to-site With SRP527W
Aug 21, 2011I'd like to create a site-to-site vpn between an SRP527 and an other vpn gateway. The problem is i don't see how to route all traffic from the local network (network defined by the lan ip interface of the SRP527) to the other vpn gateway? It seems to be only possible to define the destination network (accessible via the vpn) with ip/mask (but only for "small" network: for exemple i tried with 10.2.0.0 mask 255.255.0.0 and it's ok but i tried with 10.0.0.0 mask 255.0.0.0 -> it's not working. I obtain the message "invalid ip")
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco Firewall :: ASA 5505 Site-to-Site With UC540 Routing?
Dec 4, 2012We are setting up a new phone system using the UC540 with a VPN connection between 2 buildings using 2 Cisco ASA 5505's at either end.The problem I am having is getting the phones at the remote site to connect to the UC540 at the main site.
Phones/Computers (10.0.1.0/24) -- ASA -------------VPN Tunnel------------- ASA -- UC540 -----------Data Vlan1 (10.0.0.0/24)
|------Voice Vlan100 (10.1.1.0/24)
What i am told by UC500 support is that the phones at the remote site will connect if they have connectivity to the TFTP subnet on the UC540, which is 10.1.10.0/30 I added the static route on the ASA and I can ping the 10.1.10.1 TFTP server on the UC540 from the ASA, but not for any other device on the 10.0.0.0/24 network, such as the DC. I added the static route there and was able to ping, so something in the ASA seems to be preventing it.
I also can't seem to get the ASA at the remote site to ping 10.1.10.1. I've tried adding the static route there in hopes it would forward it through the VPN tunnel.
Cisco VPN :: ASA 5520 / Site To Site Failover VPN Connection And Routing?
Apr 8, 2013We have 3 sites, with a Cisco ASA 5520 at each location.
HQ (Headquarters) internal network: 172.16.110.0/24,
DR (Disaster Recovery) internal network: 172.16.120.0/24
BO (Branch Office) internal network: 172.16.150.0/24
HQ and DR have a 100Mbps permanent MPLS link between each other.Branch Office has a Site 2 Site VPN connection to HQ. If it fails, it establishes a Site 2 Site VPN connection to DR. This works perfectly.Now the routing issue... There is no route to the BO in the routing table at HQ/DR. The default gateway is used to reach the BO and that works for HQ when the VPN is between HQ/BO. If the VPN fails over to DR/BO, HQ can't reach BO anymore.I need to have some kind of conditional route injection from the ASA where the VPN is established. I was considering a tracked static route, but I was wondering if the S2S VPN itself has a functionality to do so. I thought the Reverse Route Injection was it but it's enabled on our crypto map and doesn't seem to work...
SSL-VPN 2000 / TZ100 -Routing Traffic Over Site To Site VPNs
Jun 2, 2013I'm working with a client who has a site to site VPN between the main office and a branch office. The main office is 192.168.200.0/24 and the branch office is 192.168.1.0/24. The issue is when the branch office users use the VPN in they receive a 192.168.200.x address, however, they cannot access a server or any other resources at the branch office.
They have a SSL-VPN 2000 connected to a TZ100 at the main office and a Juniper device at the branch office. I did try setting the Tunnel All mode on the NetExtender but that does not allow me to access the resources at the branch office. Additionally, those users at the main office can access the resources at the branch office without getting on the VPN.
Cisco VPN :: ASA5510 - Site To Site With Dynamic IP In One Site
Jan 27, 2012i want configure VPN between backoffice which have ASA5510 firewall with static IP and site which have cisco router 1861 with dynamic IP.
how i can configure the site to site between them?
Cisco VPN :: PIX515 - Routing WRT Site-to-site VPN
May 30, 2013I'm setting up a site to site VPN link between two PIX515 running 6.3(5) and I have some questions about routing. The layout is this:
10.30.29.0/24 -|Remote Pix515|- 216.xxx.xxx.19 ~~~~ Internet ~~~~ 96.xxx.xxx.101 -|HQ Pix515|- 10.30.20.0/24
The remote Pix serves as the gateway/NAT firewall for general internet traffic as well as the VPN endpoint. Its inside IP is 10.30.29.1. The Pix at HQ serves only as the site-to-site VPN endpoint . Its IP is 10.30.20.3. NAT is disabled on VPN traffic and all IPSEC traffic is permitted (by way of"sysopt connection permit-ipsec").The gateway for the HQ subnet is at 10.30.20.1.I need machines on the remote side to be able to "see" shares at HQ. Machines on the remote side don't need to be visible to HQ.
It seems to me the remote PIX will correctly handle routing traffic bound for the HQ subnet through the tunnel using the crypto map/ACLs. And I suspect the HQ PIX will correctly handle traffic bound for the remote subnet if/when it receives such traffic on its inside interface for the same reason. But, I have to get packets leaving machines on the HQ subnet, that are bound for the remote subnet, to the HQ PIX's inside interface somehow, right?
My question: Is it sufficient to setup a static route on the HQ gateway that routes packets bound for the remote subnet to the HQ PIX?
Cisco VPN :: 2901 / 2921 / 5505 ASA - Router Versus Firewall Site To Site VPN?
May 30, 2013I would like to know both Cisco 2901 or 2921 router and Cisco 5505 ASA can build site to site VPN.
1) what is the different to build site to site VPN between router and firewall ?
2) which is the best choice if using in site to site VPN connection ?
Cisco VPN :: Configuring IPsec Site-to-site VPN With 2911 Router
Mar 15, 2011I have a Cisco 2911 router and a Cisco RV 120W router and i would like to establish a VPN tunnel between theese two. I have defined the settings on the Cisco RV 120W router and i just want the Cisco 2911 to follow those. setting up a connection with Cisco IOS.
View 1 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: Configure Site-to-site VPN Using 881 Router On End And Connecting To ASA5510?
Aug 22, 2011I need to configure a site-to-site VPN using a Cisco 881 router on my end and connecting to an ASA5510 on my suppliers end.Our supplier has configured their end and I do not have access to their configuration.
They told us we have to NAT all inside address' to a single address (192.168.89.1) as this is the only one they will let through their firewall/tunnel.I know how to set up the VPN but not too sure how to set up the NAT part.
My sanatized config is attached. The code I am using to NAT my inside network to the single address 192.168.89.1, and send all traffic accross the VPN tunnel as this address is correct? With the router running this config the VPN tunnel does not connect.
Cisco Routers :: Site To Site VPN Tunnels From A RV042G Router?
Dec 15, 2012I have an issue with 2 site to site VPN tunnels from a RV042G router. The issue is for both VPN tunnels is that in the logs, it is showing that when the RV042G router is trying to establish the tunnel, it is getting a response from the remote gateway internal address and not the Public address of the remote gateways. On the remote gateways I have other site to site VPN's terminating fine and the tunnels are passing traffic. I only have an issue with the RV042. On the VPN Tunnel page it shows for both tunnels waiting for connection. This is an output from the log of the RV042G
Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: we require peer to have ID '203.43.XX.XXX', but peer declares '126.0.21.52' Dec 17 15:19:48 2012VPN Log(g2gips0) #2174: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.43.XX.XXX:500 Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: [Tunnel Negotiation Info] >>> Initiator Receive Main Mode 6th packet Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: Peer ID is ID_IPV4_ADDR: '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: we require peer to have ID '203.47.XXX.XX', but peer declares '10.1.202.65' Dec 17 15:39:50 2012VPN Log(g2gips1) #2192: sending encrypted notification INVALID_ID_INFORMATION to 203.47.XXX.XX:500
VPN tunnel terminating on 203.43.XX.XXX is a Checkpoint firewall running R70 software version?VPN tunnel terminating on 203.47.XXX.XX is a Cisco ASA 5510 running ASA 8.2.4 software?As stated above, I have other VPN tunnels working fine. This RV042 is a replacement router as the original router suffered a power surge.
Cisco VPN :: 1812 IOS And ASA 5505 Router - Setting Up Site-to-site VPN On 881
Mar 31, 2011Just now my boss asked me to prepare to set up site-to-site VPN on Cisco 881 Integrated Services router to ASA 5505 router which is now running at the HQ side. I am now learning pdf file from Cisco which mention how to setup site-to-site VPN between Cisco 1812 IOS router and ASA 5505 router by using ASDM V6.1 and SDM V2.5. Can't find the paper for that Cisco 881 device.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco VPN :: Create A Site To Site VPN Using 2901 And Linksys Router?
Mar 28, 2012I am trying to create a site to site VPN using a cisco 2901 and Linksys router.I have the VPN configured and connected and I can ping gateway to gateway. However, from the Cisco I can't ping any of the devices beyond the gateway.Example, from the cisco I can ping 192.168.5.254 (gateway IP address) source gig 0/1 and it works great.
However if I ping from the cisco 192.168.5.50 (end user PC) source gig 0/1 it doesn't work.I have created a client VPN and that works perfectly.Below is my config.
crypto isakmp policy 1
encr 3des
authentication pre-share
group 2
!
crypto isakmp policy 2
[code]....
Cisco WAN :: 877 Is Site-to-Site VPN With Dynamic IP And Internet Browsing Possible On Same Router
Dec 12, 2010I have Cisco 877 routers, with ethernet (LAN) and ADSL (external) interfaces. The ADSL interface gets dynamic IP. Is Site to Site VPN with Dynamic IP and Internet Browsing Possible on the Same Router.
View 4 Replies View RelatedCisco Routers :: Site-to-Site RV110 To Belkin Router VPN
May 27, 2013I'm setting up a site-to-site VPN between two offices, Site A uses a Cisco RV110W VPN Router with a static WAN IP and local IP 192.168.1.0/24 while Site B I have set up with a Belkin N300 VPN router which also has a Static WAN IP and the local IP is set to 192.168.2.0/24
I'm able to ping from Site B (192.168.2.xxx) to Site A, however I can't communicate from Site A back to Site B.how I could go about troubleshooting this? I've been scouring the internet for 3 days trying to get to the bottom of this with no luck.
Cisco VPN :: Tunnel Not Establishing On Site To Site VPN On Router RV220W
Jan 13, 2012I have recently bought two CISCO routers RV220W for our main and brach office mainly for VPN tunneling. I didnt know they are routers only not modems. so I have set it up using BT 2wire Router as modem only.
I have successfuly setup the routers and manage to establish the VPN tunneling between two routers. AS bt doesnt give static WAN IP address so I have used Dyndns which works fine. although I have 5 static ip address which cannot be used for WAN unless i cahnge to one IP address even then BT tech said it will not work.
when I created the tunnel i could ping both servers with their IP only not with the names. I can ping them fine locally. I could also see the network from branch office to main office but not from main office to branch office. today when I restarted the server I cannot ping both server i mean vice versa but VPN tunnel is established. now I cannot see the network from branch office to main office as well.
Both sites running windows server 2008 standard. main office server has 6 NIC cards two wwith public and three with private ip addresses, its also runing Terminal server, exchange, file etc. the branch office has two NIC card one with private and one with public ip. Intially I could establish the VPN tunnel as the network range was same on both sites so I changed one in th e10.0.0.0 range other in 192.168.1.0 range and VPN tunnel was established straightaway.
As soon as the VPN tunnel was created I manage to creat an external trust without any problems and both servers are added in each other forward zones as name servers.
in the main office the fues went off and I had to re-start the router and now the VPN tunnel is not establishing, mainly the error is ISAKMP-SA Expired I will paste the log of both routers below
1. How to Clear Old or Existing Security Associations (Tunnels) on RV220W
2. how to fix the problem where I can ping the server with their IP as well as domain names ?
3. how to set it up so that both sides can see the network resources as well as access it ?
4. how to set it up so if the staff in branch office wants to log on the domain in main office he can simply do it as he does it in his office.